167
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The Intentions of Letter Writers for Applicants to a Baccalaureate-M.D. Program: Self-Report and Content Analyses of Letters of Reference

, &
Article: 4586 | Published online: 09 Dec 2009

  • Kogan LR and McConnell SL. Gaining acceptance into veterinary school: A review of medical and veterinary admissions policies and procedures. J Vet Med Educ. 2001; 28: 101–10.
  • O’Halloran CM, Altmaier EM, Smith WL, Franken EA Jr. Evaluation of resident applicants by letters of recommendation: A comparison of traditional and behavior-based formats.Invest Radiol. 1993; 28: 274–7.
  • McCabe BJ, Blagg JD Jr, Gardner J, Shook B. Evaluation of the use of standardized forms in admissions in radiologic technology, medical technology and dietetics. J Allied Health. 1989; Winter: 189–98.
  • Breland, NS. The use of letters of recommendationin undergraduate admissions. J Coll Stud Pers. 1983; 24: 247–53.
  • Johnson M, Elam C, Edwards J, Taylor D, Heldberg C, Hinkley R, Comeau R. Medical school admission committee members’ evaluations of and impressions from recommendation letters. Acad Med. 1998; 73(10 Suppl): S41–3.
  • Larkin GL and Marco CA. Ethics seminars: Beyondauthorship requirements-ethical considerations in writing letters of recommendation. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 70–3.
  • Bandiera G and Regehr G. xEvaluation of a structured application assessment instrument for assessing applications to Canadian postgraduate training programs in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 594–8.
  • Marley J and Carman I. Selecting medical students: a case report of the need for change. Med Educ. 1999; 33: 455–9.
  • Girzadas DV Jr, Harwood RC, Deane J, Garrett S. A comparison of standardized and narrative letters of recommendation. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5: 1101–4.
  • Handelman SL, Iranpour B, Brunette PM, Solomon E. Evaluation of common predictors for selection of postdoctoral dental students. J Dent Educ. 1983; 47: 155–9.
  • Wright SM and Ziegelstein RC. Writing more informative letters of reference. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19: 588–93.
  • Edmond M, Roberson M, Hasan N. The dishonest dean’s letter: an analysis of 532 dean’s letters from 99 U.S. medical schools. Acad Med.1999; 74: 1033–5.
  • Smith PF. Recommendations and selective admissions. NASSP Bull. 1983; 67: 65–71.