731
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Assessing Medical Student Professionalism: An Analysis of a Peer Assessment

(Assistant Professor) , (Assistant Professor) , (Assistant Dean) & (Assistant Dean)
Article: 4587 | Published online: 09 Dec 2009

  • Swick RM. Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Academic Medicine. 2000 Jun; 75 (6): 612–6.
  • Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists (CanMEDS). Extract from the CanMEDS 2000 project societal needs working group report. Medical Teacher. 2000; 22 (6): 549–54.
  • Harden RM, Crosby JR, Davis MH, Friedman M. From competency to Meta-competency: a model for the specification of learning outcomes. Medical Teacher. 1999; 21 (6): 546–52.
  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. c2006. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcomes Project. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/.
  • Association of American Medical Colleges. Report 1: Learning Objectives for Medical Student Education. Guidelines for Medical Schools. 1998.
  • Arnold L. Assessing professional behavior: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Academic Medicine. 2002; 77 (6): 502–15.
  • Lazarus CJ, Chauvin SW, Rodenhauser P, Whitlock R. The program for professional values and ethics in medical education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2000; 12 (4): 208–11.
  • Bryan RE, Krych AJ, Carmichael SW, Viggiano TR, Pawlina W. Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2005; 34 (8): 486–91.
  • Devellis RE Scale development: Theory and applications. London: Sage; 2003.
  • Huba ME, Freed SE. Learner-centered assessmentin college campuses: shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon; 2000.
  • Goodwin LD. Interrater agreement and reliability. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2001; 5 (1): 13–34.
  • Brennan RL. Elements of Generalizability Theory. Iowa City: American College Testing; 1992.
  • Kreiter CD, Ferguson K, Lee W, Brennan RL, Densen P. A generalizability study of a new standardized rating form used to evaluate students’ clinical clerkship performances. Academic Medicine. 1998; 73 (12): 1294–98.
  • Arnold L, Willoughby TL, Calkins EV, Gammon L, Eberhart G. Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students. Journal of Academic Medicine. 1981; 56: 35–42.
  • Panszi S, Gruppen L, Grum C, Stern DT. What do peers know about professionalism? Proceedings of the Research in Medical Education Conference. Group on Educational Affairs. AAMC Annual Meeting; 2000; Chicago, ILL, 2000.
  • Dannefer EF, Henson LC, Bierer SB, Grady-Weliky TA, Meldrum S, Nofziger AC, Barclay C, Epstein RM. Peer assessment of professional competence. Medical Education. 2005; 39: 713–22.
  • Arnold L, Shue CK, Kritt B, Ginsburg S, and Stern DT. Medical students’ views on peer assessment in professionalism. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2005 Sep; 20 (9): 819–24.