- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Requirements for residency education in family medicine [document on the Internet]. Chicago (IL): ACGME; 2000 [cited 2006 Jan]. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/acWeb-site/downloads/RRC_progReq/120pr701.pdf
- Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, Bucholtz JR, Dickinson JR, Evans KL, et al. The Future of Family Medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2 (suppl 1):53–32.
- Lam CL. The 21” century: the age of family medicine research? Ann Fam Med 2004;2(Suppl 2): S50–4.
- Kruse SE, Bradley J, Wesley RM, Markwell SJ. Research support infrastructure and productivity in US family practice residency programs. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 54–60
- Mainous AG 3rd, Hueston WJ, Ye X, Bazell C. A comparison of family medicine research in research intense and less intense institutions. Arch Fam Med. 2000; 9: 1100–4.
- Mills OF, Zyzanski SJ, Flocke S. Factors associated with research productivity in family practice residencies. Fam Med. 1995; 27: 188–93.
- Ferrer RL, Katerndahl DA. Predictors of short-term and long-term scholarly activity by academic faculty: a departmental case study. Fam Med 2002; 34: 455–61.
- Young RA, DeHaven MJ, Passmore C, Baumer JG. Research participation, protected time, and research output by family physicians in family medicine residencies. Fam Med. 2006; 38: 341–8.
- Bland CJ, Ruffin MT 4th. Characteristics of a productive research environment: literature review. Acad Med. 1992; 67: 385–97.
- DeHaven MJ, Wilson GR, O’Connor-Ket-tlestrings P. Creating a research culture: what we can learn from residencies that are successful in research. Fam Med. 1998; 30: 501–7.
- American Academy of Family Physicians. Directory of family practice residency programs [da-tabase on the Internet]. Leawood (KS): The Association; 2005 [cited 2006 Jan]. Available from: http://www.aafp.org/residencies/
- Sheehan K. E-mail survey response rates: A review. JCMC [serial on the Internet]. 2001 [cited 2006 Jan];6(2):[about 18 p.]. Available from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/sheehan.html
- Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000; 60: 821–36.
- Fincher RM, Simpson DE, Mennin SP, Rosen-feld GC,Rothman A, McGrew MC, Hansen et al. Scholarship in teaching: an imperative for the 21” century. Acad Med. 2000; 75: 887–94.
- Glassick CE, Huber MT, Maeroff GI. Scholarshipassessed: evaluation of the professoriate. San Fransisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1997.
- Bland CJ, Center BA, Finstad DA, Risbey KR, Staples JG. A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Acad Med. 2005; 80: 225–37.
- Neale AV. A national survey of research requirements for family practice residents and faculty. Fam Med. 2002; 34: 262–7.
- Oeffmger KC, Roaten SP Jr, Ader DN, Buchanan RJ. Support and rewards for scholarly activity in family medicine: A national survey. Fam Med. 1997; 29: 508–12.
- Katerndahl DA. Associations between departmental features and departmental scholarly activity. Fam Med. 1996; 28: 119–27
Medical Education Online
Volume 11, 2006 - Issue 1