Advanced search
Publication Cover
Medical Education Online Volume 13, 2008 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
192
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills

Lawrence S. AmesseDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Dayton, Ohio, USACorrespondence[email protected]
, MD, PhD, HCLD,
Ealena CallendarDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Dayton, Ohio, USA
, MD,
Teresa Pfaff-AmesseDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Dayton, Ohio, USA
, MD,
Janice DukeDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Dayton, Ohio, USA
, MD &
William N.P. HerbertDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
, MD
Article: 4482 | Published online: 09 Dec 2009

References

  • Jaffe CC, Lynch PJ. Computer-aided instruction in radiology: Opportunities for more effective learning. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 463–7.
  • Hudson JN. Computer-aided learning in the real world of medical education: does the quality of interacting with the computer affect student learn-ing? Med Edu 2004; 38: 887–95.
  • Coiera E, Recent advances: Medical informatics. BMJ 1995; 310: 1381–7.
  • Adler MD, Johnson KB. Quantifying the literature of computer-aided instruction in medical education. Acad Med 2000; 75: 1025–8.
  • Letterie GS, Medical education as a science: the quality of evidence for computer-assisted instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 849–53.
  • Devitt P, Smith JR, Palmer E. Improved student learning in ophthalmology with computer-aided instruction. Eye 2001; 15: 635–9.
  • Hallgren RC, Parkhurst PE, Monson CL, et al. An interactive, web-based tool for learning anatomic landmarks. Acad Med 2002; 77: 263–5.
  • Khalil MK, Johnson TF, Lamar CH. Compari-son of computer-based and paper-based imagery strategies in learning anatomy. Clin Anat 2005; 18: 457–64.
  • Enzenhnofer M, Bludau HB, Komm N, et al. Im-provement of the educational process by comput-er-based visualization of procedures: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6: 1-12 (e16).
  • Banks E, Chudnoff S, Comerford Freda M, et al. An interactive computer program for teaching residents pap smear classification, screening and management guidelines: a pilot study. J Reprod Med 2007; 52: 995–1000.
  • Holt IR, Miklaszewicz P, Cranson JC, et al. Com-puter assisted learning is an effective way of teaching endocrinology. Clin Endrocrinol 2001: 55:537–42.
  • Devitt P, Palmer E. Computer-aided learning: an overvalued educational resource? Med Educ 1999; 33: 136–9.
  • Baker R, Dwyer F. A meta-analytic assessment of the effect of visualized instruction. Int J Inst Media 2000; 27: 417–26.
  • West CK, Farmer JA, Wolff PM. 1991. Instruc-tional Design: Implications from Cognitive Science. Boston: A Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Fetal Ultrasound Simulator CD-ROM by Wesley Lee, Washington, DC: ACOG, 1998.
  • Lee W, Hodges AN, Williams S, et al. Fetal ultra-sound training for obstetrics and gynecology residents. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 333–8.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ultrasonography in Pregnancy. ACOG Technical Bulletin 187. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1993.
  • Keane DR, Norman GR, Vickers J. The inadequacy of recent research on computer-assisted instruction. Acad Med 1991; 66: 444–8.
  • Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Student Educational Objectives, 8th ed, Crofton, MD: APGO, 2004.
  • Borges NJ, Manuel S, Elam CL, et al. Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school. Acad Med 2006; 81: 571–6.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.