High resolution climate simulations over the Arctic

References

• Abegg, C. 1999: Parameterization of atmospheric boundary layer processes in a regional climate model of the Arctic. Ber. Polatforsch. 311. 120 pp. Bremerhaven: Alfred Wegener Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bromwich, D. H., Chen, B. & Plan, X. 1995: Intercomparison of simulated polar climates by global climate models. Proceed-ings of the Fourth Conference on Polar Meteorology and Oceanography. Pp. 14-19. Dallas, TX: American Meteoro-logical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bromwich, D. H., Tzeng, R.-Y. & Parish, T. R. 1994: Simulation of the modern Arctic climate by the NCAR CCM1. J. Clim. 7, 1050–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattle, H. 1991: Cloud schemes and the simulation of Arctic surface insolation and sea ice in the UKMO climate model. In E. Raschke et al. (eds.): WCRP report on a workshop on polar radiation fluxes and sea ice modeling. Pp. 58-61. Geneva: World Meteorological Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Bromwich, D. H., Hines, K .M. & Plan, X. 1995: Simulations of the 1979-1988 polar climates by global climate models. Ann. Glaciol. 2/, 83.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X. & Wallace, J. M. 1991: Cluster analysis of the northern hemisphere wintertime 500 hPa height field: spatial patterns. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 2674–2696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. H., Christensen, O. B., Lopez, P., van Meijgaard, E. & Botzet, M. 1996: The HIRHAM4 regional atmospheric climate model. DMI Scientific Report 4. 51 pp. Copenhagen: Danish Meteorological Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dethloff, K., Rinke, A., Lehmann, R., Christensen, J. H., Botzet, M. & Machenhauer, B. 1996: Regional climate model of the Arctic atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 23401–23422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enke, W. & Spekat, A. 1997: Downscaling climate model outputs into local and regional weather elements by classification and regression. Clim. Res. 8, 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, A. H., Chapman, W. L., Walsh, J. E. & Weller, G. 1995: Development of a regional climate model of the western Arctic. J. Clint. 8, 155–1570.
   Google Scholar
• Overland, J. E., Adams, J. M. & Bond, N. A. 1997: Regional variation of winter temperatures in the Arctic. J. Clim. 10, 821–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinke, A., Dethloff, K., Christensen, J. H., Botzet, M. & Macherthauer, B. 1997: Simulation and validation of Arctic radiation and clouds in a regional climate model./. Geophys. Res. 102, 29833–29847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeckner, E. et al. (14 authors) 1992: Simulation of the present-day climate with the ECHAM model: impact of model physics and resolution. MPI Report 93. 171 pp. Hamburg: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology.
   Google Scholar
• Roeckner, E., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L., Cluistoph, M., Claussen, M., Duemenil, L., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Schlese, U. & Schulzweida, U. 1996: The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: model description and simulation of present-day climate. MPI Report 218. 90 pp. Hamburg: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology.
   Google Scholar
• Serreze, M. C., Box, J. E., Barry, R. G. & Walsh, J. E. 1993: Characteristics of Arctic synoptic activity, 1952-1989. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 51, 147–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spekat, A. 1997: Objectively derived circumpolar circulation patterns: a starting point for downscaling in the north polar region. Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Applied Climatology. Pp. 135-136. Reno, NV: American Meteorolo-gical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, X., Walsh, J. E. & Chapman, W. L. 1996: An assessment of global climate model simulations of Arctic air temperatures. J. Clim. 9, 1060–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. E. & Crane, R. G. 1992: A comparison of GCM simulations of Arctic climate. Geophys. Res. Leo. 19, 29–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. E., Lynch, A., Chapman, W. & Musgrave, D. 1993: A regional model for studies of atmosphere-ice-ocean interac-tion in the western Arctic. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 51. 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar