The interplay of global and polar regimes

References

• AMAP 1997: Arctic pollution issues: a state of the Arctic environment report. Oslo: AMAP.
   Google Scholar
• Bankes, N. 1998: Steps towards the international regulation of POPs. Northern Perspect. 25 (2), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Benedick, R. 1998: Ozone diplomacy: new directions in safeguarding the planet. Cambridge (USA): Harvard Uni-versity Press.
   Google Scholar
• CAFF 1997a: Report to the senior Arctic officials of the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy. Alta, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• CAFF 1997b: Co-operative strategy for the conservation of biological diversity in the Arctic. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• CARC 1998: Special issue on Arctic contaminants. Northern Perspect. 25 (2), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, F. S. & Körner, C. (eds.) 1995: Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and eco.syston consequences. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi, S. 1996: The polar regions: a political geography. Chichester (UK): John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 1997: The politics of the Earth. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, B. V. (ed.) 1994: Arctic environment: report on the Seminar on Integration of Indigenous Peoples Knowledge. Copenhagen: Ministry for the Environment (Iceland), Min-istry of the Environment (Denmark), and the Home Rule of Greenland.
   Google Scholar
• Hoel, A. H. 1999: Institutional interplay among environmental institutions in the Arctic. Paper presented at the Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community, Shonan Village, Japan, 24-26 June.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. 1992: Brazil and the international politics of Amazonian deforestation. In A. Hurrell & B. Kingsbury (eds.): The international politics of the environment. Pp. 398-429. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• IASC 1994: A regional research programme in the Arctic on global change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joyner, C. 1996: The effectiveness of CRAMRA. In O. S. Stokke and D. Vidas (eds.): Governing the Antarctic: the effectiveness and legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System. Pp. 152-173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joyner, C. 1998: Governing the frozen commons: the Antarctic regime and environmental protection. Columbia (USA): University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, R. W., Turner, B. L. & Clark, W. C. 1990: The great transformation. In B. L. Turner et al. (eds.): The Earth as transformed by human action. Pp. 1-17. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, B. et al. 1998: The Arctic and the Antarctic. In R. T. Watson et al. (eds.): The regional impacts of climate change: an assessment of vulnerability. Pp. 85-103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oechel, W. C., Hastings, S. J., Jenkins, M., Reichers, G., Grulke, N. & Vorlitis, G. 1993: Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a carbon sink to a source. Nature 361, 520-526.
   Google Scholar
• Osherenko, G. 1988: Can comanagement save Arctic wildlife? Environment 30 (6), 6-13; 29-34.
   Google Scholar
• Parson, E. A. & Greene O. 1995: The complex chemistry of the international ozone agreements. Environment 37 (3), 16-20; 35-43.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. L. & Johnson, D. R. (eds.) 1995: Human ecology and climate change: people and resources in the Far North. Washington, D.C.: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Prestrud, P. & Stirling, I. 1994: The International Polar Bear Agreement and the current status of polar bear conservation. Aquat. Mamm. 20 (3), 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K. & Victor, D. G. 1996: Biodiversity since Rio: the future of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Environ-ment 38 (4), 16-20; 37-45.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, D. R. 1996: The polar regions and the development of international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scrivener, D. 1999: Arctic environmental cooperation in transition. Polar Rec. 35 (192), 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Stokke, O. S. 1996: The effectiveness of CCAMLR. In O. S. Stokke & D. Vidas (eds.): Governing the Antarctic: the effectiveness and legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System. Pp. 120-151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lugt, C. 1997: An international environmental regime for the Antarctic: critical investigations. Polar Rec. 33 (186), 223–238.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D. G. & Salt, J. E. 1994: From Rio to Berlin: managing climate change. Environment 36 (10), 16-15; 25-32.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D. G., Raustiala, K. & Skolnikoff, E. (eds.) 1998: The implementation and effectiveness of international environ-mental conuninnents: theory and practice. Cambridge (USA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Moltke, K. 1997: Institutional interactions: the structure of regimes for trade and the environment. In O. R. Young (ed.): Global governance: drawing insights from the environmental experience. Pp. 247-272. Cambridge (USA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, C. & Moss, R. C. (eds.) 1998: The regional impacts of climate change: an assessment of vulnerability. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Resources Institute 1996: World resources, 1996-1997. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 1992: Arctic politics: conflict and cooperation in the circumpolar north. Hanover (USA): University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 1997: Arctic governance: bringing the high latitudes in from the cold. Int. Environ. Affairs 9(J), 54-68.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (with contributions from Arun Agrawal, Leslie A. King, Peter H. Sand, Arild Underdal & Merfilyn Wasson) 1999: Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC) Science Plan. IHDP Report No. 9.
   Google Scholar