The impact of human activities on wilderness and aesthetic values in Antarctica

References

• Arriaza M. Canas-Ortega J.F. Canas-Madueno J.A. Ruiz-Aviles P. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2004; 69: 115–125. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur L.M. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: some empirical tests. Forest Science. 1977; 23: 151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur L.M. Daniel T.C. Boster R.S. Scenic assessment: an overview. Landscape Planning. 1977; 4: 109–129. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop I.D. Testing perceived landscape colour differences using the internet. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1997; 37: 187–196. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley A.C. The sublime. Oxford lectures on poetry. Bradley A.C. Macmillan & Co.. London, 1950; 37–65.
   Google Scholar
• Callicott J.B. & Michael P.N. 1998. The great new wilderness debate. AthensGA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson A.A. On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty. Landscape Planning. 1977; 4: 131–172. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codling R. Wilderness and aesthetic values in the Antarctic. Polar Record. 2001; 37: 337–352. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press. New York, 1988
   Google Scholar
• COMNAP (Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs). 2012. Antarctic facilities list. Accessed on the internet at https://www.comnap.aq/Members/SitePages/Home.aspx on 21 April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cronon W. The trouble with wilderness, or, getting back to the wrong nature. The great new wilderness debate. Callicott J.B. Nelson M.P. University of Georgia Press. Athens GA, 1995; 471–499.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel T.C. Measuring the quality of the natural environment, a psychophysical approach. American Psychologist. 1990; 45: 637–641. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2001; 54: 267–281. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel T.C. Boster R.S. Measuring landscape esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture. Fort Collins CO, 1976
   Google Scholar
• Dearden P. Factors influencing landscape preferences: an empirical investigation. Landscape Planning. 1984; 11: 293–306. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilworth G. 2006. Defining wilderness with pictures: an exploratory study. In R. Burns & K. Robertson (compilers): Proceedings of the 2006 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Pp. 295–299. Newton SquarePA: Northern Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program). 2009. GNU Image Manipulation Program. Accessed on the internet at http://www.gimp.org/ on 4 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter F.J. Wallnau L.B. Statistics for the behavioral sciences9th edn. Wadsworth. Belmont CA, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Guha R. Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: a Third World critique. The great new wilderness debate. Callicott J.B. Nelson M.P. University of Georgia Press. Athens GA, 1989; 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer P. 1998. Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. InM.Kelly: Encyclopedia of aesthetics. Vol. 1. Pp. 227–228. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habron D. Visual perception of wildland in Scotland. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1998; 42: 45–56. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington J. Daniel T.C. Brown T.C. Anything goes means everything stays: the perils of uncritical pluralism in the study of ecosystem values. Society & Natural Resources. 1994; 7: 535–546. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan R. Kaplan S. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Ulrich's Bookstore. Ann Arbor MI, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Klein A.G. Kennicutt M.C. II, Wolff G.A. Sweet S.T. Bloxoma T. Gielstraa D.A. Cleckley M. The historical development of McMurdo Station, Antarctica, an environmental perspective. Polar Geography. 2008; 31: 119–144. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos C.F, Locke H. Introduction. A handbook on international wilderness law and policy. Kormos C.F. Fulcrum Publishing. Golden CO, 2008; 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Landres P. Barr B. Kormos C.F. The matrix. a comparison of international wilderness laws. A handbook on international wilderness law and policy. Kormos C.F. Fulcrum Publishing. Golden CO, 2008; 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lange E. Hehl-Lange S. Brewer M.J. Scenario-visualization for the assessment of perceived green space qualities at the urban–rural fringe. Journal of Environmental Management. 2008; 89: 245–256. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesslie R. Maslen M. National wilderness inventory handbook. Australian Heritage Commission. Canberra, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Lesslie R.G. Taylor S.G. The wilderness continuum concept and its implications for Australian wilderness preservation policy. Biological Conservation. 1985; 32: 309–333. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low T. The new nature. Viking. Camberwell Victoria, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Lutz A.R. Simpson-Housley P. Deman A.F. Wilderness: rural and urban attitudes and perceptions. Environment and Behavior. 1999; 31: 259–266. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan F. Barker G. Briggs C. Price R. Keys H. Environmental domains of Antarctica. Version 2.0 Final Report. Landcare Research Contract Report LC0708/055. Landcare Research. LincolnNew Zealand, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Nash R. Wilderness and the American mind. Yale University Press. New Haven, 1975
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson M.H. Mountain gloom and mountain glory. The development of the aesthetics of the infinite. W.W. Norton & Company. New York, 1963
   Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger M. The idea of wilderness. Yale University Press. New Haven, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Perry R. B. General theory of value: its meaning and basic principles construed in terms of interest. Longmans, Green and Co. New York, 1926
   Google Scholar
• Pyne S.J. The ice. A journey to Antarctica. Arlington Books. London, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Reips U.-D. Standards for internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology. 2002; 49: 243–256. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodiek S.D. Fried J.T. Access to the outdoors: using photographic comparison to assess preferences of assisted living residents. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2005; 73: 184–199. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth M. Validating the use of internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment—an empirical study from Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2006; 78: 179–192. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty). 1991. Protocol on environmental protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/documents/recatt/Att006_e.pdf on 1 November 2010.
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty). 2008. Resolution 3 (2008)-ATCM XXXI-CEP XI, Kyiv. Environmental Domains Analysis for the Antarctic Continent. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/devAS/info_measures_listitem.aspx?lang=e&id=412 on 22 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty). 2012. List of consultative parties. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_parties.aspx?lang=e on 29 June 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton R. The aesthetic gaze. The Roger Scruton reader. Dooley M. Continuum. London, 2009; 137–151.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenant M. Antrop M. Landscape representation validity: a comparison between on-site observations and photographs with different angles of view. Landscape Research. 2011; 36: 363–385. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerson R. Protection of wilderness and aesthetic values in Antarctica. Protection of the three poles. Huettmann F. Springer. Tokyo, 2012; 77–109.
   Google Scholar
• Summerson R. Bishop I.D. Aesthetic value in Antarctica: beautiful or sublime?. The Polar Journal. 2011; 1: 225–250. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Google Scholar
• Summerson R. Riddle M.J. Assessing wilderness and aesthetic values in Antarctica. Antarctic ecosystems: models for wider understanding. Davison W. et al.. University of Canterbury. Christchurch, 2000; 303–307.
   Google Scholar
• Washington H. 2006. The wilderness knot. PhD thesis, College of Health and Science, School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Wherrett J.R. Issues in using the internet as a medium for landscape preference research. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1999; 45: 209–217. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wherrett J.R. Creating landscape preference models using internet survey techniques. Landscape Research. 2000; 25: 79–96. 10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y. Bishop I. Hossain H. Sposito V. Using GIS in landscape visual quality assessment. Applied GIS , .1–18.20. 2006; 2: 18.
   Google Scholar