On-site and in situ remediation technologies applicable to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sites in the Antarctic and Arctic

References

• Abhilash P.C., Singh H.B., Powell J.R., Singh B.K. Plant–microbe interactions: novel applications for exploitation in multi-purpose remediation technologies. Trends in Biotechnology. 2012; 30: 416–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar Y.B., Gale R.J. Electrokinetic remediation: basics and technology status. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 1995; 40: 117–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acuña A.J., Pucci O.H., Pucci G.N. Gomes G.S. Electrobioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil from Patagonia Argentina. New technologies in the oil and gas industry. 2012; Rijeka, Croatia: InTech. 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• ADEC (Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation). Oil and other hazardous substances pollution control. 18 AAC 75. 2012; Juneau, AK: Department of Environmental Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Aislabie J.M., Balks M.R., Foght J.M., Waterhouse E.J. Hydrocarbon spills on Antarctic soil: effect and management. Environmental Science and Technology. 2004; 38: 1265–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aislabie J.M., Saul D.E., Foght J.M. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils. Extremophiles. 2006; 10: 171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari A., Ghoshal S. Pilot-scale bioremediation of a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated clayey soil from a sub-Arctic site. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2014; 280: 595–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alisi C., Musella R., Tasso F., Ubaldi C., Manzo S., Cremisini C., Sprocati A.R. Bioremediation of diesel oil in a co-contaminated soil by bioaugmentation with a microbial formula tailored with native strains selected for heavy metals resistance. Science of the Total Environment. 2009; 407: 3024–3032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saleh E.S., Obuekwe C. Inhibition of hydrocarbon bioremediation by lead in a crude-oil contaminated soil. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2005; 56: 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora M., Snape I., Stevens G.W. Toluene sorption by granular activated carbon and its use in cold regions permeable reactive barrier: fixed bed studies. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2011; 69: 59–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas R.M. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective. Microbiological Reviews. 1981; 45: 180–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atlas R.M. Microbial hydrocarbon degradation–bioremediation of oil spills. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 1991; 52: 149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balks M.R., Paetzold R.F., Kimble J.M., Aislabie J., Campbell I.B. Effects of hydrocarbon spills on the temperature and moisture regimes of cryosols in the Ross Sea region. Antarctic Science. 2002; 14: 319–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraud F., Fourcade M.C., Tellier S., Astruc M. Modelling of decontamination rate in an electrokinetic soil processing. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 1997; 68: 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraud F., Tellier S., Astruc M. Ion velocity in soil solution during electrokinetic remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 1997; 56: 315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterman S., Kulshrestha A., Cheng H. Hydrocarbon vapour transport in low moisture soils. Environmental Science and Technology. 1995; 29: 171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer M.E., Sloyer J.L. Jr. The electrophoretic mobility of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria: an electrokinetic analysis. Journal of General Microbiology. 1990; 136: 867–874.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bej A.K., Aislabie J., Atlas R.M. Polar microbiology: the ecology, biodiversity and bioremediation potential of microorganisms in extremely cold environments. 2010; Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell T.H., Callender K.L., Whyte L.G., Greer C.W. Microbial competition in polar soils: a review of an understudied but potentially important control on productivity. Biology. 2013; 2: 533–554.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolton M. Comparing two remediation alternatives for diesel-contaminated soil in the Arctic using life cycle assessment. 2012; Ontario: Queens University. Master's thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Børresen M., Breedveld G.D., Rike A.G. Assessment of the biodegradation potential of hydrocarbons in contaminated soil from a permafrost site. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2003; 37: 137–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børresen M.H., Barnes D.L., Rike A.G. Repeated freeze–thaw cycles and their effects on mineralization of hexadecane and phenanthrene in cold climate soils. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2007; 49: 215–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakstad O.G. Margesin R. Natural and stimulated biodegradation of petroleum in permafrost affected regions. Psychrophiles, from biodiversity to biotechnology. 2008; Berlin: Springer. 389–407.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley-Alves J., Wasley J., King C.K., Powell S., Robinson S.A. Phytoremediation of hydrocarbon contaminants in Subantarctic soils: an effective management option. Journal of Environmental Management. 2014; 142: 60–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camenzuli D., Freidman B.L., Statham T.M., Mumford K.A., Gore D.B. site and in situ remediation technologies applicable to metal-contaminated sites in Antarctica and the Arctic: a review. Polar Research. 2013; 33: 21522. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/polar.v33.21522.
   Google Scholar
• Cang L., Wang Q., Zhou D., Xu H. Effects of electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation of a multiple-metal contaminated soil on metal bioavailability and uptake by Indian mustard. Separation and Purification Technology. 2011; 79: 246–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang W., Dyen M., Spagnuolo L., Simon P., Whyte L., Ghoshal S. Biodegradation of semi- and non-volatile petroleum hydrocarbons in aged, contaminated soils from a sub-Arctic site: laboratory pilot-scale experiments at site temperatures. Chemosphere. 2010; 80: 319–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang W., Ghoshal S. Respiratory quotients as a useful indicator of the enhancement of petroleum hydrocarbon biodegradation in field-aged contaminated soils in cold climates. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2014; 106–107: 110–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatham J. Landfarming on the Alaskan north slope—historical development and recent applications. 2003. Paper presented at the 10th Annual International Petroleum Environmental Conference. 11–14 November, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Chuvilin E.M., Naletova N.S., Miklyaeva E.C., Kozlova E.V., Instanes A. Factors affecting spreadability and transportation of oil in regions of frozen ground. Polar Record. 2001; 37: 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Curtosi A., Pelletier E., Vodopivez C.L., Mac Cormack W.P. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil and surface marine sediment near Jubany Station (Antarctica). Role of permafrost as a low-permeability barrier. Science of the Total Environment. 2007; 383: 193–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das N., Chandran P. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview. Biotechnology Research International 2011. 2011; 941810. http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/941810.
   Google Scholar
• Delille D. Response of Antarctic soil bacterial assemblages to contamination by diesel fuel and crude oil. Microbial Ecology. 2000; 40: 159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delille D., Duval A., Pelletier E. Highly efficient pilot biopiles for on-site fertilization treatment of diesel oil-contaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2008; 54: 7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delille D., Pelletier E., Delille B., Coulon F. Effect of nutrient enrichments on the bacterial assemblage of Antarctic soils contaminated by diesel or crude oil. Polar Record. 2003; 39: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Deprez P.P., Arens M., Locher H. Identification and assessment of contaminated sites at Casey Station, Wilkes Land, Antarctica. Polar Record. 1999; 35: 299–316.
   Google Scholar
• Dias R.L., Ruberto L., Hernandez E., Vazquez S.C., Balbo A.L., Del Panno M.T., Mac Cormack W.P. Bioremediation of an aged diesel oil-contaminated Antarctic soil: evaluation of the “on site” biostimulation strategy using different nutrient sources. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2012; 75: 96–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Z.Y., Huang W.H., Xing D.F., Zhang H.F. Remediation of soil co-contaminated with petroleum and heavy metals by the integration of electrokinetics and biostimulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2013; 260: 399–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Canada. Federal contaminated sites action plan. Federal guidelines for landfarming petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soils. 2013; Gatineau, QC: Environment Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Fan X., Wang H., Luo Q., Ma J., Zhang X. The use of 2D non-uniform electric field to enhance in situ bioremediation of 2,4-dichlorophenol-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007; 148: 29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson S.H., Franzmann P.D., Revill A.T., Snape I., Rayner J.L. The effects of nitrogen and water on mineralisation of hydrocarbons in diesel-contaminated terrestrial Antarctic soils. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2003; 37: 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrera-Rodríguez O., Greer C.W., Juck D., Consaul L.L., Martinez-Romero E., Whyte L.G. Hydrocarbon-degrading potential of microbial communities from Arctic plants. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2013; 114: 71–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filler D.M., Lindstrom J.E., Braddock J.F., Johnson R.A., Nickalaski R. Integral biopile components for successful bioremediation in the Arctic. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2001; 32: 143–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filler D.M., Reynolds C.M., Snape I., Daugulis A.J., Barnes D.L., Williams P.J. Advances in engineered remediation for use in the Arctic and Antarctic. Polar Record. 2006; 42: 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filler D.M., Snape I., Barnes D.L. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in cold regions. 2008; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filler D.M., Van Stempvoort D.R., Leigh M.B. Margesin R. Remediation of frozen ground contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons: feasibility and limits. Permafrost soils. 2009; Berlin: Springer. 279–301.
   Google Scholar
• Fritt-Rasmussen J., Jensen P.E., Christensen R.H.B., Dahllof I. Hydrocarbon and toxic metal contamination from tank installations in a northwest Greenlandic village. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 2012; 223: 4407–4416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryirs K.A., Hafsteinsdottir E.G., Stark S.C., Gore D.B. Metal and petroleum hydrocarbon contamination at Wilkes Station, East Antarctica. Antarctic Science. 2014; 27: 118–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryirs K.A., Snape I., Babicka N. The type and spatial distribution of past waste at the abandoned Wilkes Station, East Antarctica. Polar Record. 2013; 49: 328–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germaine K.J., Byrne J., Liu X., Culhane J., Keohane J., Lally R., Kiwanuka S., Ryan D., Dowling D. Ecopiling: a combined phytoremediation and passive biopiling system for remediating hydrocarbon impacted soils at field scale. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014; 5: 756–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibert O., Lefevre B., Fernandez M., Bernat X., Paraira M., Calderer M., Martinez-Llado X. Characterising biofilm development on granular activated carbon for drinking water production. Water Research. 2013; 47: 1101–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore D.B. Margesin R. Application of reactive barriers operated in frozen ground. Permafrost soils. 2009; Berlin: Springer. 303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Gore D.B., Heiden E.S., Snape I., Nash G., Stevens G.W. Grain size of activated carbon, and untreated and modified granular clinoptilolite under freeze–thaw: applications to permeable reactive barriers. Polar Record. 2006; 42: 121–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore D.B., Revill A.T., Guille D. Petroleum hydrocarbons ten years after spillage at a helipad in Bunger Hills, East Antarctica. Antarctic Science. 1999; 11: 427–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore D.B., Snape I. Freeze–thaw cycling, moisture and leaching from a controlled release nutrient source. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2008; 52: 401–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratuito M.K.B., Panyathanmaporn T., Chumnanklang R.A., Sirinuntawittaya N., Dutta A. Production of activated carbon from coconut shell: optimization using response surface methodology. Bioresource Technology. 2008; 99: 4887–4895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grechishchev S.E., Instanes A., Sheshin J.B., Pavlov A.V., Grechishcheva O.V. Laboratory investigation of the freezing point of oil-polluted soils. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2001; 32: 183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer C.W., Whyte L.G., Niederberger T.D. Timmis K.N. Microbial communities in hydrocarbon contaminated temperate, tropical, alpine, and polar soils. Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. 2010; Berlin: Springer. 2313–2328.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta V.K., Saleh T.A. Sorption of pollutants by porous carbon, carbon nanotubes and fullerene—an overview. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 2013; 20: 2828–2843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen H.K., Lamas V., Gutierrez C., Nunez P., Rojo A., Cameselle C., Ottosen L.M. Electro-remediation of copper mine tailings. Comparing copper removal efficiencies for two tailings of different age. Minerals Engineering. 2013; 41: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms H., Wick L.Y. Dispersing pollutant-degrading bacteria in contaminated soil without touching it. Engineering in Life Sciences. 2006; 6: 252–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horel A., Schiewer S. Investigation of the physical and chemical parameters affecting biodegradation of diesel and synthetic diesel fuel contaminating Alaskan soils. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2009; 58: 113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornig G., Northcott K., Snape I., Stevens G. Assessment of sorbent materials for treatment of hydrocarbon contaminated ground water in cold regions. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2008; 53: 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosney M.S., Rowe R.K. Performance of GCL after 10 years in service in the Arctic. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2014; 140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001160 article no. 04014056.
   Google Scholar
• Huang D., Xu Q., Cheng J., Lu X., Zhang H. Electrokinetic remediation and its combined technologies for removal of organic pollutants from contaminated soils. International Journal of Electrochemical Science. 2012; 7: 4528–4544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman S.A., Maini G., Sharman A.K., Sunderland G., Knowles C.J. Electrokinetic movement and biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in silt soil. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2001; 74: 40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen K.S., Puustinen J., Suortti A.M. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by composting in biopiles. Environmental Pollution. 2000; 107: 245–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinovich I., Rutter A., Poland J.S., Cairns G., Rowe R.K. Remediation of PCB contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic: excavation and surface PRB technology. Science of the Total Environment. 2008; 407: 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinovich I.K., Rutter A., Rowe R.K., Poland J.S. Design and application of surface PRBs for PCB remediation in the Canadian Arctic. Journal of Environmental Management. 2012; 101: 124–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi S., Sinkkonen A., Romantschuk M. Enhancing bioremediation of diesel-fuel-contaminated soil in a boreal climate: comparison of biostimulation and bioaugmentation. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2011; 65: 359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellems B.L., Hinchee R.E. Hinchee R.E. Review of bioremediation experience in Alaska. Hydrocarbon bioremediation. 1994; Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. 483–443.
   Google Scholar
• Kennicutt M.C. II, Sweet S.T. Hydrocarbon contamination of the Antarctic peninsula: III. The Bahia Paraiso—two years after the spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 1992; 25: 303–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F.I., Husain T., Hejazi R. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. Journal of Environmental Management. 2004; 71: 95–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S.O., Moon S.H., Kim K.W., Yun S.T. Pilot scale study on the ex situ electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from municipal wastewater sludges. Water Research. 2002; 19: 4765–4774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W.S., Kim S.O., Kim K.W. Enhanced electrokinetic extraction of heavy metals from soils assisted by ion exchange membranes. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2005; 118: 93–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M.M., Kinner N.E., Deming D.P., Simonton J.A., Belden L.M. Bioventing of no. 2 fuel oil: effects of air flowrate, temperature, nutrient amendment, and acclimation. Remediation Journal. 2014; 24: 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Klein A.G., Sweet S.T., Wade T.L., Sericano J.L., Kennicutt M.C. II. Spatial patterns of total petroleum hydrocarbons in the terrestrial environment at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Antarctic Science. 2012; 24: 450–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota M., Nakabayashi T., Matsumoto Y., Shiomi T., Yamada Y., Ino K., Yamanokuchi H., Matsui M., Tsunoda T., Mizukami F., Sakaguchi K. Selective adsorption of bacterial cells onto zeolites. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2008; 64: 88–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy J.G., Colwell R.R. Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiological Reviews. 1990; 54: 305–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leewis M., Reynolds C.M., Leigh M.B. Long-term effects of nutrient addition and phytoremediation on diesel and crude oil contaminated soils in Subarctic Alaska. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2013; 96: 129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L., Benson C.H. Evaluation of five strategies to limit the impact of fouling in permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Hazardous materials. 2010; 181: 170–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima A.T., Kleingeld P.J., Heister K., Gustav Loch J.P. Removal of PAHs from contaminated clayey soil by means of electro-osmosis. Separation and Purification Technology. 2011; 79: 221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Q., Mendelssohn I.A. Potential of restoration and phytoremediation with Juncus roemerianus for diesel-contaminated coastal wetlands. Ecological Engineering. 2009; 35: 85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loop C.M., White W.B. A conceptual model for DNAPL transport in karst ground water basins. Groundwater. 2001; 39: 119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Q., Wang H., Zhang X., Fan X., Qian Y. In situ bioelectrokinetic remediation of phenol-contaminated soil by use of an electrode matrix and a rotational operation mode. Chemosphere. 2006; 64: 415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madueño L., Coppotelli B.M., Alvarez H.M., Morelli I.S. Isolation and characterization of indigenous soil bacteria for bioaugmentation of PAH contaminated soil of semiarid Patagonia, Argentina. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2011; 65: 345–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maini G., Sharman A.K., Knowles C.J., Sunderland G., Jackman S.A. Electrokinetic remediation of metals and organics from historically contaminated soil. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2000; 75: 657–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair J., Schinner F., Margesin R. A feasibility study on the bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil from an alpine former military site: effects of temperature and biostimulation. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2013; 96: 122–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzetti S. Remediation technologies for oil-drilling activities in the Arctic: oil-spill containment and remediation in open water. Environmental Technology Reviews. 2014; 3: 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Margesin R., Schinner F. Bioremediation (natural attenuation and biostimulation) of diesel-oil-contaminated soil in an alpine glacier skiing area. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001; 67: 3127–3133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin T.A., Ruby M.V. Review of in situ remediation technologies for lead, zinc, and cadmium in soil. Remediation. 2004; 14: 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy K., Walker L., Vigoren L., Bartel J. Remediation of spilled petroleum hydrocarbons by in situ landfarming at an Arctic site. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2004; 40: 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWatters R., Wilkins D., Spedding T., Hince G., Snape I., Rowe R.K., Jones D., Bouazza A., Gates W.P. Geosynthetics in barriers for hydrocarbon remediation in Antarctica. 2014. Paper presented at the 10th international conference on geosynthetics—10ICG. 21–25 September, Berlin..
   Google Scholar
• Michaud L., Giudice A.L., Saitta M., Domenico M.D., Bruni V. The biodegradation efficiency on diesel oil by two psychrotrophic Antarctic marine bacteria during a two-month-long experiment. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2004; 49: 405–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misaelides P. Application of natural zeolites in environmental remediation: a short review. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2011; 144: 15–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohn W.W., Radziminski C.Z., Fortin M.C., Reimer K.J. On site bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated Arctic tundra soils in inoculated biopiles. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001; 57: 242–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford K.A., Rayner J.L., Snape I., Stark S.C., Stevens G.W., Gore D.B. Design, installation and preliminary testing of a permeable reactive barrier for diesel fuel remediation at Casey Station, Antarctica. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2013; 96: 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford K.A., Rayner J.L., Snape I., Stevens G.W. Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica. Chemosphere. 2014; 117: 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcott K.A., Bacus J., Taya N., Komatsu Y., Perera J.M., Stevens G.W. Synthesis and characterization of hydrophobic zeolite for the treatment of hydrocarbon contaminated ground water. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010; 183: 434–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okere U.V., Cabrerizo A., Dachs J., Jones K.C., Semple K.T. Biodegradation of phenanthrene by indigenous microorganisms in soils from Livingstone Island, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2012; 329: 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudyn K., Rutter A., Rowe K.R., Poland J.S. Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic by landfarming. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2008; 53: 102–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelo L.W. Review: in situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010; 177: 81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips L.A., Greer C.W., Farrell R.E., Germida J.J. Field-scale assessment of weathered hydrocarbon degradation by mixed and single plant treatments. Applied Soil Ecology. 2009; 42: 9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland J.S., Riddle M.J., Zeeb B.A. Contaminants in the Arctic and the Antarctic: a comparison of sources, impacts, and remediation options. Polar Record. 2003; 39: 369–383.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard S.J.T., Hough R.L., Kim K.H., Bellarby J., Paton G., Semple K.T., Coulon F. Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles. Chemosphere. 2008; 71: 1432–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot Y., Pokiak C., Moreau N., Thomassin-Lacroix E., Faucher C. Soil remediation of a former tank farm site in western Arctic Canada. 2001; Edmonton, AB: Environmental Services Association of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Powell S.M., Ferguson S.H., Snape I., Siciliano S.D. Fertilization stimulates anaerobic fuel degradation of Antarctic soils by denitrifying microorganisms. Environmental Science and Technology. 2006; 40: 2011–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell S.M., Harvey P.M., Stark J.S., Snape I., Riddle M.J. Biodegradation of petroleum products in experimental plots in Antarctic marine sediments is location dependent. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2007; 54: 434–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucci G.N., Acuña A.J., Wick L.Y., Pucci O.H. Electrobioremediation of Patagonian soils contaminated with hydrocarbons. Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta. 2012; 30: 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner J.L., Snape I., Walworth J.L., Harvey P.M., Ferguson S.H. Petroleum–hydrocarbon contamination and remediation by microbioventing at sub-Antarctic Macquarie Island. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2007; 48: 139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayu S., Karpouzas D.G., Singh B.K. Emerging technologies in bioremediation: constraints and opportunities. Biodegradation. 2012; 23: 917–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer K.J., Colden M., Francis P., Mauchan J., Mohn W.W., Poland J.S . 2003. Cold climate bioremediation—a comparison of various approaches. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 3rd Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sites in Arctic and Cold Climates Conference. 4–6 May, Edmonton, AB..
   Google Scholar
• Revill A.T., Snape I., Lucieer A., Guille D. Constraints on transport and weathering of petroleum contamination at Casey Station, Antarctica. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2007; 48: 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds C.M. Cold regions research field demonstration of rhizosphere-enhanced treatment of organics-contaminated soils on native American lands with application to Northern FUD sites. 2004; Washington, DC: U.S Army Corps of Engineers. U.S Army Corps of Engineers Report ERDC/CRREL LR-04-19.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds C.M., Braley A.W., Travis M.D., Perry L.B., Iskandar I.K. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils and groundwater in northern climates. 1998; Hanover, NH: US Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory. United States Army Corps of Engineers special report 98-5.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds C.M., Koenen B.A. Rhizosphere-enhanced bioremediation. Military Engineer. 1997; 586: 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds C.M., Travis M., Braley W.A., Scholze R.J. Hinchee R. Applying field expedient bioreactors and landfarming in cold climates. Hydrocarbon bioremediation. 1994; Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. 100–106.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson E.L., King C.K., Powell S.M. The use of microbial gene abundance in the development of fuel remediation guidelines in polar soils. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2014; 11: 235–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rike A.G., Borreson M., Instanes A. Response of cold adapted microbial populations in a permafrost profile to hydrocarbon contaminants. Polar Record. 2001; 37: 239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Rike A.G., Haugen K.B., Borreson M., Engene B., Kolstad P. In situ biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in frozen Arctic soils. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2003; 37: 97–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruberto L., Vazquez S.C., Mac Cormack W.P. Effectiveness of the natural bacterial flora, biostimulation and bioaugmentation on the bioremediation of a hydrocarbon contaminated Antarctic soil. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2003; 52: 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson R., Greer C.W., Hawkes T., Desrochers R., Nelson C.H., St-Cyr M. Hinchee R.E. Monitoring an aboveground bioreactor at a petroleum refinery site using radiorespirometry and gene probes: effects of winter conditions and clayey soil. Hydrocarbon bioremediation. 1994; Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. 329–333.
   Google Scholar
• Sanscartier D., Reimer K., Zeeb B., Koch I. The effect of temperature and aeration rate on bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil in solid-phase bench-scale bioreactors. Soil and Sediment Contamination: an International Journal. 2011; 20: 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanscartier D., Zeeb B., Koch I., Reimer K.J. Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil by heated and humidified biopile system in cold climates. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2009; 55: 167–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul D.J., Aislabie J.M., Brown C.E., Harris L., Foght J.M. Hydrocarbon contamination changes the bacterial diversity of soil from around Scott Base, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2005; 53: 141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCAR (Scientific Committee on Antarctica Research). Protocol on environmental protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Record. 1993; 29: 256–275.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer A.N., Snape I., Siciliano S.D. Soil biogeochemical toxicity end points for sub-Antarctic islands contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2007; 26: 890–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seki K., Thullner M., Hanada J., Miyazaki T. Moderate bioclogging leading to preferential flow paths in biobarriers. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation. 2006; 26: 68–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro A.P., Probstein R.F. Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosis. Environmental Science and Technology. 1993; 27: 283–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano S.D., Germida J.J., Banks K., Greer C.W. Changes in microbial community composition and function during a polyaromatic hydrocarbon phytoremediation field trial. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003; 69: 483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano S.D., Schafer A.N., Forgeron M.A.M., Snape I. Hydrocarbon contamination increases the liquid water content of frozen Antarctic soils. Environmental Science and Technology. 2008; 42: 8324–8329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A., Turner A. Surfactant-induced mobilisation of trace metals from estuarine sediment: implications for contaminant bioaccessibility and remediation. Environmental Pollution. 2009; 157: 646–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape I., Ferguson S.H., Harvey P.M., Riddle M.J. Investigation of evaporation and biodegradation of fuel spills in Antarctica: II—extent of natural attenuation at Casey Station. Chemosphere. 2006; 63: 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape I., Harvey P.M., Ferguson S.H., Rayner J.L., Revill A.T. Investigation of evaporation and biodegradation of fuel spills in Antarctica I. A chemical approach using GC-FID. Chemosphere. 2005; 61: 1485–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape I., Morris C.E., Cole C.M. The use of permeable reactive barriers to control contaminant dispersal during site remediation in Antarctica. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2001; 32: 157–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stallwood B., Shears J., Williams P.A., Hughes K.A. Low temperature bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil using biostimulation and bioaugmentation with a Pseudomonas sp. from maritime Antarctica. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2005; 99: 794–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark J.S., Snape I., Riddle M.J. Abandoned Antarctic waste disposal sites: monitoring remediation outcomes and limitations at Casey Station. Ecological Management & Restoration. 2006; 7: 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Stark S.C., Gardner D., Snape I. Assessment of contamination by heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons at Atlas Cove Station, Heard Island. Polar Record. 2003; 39: 397–414.
   Google Scholar
• Straube W.L., Nestler C.C., Hanson L.D., Ringleberg D., Prichards P.H., Jones-Meehan J. Remediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) through landfarming with biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Acta Biotechnologica. 2003; 23: 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Suni S., Romantschuk M. Mobilisation of bacteria in soils by electro-osmosis. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2004; 49: 51–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton N.B., Maphosa F., Morillo J.A., Al-Soud W.A., Langenhoff A.A.M., Grotenhuis T., Rijnaarts H.H.M., Smidt H. Impact of long-term diesel contamination on soil microbial community structure. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2013; 79: 619–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassin-Lacroix E.J.M., Eriksson M., Reimer K.J., Mohn W.W. Biostimulation and bioaugmentation for on-site treatment of weathered diesel fuel in Arctic soil. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002; 59: 551–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson B.A.W., Davies N.W., Goldsworthy P.M., Riddle M.J., Snape I., Stark J.S. In situ lubricant degradation in Antarctic marine sediments. 1. Short-term changes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2006; 25: 356–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomei M.C., Daugulis A.J. Ex situ bioremediation of contaminated soils: an overview of conventional and innovative technologies. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2013; 43: 2107–2139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabian A., Kazemian H., Seifi L., Bidhendi G.N., Azimi A.A., Ghadiri S.K. Removal of petroleum aromatic hydrocarbons by surfactant-modified natural zeolite: the effect of surfactant. Clean. 2010; 38: 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Tyagi M., da Fonseca M.M.R., de Carvalho C.C.C.R. Bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies to improve the effectiveness of bioremediation processes. Biodegradation. 2011; 22: 231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). In situ treatment technologies for contaminated soil. Engineering Forum Issue Paper EPA 542/F-06/013. 2006. Accessed on the internet at http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P1000STG.pdf on 14 December 2013..
   Google Scholar
• Van Dorst J., Siciliano S.D., Winsley T., Snape I., Ferrari B.C. Bacterial targets as potential indicators of diesel fuel toxicity in sub-Antarctic soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2014; 80: 4021–4033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loon G.W., Duffy S.J. Environmental chemistry—a global perspective. 2000; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez S., Nogales B., Ruberto L., Mestre C., Christie-Oleza J., Ferrero M., Bosch R., Mac Cormack W.P. Characterization of bacterial consortia from diesel-contaminated Antarctic soils: towards the design of tailored formulas for bioaugmentation. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2013; 77: 22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignola R., Bagatin R., D'Aurisb A.F., Flegoc C., Nalli M., Ghisletti D., Millini R., Sisto R. Zeolites in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB): one year of field experience in a refinery groundwater. Part 1: the performances. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011; 178: 204–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignola R., Bagatin R., D'Aurisb A.F., Massara E.P., Ghisletti D., Millini R., Sisto R. Zeolites in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB): one year of field experience in a refinery groundwater. Part 2: zeolite characterization. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011; 178: 210–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkutyte J., Sillanpää M., Latostenmaa P. Electrokinetic soil remediation—critical overview. Science of the Total Environment. 2002; 289: 97–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walworth J., Harvey P., Snape I. Low temperature soil petroleum hydrocarbon degradation at various oxygen levels. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2013; 96: 117–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walworth J., Pond A., Snape I., Rayner J., Ferguson S., Harvey P. Fine tuning soil nitrogen to maximise petroleum bioremediation. 2006. Paper presented at the 2005 Conference on Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sites in Arctic and Cold Climates. 8–10 May, Edmonton, AB..
   Google Scholar
• Walworth J., Pond A., Snape I., Rayner J., Ferguson S., Harvey P. Nitrogen requirements for maximizing petroleum bioremediation in a sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2007; 48: 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J.Y., Huang X.J., Kao J.C.M., Stabnikova O. Simultaneous removal of organic contaminants and heavy metals from Kaolin using an upward electrokinetic soil remediation process. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007; 144: 292–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster J., Webster K., Nelson P., Waterhouse E. The behaviour of residual contaminants at a former station site, Antarctica. Environmental Pollution. 2003; 123: 163–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White D.A., Hafsteinsdóttir E.G., Gore D.B., Thorogood G., Stark S.C. Formation and stability of Pb-, Zn- & Cu-PO4 phases at low temperatures: implications for heavy metal fixation in polar environments. Environmental Pollution. 2012; 161: 143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfenden E.N.M., Hince G., Powell S.M., Stark S.C., Snape I., Stark J.S., George S.C. The rate of removal and the compositional changes of diesel in Antarctic marine sediment. Science of the Total Environment. 2011; 410–411: 205–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin B., Wu C., Wu C., Lin C. Bioaugmented remediation of high concentration BTEX-contaminated groundwater by permeable reactive barrier with immobilized bead. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2013; 244–245: 765–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y., Sun G.D., Jin J.H., Liu Y., Luo M., Zhong Z.P., Liu Z.P. Successful bioremediation of an aged and heavily contaminated soil using a microbial/plant combination strategy. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2014; 264: 430–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S.Z., Jin H.J., Wei Z., He R.X., Ji Y.J., Li X.M., Yu S.P. Bioremediation of oil spills in cold environments: a review. Pedosphere. 2009; 19: 371–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh C., Lin C., Wu C. A permeable reactive barrier for the bioremediation of BTEX-contaminated groundwater: microbial community distribution and removal efficiencies. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010; 178: 74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yergeau E., Lawrence J.R., Sanschagrin S., Waiser M.J., Korber D.R., Greer C.W. Next-generation sequencing of microbial communities in the Athabasca River and its tributaries in relation to oil sands mining activities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012; 78: 7626–7637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung C.W., Van Stempvoort D.R., Spoelstra J., Bickerton G., Voralek J., Greer C.W. Bacterial community evidence for anaerobic degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in cold climate groundwater. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2013; 86: 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar