Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty

References

• Abbink P. Antarctic policymaking and science in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany (1957–1990). 2009; Eelde, The Netherlands: Barkhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Aksnes D.W., Hessen D.O. The structure and development of polar research (1981–2007): a publication-based approach. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research. 2009; 41: 155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auburn F.M. Consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty. Comparative International Law Quarterly. 1979; 28: 514–522.
   Google Scholar
• Auburn F.M. Antarctic law and politics. 1982; London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Braun C., Mustafa O., Nordt A., Pfeiffer S., Peter H.-U. Environmental monitoring and management proposals for the Fildes region, King George Island, Antarctica. Polar Research. 2012; 31: 18206. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/polar.v31i0.18206.
   Google Scholar
• Casanovas P., Black M., Fretwell P., Convey P. Mapping lichen distribution on the Antarctic Peninsula using remote sensing, lichen spectra and photographic documentation by citizen scientists. Polar Research. 2015; 34: 25633. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.25633.
   Google Scholar
• Chown S.L., Lee J.E., Hughes K.A., Barnes J., Barrett P.J., Bergstrom D.M., Convey P., Cowan D.A., Crosbie K., Dyer G., Frenot Y., Grant S.M., Herr D., Kennicutt M.C., Lamers M., Murray A., Possingham H.P., Reid K., Riddle M.J., Ryan P.G., Sanson L., Shaw J.D., Sparrow M.D., Summerhayes C., Terauds A., Wall D.H. Challenges to the future conservation of the Antarctic. Science. 2012; 337: 158–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie K.S., Gilbert S.L., Brown C.L., Hatfield M., Hanson L. Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2016; 14: 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwedorzewska K., Korczak M. Human impact upon the environment in the vicinity of Arctowski Station, King George Island, Antarctica. Polish Polar Research. 2010; 31: 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee B.W., Chown S.L. A meta-analysis of human disturbance impacts on Antarctic wildlife. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2016; 91: 578–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COMNAP. Antarctic facilities list. 2016. Accessed on the internet at https://www.comnap.aq/Information/SitePages/Home.aspx on 24 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Convey P., Hughes K.A., Tin T. Continental governance and environmental management mechanisms under the Antarctic Treaty System: sufficient for the biodiversity challenges of this century?. Biodiversity. 2012; 13: 234–248.
   Google Scholar
• Dastidar P. National and institutional productivity and collaboration in Antarctic science: an analysis of 25 years of journal publications (1980–2004). Polar Research. 2007; 26: 175–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastidar P., Persson O. Mapping the global structure of Antarctic research vis-a-vis Antarctic Treaty System. Current Science. 2005; 89: 1552–1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudeney J.R., Walton D.W.H. Leadership in politics and science within the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Research. 2012; 31: 11075. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/polar.v31i0.11075.
   Google Scholar
• Gray A.D. Changing patterns of polar research. Paper presented at the Polar Libraries Colloquy. 2016; AK: Fairbanks. 11 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings A.D. Why did we get an international space station before an international Antarctic station?. The Polar Journal. 2011; 1: 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes K.A. How committed are we to monitoring human impacts in Antarctica?. Environmental Research Letters. 2010; 5: 041001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/041001.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes K.A. A new paradigm—Antarctic influence without Antarctic presence?. Antarctic Science. 2015; 27: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes K.A., Fretwell P., Rae J., Holmes K., Fleming A. Untouched Antarctica: mapping a finite and diminishing environmental resource. Antarctic Science. 2011; 23: 537–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes K.A., Ireland L.C., Convey P., Fleming A. Assessing the effectiveness of specially protected areas for conservation of Antarctica's botanical diversity. Conservation Biology. 2015; 30: 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes K.A., Pertierra L.R., Molina-Montenegro M.A., Convey P. Biological invasions in terrestrial Antarctica: what is the current status and can we respond?. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2015; 24: 1031–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson M. Berkman P. Building the international legal framework for Antarctica. Science diplomacy: Antarctica, science and the governance of international spaces. 2011; Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kennicutt M.C., Klein A., Montagna P., Sweet S., Wade T., Palmer T., Sericano J., Denoux G. Temporal and spatial patterns of anthropogenic disturbance at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Environmental Research Letters. 2010; 5: 034010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034010.
   Google Scholar
• NCAOR (National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research). AL/01 planning advisory. 2015. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ncaor.gov.in/antarcticas/display/352-advisory on 24 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pannatier S. Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Record. 1994; 30: 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Poland J.S., Riddle M.J., Zeeb B.A. Contaminants in the Arctic and the Antarctic: a comparison of sources, impacts, and remediation options. Polar Record. 2003; 39: 369–383.
   Google Scholar
• Qasim S.Z., Rajan H.P. Polar Research Board, Commission on Physical Science, Mathematics and Resources, National Research Council . The Antarctic Treaty System from the perspective of a new member. Antarctic treaty system an assessment. 1985; Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 345–374. Proceedings of a workshop held at Beardmore South Field Camp Antarctica January 7–13 1985 .
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell D. The polar regions and the development of international law. 1996; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty). The Antarctic Treaty. 2016a. Accessed on the internet http://www.ats.aq/e/ats on 24 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. The Protocol on enviromental protection to the Antarctic Treaty. 2016b. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/e/ep on 24 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Decision 4 (2005) consultative party status. XXVIII ATCM. 6 June–17 June 2005, Stockholm, Sweden. 2016c. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_meeting.aspx?lang=e on 24 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Guidelines on notification with respect to consultative status. 2016d. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_meeting.aspx?lang=e on 26 October 2016..
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Final report of the fourteenth Antarctic Treaty consultative meeting. Rio de Janeiro. 5–16 October 1987. 2016e. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_meeting.aspx?lang=e on 26 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Final report of the thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty consultative meeting—nineteenth committee on environmental protection meeting. 2016f. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_meeting.aspx?lang=e on 24 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Final report of the twenty-ninth Antarctic Treaty consultative meeting. Edinburgh, United Kingdom. 12–23 June 2006. 2016g. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_meeting.aspx?lang=e on 24 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Scully T , Berkman P., etal. The development of the Antarctic Treaty system. Science diplomacy: Antarctica, science and the governance of international spaces . 2011; Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press. 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tin T., Fleming Z.L., Hughes K.A., Ainley D.G., Convey P., Moreno C.A., Pfeiffer S., Scott J., Snape I. Impacts of local human activities on the Antarctic environment. Antarctic Science. 2009; 21: 3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tin T., Lamers M., Liggett D., Maher P.T., Hughes K.A. Tin T., etal. Setting the scene: human activities, environmental impacts and governance arrangements in Antarctica. Antarctic futures: human engagement with the Antarctic environment. 2014; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Walton D.W.H. Berkman P. The scientific committee on Antarctic research and the Antarctic Treaty. Science diplomacy: Antarctica, science and the governance of international spaces. 2011; Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press. 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Watts A. Watts A. Constitutional evolution: (a) the Antarctic Treaty. International law and the Antarctic Treaty System. 1992; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 9–38.
   Google Scholar
• Zumberge J.H., Kimball L.A. Polar Research Board, Commission on Physical Science, Mathematics and Resources, National Research Council . Workshop on the Antarctic Treaty System: overview. Antarctic Treaty System: an assessment. Proceedings of a workshop held at Beardmore South Field Camp, Antarctica . 1985; Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 3–12. January 7–13, 1985 .
   Google Scholar