How we remember what we can do

References

• Berti A., Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000; 12: 415–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand A. M., Mercier C., Shun P. L. W., Bourbonnais D., Desrosiers J. Effects of weakness on symmetrical grip force exertion in subjects with hemiparesis. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2004; 91: 1579–1585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhalla M., Proffitt D. Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1999; 25: 1076–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore S. J., Goodbody S. J., Wolpert D. M. Predicting the consequences of our own actions: The role of sensorimotor context estimation. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1998; 18(18): 7511–7518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois J., Bartolo A., Coello Y. Sensorimotor adaptation to a biased feedback modifies the visual perception of peripersonal space. Perception. 2009; 38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom R. Inferentialism and some of its challenges. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2007; 74: 651–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. A. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence. 1991; 47: 139–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafarelli E. Force sensation in fresh and fatigued human skeletal muscle. Exercise and Sport Science Review. 1988; 16: 139–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cafarelli E., Layton-Wood J. Effect of vibration on force sensation in fatigued muscle. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1986; 18: 516–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardellicchio P., Sinigaglia C., Costantini M. The space of affordances: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(5): 1369–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carello C., Grosofsky A., Reichel F. D., Solomon H. Y., Turvey M. T. Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology. 1989; 1(1): 27–54.
   Google Scholar
• Carson R. G., Riek S., Shahbazpour N. Central and peripheral mediation of human force sensation following eccentric or concentric contractions. Journal of Physiology. 2002; 539: 913–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisek P. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2007; 362: 1585–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark A., Toribio J. Doing without representing. Synthese. 1994; 101: 401–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello Y., Bartolo A., Amiri B., Houdayer E., Derambure P. Perceiving what is reachable depends on motor representations: A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. PLoS One. 2008; 3(8): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello Y., Delevoye-Turrell Y. Embodiment, spatial categorisation and action. Consciousness and Cognition. 2007; 16: 667–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini M., Ambrosini E., Scorolli C., Borghi A. M. When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2011; 18(2): 302–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini M., Ambrosini E., Tieri G., Sinigaglia C., Committeri G. Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research. 2010; 207(1): 95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowey A., Small M., Ellis S. Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia. 1994; 37: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Craik K. The nature of explanation. 1943; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Crane T. Crane T. The nonconceptual content of experience. The contents of experience: Essays on perception. 1992; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 136–157.
   Google Scholar
• Crane T. What is the problem of perception?. Synthesis Philosophica. 2005; 40(2): 237–264.
   Google Scholar
• Crane T. Is perception a propositional attitude?. The Philosophical Quarterly. 2009; 59(236): 452–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting J. E., Vishton P. M. Epstein W., Rogers S. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The interaction, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. Perception of space and motion. 1995; San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 69–117.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson D. Foster L., Swanson J. W. Mental events. Experience and theory. 1970; Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press. 79–101.
   Google Scholar
• Decety J., Jeannerod M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality. Does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery?. Behavioural Brain Research. 1995; 72: 127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety J., Jeannerod M., Germain M., Pastene J. Vegetative responses during imagined movements is proportional to mental effort. Behavioural and Brain Research. 1991; 42: 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety J., Jeannerod M., Prablanc C. The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research. 1989; 34: 35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety J., Sommerville J. Kosslyn S. M., Smith E. Motor cognition and mental simulation. Cognitive psychology: Mind and brain. 2007; New York: Prentice Hall. 451–481.
   Google Scholar
• Declerck G. Ciocan C., Behnke E. A. Incarnation, motricité et rapport au possible. Studia Phaenomenologica, 12, ‘Phenomenon of Body/Phenomenology of Embodiment’. 2012; Bucharest: Romanian Society for Phenomenology and Humanitas.. 35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Declerck G. Why motor simulation cannot explain affordance perception. Adaptive Behavior. 2013; 21(4): 286–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declerck G., Gapenne O. Actuality and possibility: On the complementarity of two registers in the bodily constitution of experience. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences. 2009; 8(3): 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degenaar J., Myin E. Representation-hunger reconsidered. Synthese. 2014; 191(15): 3639–3648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delevoye-Turrell Y., Bartolo A., Coello Y. Gangopadhyay N., Madary M., Spicer F. Motor representations and the perception of space: Perceptual judgments of the boundary of action space. Perception, action, and consciousness: Sensorimotor dynamics and two visual systems. 2010; Oxford: Oxford University Press. 217–242.
   Google Scholar
• Demougeot L., Papaxanthis C. Muscle fatigue affects mental simulation of action. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011; 31(29): 10712–10720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett D. Content and consciousness. 1969; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Desmurget M., Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000; 4(11): 423–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De'Sperati C., Stucchi N. Recognizing the motion of a graspable object is guided by handedness. Neuroreport. 1997; 8: 2761–2765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De'Sperati C., Stucchi N. Motor imagery and visual event recognition. Experimental Brain Research. 2000; 133: 273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindo H., La Tona G., Nivel E., Pezzulo G., Chella A., Thórisson K. R. Chella A., Pirrone R., Sorbello R., Jóhannsdóttir K. R. Simulation and anticipation as tools for coordinating with the future. Biologically inspired cognitive architectures 2012, Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the BICA Society, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 196. 2013; Berlin: Springer. 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Dretske F. Conscious experience. Mind. 1993; 102(406): 263–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus H. L. What computers still can't do. A critique of artificial reason. 1992; Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis R., Tucker M. Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology. 2000; 91: 451–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel P. Gillies D. Truth and the aim of belief. Laws and models in science. 2005; London: King's College Publishing. 77–97.
   Google Scholar
• Erdemir E., Frankel C. B., Kawamura K., Gordon S. M., Thornton S., Ulutas B. Towards a cognitive robot that uses internal rehearsal to learn affordance relations. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2008; 2016–2021. September 22–26th, Nice, France.
   Google Scholar
• Fajen B. R. Perceiving possibilities for action: On the necessity of calibration and perceptual learning for the visual guidance of action. Perception. 2005; 34(6): 717–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajen B. R., Riley M. A., Turvey M. T. Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 2009; 40(1): 79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnè A., Iriki A., Làdavas E. Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: Evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43: 238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farné A., Làdavas E. Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport. 2000; 11: 1645–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor J. A. The modularity of mind. 1983; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor J. A., Pylyshyn Z. W. How direct is visual perception? Some reflections on Gibson's ‘ecological approach’. Cognition. 1981; 9(2): 139–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frak V. G., Paulignan Y., Jeannerod M. Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping. Experimental Brain Research. 2001; 136: 120–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard C., Ammar D. Visual cues and perceived reachability. Brain and Cognition. 2005; 59(3): 287–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher S. Phenomenological and experimental research on embodied experience. 2000. Seminar of the Phenomenology and Cognition Research Group, Centre de Recherche en Épistémologie Appliquée, Paris, http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~gallaghr/paris2000.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S., Meltzoff A. N. The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philosophical Psychology. 1996; 9(2): 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese V. The inner sense of action: Agency and motor representations. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2000; 7: 23–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandevia S. C., McCloskey D. I. Sensations of heaviness. Brain. 1977; 100: 345–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbarini F., Adenzato M. At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain Cognition. 2004; 56: 100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentili R., Cahouet V., Ballay Y., Papaxanthis C. Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery. Behavioural Brain Research. 2004; 155: 231–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson J. J. Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology. 1958; 49: 182–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson J. J. Shaw R., Bransford J. The theory of affordances. Perceiving, acting and knowing. 1977; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson J. J. The ecological approach to visual perception. 1979; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Grush R. In defense of some ‘Cartesian’ assumptions concerning the brain and its operation. Biology and Philosophy. 2003; 18(1): 53–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grush R. The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2004; 27(3): 377–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grush R. Skill theory v2.0: Dispositions, emulation, and the spatiality of perception. Synthese. 2007; 159(3): 389–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan P. W., Marshall J. C. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature. 1991; 350: 498–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes P. J. Michie D. The naive physics manifesto. Expert systems in the micro-electronic age. 1978; Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 242–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hesslow G. Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2002; 6: 242–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesslow G., Jirenhed D. A. Must machines be zombies? Internal simulation as a mechanism for machine consciousness. Proceedings of AAAI Symposium. 2007a; 1–6. Washington DC, 8–11 November 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hesslow G., Jirenhed D. A. The inner world of a simple robot. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2007b; 14(7): 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann H. Perception through visuomotor anticipation in a mobile robot. Neural Networks. 2007; 20(1): 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst A. C. T., van Lier R., Steenbergen B. Spatial dependency of action simulation. Experimental Brain Research. 2011; 212(4): 635–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl E. Thing and space: Lectures of 1907. 1997; Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl H. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. 1913; The Hague: Nijhoff. 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl H. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. 1950; The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto D., Myin E. Radicalizing enactivism. Basic minds without content. 2013; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport. 1996; 7: 2325–2330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iriki A., Tanaka M., Obayashi S., Iwamura Y. Self-images in the videomonitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. Neuroscience Research. 2001; 40: 163–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod M. The representing brain. Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 1994; 17: 1987–2245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage. 2001; 14: 103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod M. Roessler J., Eilan N. Consciousness of action and self-consciousness: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Agency and self-awareness. 2003; Oxford: Oxford University Press. 128–149.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod M. Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. 2006; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod M., Arbib M. A., Rizzolatti G., Sakata H. Grasping objects: The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neurosciences. 1995; 18: 314–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod M., Frak V. Mental Imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 1999; 9: 735–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod M., Gallagher S. From action to interaction: An interview with Marc Jeannerod. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2002; 9(1): 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod M., Jacob P. Visual cognition: A new look at the two-visual systems model. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43(2): 301–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson S. H. Thinking ahead: The case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition. 2000; 74: 33–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L. A., Hunter I. W. Effect of fatigue on force sensation. Experimental Neurology. 1983a; 81: 640–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L. A., Hunter I. W. Perceived force in fatiguing isometric contractions. Perception & Psychophysics. 1983b; 33: 369–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junghans A. F., Evers C., De Ridder D. T. D. . Eat me if you can: Cognitive mechanisms underlying the distance effect. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12): e84643. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084643.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler W. The mentality of apes. 1925; London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
   Google Scholar
• Linkenauger S. A., Leyrer M., Bülthoff H. H., Mohler B. J. Welcome to Wonderland: The influence of the size and shape of a virtual hand on the perceived size and shape of virtual objects. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7): e68594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkenauger S. A., Witt J. K., Proffitt D. R. Taking a hands-on approach: Apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2011; 37(5): 1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo M. R., Lourenco S. F. On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44: 977–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo M. R., Lourenco S. F. Space perception and body morphology: Extent of near space scales with arm length. Experimental Brain Research. 2007; 177(2): 285–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravita A., Husain M., Clarke K., Driver J. Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia. 2001; 39: 580–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravita A., Spence C., Driver J. Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology. 2003; 13: R531–R539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravita A., Spence C., Kennett S., Driver J. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition. 2002; 83: B25–B34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravita A., Spence C., Sergent C., Driver J. Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychological Science. 2002; 13: 350–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark L. S. Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1987; 13(3): 361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels C. F. Affordances: Four points of debate. Ecological Psychology. 2003; 15(2): 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller R. Riegler A., Peschl M., Von Stein A. Perception through anticipation. A behavior-based approach to visual perception. Understanding representation in the cognitive sciences. 1999; New York: Plenum Academic/Kluwer Publishers. 169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Morgado N., Gentaz É., Guinet É., Osiurak F., Palluel-Germain R. Within reach but not so reachable: Obstacles matter in visual perception of distances. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2013; 20(3): 462–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton S. T., Kosslyn S. M. Imagining predictions: Mental imagery as mental emulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009; 364(1521): 1273–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Regan J. K., Noë A. What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of visual experience. Synthese. 2001; 129(1): 79–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas Z., Mack A. Potentiation of action by undetected affordant objects. Visual Cognition. 2008; 16(7): 892–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons L. M. Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1994; 20: 709–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons L. M., Fox P. T. The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1998; 15: 583–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacocke C. Sense and content: Experience, thought, and their relations. 1983; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pegna A. J., Petit L., Caldara-Schnetzer A. S., Khateb A., Annoni J. M., Sztajzel R., Landis T. So near yet so far: Neglect in far or near space depends on tool use. Annals of Neurology. 2001; 50: 820–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzulo G. Coordinating with the future: The anticipatory nature of representation. Minds and Machines. 2008; 18(2): 179–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzulo G., Barca L., Bocconi A. L., Borghi A. M. When affordances climb into your mind: Advantages of motor simulation in a memory task performed by novice and expert rock climbers. Brain and Cognition. 2010; 73(1): 68–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip B. A., Frey S. H. Stimulus–response correspondence across peripersonal space is unaffected by chronic unilateral limb loss. Experimental Brain Research. 2013; 224(3): 373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeck K. Phantoms following amputation in early childhood and in congenital absence of limbs. Cortex. 1964; 1: 269–275.
   Google Scholar
• Proffitt D. R., Bhalla M., Gossweiler R., Midgett J. Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1995; 2: 409–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffitt D. R., Stefanucci J., Banton T., Epstein W. The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science. 2003; 14: 106–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine W. V. O. Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review. 1951; 60: 20–43.
   Google Scholar
• Reed E. S. James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. 1988; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld E. Kiverstein J., Wheeler M. Context-switching and responsiveness to real relevance. Heidegger and cognitive science. 2012a; Basingtoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 105–135.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld E. Paglieri F. Bodily intentionality and social affordances in context. Consciousness in interaction. The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness. 2012b; Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 207–226.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld E., De Haan S., Denys D. Social affordances in context: What is it that we are bodily responsive to?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013; 36(4): 436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat P., Goubet N., Senders S. J. To reach or not to reach? Perception of body effectivities by young infants. Infant and Child Development. 1999; 8(3): 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousselet G. A., Fabre-Thorpe M., Thorpe S. J. Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience. 2002; 5(7): 629–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle G. The concept of mind. 1949; New York: Barnes & Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Sack A. T., Lindner M., Linden D. E. Object- and direction-specific interference between manual and mental rotation. Perception & Psychophysics. 2007; 69: 1435–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenck W. Pezzulo G., Butz M., Sigaud O., Baldassarre G. Space perception through visuokinesthetic prediction. Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: From psychological theories to artificial cognitive systems, lecture notes in artificial intelligence, 5499. 2009; Berlin: Springer. 247–266.
   Google Scholar
• Schenck W., Hasenbein H., Möller R. Di Nuovo A. G., De la Cruz V. M., Marocco D. Detecting affordances by mental imagery. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Adaptive Behaviour (SAB 2012), Workshop on Artificial Mental Imagery in Cognitive Systems and Robotics. 2012; 15–32. August 27th, Odense, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Searle J. R. The rediscovery of the mind. 1992; Cambridge, MA/London, UK: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle J. R. Bock G. R., Marsh J. The problem of consciousness. Experimental and theoretical studies of consciousness. 2007; CIBA Foundation Symposium 174, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Simon A. M., Kelly B. M., Ferris D. P. Sense of effort determines lower limb force production during dynamic movement in individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009; 23(8): 811–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinigaglia C., Rizzolatti G. Through the looking glass: Self and others. Consciousness and Cognition. 2011; 20: 64–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith D. W. How to Husserl a Quine – And a Heidegger, too. Synthese. 1994; 98(1): 153–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanucci J. K., Geuss M. N. Big people, little world: The body influences size perception. Perception. 2009; 38(12): 1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner P. The delocalized mind. Judgements, vehicles, and persons. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2014; 13(3): 437–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen T. A. Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology. 2003; 15(2): 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1998; 24: 830–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker M., Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition. 2001; 8: 769–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker M., Ellis R. Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica. 2004; 116: 185–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner P. Affordance as context. Interacting with Computers. 2005; 17(6): 787–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turvey M. T. Weimer W. B., Palermo D. S. Constructive theory, perceptual systems, and tacit knowledge. Cognition and the symbolic process. 1974; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey M. T. Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology. 1992; 4: 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey M. T., Shaw R. E. Wilsson L. G. The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of perception for understanding memory. Perspectives on memory research. 1979; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 167–222.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey M. T., Shaw R. E., Reed E. S., Mace W. M. Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition. 1981; 9(3): 237–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren W. H., Whang S. Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1987; 13(3): 371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler M., Kosslyn S. M., Berthoz A. Mental processes in mental rotation. Cognition. 1998; 68: 77–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilf M., Holmes N. P., Schwartz I., Makin T. R. Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013; 4: 591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt J. K. Tool use influences perceived shape and perceived parallelism, which serve as indirect measures of perceived distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2011; 37(4): 1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt J. K., Linkenauger S. A., Bakdash J. Z., Proffitt D. R. Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2008; 15(3): 581–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt J. K., Proffitt D. R. See the ball, hit the ball: Apparent ball size is correlated with batting average. Psychological Science. 2005; 16: 937–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt J. K., Proffitt D. R. Action-specific influences on distance perception: A role for motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2008; 34(6): 1479–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt J. K., Proffitt D. R., Epstein W. Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception. 2004; 33: 577–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt J. K., Proffitt D. R., Epstein W. Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2005; 31(5): 880–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt J. K., Proffitt D. R., Epstein W. When and how are spatial perceptions scaled?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2010; 36(5): 1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein L. Anscombe G. E. M., Wright G. H. On certainty. 1969; Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlschläger A., Wohlschläger A. Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1998; 24: 397–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert D. M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M. I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science-AAAS-Weekly Paper Edition. 1995; 269(5232): 1880–1882.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert D. M., Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks. 1998; 11(7): 1317–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolverton C. Unpublished blog discussion on ‘Affordances, Part 3: Dispositions or relations – Which is it?’ Websites Notes from Two Scientific Psychologists. 2011. Retrieved January 17, 2011, from http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.fr/2010/05/affordances-part-3-dispositions-or.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ziemke T., Jirenhed D. A., Hesslow G. Internal simulation of perception: A minimal neuro-robotic model. Neurocoputing. 2005; 68: 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar