Evaluation of lateral boundary errors in a limited-domain model

References

• Anthes, R. A. 1974. Data assimilation and initialization of hurricane prediction models. J., 4tmos. Sci. 31, 702–719.
   Google Scholar
• Asselin, R. 1972. Integration of a semi-implicit model with time-dependent boundary conditions. Atmosphere 10,44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Baumhefner, D. P., Jenne, R. L. and Schlatter, T. W. 1978. Specialized Data Sets Available at the Nat. Center for Atmos. Res. (NCAR), WGNE Report 15, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Charney, J. G., Fjortoft, R. and von Neumann, J. 1950. Numerical integration of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus 2, 237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. C. 1976. A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 102, 405–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, D. J., Leslie, L. M., McGregor, J. L. and Hincksman, D. R. 1978. A limited area nested numerical weather prediction model: Formulation and preliminary results. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 104, 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrity, J. F. 1977. The LFM model-1976: A documentation. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS NMC 60, National Meteorological Center, NWS/NOAA, Washington, DC, p. 68.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, E. J. and Elsberry, R. L. 1972. A method for incorporating nested finite grids in the solution of systems of geophysical equations. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 1235–1245.
   Google Scholar
• Hodur, R. M. and Burk, S. D. 1978. The fleet numerical weather central tropical cyclone model: Comparison of cyclic and one-way interactive boundary con-ditions. Mon. Wea. Rev. 106, 1665–1671.
   Google Scholar
• Hovermale, J.B., Marks, D. G. and Scolnik, S. H. 1977. Operational analysis and prediction with a movable fine-mesh system at the National Meteorological Center. Proc. 7th Technical Exchange Conference, El Paso, Atmos. Science Lab, White Sands, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Kallberg, P. W. and Gibson, J. K. 1977. Multi-level limited area forecast using boundary zone relaxation. WGNE Rep. #15, p. 48.
   Google Scholar
• Kesel, P. G. and Winninghoff, F. J. 1972. The Fleet Numerical Weather Central operational primitive equation model. Mon. Wea. Rev. 100, 360–373.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. L., Leslie, L. M. and Gauntlett, D. J. 1978. The ANMRC limited area model: Consolidated formulation and operational results. Mon. Wea. Rev. 106, 427–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyakoda, K. and Rosati, A. 1977. One-way nested grid models: The interface conditions and the numerical accuracy. Mon. Wea. Rev. 105, 1092–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, J. E. and Deaven, D. G. 1981. The LFM-II Model-1980, NOAA Tech. Memorandum NWS NMC 66, Nat. Meteor. Center NWS/NOAA, Washington, D.C., p. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Oliger, J. and Sundstrom, A. 1976. Theoretical and prac-tical aspects of some initial-boundary value problems in fluid dynamics. STAN-CS-76-578, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Perkey, D. J. 1976. A description and preliminary results from a fine-mesh model for forecasting quantitative precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 104, 1513–1526.
   Google Scholar
• Perkey, D. J. and Kreitzberg, C. W. 1976. A time-dependent lateral boundary scheme for limited-area primitive equation models. Mon. Wea. Rev. 104, 744–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. and Shukla, J. 1973. On the strategy of combining coarse and fine grid meshes in numerical weather prediction. J. Appl. Meteorol. 12, 763–770.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. 1978. The nested grid model. NOAA Tech. Reports, NWS, 96.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A. and O'Brien, J. J. 1970. Boundary conditions for fine-mesh limited-area forecasts. J. Appl. Meteorol. 9, 345–349.
   Google Scholar
• Staniforth, A. N. and Mitchell, H. L. 1978. A variable-resolution finite-element technique for regional fore-casting with the primitive equations. Mon. Wea. Rev. 106, 439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundström, A. and Elvius, T. 1979. Numerical Methods Used in Atmospheric Models-Vol. II, Chap. 7 (Computational Problems Related to Limited area Modeling). GARP publication series #17, WMO, p. 495.
   Google Scholar
• Teweles, S. and Wobus, H. B. 1954. Verification of Prognostic Charts. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 35, 455–463.
   Google Scholar
• Valent, R. A., Downey, P. H. and Donnelly, J. L. 1977.Description and operational aspects of the NCAR Segmented Limited Area Model (LAMSEG), NCAR Report #0501-77/08,105.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, W. M. and Kasahara, A. 1970. A January simulation experiment with the two-layer version of the NCAR global circulation model. Mon. Wea. Rev. 98,559–580.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, W. M. and Baumhefner, D P. 1975. A method of removing lamb waves from initial data for primitive equation models. J. Appl. Meteorol. 14, 114–119.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, W. M., Otto-Bliesner, B. and Williamson, G. 1977. January and July simulation experiments with the 2.5° latitude-longitude version of the NCAR General Circulation Model. NCAR Tech. Note #123 + STR, p. 39.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, D. L. 1976. Normal mode initialization procedure applied to forecasts with the global shallow water equations. Mon. Wea. Rev. 104, 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, D. L. and Browning, G. L. 1974. Formu-lation of the lateral boundary conditions for the NCAR limited area model. J. Appl. Meteorol. 13, 8–15.
   Google Scholar