284
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A simple three-dimensional canopy – planetary boundary layer simulation model for scalar concentrations and fluxes

, , &
Pages 784-819 | Received 02 Jul 2001, Accepted 17 Jun 2002, Published online: 15 Dec 2016

References

  • Alapaty, K., Raman, S. and Niyogi, S. 1997. Uncertainty in the specification of surface characteristics: a study of prediction errors in the boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 82,473–500.
  • Apsley, D. and Castro, I. 1997. A limited-length-scale k-e model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 83, 75–98.
  • Ayotte, K., Finnigan, J. and Raupach, M. 1999. A second-order closure for neutrally stratified vegeta-tive canopy flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 90, 189–216.
  • Belov, P., Borisenlcov, E. and Panin, B. 1989. Numerical methods of weather forecast. Hydrometeoizdat, Moscow, 376 pp (in Russian).
  • Belsky, A. J., Amundson, R. G., Duxbury, J. M., Riha, S. J., Ali, A. R. and Mwonga, S. M. 1989. The effects of trees on their physical, chemical and biological environments in a semi-arid savanna in Kenya. J. Appl. Ecol. 26, 1005-1024.
  • Blalcadar, A. K. 1962. The vertical distrubution of wind and turbulent exchange in a neutral atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 67, 3095–3102.
  • Bobylyeva, I. 1970. The study of turbulence characteristics in the atmospheric boundary layer. Trans. Leningrad Hy-drometeorol. Inst. 40, 3-63 (in Russian).
  • Brown, A. R. 1996. Evaluation of parametrization schemes for the convective boundary layer using large-eddy simu-lation results. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 81, 167–200.
  • Businger, J., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y. and Bradley, E. F. 1971. Flux-profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 181-189.
  • Campbell, G. S. and Norman, J. M. 1988. Environ. Biophys. Springer, Berlin, 286 pp.
  • Carroll, J. 1993. Sensitivity of PBL model predictions to model design and uncertainties in environmental inputs. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 65, 137–158.
  • Clapp, R. B. and Nornberger, G. M. 1978. Empirical equa-tions for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resour. Res. 14, 601–604.
  • Cowan, I. R. and Farquhar, G. D. 1977. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symp. Soc. Exper. Biol. 31, 471–505.
  • Cowan, I. R. 1977. Stomatal behavior and environment. Adv. Bot. Res. 4, 117–228.
  • DePury, D. and Farquhar, G. D. 1997. Simple scaling of pho-tosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant, Cell Environ. 20, 537–557.
  • Dubov, A. and Bykova, L. 1973. Characteristics of turbu-lent flow in atmospheric boundary layer over forest and inside it. Trans. Main Geophys. Observatory 297, 13-24 (in Russian).
  • Dubov, A., Bykova, A. and Marunich, C. 1978. Turbulence in vegetation canopy. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad. 182 pp (in Russian).
  • Finnigan, J. 2000. Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 519–571.
  • Garratt, J. R., Hess, G. D., Physick, W. L. and Bougeault, P. 1996. The atmospheric boundary layer - advances in knowledge and application. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 78, 9-37.
  • Gross, G. 1987. Some effects of deforestation on noctur-nal drainage flow and local climate: a numerical study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 38, 315–337.
  • Gross, G. 1993. Numerical simulation of canopy flows, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 168 pp.
  • Gutman, L. 1969. The introduction to the nonlinear the-ory of mesometeorological processes. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad. 229 pp (in Russian).
  • Hasse, L. 1993. Turbulence closure in boundary-layer theory - an invitation to debate. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 65, 249–254.
  • Jacobson, M. Z. 1999. Fundamentals of atmospheric model-ing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 656 pp.
  • Jacquemin, B. and Noilhan, J. 1990. Sensitivity study and validation of a land surface parameterization using the HAPEX-MOBILHY data set. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 52, 93–134.
  • Jarvis, P. G. 1976. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 273, 593–610.
  • Kalnay, E., et. al. 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year re-analysis project, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437-471.
  • Kanda, M. and Hino, M. 1994. Organized structures in de-velopment turbulent flow within and above a plant canopy, using a large eddy simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 68, 237–257.
  • Karpov, V. 1983. Regulation factors of spruce forest ecosys-tem, Nauka, Leningrad. 320 pp (in Russian).
  • Kelliher, E M., Lloyd, J., Arneth, A., Byers, J. N., McSev-eny, T. M., Milukova, I., Grigoriev, S., Panfyorov, M., Sogatchev, A., Varlagin, A., Ziegler, W., Bauer, G. and Schulze, E.-D. 1988. Evaporation from a central Siberian Forest. J. Hydrol. 205, 279-296.
  • Kolmogorov, A. 1941. A local turbulence structure in un-compressible fluids at very high Reynold's numbers. Rep. USSR Acad. Sci. 30, 299-303 (in Russian).
  • Kolmogorov, A. 1942. Turbulence flow equations of an un-compressible fluid. Trans. USSR Acad. Sci. Phys. 6,56-58 (in Russian).
  • Kondratev, K. Ya. 1954. Radiation in the Atomsphere. Hy-drometeoizdat, Leningrad. 600 pp (in Russian).
  • Kunz, R. and Moussiopoulos, N. 1995. Simulation of the wind fields in Athens using refined boundary conditions. Atmos. Environ. 29, 3575–3591.
  • Kunz, R. and Moussiopoulos, N. 1997. Implementation and assessment of a one-way nesting technique for high res-olution wind flow simulation. Atmos. Environ. 31, 3167–3176.
  • Laykhtman, D. 1970. Physics of atmospheric boundary layer. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 341 pp (in Russian).
  • Leclerc, M. Y. and Thurtell, G. W. 1990. Footprint predictions of scalar fluxes using a marcovian analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 52, 247–258.
  • Legotina, S. I. and Orlenlco, L. R. 1977. On turbulent flow calculations of sensible and latent heat using gradient mea-surements data. Trans. Main Geophys. Observatory 398, 91-98 (in Russian).
  • Liu, J., Chen, J. M., Black, T. A. and Novak, M. D. 1996. E-e modelling of turbulent air flow downwind of a model forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 77, 21–44.
  • Lloyd, J. and Farquhar, G. D. 1994. 13C discrimination during CO2 assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere. Oecologia 99, 210–215.
  • Lloyd, J. and Taylor, J. A. 1994. On the temperature depen-dence of soil respiration. Funct. Ecol. 8, 315–323.
  • Lloyd, J., Grace, J., Miranda, A. C., Meir, P., Wong, S. C., Miranda, H. S., Wright, I. R., Gash, J. H. C. and McIntyre, J. 1995. A simple calibrated model of Amazon rainforest productivity based on leaf biochemical properties. Plant, Cell Environ. 18, 1129–1145.
  • Lloyd, J., Francey, R. J., Mollicone, D., Raupach, M. R., Sogachev, A., Arneth, A., Byers, J. N., Kelliher, F. M., Rebmann, C., Valentini, R., Wong, S.-C., Bauer, G. and Schulze, E.-D. 2001. Vertical profiles, boundary layer bud-gets, and regional flux estimates for CO2, its 13 C/12C ratio and for water vapour above a forest/bog mosaic in central Siberia Global Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 267-284.
  • Lloyd, J., Langenfelds, R., Francey, R. J., Gloor, M., Zolotilcine, D., Tchebakova, N., Shibistova, O., Allison, C. A., Brand, W. A., Werner, R. and Schulze, E.-D. 2002. A trace gas climatology above Zotino, central Siberia Tel-lus 54B, this issue.
  • McCumber, M. C. and Pielke, R. A. 1981. Simulation of the effects of surface fluxes of heat and moisture in a mesoscale numerical model. Part I: Soil layer. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 9929–9938.
  • Mellor, G. and Yamada, T. 1975. A simulation of the Wangara atmospheric boundary layer data. J. Atmos. Sci. 32,2309–2329.
  • Menzhulin, G. 1970. On the calculation methodology of the meteorological regime in vegetation canopies. Meteorol. Hydrol. 2, 92-99 (in Russian).
  • Menzhulin, G. 1974. Modeling of the hydrometeorological regime in vegetations. Trans. Main Geophys. Observatory 318, 5-34 (in Russian).
  • Menzhulin, G. 1986. Energy and matter transfer in agroe-cosystems. D. Sci. Thesis, Leningrad State Hydrological Institute, 507 pp (in Russian).
  • Mix, W., Goldberg, V. and Bernhardt, K.-H. 1994. Numer-ical experiments with different approaches for boundary layer modeling under large-area forest canopy conditions. Meteorol. Z. 3, 187–192.
  • Monin, A. and Yaglom, A. 1965. Statistical hydromechanics. Part I, Science Publ., Moscow, 640 pp (in Russian).
  • Monteith, J. L. and Unsworth, M. H. 1990. Principles of environmental physics (2nd edn.). Edward Arnold London, 291 pp.
  • Naegler, T., Kolle, O., Milukova, I., Varlagin, A. and Levin, I. 2002. Comparison of methods to measure nocturnal respi-rative CO2 fluxes in a temperate forest in Western Russia. Tellus 54B, this issue.
  • Nichols, W. D. 1992. Energy budgets and resistance to energy transport in sparsely vegetated rangeland. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 60, 221–247.
  • Nickerson, E. C. and Smiley, V. E. 1975. Surface energy budget parameterizations for urban scale models. J. Appl. Meteorol. 14, 297–300.
  • Noilhan, J. and Planton, S. 1989. A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological model. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 536–549.
  • Penenlco, V. and Aloyan, A. 1985. Models and methods for environmental protection problems. Science Publ, Moscow, 256 pp (in Russian).
  • Pielke, R. 1984. Mesoscale meteorological modeling. Aca-demic Press, New York, 612 pp.
  • Rannic, E., Aubinet, M., Kurbanmuradov, O., Sabelfeld, K. K., Marlcicanen, T. and Vesala, T. 2000. Footprint analysis for measurements over a heterogeneous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 97, 137-166.
  • Raupach, M. R. 1995. Vegetation-atmosphere interaction and surface conductance at leaf, canopy and regional scales. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 73, 151–179.
  • Raupach, M. R., Finnigan, J. J. and Brunet, Y. 1996. Co-herent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 78,351–382.
  • Ross, Yu. K. 1975. Radiation regime and architecture of veg-etation canopies. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 342 pp (in Russian).
  • Ross, Yu. K. and Nilson, T. A. 1967. The radiation regime of a vegetation canopy with horizontally oriented leaves. In Phytoactinometrical researches of vegetation canopy. Valgus Publ. Tallin, 5-34 (in Russian).
  • Schilling, V. 1991. A parameterization for modelling the meteorological effects of tall forest — a case study of a large clearing. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 55, 283–304.
  • Schulze, E.-D., Lloyd, J., Kelliher, E M., Wirth, C., Reb-mann, C., Liihker, B., Mund, M., Knohl, A., Milykova, I., Schulze, W., Ziegler, W., Varlagin, A., Valentini, R., So-gachov, A., Valentini, R., Dore, S., Grigoriev, S., Kolle, O., Tchebakova, N. and Vygodskaya, N. N. 1999. Pro-ductivity of forests in the Eurosiberian boreal region and their potential to act as a carbon sink — A synthesis. Global Change Biol. 5, 703-722.
  • Sellers, R, Mintz, Y., Sud, V. and Dalcher, A. 1986. A simple model (Si-B) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 505–531.
  • Shaw, R. and Schumann, U. 1992. Large eddy eimulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 61, 47–64.
  • Shen, S. and Leclerc, M. Y. 1997. Modelling the turbulent structure in the canopy layer. J. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 87, 3–25.
  • Shibistova, O., Lloyd, J., Kolle, O., Arneth, A. and Schulze, E.-D. 2002. Seasonal and spatial variability in soil CO2 efflux rates for a central Siberian Pinus sylvestris forest. Tellus 54B, this issue.
  • Sivkov, S. I. 1968. Calculation methods of solar radiation characteristics. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 232 pp (in Russian).
  • Smagorinsky, J. 1965. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: The basic experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev. 93, 727–760.
  • Sorbjan, Z. 1989. Structure of the atmospheric bound-ary layer. Prentice-Hall, and Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 360 pp.
  • Spitters, C. J. T., Toussaint, H. A. J. M. and Goudriaan, J. 1986. Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modelling canopy photosynthesis: Part I. Components of incoming radiation. J. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38, 217–229.
  • Stull, R. B. 1988. An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 670 pp.
  • Styles, J. M., Lloyd, J., Zolotulchin, D., Kieran, A., Lawton, Tchebalcova, N., Francey, R. J., Arneth, A., Salamalcho, D., Kolle, O. and Schulze, E.-D. 2002. Estimates of re-gional surface carbone and oxygen isotope discrimination during photosynthesis from profile of CO2 concentration and its isotopic composition in the convective boundary layer. Tellus 54B, this issue.
  • Sun, W.-Y. and Bosilovich, W. 1996. Planetary boundary layer and surface layer sensitivity to land surface parame-ters. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 77,353–378.
  • Therry, G. and Lacarrere, P. 1983. Improving the eddy kinetic energy model for planetary boundary layer description. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 63–88.
  • Tjernström, M. 1989. Some tests with a surface energy bal-ance scheme, including a bulk parameterization for veg-etation in a mesoscale model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 48, 33–68.
  • Tsipris, I. B. and Menzhulin, G. V. 1972. The calculation of relationship between forest belts and surface airflow. Meteorol. Hydrol. N11, 82-88 (in Russian).
  • Tuzet, A., Perrier, A., and Olid Aissa, A. K. 1993. A pre-diction model for field drying of hay using a heat balance method. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 65, 63–89.
  • Vager, B. and Nadezhina, E. 1975. A model for the turbulence scale and calculations of the atmospheric boundary layer structure. Trans. Main Geophys. Observatory 326, 3-10. (in Russian).
  • Vager, B. and Nadezhina, E. 1979. Atmospheric boundary layer in conditions of horizontal nonuniformity. Gidrome-teoizdat, Leningrad, 136 pp (in Russian).
  • Valentini, R., Dore, S., Marchi, G., Mollicone, D., Panfyorov, M., Rebmann, C., Kolle, O. and Schulze, E.-D. 2000. Car-bon and water exchanges of two contrasting central Siberia landscape types: regenerating forest and bog. Funct. Ecol. 14, 87-96.
  • Varlagin, A. V. and Vygodslcaya, N. N. 1993. Influence of ecological and morphological factors on stomata resis-tance of norway spruce. Lesovedenie, Moscow 3, 48-60. (in Russian).
  • Wang, H., Talcle, E. S. and Shen, J. 2001. Shelterbelts and windbreaks: Mathematical modeling and computer simu-lation of turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33, 549-586.
  • Wang, Y. P. and Leuning, R. 1998. A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosyntesis and pardoning of available energy. Part I: Model description and compari-son with a multi-layered model. Agric. For. Meteorol. 91, 89–111.
  • Wilson, J. 1988. A second-order closure model for flow through vegetation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 42, 371–392.
  • Wilson, J. and Flesch, T. 1999. Wind and remnant tree sway in forest cutblocics. Part 3. A windflow model to diagnose spatial variation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 93, 259–282.
  • Wu, J., Liu, Y. and Jelinski, D. 2000. Effects of leaf area pro-files and canopy stratification on simulated energy fluxes: the problem of vertical spatial scale. Ecol. Modelling 134, 283-297.
  • Zeng, P. and Takahashi, H. 2000. A first-order closure model for wind flow within and above vegetation canopies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 103, 301–313.
  • Zhenjia, L. I., Lin, J. D. and Miller, D. R. 1990. Air flow over and through a forest edge: a steady-state numerical simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 51, 179-197.
  • Ziemann, A. 1998. Numerical simulation of meteorological quantities in and above forest canopies. Meteorol. Z. 7, 120–128.
  • Zilitinkevich, S. 1970. Dynamics of the atmospheric bound-ary layer. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 291 pp (in Russian).