Regional pattern and interannual variations in global terrestrial carbon uptake in response to changes in climate and atmospheric CO₂

References

• Agbu, P. A. and James, M. E. 1994. The NOAA/NASA Pathfinder AVHRR Land Data Set User's Manual. Goddard Space Flight Center, Green-belt, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, V. A., Juday, G. P. and Finney, B. P. 2000. Reduced growth of Alaskan white spruce in the twentieth century from temperature-induced drought stress. Nature 405, 668–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batjes, N. H., Fischer, G., Nachtergaele, E O., Stolbovoy, V. S. and van Velthuizen, H. T. 1997. Soil Data Derived from WISE for Uses in Regional and Global AEZ Studies (Version I). International Institute of Applied System Analysis, Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bousquet, P., Peylin, R, Ciais, P., Le Quere, C., Friedlingstein, P. and co-authors 2000. Regional changes in carbon dioxide fluxes of land and oceans since 1980. Science 290, 1342–1346.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, M. K., Prince, S. D. and Shugart, H. H. 2002. Increasing terres-trial carbon uptake from the 1980s to the 1990s with changes in cli-mate and atmospheric CO2. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 16, 1069, 10.1029/2001GB001553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, M. K., Prince, S. D., Small, J. and Goetz S. 2004. Satellite remotely sensed interannual variability in terrestrial net primary productivity from 1980 to 2000. Ecosystems 7, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, M. K. and Woodward, F. I. 1998. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature 393, 249–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspersen, J. R, Pacala, S. W., Jenkins, J. C., Hurtt, G. C., Moorcroft, P. R. and co-authors 2000. Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in US forests. Science 290, 1148–1151.
   Google Scholar
• DeFries, R., Houghton, R. A., Hansen, M. C., Field, C. B., Skole, D. and co-authors 2002. Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14256–14261.
   Google Scholar
• DeLucia, E. H., Hamilton, J. G., Naidu, S. L., Thomas, R. B., Andrews, J. A. and co-authors 1999. Net primary production of a forest ecosys-tem with experimental CO2 enrichment. Science 284, 1177–1179.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, B. G., Gonzalez-Meler, M. A. and Long, S. P. 1997. More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 609–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folland, C. K., Karl, T. R., Christy, J. R., Clarke, R. A., Gruza, G. V. and co-authors 2001. In: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (ed. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden et al.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 99–181
   Google Scholar
• Friedlingstein, R, Fung, I. Y., Holland, E., John J., Brasseur, G. and co-authors 1995. On the contribution of CO2 fertilization to the missing biospheric sink, Global Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 541–556.
   Google Scholar
• Frouin, R. and Pinker, R. T. 1995. Estimating photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of the Earth's surface from satellite observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 51, 98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, S. J., Prince, S. D., Small, J., Gleason, A. C. R., Thawley, M. M. and co-authors 2000. Interannual variability of global terrestrial primary production: reduction of a model driven with satellite obser-vations. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 20007–20091.
   Google Scholar
• Groisman, P. Y., Knight, R. W. and Karl, T. R. 2001. Heavy precipitation and high stream flow in the United States: trends in the 20th century. Bull. Am. Meteorol Soc. 82, 219–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurney, K. R., Law, R. M., Denning, A. S., Rayner, P. J., Baker, D. and coauthors. 2002. Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models. Nature 415, 626–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. C., DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G. and Sohlberg, R. 2000. Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21, 1331–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M. and Reynolds R. 1996. Global surface temperature in 1995: return to pre-Pinatubo level. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 1665–1668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, R. A. 2003. Why are the estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different? Global Change Biol. 9, 500–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, R. A., Hackler, J. L. and Lawrence, K. T. 1999. The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change, Science 285, 574–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, G. J. and Bolvin, D. T. 2000. GPCP Version 2 Combined Precipitation Data Set Documentation, SSAI and Laboratory for At-mosphere. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD.
   Google Scholar
• IGBP Terrestrial Carbon Working Group 1998. The terrestrial carbon cycle: implications for the Kyoto Protocol. Science 280, 1393–1394.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, I. A., Freibauer, A., Ciais, R, Smith, P., Nabuurs, G. and co-authors 2003. Europe’s terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12% of Eu-ropean anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Science 300, 1538–1542.
   Google Scholar
• Keeling, C. D. and Whorf, T. P. 2002. Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, R. A. 1999. Big El Nino events ride on the back of slower climate change. Science 283, 1108–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, C. 2000. Biosphere responses to CO2-enrichment. Ecol Appl. 10, 1590–1619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucht, W., Prentice, I. C., Myneni, R. B., Stich, S., Friedlingstein, P. and co-authors 2002. Climatic control of the high latitude vegetation greening trend and the Pinatubo effect. Science 296, 1687–1689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Wan, S., Hui, D. and Wallace, L. 2001. Acclimation of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie. Nature 413, 622–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi, Y. and Grace, J. 2000. Tropical forests and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Trends. Ecol. Evol 15, 332–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myneni, R. B., Dong, J. and Tucker, C. J. 2001. A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14 784-14 789.
   Google Scholar
• Nemani, R., White, M., Thornton, R, Nishida, K., Reddy, S. and co-authors 2002. Recent trends in hydrologic balance have enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink in the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 10.1029/2002GL014867.
   Google Scholar
• New, M., Hulme, M. and Jones, P. D. 2001. Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability: II: development of a 1901-96 monthly grid of terrestrial surface climate. J. Climate 13, 212–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. E., Some, B. and Kane, B. 2001. An analysis of re-cent rainfall conditions in west Arica, including the rainy seasons of the 1997 El Nino and the 1998 La Nina years. J. Climate 3, 2628–2640.
   Google Scholar
• Post, W. M., Emanuel, W. R., Zinke, P. J. and Stangenberger, A. G. 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298, 156–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, I. C., Farquhar, G. D., Fasham, M. J. R., Heimann M. L., Jaramillo, V. J. and co-authors 2001. In: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (eds T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden et al). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 183–237
   Google Scholar
• Prince, S .D. and Goward, S. N. 1995. Global primary production: a remote sensing approach. J. Biogeog. 22, 815–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robock, A., Konstantin, Y. V, Srinivasan, G., Entin, J. K., Hollinger, S. E. and co-authors 2000. The global soil moisture data bank. Bull. Am. Meteorol Soc. 81, 1281–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustad, L. E. and Norby, R. J. 2002. In: The Earth System: Biological and Ecological Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (eds H. A. Mooney and J. G. Canadell). John Wiley, Chichester, 575–581.
   Google Scholar
• Schimel, D. S., House, J. I., Hibbard, J. I., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P. and co-authors 2001. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 414, 169–172.
   Google Scholar
• Schimel, D., Melillo, J., Tian, H., Guire A., Kicklighter, D. and co-authors 2000. Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to car-bon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science 287, 2004.-2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezzi, E. and Valentini, R. (eds) 2003. CarboEurope-GHG: Temporal and Spatial Resolution of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe. The European Commission, Research Program Environment and Sustain-able Development, Foligno, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Stenseth, N. C., Mysterud, A., Ottersen, G., Hurrell, J. W., Chan, K. S. and co-authors 2002. Ecological effects of climate fluctuations. Science 297, 1292–1296.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. V, Randerson, J. T., Malmstrom, C. M. and Field C. B. 1996. Change in net primary production and heterotrophic respiration: how much is necessary to sustain the terrestrial carbon sink? Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 10, 711–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wofsy, S. C. and Harriss, R. C. 2002. The North American Carbon Program (NACP), Report of the NACP Committee of the US Intera-gency Carbon Cycle Science Program. US Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wolter, K. and Timlin, M. S. 1998. Measuring the strength of ENSO-how does 1997/98 rank? Weather 53, 315–324.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, F. I., Smith, T. M. and Emanuel, W. R. 1995. A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 9,471–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar