Spaceborne observations of low surface aerosol concentrations in the Stockholm region

References

• Al-Saadi J., Szykman J., Pierce R. B., Kittaka C., Neil D., co-authors. Improving national air quality forecasts with satellite aerosol observations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2005; 86: 1249–1261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-9-1249.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson J. O. , Thundiyil J. G. , Stolbach A . Clearing the air: a review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health. J. Med. Toxicol. 2012; 8: 166–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ångström A . The parameters of atmospheric turbidity. Tellus. 1964; 16: 64–75.
   Google Scholar
• Areskoug H . Bestämning av PM10 – En jämförelse av de vanligaste mätmetoderna använda i Sverige och den europeiska referensmetoden [Measurements of PM10 – A Comparison of the Most Common Methods Used in Sweden with the European Reference Method]. 2007; Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University (in Swedish),. ITM report 168.
   Google Scholar
• Baars H., Kanitz T., Engelmann R., Althausen D., Heese B., co-authors. An overview of the first decade of PollyNET: an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016; 16: 5111–5137. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Boys B. L., Martin R. V., Van Donkelaar A., MacDonell R. J., Hsu N. C., co-authors. Fifteen-year global time series of satellite-derived fine particulate matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014; 48: 11109–11118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502113p.
   Google Scholar
• CALIPSO Data User's Guide. 2015. Online at: http://www-calipso.larc.nasa.gov/resources/calipso_users_guide/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnovsky A., Tang C., Lyapustin A., Wang Y., Schwartz J., co-authors. A critical assessment of high-resolution aerosol optical depth retrievals for fine particulate matter predictions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013; 13: 10907–10917. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10907-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher S. A., Gupta P. Satellite remote sensing of particulate matter air quality: the cloud-cover problem. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2010; 60: 596–602. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.5.596.
   Google Scholar
• Crumeyrolle S., Chen G., Ziemba L., Beyersdorf A., Thornhill L., co-authors. Factors that influence surface PM2.5 values inferred from satellite observations: perspective gained for the US Baltimore/Washington metropolitan area during DISCOVER-AQ. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014; 14: 2139–2153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2139-2014.
   Google Scholar
• DiNicolantonio W., Cacciari A., Tomasi C. Particulate matter at surface: Northern Italy monitoring based on satellite remote sensing, meteorological fields, and in-situ Samplings. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 2009; 2: 284–292. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2033948.
   Google Scholar
• Engel-Cox J. A. , Holloman C. H. , Coutant B. W. , Hoff R. M . Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality. Atmos. Environ. 2004; 38: 2495–2509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidhagen L., Johansson C., Langner J., Olivares G. Simulation of NOx and ultrafine particles in a street canyon in Stockholm, Sweden. Atmos. Environ. 2004; 40: 2029–2044. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.014.
   Google Scholar
• Glantz P., Kokhanovsky A., Von Hoyningen-Huene W., Johansson C. Estimating PM2.5 over southern Sweden using space-borne optical measurements. Atmos. Environ. 2009; 43: 5838–5846. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.017.
   Google Scholar
• Glantz P., Tesche M. Assessment of two aerosol optical thickness retrieval algorithms applied to MODIS Aqua and Terra measurements in Europe. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2012; 5: 1727–1740. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1727-2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff R. M., Christopher S. A. Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: have we reached the promised land?. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2009; 59: 645–675. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.6.645.
   Google Scholar
• Holben B. N. , Eck T. F. , Slutsker I. , Tanré D. , Buis J. P. , co-authors . AERONET – a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization. Rem. Sens. Environ. 1998; 66: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison K. D . Applications of MODIS satellite data and products for monitoring air quality in the state of Texas. Atmos. Environ. 2003; 37: 2403–2412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson C., Norman M., Gidhagen L. Spatial & temporal variations of PM10 and particle number concentrations in urban air. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007; 127: 477–487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9296-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kacenelenbogen M., Léon J.-F., Chiapello I., Tanré D. Characterization of aerosol pollution events in France using groundbased and POLDER-2 satellite data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006; 6: 4843–4849. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4843–2006.
   Google Scholar
• Künzli N., Kaiser R., Medina S., Studnicka M., Chanel O., co-authors. Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment. Lancet. 2000; 356: 795–801. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02653-2.
   Google Scholar
• Levy R. C., Mattoo S., Munchak L. A., Remer L. A., Sayer A. M., co-authors. The collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2013; 6: 2989–3034. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Li J., Carlson B. E., Lacis A. A. How well do satellite AOD observations represent the spatial and temporal variability of PM2.5 concentration for the United States?. Atmos. Environ. 2015; 102: 260–273. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.010.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y., Sarnat J. A., Kilaru V., Jacob D. J., Koutrakis P. Estimating ground-level PM 2.5 in the eastern United States using satellite remote sensing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005; 39: 3269–3278. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es049352m.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston J. M., Redemann J., Shinozuka Y., Johnson R., Russell P. B., co-authors. Comparison of MODIS 3 km and 10 km resolution aerosol optical depth retrievals over land with airborne sunphotometer measurements during ARCTAS summer 2008. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014; 14: 2015–2038. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2015-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Munchak L. A., Levy R. C., Mattoo S., Remer L. A., Holben B. N., co-authors. MODIS 3 km aerosol product: applications over land in an urban/suburban region. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2013; 6: 1747–1759. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1747-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Paciorek C. J., Liu Y. Limitations of remotely sensed aerosol as a spatial proxy for fine particulate matter. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009; 117: 904–909. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800360.
   Google Scholar
• Patashnick H. , Rupprecht E. G . Continuous PM-10 measurements using the tapered element oscillating microbalance. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 1991; 41: 1079–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier B., Santer R., Vidot J. Retrieving of particulate matter from optical measurements: a semiparametric approach. J. Geophys. Res. 2007. ; 112 , D06208. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006737.
   Google Scholar
• Remer L. A., Kaufman Y. J., Tanré D., Mattoo S., Chu D. A., co-authors. The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation. J. Atmos. Sci. 2005; 62 , 947–973. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAS3385.1.
   Google Scholar
• Remer L. A., Kleidman R. G., Levy R. C., Kaufman Y. J., Tanré D., co-authors. Global aerosol climatology from the MODIS satellite sensors. J. Geophys. Res. 2008; 113 , D14S07. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009661.
   Google Scholar
• Remer L. A., Mattoo S., Levy R. C., Munchak L. A. MODIS 3 km aerosol product: algorithm and global perspective. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2013; 6: 1829–1844. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1829-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap M., Apituley A., Timmermans R. M. A., Koelemeijer R. B. A., de Leeuw G. Exploring the relation between aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 at Cabauw, the Netherlands. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009; 9: 909–925. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-909-2009.
   Google Scholar
• Snider G., Weagle C. L., Martin R. V., van Donkelaar A., Conrad K., co-authors. SPARTAN: a global network to evaluate and enhance satellite-based estimates of ground-level particulate matter for global health applications. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015; 8: 505–521. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-505-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tunved P., Hansson H.-C., Kulmala M., Aalto P., Viisanen Y., co-authors. One year boundary layer aerosol size distribution data from five Nordic background stations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2003; 3: 2183–2205. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-2183-2003.
   Google Scholar
• Van Donkelaar A., Martin R. V., Brauer M., Kahn R., Levy R., co-authors. Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: development and application. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010; 118: 847–855. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901623.
   Google Scholar
• Van Donkelaar A., Martin R. V., Park R. J. Estimating ground-level PM2.5 with aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing. J. Geophys. Res. 2006; 111 , D21201. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006996.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J., Christopher S. A. Intercomparison between satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: implications for air quality studies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003; 30 , 2095. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018174.
   Google Scholar
• Winker D. M. , Vaughan M. A. , Omar A. , Hu Y. , Powell K. A. , co-authors . Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP data processing algorithms. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 2009; 26: 2310–2323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide. 2005; Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press,. Global update 2005. Summary of risk assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H., Hoff R. M., Engel-Cox J. A. The relation between moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 over the United States: a geographical comparison by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regions. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2009; 59: 1358–1369. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.11.1358.
   Google Scholar