Coupling an aerosol box model with one-dimensional flow: a tool for understanding observations of new particle formation events

References

• Asmi E. , Kivekäs N. , Kerminen V.-M. , Komppula M. , Hyvärinen A.-P. , co-authors . Secondary new particle formation in Northern Finland Pallas site between the years 2000 and 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011; 11: 12959–12972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birmili W., Berresheim H., Plass-Dülmer C., Elste T., Gilge S., co-authors. The Hohenpeissenberg aerosol formation experiment (HAFEX): a long-term study including size-resolved aerosol, H2SO4, OH, and monoterpenes measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2003; 3: 361–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-361-2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bonn B., Sun S., Haunold W., Sitals R., van Beesel E., co-authors. COMPASS – COMparative particle formation in the atmosphere using portable simulation chamber study techniques. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2013; 6: 3407–3423. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3407-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Boulon J., Sellegri K., Hervo M., Picard D., Pichon J.-M., co-authors. Investigation of nucleation events vertical extent: a long term study at two different altitude sites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011; 11: 5625–5639. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5625-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Crippa P. , Pryor S. C . Spatial and temporal scales of new particle formation events in eastern North America. Atmos. Environ. 2013; 75: 257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Maso M. , Kulmala M. , Riipinen I. , Wagner R. , Hussein T. , co-authors . Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland. Boreal Environ. Res. 2005; 10: 323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draxler R. R. , Hess G. D . An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system of trajectories, dispersion, and deposition. Aust. Meteor. Mag. 1998; 47: 295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein T. , Junninen H. , Tunved P. , Kristensson A. , Dal Maso M. , co-authors . Time span and spatial scale of regional new particle formation events over Finland and Southern Sweden. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009; 9: 4699–4716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson M. Z . Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modelling. 2005; Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 2nd ed ISBN: 0 521 54865 9.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong C.-H. , Evans G. J. , McGuire M. L. , Chang R. Y.-W. , Abbatt J. P. D. , co-authors . Particle formation and growth at five rural and urban sites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010; 10: 7979–7995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl M., Leck C., Gross A., Pirjola L. A study of new particle formation in the marine boundary layer over the central Arctic Ocean using a flexible multicomponent aerosol dynamic model. Tellus B. 2012; 64: 17158. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.17158.
   Google Scholar
• Kerminen V.-M., Lihavainen H., Komppula M., Viisanen Y., Kulmala M. Direct observational evidence linking atmospheric aerosol formation and cloud droplet activation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005; 32: L14803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023130.
   Google Scholar
• Kerminen V.-M. , Pirjola L. , Kulmala M . How significantly does coagulational scavenging limit atmospheric particle production?. J. Geophys. Res. 2001; 125: 24110–24125.
   Google Scholar
• Komppula M. , Sihto S.-L. , Korhonen H. , Lihavainen H. , Kerminen V.-M. , Kulmala M. , Viisanen Y . New particle formation in air mass transported between two measurement sites in Northern Finland. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006; 6: 2811–2824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen H., Lehtinen K. E. J., Kulmala M. Multicomponent aerosol dynamics model UHMA: model development and validation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2004; 4: 757–771. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-757-2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensson A. , Johansson M. , Swietlicki E. , Kivekäs N. , Hussein T. , co-authors . NanoMap: geographical mapping of atmospheric new-particle formation through analysis of particle number size distribution and trajectory data. Boreal Env. Res. 2014; 19(Suppl B): 329–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulmala M., Kontkanen J., Junninen H., Lehtipalo K., Manninen H. E., co-authors. Direct observations of atmospheric aerosol nucleation. Science. 2013; 339: 943–946. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Kulmala M., Laakso L., Lehtinen K. E. J., Riipinen I., Dal Maso M., co-authors. Initial steps of aerosol growth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2004b; 4: 2553–2560. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2553-2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kulmala M., Vehkamäki H., Petäjä T., Dal Maso M., Lauri A., co-authors. Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations. J. Aerosol Sci. 2004a; 35(2):143–176. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen K. E. J., Dal Maso M., Kulmala M., Kerminen V.-M. Estimating nucleation rates from apparent particle formation rates and vice versa: revised formulation of the Kerminen–Kulmala equation. J. Aerosol Sci. 2007; 38(9):988–994. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen K. E. J. , Kulmala M . A model for particle formation and growth in the atmosphere with molecular resolution in size. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2003; 3: 251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppä J. , Anttila T. , Kerminen V.-M. , Kulmala M. , Lehtinen K. E. J . Atmospheric new particle formation: real and apparent growth of neutral and charged particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011; 11: 4939–4955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makelä J. M. , Aalto P. , Jokinen V. , Pohja T. , Nissinen A. , co-authors . Observations of ultrafine aerosol particle formation and growth in boreal forest. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1997; 24: 1219–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson E. D. , Rannik Ü. , Kulmala M. , Buzorius G. , O'Dowd C. D . Effects of continental boundary layer evolution, convection, turbulence and entrainment, on aerosol formation. Tellus B. 2001; 53: 441–461.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dowd C. D., Monahan C., Dall'Osto M. On the occurrence of open ocean particle production and growth events. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010; 37(19):L19805. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044679.
   Google Scholar
• Riipinen I., Yli-Juuti T., Pierce J. R., Petäjä T., Worsnop D. R., co-authors. The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth. Nat. Geosci. 2012; 5: 453. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1499.
   Google Scholar
• Roldin P., Swietlicki E., Schurgers G., Arneth A, Lehtinen K. E. J., Boy M., Kulmala M. Development and evaluation of the aerosol dynamics and gas phase chemistry model ADCHEM Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011; 11: 5867–5896. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5867-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Stanier C. , Khlystov A. , Pandis S . Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS). Atmos Environ. 2004; 38: 3275–3284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg M. R., McMurry P. H., Sakurai H., Smith J. N., Mauldin R. L., III, co-authors. Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta. J. Geophys. Res. 2005; 110: D22S05. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005935.
   Google Scholar
• Väänänen R. , Kyrö E.-M. , Nieminen T. , Kivekäs N. , Junninen H. , co-authors . Analysis of particle size distribution changes between three measurement sites in northern Scandinavia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013; 13: 11887–11903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehner B. , Siebert H. , Stratmann F. , Tuch T. , Wiedensohler A. , co-authors . Horizontal homogeneity and vertical extent of new particle formation events. Tellus B. 2007; 59: 362–371.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedensohler A. , Birmili W. , Nowak A. , Sonntag A. , Weinhold K. , co-authors . Mobility particle size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2012; 5: 657–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar