References
- Baumert , K. 1999 . “ Understanding additionality. ” . In Promoting Development While Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Trends and Baselines. Edited by: Goldemberg , J. and Reid , W. 135 – 143 . New York
- Bedi , C. 1994 . “ No regrets under joint implementation? ” . In Joint Implementation of Climate Change Commitments. Edited by: Ghosh , P. and Puri , J. 103 – 107 . New Delhi
- Chayes , A. and Chayes , A. H. 1995 . The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge : Harvard University Press .
- Chomitz , K. 1998 . Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Through DSM Projects: Lessons Learned from DSM Evaluation in the United States. Washington : World Bank .
- DeSombre , E. R. and Kaufmann , J. 1996 . “ The montreal protocol multilateral fund: partial success story. ” . In Institutions for Environemntal Aid. Edited by: Keohane , R. O. and Levy , M. A. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
- Fankhauser , S. 1999 . The GEF Incremental Cost Framework—Experience from Climate Change Projects London
- Grubb , M. , Vrolijk , C. and Brack , D. 1998 . The Kyoto Protocol. London : Earthscan .
- International Energy Agency . 1997 . Activities Implemented Jointly—Partnerships for Climate and Development Paris
- ILO . 2000 . http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/norm/sources/glossry.htm# Glossary in ILO homepage. Accessed August 2000
- Imai , H. , Akita , J. , Niizawa , H. and Sawa , T. 1999 . Some Consistency and Incentive Issues in CDM Kyoto
- Ishii , A. 2000 . Implementation of the protocols of the conventiion on long range transboundary air pollution. 82 – 89 . Japan : In: World Enviromental Policies, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI) . (in Japanese)
- Levy , M. 1995 . “ European acid rain: the power of tote-board diplomacy. ” . In Institutions for the Earth: Source of Effective International Environmental Protection. Edited by: Haas , P. , Keohane , R. O. and Levy , M. A. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
- Meyers , S. 1999 . Additionality of emissions reductions from clean development mechanism projects: issues and options for project-level assessment. LBNL-43704 Berkeley
- Michaelowa , A. 1998 . Joint implementation— the baseline issue. . Global Environmental Change , 8 ( 1 ) : 81 – 92 .
- Nadel , S. , Reid , M. and Wolcott , D. , eds. 1992 . Regulatory Incentives for Demand-Side Management. Washington, DC, Berkeley : American Council for an Energy Ef cient Economy .
- Philibert , C. 1999 . Think Piece on the Additionality under the CDM Paris
- Rentz , H. 1998 . Joint implementation and the question of additionality—a proposal for a pragmatic approach to identify possible joint implementation projects. . Energy Policy , 4 : 275 – 279 .
- Rolfe , C. 1998 . Additionality: What is it? Does it Matter? Vancouver.
- Sugiyama , T. and Michaelowa , A. 2000 . What must COP6 decide?: Extended e xibility backed by transparency and responsibility. CRIEPI Working Paper Y99911, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry
- UN Framework Convention on Climate Change . 1997 . Kyoto protocol to theUnited Nations framework convention on climate change. FCCC/CP/L.7/Add.1 Kyoto
- Varming , S. , Larsen , P. and Christensen , B. 1998 . “ Possibilities of AIJ: two Polish cases. ” . In Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Technologies for Activities Implemented Jointly. Amsterdam Edited by: Riemer , P. , Smith , A. and Thambimuthu , K. 529 – 534 .
- Victor , D. 1998 . “ The operation and effectiveness of the montreal protocol's non-compliance procedure. ” . In The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments. Edited by: Victor , D. , Raustiala , K. and Skolnikoff , E. B. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
- Wettestad , J. 1998 . “ Participation in NOx policy-making and implementation in The Netherlands, UK, and Norway: different approaches but similar results? ” . In The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments. Edited by: Victor , D. , Raustiala , K. and Skolnikoff , E. B. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .