References
- Kopans DB. Screening for breast cancer. In: Kopans DB. Breast imaging. 2d ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998: 55–100
- Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH, et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age: new results from the Swedish Two-County Trial. Cancer 1995; 75(10): 2507–17
- Black WC, Welch HG. Screening for disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168(1): 3–11
- Feig SA. Estimation of currently attainable benefit from mammo-graphie screening of women aged 40–49 years. Cancer 1995; 75(10): 2412–9
- Smart CR, Hendrick RE, Rutledge JH 3d, et al. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 years: current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Cancer 1995; 75(7): 1619–26
- Rogers LF. The mammography muddle. (Editorial) AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168(5): 1151
- Kopans DB. The breast cancer screening controversy: lessons to be learned. (Editorial) J Surg Oncol 1998; 67(3): 143–50
- Monsees BS. Assessment of the recent consensus development panel on screening women aged 40–49 for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169(3): 625–6
- Cardenosa G. What age should routine mammography be commenced? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168(5): 1377–8
- Bassett L. Incorporating new technologies into clinical practice. Radiology 1998; 206(2): 301–3
- Williams MB, Pisano ED, Schnall MD, et al. Future directions in imaging of breast diseases. Radiology 1998; 206(2): 297–300
- Hall FM. Sonography of the breast: controversies and opinions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169(6): 1635–6
- Jackson VP. Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography? (Editorial) Radiology 1995; 196(l): 14–5
- Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 1997; 24(2): 94–108
- American College of Radiology. Assessment categories. In: American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (Illustrated BI-RADS). Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998: 179–81
- Rubin E, Dempsey PJ, Pile NS, et al. Needle-localization biopsy of the breast: impact of a selective core needle biopsy program on yield. Radiology 1995; 195(3): 627–31
- Feig SA, D' Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171 (1): 29–33
- Field LR, Wilson TE, Strawderman M, et al. Mammo-graphie screening in women more than 64 years old: a comparison of 1- and 2-year intervals. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170(4): 961–5
- Byers T, Costanza ME, Kattlove H. Screening mammography: when should it stop? Cancer Pract 1997; 5(1): 52–4
- Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186(3): 275–83
- Piccoli CW, Feig SA, Vaia MA. Breast imaging case of the day: benign intraductal papilloma with focal atypical papillomatous hyperplasia. Radiographics 1998; 18(3): 783–6
- Berg WA. When is core breast biopsy or fine-needle aspiration not enough? (Editorial) Radiology 1996; 198(2): 313–5
- Parker SH, Klaus AJ. Performing a breast biopsy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiographics 1997; 17(5): 1233–52