References
- Sigman M, Lipshultz LI, Howards SS. Evaluation of the subfertile male. In: Lipshultz LI, Howards SS, eds. Infertility in the male. 3d ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1997: 173–93
- Sandlow JI, Sparks AE. Evaluation of the male in couples seeking reproductive assistance: going beyond the seminal fluid analysis. Assist Reprod Rev 1998; 8: 36–9
- Jarow JP. Life-threatening conditions associated with male infertility. Urol Clin North Am 1994; 21(3): 409–15
- Sigman M, Jarow JP. Endocrine evaluation of infertile men. Urology 1997; 50(5): 659–64
- Tulloch WS. Varicocele in subfertility: results of treatment. Br Med J 1955; 2: 356–8
- Finkel DM, Phillips JL, Snyder PJ. Stimulation of spermatogenesis by gonadotropins in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. N Engl J Med 1985; 313(11): 651–5
- Fogdestam I, Fall M, Nilsson S. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy in the treatment of occlusive azoospermia. Fertil Steril 1986; 46(5): 925–9
- Jones HW Jr, Toner JP. The infertile couple. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1710–5
- Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993; 59(3): 613–6
- Pryor JL, Kent-First M, Muallem A, et al. Microdeletions in the Y chromosome of infertile men. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 534–9
- Kliesch S, Behre HM, Nieschlag E. High efficacy of gonadotropin or pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal men. Eur J Endocrinol 1994; 131: 347–54
- Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocelectomy: 986 cases in a twelve-year study. Urology 1977; 10(5): 446–9
- Belker AM, Thomas AJ Jr, Fuchs EF, et al. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol 1991; 145(3): 505–11
- Greenberg SH, Lipshultz LI, Wein AJ. Experience with 425 subfertile male patients. J Urol 1978; 119: 507–10
- Weinbauer GF, Gromoll J, Simoni M, et al. Physiology of testicular function. In: Nieschlag E, Behre HM, eds. Andrology: male reproductive health and dysfunction. Berlin: Springer, 1997: 45–6
- McClure RD, Khoo D, Jarvi K, et al. Subclinical varicocele: the effectiveness of varicocelectomy. J Urol 1991; 145: 789–91
- Wheatley JK, Bergman WA, Green B, et al. Transvenous occlusion of clinical and subclinical varicoceles. Urology 1991; 37: 362–5
- Ivanissevich O. Left varicocele due to reflux: experience with 4,470 operative cases in 42 years. J Int Coll Surg 1960; 34: 742–55
- Palomo A. Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique: preliminary report. J Urol 1949; 61(3): 604–7
- Marmar JL, DeBenedictis TJ, Praiss D. The management of varicoceles by microdis-section of the spermatic cord at the external inguinal ring. Fertil Steril 1985; 43(4): 583–8
- Schlesinger MH, Wilets IF, Nagler HM. Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy. Urol Clin North Am 1994; 21(3): 517–29
- Dubin L, Amelar RD. Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1971; 22(8): 469–74
- Steckel J, Dicker AP, Goldstein M. Relationship between varicocele size and response to varicocelectomy. J Urol 1993; 149: 769–71
- Vazquez-Levin MH, Friedmann P, Goldberg SI, et al. Response of routine semen analysis and critical assessment of sperm morphology by Kruger classification to therapeutic varicocelectomy. J Urol 1997; 158: 1804–7
- Zenni MK, Donovan JF, Sparks AE, et al. The effect of varicocelectomy on strict morphology in men with male factor subfertility. (Abstr) J Urol 1997; 157: 170
- Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, et al. New method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for human in vitro fertilization. Urology 1987; 30(3): 248–51
- Comhaire F. Economic strategies in modern male subfertility treatment. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 103–6
- Schlegel PN. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology 1997; 49: 83–90
- Donovan JF, DiBaise M, Sparks AE, et al. Comparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort? Hum Reprod 1998; 13(2): 387–93