The Current Approach to the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Lessons from PIOPED II

References

• Alpert JS, Dalen JE. Epidemiology and natural history of venous thromboembolism. Progress Cardio Dis. 1994; 36: 417–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalen JE, Alpert JS. Natural history of pulmonary embolism. Progress Cardio Dis. 1975; 17: 259–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Thoracic Society. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism: clinical practice guideline. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 1999; 160: 1043–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128: 663–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACCP Consensus Committee on Pulmonary Embolism. Opinions regarding the diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolic disease. Chest. 1998; 113: 499–504.
   Google Scholar
• Hansell DM. Spiral computed tomography and pulmonary embolism: current state. Clinical Radiology. 1997; 52: 575–581.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker EA, Rivitz SM, Shepard JA, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis. Radiology. 1998; 209: 235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D, et al. Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135: 88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL, et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1997; 205: 447–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rathbun SW, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL. Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132: 227–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng J, Krishnan JA, Segal JB, et al. Accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic literature review. Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183: 1819–1827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou K.H, et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 293: 2012–2017.
   Google Scholar
• Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1760–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, Liu Y, McAuliffe TL, O'Brien DJ. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram-prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology. 2000; 215: 535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al; for the Evaluation du Scanner Spirale dans l'Embolie Pulmonaire Study Group. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet. 2002; 360: 1914–1920.
   Google Scholar
• Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF, Ryu JH, et al. Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002; 77: 130–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourriot K, Couffinhal T, Bernard V, Montaudon M, Bonnet J, Laurent F. Clinical outcome after a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiographic finding in an inpatient population from cardiology and pneumology wards. Chest. 2003; 123: 359–365.
   Google Scholar
• van Strijen MJ, de Monye W, Schiereck J, et al; for the Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism Study Group. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 307–314.
   Google Scholar
• Donato AA, Scheirer JJ, Atwell MS, Gramp J, Duszak R Jr. Clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative helical computed tomographic results in whom anticoagulation was withheld. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 2033–2038.
   Google Scholar
• Moores LK, Jackson WL Jr, Shorr AF, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism managed with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 866–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Cummings M. The effect of single-detector CT versus MDCT on clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative results on CT pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 1231–1235.
   Google Scholar
• Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F, et al. Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Radiology. 2002: 223: 461–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al; for PIOPED II. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 2317–2327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135(2): 98–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PIOPED investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. JAMA. 1990; 263: 2753–2759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006; 295: 172–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruip MJ, Leclercq MG, van der HC, Prins MH, Buller HR. Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138(12): 941–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Committee, Clinical Policies Committee Subcommittee on Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 41(2): 257–270.
   Google Scholar
• British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax. 2003; 58(6): 470–483.
   Google Scholar
• Hull RD, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS, et al. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154: 289–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cogo A, Lensing AW, Koopman MM, et al. Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. Br Med J. 1998; 316: 17–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar