Coronary Revascularization: 2011

References

• . Konstantinov IE, Vasilii I, Kolesov. A surgeon to remember. Tex Heart Inst J. 2004;31:349–358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Takaro T, Peduzzi P, Detre KM, . Survival in subgroups of patients with left main coronary artery disease. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of Surgery for Coronary Arterial Occlusive Disease. Circulation. 1982;66(1):14–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Prospective randomized study of coronary artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris: a progress report on survival. Circulation. 1982;65(7 pt 2):67–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Alderman EL, Bourassa MG, Cohen LS, . Ten-year follow-up of survival and myocardial infarction in the randomized Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Circulation. 1990;82(5):1629–1646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Peduzzi P, Kamina A, Detre K. Twenty-two-year follow-up in the VA Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Stable Angina. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(12):1393–1399
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Veldkamp RF, Valk SD, van Domburg RT, van Herwerden LA, Meeter K. Mortality and repeat interventions up until 20 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery with saphenous vein grafts. A follow-up study of 1041 patients. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(9):747–753
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Stephan WJ, O'Keefe Jr JH, Piehler JM, . Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1140–1146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Morrison DA, Sethi G, Sacks J, ; Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat bypass surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia: AWESOME randomized trial and registry experience with post-CABG patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(11):1951–1954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, ; VA Cooperative Study Group #207/297/364. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(11):2149–2156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Ferguson TB, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Grover FL; STS National Database Committee. A decade of change–risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990–1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(2):480–489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, . Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(1):1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularization on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001;358(9285):870–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Tranbaugh RF, Dimitrova KR, Friedmann P, . Radial artery conduits improve long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(4):1165–1172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Capuano TA, Sullivan K, Rothenberger C, Meeker C, Gallagher-Sabo M, Sebastian M. A benchmark project to improve cost and quality outcomes for CABG patients. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1999;18(1):36–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Foster DA, Heller ST. Associations between outcomes reflecting quality of care and Medicare's Hospital Compare Quality Measures. Presented at: Academy Health Annual Research Meeting; June 3–5, 2007; Orlando, FL
   Google Scholar
• . Halkos ME, Puskas JD. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Surg Clin North Am. 2009;89(4):913–922
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Salzberg SP, Adams DH, Filsoufi F. Coronary artery surgery: conventional coronary artery bypass grafting versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005;20(6):509–516
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, ; Octopus Study Group. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation. 2001;104(15):1761–1766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2002;359(9313):1194–1199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Légaré JF, Buth KJ, King S, . Coronary bypass surgery performed off pump does not result in lower in-hospital morbidity than coronary artery bypass grafting performed on pump. Circulation. 2004;109(7):887–892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, . A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(1):21–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, ; Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(19):1827–1837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Martens TP, Argenziano M, Oz MC. New technology for surgical coronary revascularization. Circulation. 2006;114(6):606–614
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Subramanian VA, Patel NU, Patel NC, Loulmet DF. Robotic assisted multivessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with port-access stabilization and cardiac positioning: paving the way for outpatient coronary surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(5):1590–1596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Srivastava S, Gadasalli S, Agusala M, . Use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in CABG through lateral thoracotomy with robotic assistance in 150 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(3):800–806
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, . Endoscopic versus open veingraft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(3):235–244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Gruentzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary artery stenoses: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(2):61–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . King SB. 50th anniversary historical article. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(3):615–617
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Hartzler GO. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in multi-vessel disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1983;9;537–541
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, Joffre F, Kappenberger L. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(12):701–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, Joffre F, Kappenberger L. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(12):701–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, . A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(8):489–495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, . Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(14):1315–1323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, . The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(6):1110–1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Parisi AF, Folland ED, Hartigan P. A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(1):10–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Helton TJ, Borek PP, Mood GR, Bhatt DL. Late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Med. 2006;119(12):1056–1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Hollman J, Simpfendorfer C, Franco I, Whitlow P, Goormastic M. Multivessel and single-vessel coronary angioplasty: a comparative study. Am Heart J. 1992;124(1):9–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Hueb W, Lopes N, Gersh BJ, . Ten-year follow-up survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2010;122(10):949–957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, ; Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Group. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multi-vessel disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(16):1117–1124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . ; The BARI 2D Study GroupFrye RL, August P, . A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2503–2515
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . The BARI Investigators. The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(15):1600–1606
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Dauerman HL. Percutaneous coronary intervention, diabetes mellitus, and death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(11):1076–1079
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Jacobs AK. Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction—is it worth the wait? N Engl J Med. 2003;349(8):798–800
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361(9351):13–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Mehta RH, Lopes RD, Ballotta A, . Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease? Am Heart J. 2010;159(1):141–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm. Circulation. 2003;107(24):2998–3002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Ben-Gal Y, Moses JW, Mehran R, . Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization for multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(10):1059–1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . O'Keefe JH Jr, Hartzler GO, Rutherford BD, . Left main coronary angioplasty: early and late results of 127 acute and elective procedures. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64(3):144–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Bentivoglio LG, VanRaden MJ, Kelsey SF, Detre KM. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with relative contraindications: results of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute PTCA registry. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53(12):82C–88C
   Google Scholar
• . Seung KB, Park DW, Kim YH, . Stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(17):1781–1792
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Morice, MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, . Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation. 2010;121(24):2645–2653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Meier B. Kissing balloon coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:918–920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Colombo A, Bramucci E, Saccà S, . Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations. The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. Circulation. 2009;119(1):71–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Hakeem A, Khan FM, Bhatti S, . Provisional vs complex stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions: meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21(11):589–595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Movahed MR. Coronary artery bifurcation lesion classifications, interventional techniques and clinical outcome. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2008;6(2):261–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Latib A, Colombo A, Sangiorgi GM. Bifurcation stenting: current strategies and new devices. Heart. 2009;95(6):495–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Grantham JA, Marso SP, Spertus J, House J, Holmes DR, Rutherford BD. Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(6):479–486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Saito S. Different strategies of retrograde approach in coronary angioplasty for chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71(1):8–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Hsu JT, Tamai H, Kyo E, Tsuji T, Watanabe S. Traditional antegrade approach versus combined antegrade and retrograde approach in the percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74(4):555–563
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Pijls NH, De Bruyne B. Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserve. Heart. 1998;80(6):539–542
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, ; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, ; SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(10):961–972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Seung KB, Park DW, Kim YH, . Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1781–1792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Grover FL, Shroyer AL, Hammermeister K, . A decade's experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons national databases. Ann Surg. 2001;234(4):464–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Carey JS, Danielsen B, Gold JP, Rossiter SJ. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(6):1276–1282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Ferris T, Torchiana D. Public release of clinical outcomes data–online CABG report cards. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(17):1593–1595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Zunis. A risk score to predict in-hospital mortality for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. http://www.zunis.org/CABG%20Risk%20Calculator.htm. Accessed January 10, 2011
   Google Scholar
• . Hannan EL, Wu C, Bennett EV, . Risk stratification of in-hospital mortality for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3):661–668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . The Heart.org. PCI gains ground for left main and multivessel disease in new ESC revascularization guidelines. http://www.theheart.org/article/1114187.do. Accessed December 15, 2010
   Google Scholar
• . ; European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular InterventionsWijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, . Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2010;31(20):2501–2555
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC, . 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(23):2205–2241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Kumbhani D, Cannon C, Fonarow G. Association of hospital primary angioplasty volume in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with quality and outcomes. JAMA. 2009;302(20):2207–2213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Post PN, Kuijpers M, Ebels T, Zijlstra F. The relation between volume and outcome of coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(16):1985–1992
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Wijns W, Kolh PH. Experience with revascularization procedures does matter: low volume means worse outcome. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(16):1954–1957
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . Peterson ED, Coombs LP, DeLong ER, Haan CK, Ferguson TB. Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. JAMA. 2004;291(2):195–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Movahed MR, Hashemzadeh M, Jamal MM, Ramaraj R. Decreasing in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with persistent higher mortality rates in women and minorities in the United States. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22(2):58–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Hemingway H, Crook AM, Feder G, . Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(9):645–665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• . HowStuffWorks. http://health.howstuffworks.com/medicine/surgeries-procedures/minimally-invasive-heart-surgery2.htm. Published 2008. Accessed January 31, 2010
   Google Scholar