Uncertainty modelling of service life and environmental performance to reduce risk in building design decisions

References

• Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB). 2006. Durability in buildings. Guidline document. Australia, Canberra: Australian Building Codes Board. 23 p.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, G. R.; Mc Duling, J. J.; Parsons, S.; Schoeman, J. C. 2007. Building condition assessment: a performance evaluation tool towards sustainable asset management, in CIB World Congress “Construction for Development”, 14–18 May 2007, Cape Town, South Africa, 649–662
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A. 1996. Estimating the life expectancies of building components in life-cycle costing calculations, Structural Survey 14(2): 4–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02630809610122730
   Google Scholar
• Balaras, A.; Droutsa, K.; Dascalaki, E.; Kontoyiannidis, S. 2005. Deterioration of European apartment buildings, Energy and Buildings 37(5): 515–527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. W. 1994. Statistical analysis for engineers and scientists. A computer based approach. New York: McGrawHill. 396 p.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, R.; Giarma, C. S.; Bikas, D. K.; Kontoleon, K.; Gervásio, H. 2007. Life cycle assessment – general methodology, in First Workshop COST Action C25: Sustainability of Constructions, 2007, Lisbon, Portugal, 1.3–1.9.
   Google Scholar
• BS 7543:1992 Guide to durability of buildings and building elements, products and components. London: British Standards Institution, 2003. 45 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravarti, I. M.; Laha, R. G.; Roy, J. 1967. Handbook of methods of applied statistics. vol. I New York: John Wiley and Sons. 419 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, J. L.; LeTeno, J. F. 1996. Requirements for an LCAbased model for the evaluation of the environmental quality of building products, Building and Environment 31(5): 487–491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(96)00016-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciroth, A. 2004. Uncertainties in life cycle assessment, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(3): 141–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02994186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniotti, B. 2003. Durability evaluation and control to prevent building pathologies, in The 2nd International Symposium on Pathology, Durability and Rehabilitation of Buildings – Learning from Construction Errors and Defects, 6–8 November 2003, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal, 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Daniotti, B.; Paolini, R. 2005. Durability design of external thermal insulation composite systems with rendering, in The 10th DBMC International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 17–20 April 2005, Lyon, France, 269–276.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2000. Commission decision of 3 May 2000 replacing Decision 94/3/EC establishing a list of wastes pursuant to Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and Council Decision 94/904/EC establishing a list of hazardous waste pursuant to Article 1(4) of Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste. 2000/532/EC. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ekvall, T. 2005. SETAC summaries, Journal of Cleaner Production 13(13–14): 1351–1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, M.; Borg, M. 2003. Generic LCA – methodology applicable for buildings, constructions and operation services – today practice and development needs, Building and Environment 38(7): 919–938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(03)00031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2008. Exploring data. Research methods in psychology. Course C8057. Sussex: University of Sussex, School of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• FprEN 15643-2:2010 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of buildings – Part 2: Framework for the assessment of environmental performance. Belgium: Comité européen de Normalisation, 2010. 22 p.
   Google Scholar
• FprEN 15978:2010 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of environmental performance of buildings – Calculation methods. Belgium: Comité européen de Normalisation, 2010. 32 p.
   Google Scholar
• FprEN 15804:2011 Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of construction products. Belgium: Comité européen de Normalisation, 2011. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• Frohnsdorff, G. J.; Sjöström, C. H.; Soronis, G. 1999. International standards for service life planning of buildings, in The 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, May 30 – June 3, 1999, Vancouver, Canada, 1537–1542.
   Google Scholar
• Gakkai, N. K. 1993. The English edition of principal guide for service life planning of buildings. Commented edition. Tokyo: Architectural Institute of Japan. 554 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar, P. 2009. Service life of buildings: methodology for service life prediction of building components. Application to external cement-renders. PhD thesis in engineering Sciences. Lisbon: instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon ( in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar, P. L.; de Brito, J. 2008. Quantifying environmental effects on cement-rendered facades: a comparison between different degradation indicators, Building and Environment 43(11): 1818–1828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar, P. L.; de Brito, J. 2011. Limit states and service life of cement renders on façades, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 23(10): 1396–1404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCe)MT.1943-5533.0000312
   Google Scholar
• Hed, G. 1999. Service life planning of building components, in The 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, May 30 – June 3 1999, Vancouver, Canada, 1543–1551.
   Google Scholar
• Heijungs, R.; Haes, H. U. D.; White, P.; Golden, J. 2008. Module k – Uncertainty in LCA. United Nations environment Programme. Presentation. 32 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, N. A.; van Nunen, H.; Erkelens, P. A. 2004. Application of the improved factor method to the Environmental impact assessment of buildings, in Central and Eastern European Conference on Sustainable Building (SB04), 2004, Warsaw, Poland, . 12 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. C. W.; Lo, S. M.; Yiu, C. Y.; Yau, L. M. 2004. A survey of materials used in external wall finishes in Hong Kong, Hong Kong Surveyor 15(2): 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hovde, P. J. 2000. Factor methods for service life prediction: a state-of-the-art. Draft Report. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology. 125 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hovde, P. J. 2004. Part A: factor methods for service life prediction. Trondheim, Norway. CIB W080 / RILEM 175-SLM: Service Life Methodologies. Prediction of Service Life for Buildings and Components, Task Group: Performance based methods for service life prediction. State of the Art Reports.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15686-1:2000 Buildings and constructed assets – Service life planning – Part 1: General principles. International Organization for Standardization, 2006. International Organization for Standardization, 2000. 31 p.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15686-2:2001 Building and construction assets – Service life planning – Part 2: Service life prediction procedures. International Organization for Standardization, 2001. 21 p.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15686-6:2004 Buildings and constructed assets – Service life planning – Part 6: Procedures for considering environmental impacts. International Organization for Standardization, 2004. 22 p.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15686-7:2006 Buildings and constructed assets – Service life planning – Part 7: Performance evaluation for feedback of service life data from practice. International Organization for Standardization, 2006. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/DIS 15686-8.2:2006 Buildings and constructed assets – Service life planning – Part 8: Reference service life and service-life estimation. International Organization for Standardization, 2006. 35 p.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, 2006. 20 p.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, 2006. 46 p.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliet, O.; Saadé, M.; Crettaz, P.; Shaked, S. 2010. Analyse du cycle de vie: Comprendre et réaliser un écobilan. Paris: PPUR. 242 p. ( in French).
   Google Scholar
• Kibert, C. J. 2002. Construction ecology: nature as a basis for green buildings. London: Spon Press. 336 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kliukas, R.; Kudzys, A. 2004. Probabilistic durability prediction of existing building elements, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 10(2): 107–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13923730.2004.9636294
   Google Scholar
• Krigsvoll, G.; Fumo, M.; Morbiducci, R. 2007. National and international (ISO and CEN) standardisation relevant for sustainability in construction, in First Workshop COST Action C25: Sustainability of Constructions, September 2007, Lisbon, Portugal, 1.35–1.42.
   Google Scholar
• Kus, H.; Nygren, K.; Norberg, P. 2004. In-use performance assessment of rendered autoclaved concrete walls by long-term moisture monitoring, Building and Environment 39(6): 677–687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacasse, M. A.; Sjöström, C. 2004. Recent advances in methods for service life prediction of buildings materials and components – an overview, in CIB World Building Congress, 2–7 May 2004, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lassandro, P.; Lerario, A.; Maiellaro, N. 2007. An application of LCA methodology to residential building in Italy: support tools for designers, in Portugal SB07. Sustainable Construction, Materials and Practices – Challenge of the Industry for the New Millennium, 7–8 June 2007, Lisbon, Portugal, 273–278.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliefors, H. W. 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown, Journal of the American Statistical Association 68(318): 399–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916
   Google Scholar
• Mc Duling, J.; Horak, P. E.; Cloete, C. 2008. Service life prediction beyond the ‘Factor Method’, in The 11th DBMC International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, May 2008, Istanbul, Turkey, T42.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, K. 1999. Towards the practical evaluation of service life-illustrative application of the probabilistic approach, in The 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 31 May – 3 June 1999, Vancouver, Canada, 1319–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, K. 2004. Engineering design methods for service life prediction, in CIB W80 / RILEM 175 – Service Life Methodologies; Prediction of service life of Buildings and Components, Task Group: Performance based methods of service life prediction. Trondheim, Norway, 52–95.
   Google Scholar
• Motulsky, H. J. 1999. Analyzing data with GraphPad Prism. San Diego, USA: GraphPad Software, Inc. 379 p.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Building Code. New Zealand: Ministry of Business, Innovation and employment, 1992. 88 p.
   Google Scholar
• Nunen, H. V. 2010. Assessment of the sustainability of flexible building. The improved factor method: service life prediction of buildings in the Netherlands, applied to Life Cycle Assessment. PhD Thesis. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, O.; Castellsa, F.; Sonnemann, G. 2009. Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA, Construction and Building Materials 23(1): 28–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozik, D. 2006. Introduction to life cycle assessment. Massachusetts institute of Technology, USA. 45 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. 2003. The social and economic value of construction. The construction industry's contribution to sustainable development. London: nCRISP. 97 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rudbeck, C. 1999. Assessing the service life of building envelope construction, in The 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 30 May – 3 June 1999, Vancouver, Canada, 1051–1061.
   Google Scholar
• Satapathy, S. C.; Murthy, J. V. R.; Reddy, P. V. G. D. P.; Misra, B. B.; Dash, P. K.; Panda, G. 2009. Particle swarm optimized multiple linear regression linear model for data classification, Applied Soft Computing 9(2): 470–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S.; Wilk, M. B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples), Biometrika 52(3–4): 591–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2333709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L. Y.; Wu, Y. Z.; Chan, E. H. W.; Hao, J. L. 2005. Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction projects, Journal of Zhejiang University Science 6A(4): 339–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.A0339
   Google Scholar
• Shohet, I.; Paciuk, M. 2004. Service life prediction of exterior cladding components under standard conditions, Journal of Construction Management and Economics 22(10): 1081–1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000213274
   Google Scholar
• Shohet, I.; Rosenfeld, Y.; Puterman, M.; Gilboa, E. 1999. Deterioration patterns for maintenance management a methodological approach, in The 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 30 May – 3 June 1999, Vancouver, Canada, 1666–1678.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, A.; de Brito, J.; Gaspar, P. 2011a. Service life prediction model applied to natural stone wall claddings (directly adhered to the substrate), Construction and Building Materials 25(9): 3674–3684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, A.; Dias, J.; Gaspar, P.; de Brito, J. 2011b. Service life prediction models for exterior stone cladding, Building Research and Information 39(6): 637–653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.617095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, A.; de Brito, J.; Gaspar, P. 2012. Application of the factor method to maintenance decision support for stone cladding, Automation in Construction 22(3): 165–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, A.; Dias, J. L. R.; Gaspar, P. L.; de Brito, J. 2013. Statistical models applied to service life prediction of rendered façades, Automation in Construction 30, 151–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre, J.; Lasvaux, S. 2012. Development of a methodology for the selection of a coherent life cycle assessment (LCA) data set of construction materials to be used as generic data for a national context: NativeLCA. Grenoble: Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment (CSTB). 88 p.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestre, J. D.; de Brito, J.; Pinheiro, M. D. 2011a. Environmental, energetic and economic life-cycle assessment from ‘Cradle to Cradle’ (3E-C2C) of Building Assemblies, in SB11 Helsinki: World Sustainable Building Conference, 18–21 October, 2011, Helsinki, Finland, 1635–1645.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestre, J. D.; de Brito, J.; Pinheiro, M. D. 2011b. Life-cycle assessment of thermal insulation materials for external walls of buildings, in Cost C25 – International Conference Sustainability of Constructions – Towards a better built environment, 2011, Innsbruck, Austria, 303–310.
   Google Scholar
• S478-95 Guideline on durability in buildings. Canada: CSA Group, 2007. 112 p.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2009. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. USA: South-Western College Publishing, Cengage Learning. 912 p.
   Google Scholar