References
- Anagnostopoulos, K.; Doukas, H.; Psarras, J. 2007. A logic-based fuzzy multicriteria decision support system using the ideal and the anti-ideal solutions: assessing the sustainability of renewable energy policines, Advances in Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2(3): 239–266.
- Aras, H.; Erdogmus, S.; Koc, E. 2004. Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process, Renew Energy 23(13): 83–92.
- Azimi, R.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Fouladgar, M. M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Basiri, M. H. 2011. Ranking the strategies of mining sector through ANP and TOPSIS in a SWOT framework, Journal of Business Economics and Management 12(4): 670–689. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.626552
- Balezentiene, L.; Streimikiene, D.; Balezentis, T. 2013. Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 17(1): 83–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.016
- Banaitiene, N.; Banaitis, A.; Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2008. Evaluating the life cycle of a building: a multivariant and multiple criteria approach, Omega 36: 429–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.10.010
- Beccali, M.; Cellura, M.; Mistretta, M. 2003. Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology, Renewable Energy 28(13): 2063–2087. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00102-2
- Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2006. The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy, Control and Cybernetics 35(2): 443–468.
- Braune, I.; Pinkwart, A.; Reeg, M. 2009. Application of mulit-criteria analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems – a review of recent literature, in 5th Dubrovnic Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems. ISBN 978-953-6313-97-6.
- Cavallaro, F. 2005. An Integrated multi-criteria system to assess sustainable energy options: an application of the Promethee method. FEEM Working Paper No. 22 [online], [cited 11 October 2012]. Available from Internet: http://ssrn.com/abstract=666741
- Cristóbal, J. R. S. 2011. Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method, Renewable Energy 36: 498–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031
- Doukas, H.; Karakosta, CH.; Psarras, J. 2009. A linguistic TOPSIS model to evaluate the sustainability of renewable energy options, International Journal of Global Energy Issues 32(1–2): 102–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2009.027976
- Evans, A.; Strezov, V.; Evans, T. J. 2009. Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(5): 1082–1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008
- Fouladgar, M. M.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Yakhchali, S. H.; Ghasempourabadi, M. H. 2012a. Project portfolio selection using fuzzy AHP and VIKOR techniques, Transformations in Business & Economics 11(25): 213–231.
- Fouladgar, M. M.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Lashgari, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2012b. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 16(1): 85–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.666657
- Fouladgar, M. M.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Moini, S. H. H. 2012c. A new hybrid model for evaluating the working strategies: case study of construction company, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(1): 164–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.667270
- Haralambopoulos, D. A.; Polatidis, H. 2003. Renewable energy projects: structuring a mul-ticriteria group decision-making framework, Renew Energy 28(9): 61–73.
- Heo, E.; Kim, J.; Boo, K. J. 2010. Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(8): 2214–2220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.020
- Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
- Kabir, A. B. M. Z.; Shihan, S. M. A. 2003. Selection of renewable energy sources using analytic hierarchy process, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy Process ISAHP, August 7–9, 2003, Bali, Indonesia, 267–276.
- Kahraman, C.; Cebi, S.; Kaya, I. 2010. Selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design: the case of Turkey, Journal of Universal Computer Science 16(1): 82–102.
- Kahraman, C.; Kaya, İ. 2010. A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives, Expert Systems with Applications 37: 6270–6281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.095
- Kaya, İ.; Kahraman, C. 2011. Evaluation of green and renewable energy system alternatives using a multiple attribute utility model: the case of Turkey, Soft Computing in Green and Renewable Energy Systems: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 269: 157–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22176-7_6
- Kaya, T.; Kahraman, C. 2010. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR and AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul, Energy 35: 2517–2527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051
- Kaya, T.; Kahraman, C. 2011. Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology, Expert Systems with Applications 38: 6577–6585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.081
- Kaltschmitt, M.; Streicher, W.; Wiese, A. 2007. Renewable energy: technology, economics and environment. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
- Lashgari, A.; Fouladgar, M. M.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Skibniewski, M. J. 2011. Using an integrated model for shaft sinking method selection, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 17(4): 569–580. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.628687
- Lashgari, A.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Fouladgar, M. M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Shafiee, S.; Abbate, N. 2012. Equipment selection using fuzzy multi criteria decision making model: key study of Gole Gohar iron mine, Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics 23(2): 125–136.
- Lee, S. K.; Mogi, G.; Kim, J. W. 2009. Decision support for prioritizing energy technologies against high oil prices: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22(6): 915–920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.07.001
- Lee, S. K.; Mogi, G.; Lee, S. K.; Kim, J. W. 2011. Prioritizing the weights of hydrogen energy technologies in the sector of the hydrogen economy by using a fuzzy AHP approach, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36(2): 1897–1902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.035
- MacCrimmon, K. R. 1968. Decision making among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach. RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA.
- Nigim, K.; Munier, N.; Green, J. 2004. Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources, Renewable Energy 29(11): 1775–1791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.012
- Oberschmidt, J.; Geldermann, J.; Ludwig, J.; Schmehl, M. 2010. Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies, International Journal of Energy Sector Management 4(2): 183–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506221011058696
- Opricovic, S. 1998. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering (in Serbian). Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21stCentury (REN21). 2011. Renewables 2011: global status report. 17 p.
- Reza, B.; Sadiq, R.; Hewage, K. 2011. Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: an AHP-based life cycle analysis, Construction and Building Materials 25: 2053–2066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.041
- Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Saaty, T. L. 1994. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, Interfaces 24: 19–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.24.6.19
- Shen, Y. Ch.; Chou, Ch. J.; Lin, G. T. R. 2011. The portfolio of renewable energy sources for achieving the three E policy goals, Energy 36(5): 2589–2598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.053
- Sola, A. V. H.; Mota, C. M. M.; Kovaleski, J. L. 2011. A model for improving energy efficiency in industrial motor system using multicriteria anglysi, Energy Policy 39(6): 3645–3654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.070
- Streimikiene, D.; Balezentis, T. 2013. Multi-objective ranking of climate change mitigation policies and measures in Lithuania, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 18: 144–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.040
- Streimikiene, D.; Balezentis, T.; Krisciukaitiene, I.; Balezentis, A. 2012. Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(5): 3302–3311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.067
- Virtanen, M. 2011. Choosing the optimal energy system for buildings and districts. Master's thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology.
- Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Yakhchali, S. H. 2012. Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 30: 194–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.021
- Yi, S. K.; Sin, H. Y.; Heo, E. 2011. Selecting sustainable renewable energy source for energy assistance to North Korea, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15: 554–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.08.021
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 1996. Determination of an efficient contractor by using the new method of multicriteria assessment, in D. A. Langford, A. Retik (Eds.). International Symposium for “The Organisation and Management of Construction”. Shaping Theory and Practice, vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65. London, Weinheim, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras. London: E and FN SPON: 94–104.
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2): 159–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2): 397–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291