Coalition or decentralization: a game-theoretic analysis of a three-echelon supply chain network

References

• Adida, E.; Demiguel, V. 2011. Supply chain competition with multiple manufacturers and retailers, Operations Research59(1): 156–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arda, Y.; Hennet, J. C. 2005. Supply chain coordination through contract negotiation, in Conference on Decision and Control, 12–15 October, 2005, Seville, Spain, 4658–4684.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, S.; Wang, D. 2008. Research on inventory game of supply chain based on credit coordination mechanism, in IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 12–15 October, 2008, Beijing, China, 3037–3042.
   Google Scholar
• Bazaraa, M. S.; Sherali, H. D.; Shetty, C. M. 1993. Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cachon, G. P.; Kok, G. A. 2010. Competing manufacturers in a retail supply chain: on contractual form and coordination, Management Science56(3): 571–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cachon, G. P.; Lariviere, M. A. 1999. Capacity choice and allocation: strategic behavior and supply chain performance, Management Science45(8): 1091–1108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabortty, S.; Pal, M.; Nayak, P. K. 2010. Solution of interval-valued manufacturing inventory models with shortage, International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences4(2): 357–365.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, C.; Kamrani, A. K. 2004. Mass customization: a supply chain approach. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9015-0
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. C. 2008. A note on the EPQ model with shortages and variable lead time, Information and Management Sciences15(1): 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. S. 2009. Comparing Cournat output and Bertrand price doupoly game. Taiwan: Dahan Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, S.; Meindel, P. 2007. Supply chain management. New York: Prenticehall.
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeili, M.; Aryanejad, M.; Zeephongsekul, P. 2008. A game theory approach in seller–buyer supply chain, European Journal Of Operation Research195(2): 442–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, S. X. 2008. Coordination of pricing decisions in multiple product supply chains, in 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 12–14 October, 2008, Dalian, China, 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, J. S.; Jia, L. M.; Jiao, H. L. 2007. The three stage supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts, in IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services, 18–20 November, 2007, Nanjing, China, 1216–1220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/GSIS.2007.4443466
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. 1958. Industrial dynamics – a major breakthrough for decision makers, Harvard Business Review36(4): 37–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. 2002. A primer in game theory. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K.; Nicoleta, M. 2011. Overview and classification of coordination contracts within forward and reverse supply chains, Discussion Papers on Business and Economics7: 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gumus, T. A.; Guneri, F. A. 2007. Multi-echelon inventory management in supply chains with uncertain demand and lead times: literature review from an operational research perspective, in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture221(10): 1553–1570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, D.; Weerawat, W. 2006. Supplier manufacturer coordination in capacitated two stage supply chains, Elsevier: European Journal of Operational Research175(1): 67–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennet, J. C.; Arda, Y. 2008. Supply chain coordination: a game theory approach, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence21(3): 399–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaber, M. Y.; Osman, I. H.; Guiffrida, A. L. 2006. Coordinating a three level supply chain with price discounts, price dependent demand, and profit sharing, International Journal of Integrated Supply Chain2(1): 28–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2006.008337
   Google Scholar
• Jaafarnejad, A.; Amoozad Mahdiraji, H.; Mohaghar, A.; Modarresyazdi, M. 2012. Retailers leadership mathematical modeling in unlimited three echelon supply chain: non-cooperative game theory approach, Archives Des Science65(6): 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, P.; Amoozad Mahdiraji, H.; Govindan, K.; Meidutė, I. 2013. Leadership selection in an unlimited three-echelon supply chain, Journal of Business Economics and Management14(3): 616–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.761648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiazhen, H.; Qin, L. 2008. Revenue coordination contract based on Stackelberg game in upsteam supply chain, in 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 12–14 October, 2008, Dalian, China, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplinski, O.; Tamosaitiene, J. 2010. Game theory applications in construction engineering and management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy16(2): 348–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaviani, M. R.; Chaharsooghi, K.; Naimi Saidgh, A. 2011. Stackelberg game theory approach for manufacturer – retailer supply chain coordination using imperialist competitive algorithm, in 2nd International Conference on Logistics & Supply Chain Conference, 22–23 November, 2011, Tehran, Iran, 130–145.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W. 1993. Determining order quantity and selling price by geomettric programming: optimal solution, bounds, and sensitivity, Decesion Science24(1): 76–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. L.; Padmanabhan, V.; Seungjin, W. 1997. The bullwhip effect in supply chains, Sloan Management Review Spring: 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Leng, M. M.; Parlar, M. 2010. Game theoretic analysis of decentralized assembly supply chains: non cooperative equilibria vs. coordination with cost sharing contracts, European Journal of Operational Research204(1): 96–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, M. M.; Zhu, A. 2009. Side payments contracts in two person nonzero sum supply chain games: review, discussion and applications, European Journal of Operational Research196(2): 600–618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.; Zhang, H. 2006. Supply chain coordination with contracts for online game industry, in IEEE International Conference on Innovation and Technology, June, 2006, Singapore, China, 867–871.
   Google Scholar
• Oganezov, K. N. 2006. Inventory models for production systems with constant linear demand, time value of money and perishable or nonperiashable items. Virginia: West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, M. J. 2004. An introduction to game theory. Newyork: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F. 2008. Experience of the game theory application in construction management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy14(4): 531–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2005. Fuzzy matrix games multi-criteria model for decisionmaking in engineering, Informatica16(1): 107–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.531-545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2012. Equilibrium approaches for construction processes- multi-objective decision making for construction projects, Bauingenieur87(5): 210–215.
   Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. 2010. Sustainable assessment of construction site by applying game theory, Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics21(3): 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentico, D. W.; Drake, M. J.; Toews, C. 2009. The deterministic EPQ with partial backordering: a new approach, Omega37(3): 624–636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmusen, E.; Blackwell, B. 2005. Games and information; an introduction to game theory. 4th ed. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi, D.; Kaminsky, P.; Simchi-Levi, E. 2004. Managing the supply chain: the definitive guide for the business professional. New York: Mc-Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Stadtler, H.; Kilger, C. 2007. Supply chain management and advanced planning: concepts, models, software, and Case Studies. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, H. D.; Ginevicius, R. 2010. New co-opettion approach for supply chain applications and the implementation a new allocation rule, in 6thInternational Conference Business and Management, 13–14 May, 2010, Vilnius, Lithuania,147–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.21
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. 2005. Supply chain architecture: a blueprint for networking the flow of material, Information and Cash. Florida: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. Y.; Michael, H. S.; Patrick, Y. 2007. Supply chain management: issues in the new era of collaboration and competition. Pensylvania: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Sun, X.; Dang, F. 2009. Dynamic cooperation mechanism in supply chain for perishable agricultural products under one to multi, Advances in Neural Networks: Lecture Noes in Computer Science5553: 1212–1221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11424-009-9166-6
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Tang, W. 2009. Fuzzy EPQ inventory models with backorder, Journal of System and Science Complexity22(2): 313–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.; Zhao, L. 2009. Helper mode analysis in a supply chain: based on supermodular game theory, International Conference on Management and Service Science, 20–22 September, 2009, Wuhan, China, 978–983.
   Google Scholar
• Wisner, J.; Tan, K.; Leong, G. 2008. Principles of supply chain management: a balanced approach. Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y.; Zhong, H. 2011. Benefit mechanism designing: for coordinating three stages supply chain, in International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering, 8–11 January, 2011, Harbin, China, 966–969.
   Google Scholar
• Ying, H. L.; Qi, C. Y.; Sheng, J. Z. 2007. Research on the coordination mechanism model of the three level supply chain, in International Conference on management Science and Engineering, 20–22 August, 2007, Harbin, China, 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Zandi, F.; Tavana, M.; O'Connor, A. 2012. A strategic cooperative game-theoretic model for market segmentation with application to banking in emerging economies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy18(3): 389–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.688072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Peldschus, F.; Ustinovicius, L. 2004. Game theory in building technology and management. Vilnius: Technika.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2008. A new logarithmic normalization method in game theory, Informatica19(2): 303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy17(2): 397–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Cheng, T. E.; Yang, X.; Huang, Z. 2010. Coordination of supply chains by option contracts: a cooperative game theory approach, European Journal of Operational Research207(2): 668–675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar