Applicability of existing performance evaluation tools and concepts to the Nigerian facilities management practice

REFERENCES

• Adeosun, O. (2010) Quality basic education development in Nigeria: imperative for use of ICT, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 13(2), pp. 193–211.
   Google Scholar
• Adewunmi, Y. A. Omirin, M. M. and Adejumo, F. (2008) Benchmarking in facilities management in Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the European Facilities Management Conference (EFMC-2008), Facility management: adding value to core business. Strategies–Opportunities–Functionality, Manchester, UK, 10–11 June 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Adeyinka, T. (2009) Attitudinal correlates of some selected Nigerian librarians toward the use of ICT, International Journal of Information Science Management, 17(1), pp. 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Akpan-Obong, P. (2007) Information and communication technology in development: contextually and promise. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, São Paulo, Brazil, 05 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, K. (1992) Quality managed facilities, Facilities, 10(2), pp. 19–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002178
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, K. (2008) Usability of workplaces: phase two. Philosophy and concepts. In: Alexander, K. (Ed.), Project Report, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Available at: http://heyblom.websites.xs4all.nl/website/W111_Pub.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, K. (2010) Usability of workplaces: phase three. Usability of learning environments. In: Alexander, K. (Ed.), Project Report, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 5–16. Available at: http://cibworld.xs4all.nl/dl/publications/pub330.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ali, M. J., Ahmed, K. and Henry, D. (2004) Disclosure compliance with national accounting standards by listed companies in South Asia, Accounting and Business Research, 34(3), pp. 183–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729963
   Google Scholar
• Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D. and Sarshar, M. (2000) Performance evaluation in facilities management: using the balanced scorecard approach. In: COBRA 2000 RICS (Construction and Building Research Conference), University of Greenwich, August 30 – September 1 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Apanpa, S. O. and Lawal, O. O. (2009) ICT competence of ESL teachers in Nigeria's secondary schools. Paper presented at the ISTE annual NECC conference, June 2009, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Apgar, M. (1995) Managing real estate to build value, Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp. 162–179.
   Google Scholar
• Apulu, I. and Latham, A. (2009) Information and communication technology adoption: Challenges for Nigerian SMEs, TMC Academic Journal, 4(2), pp. 64–80.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, B. and Brooks, A. (2000) Total facilities management. London: Blackwell Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Augenbroe, G. and Park, C. (2005) Quantification methods of technical building performance, Building Research and Information, 33(2), pp. 159–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000325327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakstad, S. H., Hansen, G. K. and Knudsen, W. (2008) Usability of workplaces: phase two. Methods and tools for evaluation of usability in buildings. In: Alexander, K. (Ed.), Project Report, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Available at: http://heyblom.websites.xs4all.nl/website/W111_Pub.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blakstad, S. H., Olsson, N., Hansen, G. K. and Knudsen, W. (2010) Usability of workplaces: phase three. Usability mapping tool. In: Alexander, K. (Ed.), Project Report, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 17–29. Available at: http://cibworld.xs4all.nl/dl/publications/pub330.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bordass, B. and Leaman, A. (2005) Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 3: Case studies of the use of techniques in the feedback portfolio, Building Research and Information, 33(4), pp. 361–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210500162032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordass, B., Leaman, A. and Ruyssevelt, P. (2001) Assessing building performance in use 5: Conclusions and implications, Building Research and Information, 29(2), pp. 144–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210010008054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottom, C. (2003) Financial management. In: Booty, F. (Ed.), Facilities management handbook, 2nd edition. UK: Lexis Nexis Butherworths, pp. 163–206.
   Google Scholar
• Brackertz, N. and Kenley, R. (2002) A service delivery approach to measuring facility performance in local government, Facilities, 20(3/4), pp. 127–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632770210423885
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, F. (2011) Impact of FM on organizational performance. MSc thesis, School of Built Environment, Herriot Watt University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Chotipanich, S. (2004) Positioning facilities management, Facilities, 22(13/14), pp. 364–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632770410563086
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L., Haynes, B., Pinder, J. and Price, I. (2004) The boundaries of workplace evaluation. In: Proceeding of Futures II conference, London, UK, March 26 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, J. J. and Taylor, S. A. (1992) Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension, Journal of Marketing, 56(3), pp. 55–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, H. and Walters, M. (2000) The role of building and facilities management in disaster recovery planning. In: COBRA 2000 RICS (Construction and Building Research Conference), University of Greenwich, August 30 – September 1 2000.
   Google Scholar
• EFQM (2011) The EFQM Excellence Model 2010. [Online]. European Foundation of Quality Management (EFQM). Available at: http://www.efqm.org/the-efqm-excellence-model
   Google Scholar
• Games, D. (2011) African oil companies must improve standard or lose out. Business Day newspaper of 8th March. Available at: http://www.africaatwork.co.za/?p=373
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. K., Blakstad, S. H. and Knudsen, W. (2011) USEtool. Evaluating usability. Methods handbook. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hinks, J. (2000) FM performance and accountability. In: Nutt, B. and McLennan, P. (Eds.), Facility management: risks and opportunities. Oxford: Blackwell Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hinks, J. and McNay, P. (1999) The creation of a management-by-variance tool for facilities management performance assessment, Facilities, 17(1/2), pp. 31–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632779910248893
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, N., Bruhns, H., Gray, J. and Tippert, H. (1993) Building quality assessment: research, development and analysis for office and retail buildings, Centre for Building Performance Research, Victoria, New Zealand University of Wellington, .
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996) The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuteyi, D. (2009) Poor funding, bane of SMEs, Nigerian Punch Newspaper, April 8th 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, E., Chan, A. and Chan, D. (2010) Benchmarking success of building maintenance projects, Facilities, 28(5/6), pp. 290–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632771011031529
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, A. and Levainen, K. (2006) A framework for identifying and measuring value added by Corporate Real Estate, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 8(1), pp. 38–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14630010610664796
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, A. and Nenonen, S. (2006) A conceptual framework of CREM performance measurement tools, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 8(3), pp. 108–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14630010610711739
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, G., Kelly, J. R., Hinks, J. and Bititci, U. S. (2002) A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings, Journal of Facilities Management, 1(2), pp. 142–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14725960310807881
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X. and Minogue, M. (2011) Performance measurement models in facility management: a comparative study, Facilities, 29(11/12), pp. 472–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632771111157141
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Q. Z., Alho, J. and Alexander, K. (2007) Performance measurement action research, Journal of Facilities Management, 5(4), pp. 290–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14725960710822277
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Q., Z. Nelson, M. M. and Alexander, K. (2004) Developing QMF into a performance measurement tool. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Measurement and Management, Edinburg, UK, July 27-30 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. and Moss, Q. Z. (2005) Measuring facilities management performance: measuring the improbable? In: Proceedings of the European Facility Management Conference, Frankfurt, Germany, April 19-21 2005, pp. 213–222.
   Google Scholar
• Nenonen, S., Rasila, H., Junnonen, J. M. and Karna, S. (2008) Usability of workplaces: phase two. Customer journey – a method to investigate user experience. In: Alexander, K. (Ed.), Project Report, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Available at: http://heyblom.websites.xs4all.nl/web-site/W111_Pub.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oseland, N. and Willis, S. (2000) Property performance and productivity. In: Nutt, B. and McLennan, P. (Eds.), Facility management: risks and opportunities. Oxford: Blackwell Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. and Berry, L. (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality, Journal of Retailing, 64(1), pp. 12–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder, J., Price, I., Wilkinson, S. J. and Demack, S. (2003) A method for evaluating workplace utility, Property Management, 21(4), pp. 218–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02637470310495009
   Google Scholar
• Preiser, W. F. E. (1997) Post-occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better, Facilities, 13(11), pp. 19–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632779510097787
   Google Scholar
• Preiser, W. F. E. and Nasar, J. L. (2008) Assessing building performance: its evolution from post-occupancy evaluation, International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), pp. 84–99.
   Google Scholar
• Redestam, K. E. and Newton, R. R. (2001) Surviving your dissertation. A complete guide to content and process. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson H. S., Carrillo, P. M., Anumba, C. J. and Al-Ghassani, A. M. (2005) Review and implementation of performance management models in construction engineering organizations, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 5(4), pp. 203–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14714170510815258
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. and Haynes, B. (2004) An evaluation of customer perception of FM service delivery, Facilities, 22(7/8), pp. 170–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632770410547534
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, E. and Barrett, P. S. (1996) An assessment of facilities management performance: a look behind the scenes, a stroll around the block a voyage into hyperspace. In: COBRA 96, RICS Research.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, E. (2003) Rationale and challenge. In: Teicholz, E. (Ed.), Facility design and management handbook, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, M. and Pitt, M. (2008) Innovative customer performance measurement and benchmarking. In: Proceedings of the European Facilities Management Conference (EFMC-2008), Facility Management: adding value to core business. Strategies–Opportunities– Functionality, Manchester, UK, June 10-11 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, A. and Puhto, J. (2001) Service provision trends of facility management in Northern Europe. Helsinki University of Technology Construction Economics and Management Publications 199. Espoo 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Umoren, A. O. (2008) Accounting disclosures and corporate attributes: a study of tested Nigerian companies. PhD thesis, Covenant University.
   Google Scholar
• Varcoe, B. J. (1996) Facilities performance measurement, Facilities, 14(10/11), pp. 46–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632779610129168
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. S. O. (1988) Corporate financial reporting in Nigeria, Accounting and Business Research, 18(72), pp. 352–362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1988.9729382
   Google Scholar
• Way, M. and Bordass, B. (2005) Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 2: Soft landings – involving design and building teams in improving performance, Building Research and Information, 33(4), pp. 353–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210500162008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (2011) Benchmarking facilities costs to ‘Industry Norms’ – there is no ‘Quick Fix’! [Online]. Available at: http://www.int-fpi.com/index.php?route=information/news&news_id=1
   Google Scholar
• Wong, T. (2000) Culture – its influence on facilities management in Asia. In: Proceedings of facilities management Asia, Singapore.
   Google Scholar