Company's performance self-assessment (CoPSA) among facilities outsourcing firms in malaysia: a focus on service delivery

References

• AGSA (Assessmentor-General South Africa) 2009. Report of the assessmentor-general on performance assessment of service delivery at police stations and 10111 call centres at the South African police service. RP 22/2009. Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, K. 2003. A strategy for facilities management, Facilities 21(11/12): 269–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632770310500338
   Google Scholar
• Amaratunga, D.; Baldry, D.; Sarshar, M.; Newton, R. A. 2002. Qualitative and quantitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach: a conceptual framework to measure FM performance, Work-Study Journal 51(1): 17–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00438020210415488
   Google Scholar
• Amaratunga, D.; Baldry, D. 2003. A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance, Property Management 21(2): 171–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02637470310478909
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y. 1996. Self performance appraisal vs directmanager appraisal: a case of congruence, Journal of Managerial Psychology 11(6): 50–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683949610129758
   Google Scholar
• Berrah, L.; Clivillé, V. 2008. Towards a quantitative performance measurement model in a buyer-supplier relationship context, in Kordic, V. (Ed.). Supply chain, theory and applications. Austria, Vienna: ITech Education and Publishing, 21–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683949610129758
   Google Scholar
• Bertels, K.; Jacques, J. M.; Neuberg, L.; Gatot, L. 1999. Qualitative company performance assessment: linear discriminant analysis and neural network model, European Journal of Operational Research 115(3): 608–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00161-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci, U. S.; Carrie, A. S.; McDevitt, L.; Turner, T. 1998a. Integrated performance measurement systems: a reference model, in Schonsleben, P.; Buchel, A. (Eds). Organising the extended enterprise. London: Chapman & Hall, 91–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35295-4_15
   Google Scholar
• Bititci, U. S.; Carrie, A. S.; Turner, T. J.; Suwignjo, P. 1998b. Performance measurement systems: assessmenting and prioritisation of performance measures, in Neely, A. D.; Waggoner, D. B. (Eds.). Performance measurement: theory and practice. Cambridge: Fieldfare Publications, 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Bititci, U. S.; Turner, T.; Begemann, C. 2000. Dynamics of performance measurement systems, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20(6): 692–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570010321676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.; Datar, S. M.; Kulp, S. L.; Narayanan, V. G. 2008. Testing strategy with multiple performance measures: evidence from a balanced scorecard at store 24, Working Paper No. 08-081. Havard Business School, U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, S.; Whitten, D.; Green, K. 2008. Understanding service quality and relationship quality in IS outsourcing: client orientation & promotion, project management effectiveness, and the task-technology-structure fit, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Winter 2007–2008: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D. A. 1991. A service quality process map for credit card processing, Decisions Science 22(2): 406–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, K. F.; Lynch, R. L. 1988–1989. The SMART way to define and sustain success, National Productivity Review 9(1): 23–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr.4040080105
   Google Scholar
• Curran, J. M.; Meuter, M. L. 2005. Self-service technology adoption: comparing three technologies, Journal of Services Marketing 19(2): 103–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876040510591411
   Google Scholar
• De Toni, A. F.; Fornasier, A.; Montagner, M.; Nonino, F. 2007. A performance measurement system for facility management: the case study of a medical service authority, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 56(5/6): 417–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400710757123
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R.; Nanni, A. J.; Vollmann, T. E. 1990. The new performance challenge: measuring operations for world class competition. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Minh, D. L.; Bhaskar, R. 2006. Analyzing linear recursive projects an absorbing chain, Applied Mathematics and Decision Science 2006: 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JAMDS/2006/84735
   Google Scholar
• Doll, J. P.; Widdows, R.; Velde, P. D. 1983. A critique of the literature on U.S. farmland values, ERS Staff Report No. AGE5830124. U.S. Department of Agriculture, January 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, U. M. 2009. Timeless practice framework as facilities management outsourcing performance evaluation model: PhD thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru.
   Google Scholar
• Edly, F. R.; Sha'ri, M. Y.; Jafri, M. R. 2007. Manufacturing audit to improve quality performance – a conceptual framework, in World Engineering Congress 2007, 5–9 August 2007, Penang, Malaysia, 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, D. 2004. Facilities management ‘a behavioral approach’, Facilities 22(1/2): 35–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632770410517933
   Google Scholar
• Geladel, G. A.; Young, S. 2005. Test of a service profit chain model in the retail banking sector, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 78: 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317904X22926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilleard, J. D.; Granath, J. A. 2007. Usability in the workplace case study of Pamela Youde Eastern hospital, Hong Kong, in CIB World Building Congress 2007, 14–18 May 2007, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, J. J.; Murphy, M. P. 1996. Public management: failing accountabilities and failing performance review, International Journal of Public Sector Management 9(5/6): 125–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513559610146492
   Google Scholar
• Guclu, A. N.; Bilgen, S. 2010. Process based public value and effectiveness of government information systems, in Fourth International Conference of Challenges in Information Sciences, 19–21 May 2010, Nice, France. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/rcis.2010.5507344
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N. 1995. Basic econometrics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, A. M. I. 2001. Incorporating a geographic information system in the modelling of farm property values: Unpublished PhD Thesis. Lincoln Unversity, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L.; Sargent, T. J. 2005. Recursive model of dynamic linear economies. Chicago University.
   Google Scholar
• Haoming, L.; Zhang, J. 2007. Donations in a recursive dynamic model, Canadian Journal of Economics 41(1): 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Isik, Z.; Dikmen, I.; Birgonul, M. T. 2007. Using analytic network process (ANP) for performance measurement in construction, in Proceedings of the Construction and Building Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, 6–7 September 2007, Georgia Tech, Atlanta USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B.; Qureshi, A. 2006. Research on outsourcing results: current literature and future opportunities, Management Decision 44(1): 44–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740610641454
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S.; Norton, D. P. 1996. Translating strategy into action: the balanced score card. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kok, P.; van de Wiele, T .; McKenna, R .; Brown, A. 2001. A corporate social responsibility assessment within quality management framework, Journal of Business Ethics 31: 285–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropp, D. H.; Carlson, R. C. 1977. Recursive modelling of ambulatory health care settings, Journal of Medical Systems 1(2): 123–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02285280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurien, G. P.; Qureshi, M. N. 2011. Study of performance measurement practices in supply chain management, International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences 2(4): 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. G.; Pun, K. F.; Lalla, T. R. M. 2007. Measuring managers’ perception in small and medium-sized enterprises: a self-assessment scale, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management 2(3): 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. L.; Collier, D. A. 2000. The role of technology and quality on hospital financial performance: an exploratory analysis, International Journal of Service Industry Management 11(3): 202–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09564230010340715
   Google Scholar
• Lichiello, P. 2000. Guidebook for performance measurement. Seattle, Washington: TurningPoint.
   Google Scholar
• Maskel, B. H. 1991. Performance measurement for world class manufacturing. A model for American companies. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maskel, B. H. 1994. New performance measures (management master series). Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxham, J. G.; Netemeyer, R. G.; Lichtenstein, D. R. 2008. The retail value chain: linking employee perceptions to employee performance, customer assessments, and store performance, Marketing Science 27(2): 147–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moges, F. 2007. Multi-criteria performance measurement model development for Ethiopian manufacturing enterprises: Unpublished thesis for Masters of Science in Mechanical Engineering (Industrial Engineering Stream). Addis Ababa University, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A. 1999. The performance measurement revolution: why now & what next, International Journal of Operation & Production Management 19(2): 205–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910247437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A.; Gregory, M.; Platts, K. 1995. Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15(4): 80–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A.; Gregory, M.; Platts, K. 2005. Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25(12): 1228–1263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633639 doi: 10.1108/01443570510633648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A.; Mills, J.; Gregory, M.; Richards, H.; Platts, K.; Bourne, M. 1996. Getting the measure of your business. Manufacturing Engineering Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A.; Mills, J.; Platts, K.; Richards, H.; Gregory, M.; Bourne, M.; Kennerley, M. 2000. Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20(10): 1119–1145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570010343708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPR (National Performance Review, now National Partnership for Reinventing Government). 1997. Serving the American public: best practices in performance measurement. Benchmarking study report. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. L . 1994. Conceptual issues in the structural analysis of consumption emotion, satisfaction and quality: evidence in a service setting, in Allen, C . T.; John, D. R. (Eds.). Advances in consumer research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 21: 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, Z. J.; Noke, H. 2002. Innovation compass: a self-assessment tool for the new product development process, Creativity and Innovative Management 11(2): 122–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00244
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, C. M.; Gatewood, R. D.; Bill, J. B. 1997. Corporate image: employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance, Journal of Business Ethics 16(4): 401–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017989205184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, O. M. 2002. Performance measures in value management. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, A.; Purang, P. 2009. Employee perceptions of job satisfaction: comparative study on Indian banks, Asian Academy of Management Journal 14(2): 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. 1993. Outcome-related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector, British Journal of Management 4(3): 135–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1993.tb00054.x
   Google Scholar
• Suwignjo, P.; Bititci, U. S.; Carrie, A. S. 2000. Quantitative models for performance measurement system, International Journal of Production Economics 64: 231–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00061-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takim, R.; Akintoye, A.; Kelly, J. 2003. Performance measurement systems in construction, in Greenwood, D. J. (Ed.). 19th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3–5 September 2003, University of Brighton. Association of Researchers in Construction Management. Vol. 1, 423–432.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, T. 1990. The essence of facilities management, Facilities 8(8): 8–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002119
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, M.; Smith, A. 2007. User perception in workplace, Facilities 26(5/6): 196–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632770810864989
   Google Scholar
• USDC (United State Department of Commerce). 2011. Assessment module: self-assessment tool. Bureau of Industry and Security, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Vithessonthi, C. 2005. A perception-based view of the employee: a study of managers’ reactions to change: Unpublished PhD Thesis (Business Administration). Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG), University of St. Gallen.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelvang, B. 2005. Econometrics theory and applications with EViews. 2nd ed. England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. M. 2010. History of facilities management, in Facilities manager's desk reference, Chapter 1. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444320466.ch1 doi: 10.1002/9781444320466
   Google Scholar
• Wong, T . C .; Shing, C . N .; Chan, F. T . S.; Chong, A. Y . L . 2011. A study of measuring the impact of employee perception on business-IT alignment via neural network, in Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management International Conference, 6–9 December 2011, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Zuriekat, M.; Salameh, R.; Alrawashdeh, S. 2011. Participation in performance measurement systems and level of satisfaction, International Journal of Business and Social Science 2(8): 159–169.
   Google Scholar