83
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The multi-attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables weighted harmonic aggregation operators

, &
Pages 409-430 | Received 18 Aug 2011, Accepted 28 Jan 2012, Published online: 03 Oct 2013

References

  • Alonso, S.; Cabrerizo, F. J.; Chiclana, F.; Herrera, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E. 2009. Group decision-making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 24(2): 201–222.
  • Bu, G. Z.; Zhang, Y. W. 2002. Grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on the theory of grey fuzzy relation, Systems Engineering Theory and Practice 22(4): 141–144.
  • Cabrerizo, F. J.; Heradio, R.; Pérez, I. J.; Herrera-Viedma, E. 2010a. A selection process based on additive consistency to deal with incomplete fuzzy linguistic information, Journal of Universal Computer Science 16(1): 62–81.
  • Cabrerizo, F. J.; Pérez, I. J.; Herrera-Viedma, E. 2010b. Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information, Knowledge-Based Systems 23(2): 169–181.
  • Chen, D. W. 1994. Grey fuzzy set introduction. Harbin: Helongjiang Science and Technology Press.
  • Choobineh, F.; Li, H. 1993b. Ranking fuzzy multi-criteria alternatives with respect to a decision maker’s fuzzy goal, Information Science 72(1–2): 143–155.
  • Choobineh, F.; Li, H. 1993a. An index for ordering fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Set and Systems 54(3): 287–294.
  • Deng, J. L. 1982. Control problems of grey systems, Systems & Control Letters 1(5): 288–294.
  • Deng, J. L. 2002. Grey Prediction and Grey Decision. Wuhan: Huazhong University Press.
  • Herrera, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Verdegay, J. L. 1996. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79(1): 73–87.
  • Herrera, F.; Alonso, S.; Chiclana, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E. 2009. Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 8(4): 337–364.
  • Herrera, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E. 2000. Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115(1): 67–82.
  • Herrera-Viedma, E.; Cordón, O.; Luque, M.; Lopez, A. G. 2003. A model of fuzzy linguistic IRS based on multi-granular linguistic information, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 34(2–3): 221–239.
  • Jin, N.; Lou, S. C. 2003. Study on multi-attribute decision making model based on the theory of grey fuzzy relation, Intelligence Command Control and Simulation Techniques 7: 44–47.
  • Jin, N.; Lou, S. C. 2004. A grey fuzzy multi-attribute decision making method, Fire Control & Command Control 29(4): 26–28.
  • Kim, S. H.; Ahn, B. S. 1999. Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information, European Journal of Operational Research 116: 498–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00040-X .
  • Li, H. X.; Wang, P. Z. 1994. Fuzzy mathematical. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press.
  • Liu, P. D. 2009. A novel method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems 22(5): 388–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2009.02.001 .
  • Liu, P. D. 2011. A weighted aggregation operators multi-attribute group decision-making method based on interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Expert Systems with Applications 38(1): 1053–1060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.144 .
  • Liu, P. D.; Meng, F. K. 2009. The research of supplier selection based on hybrid decision-making index and projection method, Journal of Computational Information System 5(2): 601–610.
  • Liu, P. D.; Zhang, X. 2010. The study on multi-attribute decision-making with risk based on linguistic variable, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 3(5): 601–609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2010.9727726 .
  • Liu, P. D; Su, Y. 2010. The multiple attribute decision making method based on the TFLHOWA operator, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 60(9): 2609–2615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.08.087 .
  • Liu, W. L.; Liu, P. D. 2010. Hybrid multiple attribute decision making method based on relative approach degree of grey relation projection, African Journal of Business Management 4(17): 3716–3724.
  • Lu, R. 2009. Study on the analysis methods of grey fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Master's thesis. Zhejiang Gongshang University.
  • Luo, D. 2005. The analysis methods on grey decision-making problems. Zhengzhou: Yellow River and Water Conservancy Press.
  • Luo, D.; Liu, S. 2004. Analytic method to a kind of grey fuzzy decision making based on entropy, Engineering Science 6(10): 48–51.
  • Martínez, L.; Ruan, D.; Herrera, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Wang, P. P. 2009. Linguistic decision making: Tools and applications, Information Sciences 179(14): 2297–2298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.12.017 .
  • Meng, K.; Li, Y. X.; Wang, C. J.; Yang, W. T. 2007. Interval-value grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on the preference of the risk and its application, Fire Control and Command Control 32(4): 109–111.
  • Razavi Hajiagha, S. H.; Hashemi, S. S.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2013. A complex proportional assessment method for group decision making in an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(1): 22–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.762953 .
  • Wang, C. H.; Song, L. T. 1988. Fuzzy theory and methodology. Beijing: China Building Industry Press.
  • Wang, J. Q.; Wang, J. 2008. Interval grey fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach, Systems Engineering and Electronics 30(12): 2409–2411.
  • Wang, Q. Y. 1996. Grey fuzzy mathematical foundation. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press.
  • Wang, Y.; Xu, Z. S. 2008. A new method of giving OWA weights, Mathematics in Practice and Theory 38(3): 51–61.
  • Xu, Z. S. 2004. EOWA and EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 12: 791–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218488504003211 .
  • Xu, Z. S. 2006a. A note on linguistic hybrid arithmetic averaging operator in multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information, Group Decision and Negotiation 15(6): 593–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-9008-4 .
  • Xu, Z. S. 2006b. Goal programming models for multiple attribute decision making under linguistic setting, Journal of Management Sciences in China 9(2): 9–17.
  • Xu, Z. S. 2007. A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting, Knowledge-Based Systems 20(8): 719–725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2006.10.002 .
  • Xu, Z. S. 2008. Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations, Information Sciences 178(2): 452–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.05.018 .
  • Yager, R. R. 2004. OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics 34(5): 1952–1963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2004.831154 .
  • Yu, D. J. 2013. Intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application in multi-criteria group decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(1): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.762951 .
  • Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8: 338–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X .
  • Zhang, X.; Liu, P. D. 2010. Method for multiple attribute decision-making under risk with interval numbers, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 12(3): 237–242.
  • Zhang, N. 2013. Method for aggregating correlated interval grey linguistic variables and its application to decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(2): 189–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.763071 .
  • Zhu, S. Q.; Meng, K.; Zhang, H. X. 2006. Interval numbers grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and its application, Electronics Optics and Control 13(3): 36–37, 41.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.