References
- Acemoglu, D.; Robinson, J. 2010. The role of institutions in growth and development, Review of Economics and Institutions 1(2): 1–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5202/rei.v1i2.1
- Allen, M. 2004. The varieties-of-capitalism paradigm: not enough variety?, Socio-Economic Review 2(1): 87–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/soceco/2.1.87
- Amable, B. 2000. Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production, Review of International Political Economy 7(4): 645–687.
- Battisti, G.; Stoneman, P. 2010. How innovative are UK firms? Evidence from the fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on synergies between technological and organizational innovations, British Journal of Management 21(1): 187–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00629.x
- Casper, S. 2009. Can new technology firms succeed in coordinated market economies? A response to Herrmann and Lange, Socio-Economic Review 7(2): 209–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn034
- Chaudhry, A.; Garner, Ph. 2007. Do governments suppress growth? Institutions, rent-seeking, and innovation blocking in a model of Schumpeterian growth, Economics & Politics 19(1): 35–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2007.00301.x
- Crombrugghe, D.; Farla, K.; Meisel, N.; Neubourg, Ch.; Aoudia, J. Ou.; Szirmai, A. 2009. Institutional Profiles Database III. Paris: DGTPE. 25 p.
- Doloureux, D. 2002. What we should know about regional systems of innovation, Technology in Society 24(3): 243–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
- Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D. C.; Verspagen, B. 2009. The evolution of Norway's national innovation system, Science and Public Policy 36(6): 431–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/030234209X460944
- Foray, D. 2009. Research, innovation and economic growth: what does really matter?, in CD Proc. of the FutuRIS Conference on Public Support for Innovation: Efficiency and Future Prospects, April 1 2009, Paris, France, 1–21.
- Fowles, F.; Clark, W. 2005. Innovation networks: good ideas from everywhere in the world, Strategy & Leadership 33(4): 46–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10878570510608040
- Frenz, M.; Lambert, R. 2010. Connected innovation: an international comparative study that identifies mixed modes of innovation, in Proc. of the Conference Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology (DRUID Summer Conference), June 16-18, 2010, London, UK, 2–40.
- Fromhold-Eisebith, M. 2007. Bridging scales in innovation policies: how to link regional, national and international innovation systems, European Planning Studies 15(2): 217–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654310601078754
- Fuller, D. B. 2009. China's national system of innovation and uneven technological trajectory: the case of China's integrated circuit design industry, Chinese Management Studies 3(1): 58–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506140910946142
- Hall, J. C.; Sobel, R. S. 2008. Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional differences in economic growth, Southern Journal of Entrepreneurship 1(1): 69–96.
- Hall, P.; Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. 1st ed. Oxford University Press. 570 p.
- Hambrick, D. C.; Fredrickson, J. W. 2005. Are you sure you have a strategy?, Academy of Management Executive 19(4): 51–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AME.2005.19417907
- Herrmann, A. M. 2008. One political economy, one competitive strategy? Comparing pharmaceutical firms in Germany, Italy, and the UK. 1st ed. Oxford University Press. 256 p.
- Hollingsworth, J. R. 2000. Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations, Review of International Political Economy 7(4): 595–644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/096922900750034563
- Koen, C. I. 2005. Comparative international management. 1st ed. McGraw-Hill Education. 592 p.
- Khler, H.-D. 2008. Profit and innovation strategies in low-tech firms, Estudios de Economa Aplicada 26(3): 73–87.
- Lane, Ch. 2008. National capitalisms and global production networks: an analysis of their interaction in two global industries, Socio-Economic Review 6(2): 227–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwm010
- Lange, K. 2009. Institutional embeddedness and the strategic leeway of actors: the case of the German therapeutical biotech industry, Socio-Economic Review 7(2): 181–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn029
- Lewin, A. Y.; Volberda, H. W. 2005. The future of organization studies: beyond the selection-adaptation debate, in Tsoukas, H. Knudsen, Ch. (Eds). Oxford handbook of organization theory: meta-theoretical perspectives. 1st ed. Oxford University Press, 568–595.
- Lundvall, B. 1992. National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers. 342 p.
- Malakauskaitė, A.; Navickas, V. 2011. Contribution of clusters to the competitiveness of companies: revelation and evaluation, Inzinerine Ekonomika - Engineering Economics 22(1): 50–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.22.1.218
- Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy 31(2): 247–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
- National Centre of Competence in Research Quantum Photonics (NCCR QP). 2011. About us [online], [cited 17 January 2011]. Available from Internet: http://nccr-qp.epfl.ch/page20202.html
- Radziszewska-Zielina, E. 2010. Analysis of the partnering relations of Polish, Slovak and Ukrainian construction enterprises, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(3): 432–454. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.27
- Redding, G. 2005. The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism, Journal of International Business Studies 36(2): 123–155.
- Rolfstam, M. 2009. Public procurement as an innovation policy tool: the role of institutions, Science and Public Policy 36(5): 349–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/030234209X442025
- Schneiberg, M. 2007. What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900-1950, Socio-Economic Review 5(1): 47–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl006
- Schneider, S. C.; Barsoux, J.-L. 2003. Managing across cultures. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Financial Times. 352 p.
- Srivastava, J. V. 2006. Incumbent firms' innovation strategies and organizational restructuring during industry deregulation and technological change, in CD Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Management of Technology (IAMOT-2006), 05 22-26, 2006, Beijing, China, 1–8.
- Stankevice, I.; Jucevicius, G. 2010. Innovation strategy: an integrated theoretical framework, Social Sciences 3(69): 24–31.
- Thomsen, J. 2008. Processes of localization and institutionalization of local managers in economic functions in Danish owned subsidiaries in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania around the 21st century, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(4): 279–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.279-287
- Tvaronavičienė, M.; Grybaitė, V.; Tvaronavičienė, A. 2009. If institutional performance matters: development comparisons of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, Journal of Business Economics and Management 10(3): 271–278.
- Visser, A.-J.; Atzema, Oe. 2007. With or without clusters: facilitating innovation through a differentiated and combined network approach, European Planning Studies 16(9): 1169–1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654310802401573
- Whitley, R. 2000. The institutional structuring of innovation strategies: business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economies, Organization Studies 21(5): 855–886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840600215002