References
- Aghdaie, M. H.; Zolfani, S. H.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2013. Market segment evaluation and selection based on application of fuzzy AHP and COPRAS-G methods, Journal of Business Economics and Management 14(1): 213–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.721392
- Alimardani, M.; Zolfani, S. H.; Aghdaie, M. H.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2013. A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(3): 533–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.814606
- Antuchevičienė, J.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Zakarevičius, A.2012. Ranking redevelopment decisions of derelict buildings and analysis of ranking results, Journal of Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research (ECECSR)46(2): 37–62. Bucharest: Academy of Economic Studies.
- Bachher, J. S.; Guild, P. D.1996. Financing early stage technology based companies: investment criteria used by investors, in P. D. Reynolds; W. D. Bygrave; J. E. Butler; S. Birley; P. Davidsson (Eds). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson College, Wellesley, MA, 363–376.
- Baležentis, A.; Baležentis, T.; Misiunas, A. 2012. An integrated assessment of Lithuanian economic sectors based on financial ratios and fuzzy MCDM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(1): 34–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.656151
- Chen, M. F.; Tzeng, G. H.; Ding, C. G. 2008. Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives, Applied Soft Computing 8(1): 110–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2006.11.007
- Chu, M. T.; Shyu, J.; Tzeng, G. H.; Khosla, R. 2007. Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis, Expert Systems with Applications 33(4): 1011–1024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.026
- Ebrahimnejad, S.; Mousavi, S. M.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Hashemi, H.; Vahdani, B. 2012. A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment, Applied Mathematical Modelling 36(9): 4197–4217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.050
- Feeney, L.; Haines, G. H.; Riding, A. L. 1999. Private investors’ investment criteria: insights from qualitative data, Venture Capital: an International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 1(2): 121–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136910699295938
- Fouladgar, M. M.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Yakhchali, S. H.; Ghasempourabadi, M. H. 2012. Project portfolio selection using Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR techniques, Transformations in Business & Economics 11(1): 213–231.
- Fried, V. H.; Hisrich, R. D. 1994. Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making, Financial Management 23(3): 28–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665619
- Ginevičius, R.; Krivka, A.; Šimkūnaitė, J. 2010. The model of forming competitive strategy of an enterprise under the conditions of oligopolic market, Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(3): 367–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.18
- Girubha, J. R.; Vinodh, S. 2012. Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component, Materials & Design 37 478–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.022
- Gullander, S.; Napier, G.2003. Handbook in business angel networks –the Nordic case. Stockholm School of Entrepreneurship.
- Haines, G. H. Jr.; Madill, J. J.; Riding, A. R. 2003. Informal investment in Canada: financing small business growth, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship 16(3–4): 13–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2003.10593306
- Hajiagha, S. H. R.; Hashemi, S. S.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2013. A complex proportional assessment method for group decision making in an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(1): 22–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.762953
- Hall, J.; Hofer, C. W. 1993. Venture capitalists’ decision criteria in new venture evaluation, Journal of Business Venturing 8(1): 25–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90009-T
- Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. H.; Saparauskas, J. 2013. New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system, Inzinerine ekonomika – Engineering Economics 24(5): 408–414.
- Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Ghadikolaei, S. A. 2013. Performance evaluation of private universities based on balanced scorecard: empirical study based on Iran, Journal of Business Economics and Management 14(4): 696–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.665383
- Jin, F.; Liu, P.; Zhang, X. 2013. The multi-attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables weighted harmonic aggregation operators, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(3): 409–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.821685
- Ju, Y.; Wang, A. 2013. Extension of VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(5): 3112–3125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.035
- Kang, D.; Park, Y. 2014. Review-based measurement of customer satisfaction in mobile service: sentiment analysis and VIKOR approach, Expert Systems with Applications 41(4): 1041–1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.101
- Kaya, T.; Kahraman, C. 2010. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul, Energy 35(6): 2517–2527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051
- Kaya, T.; Kahraman, C. 2011. Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach, Expert Systems with Applications 38(6): 7326–7333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.003
- Khanin, D.; Baum, J. R.; Mahto, R. V.; Heller, C. 2008. Venture capitalists’ investment criteria: 40 years of research, Small Business Institute® Research Review 35 187–192.
- Kim, Y.; Chung, E. S. 2013. Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(22): 9419–9430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.040
- Kollmann, T.; Kuckertz, A. 2010. Evaluation uncertainty of venture capitalists’ investment criteria, Journal of Business Research 63(7): 741–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.06.004
- Kou, G.; Lu, Y.; Peng, Y.; Shi, Y. 2012. Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 11(1): 197–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219622012500095
- Kumar, V.; Kaura, N. M. 2003. Venture capitalists’ screening criteria, VIKALPA 28(2): 49–59.
- Landström, H. 1998. Informal investors as entrepreneurs, Technovation 18(5): 321–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00001-7
- Liu, P.; Yu, X. 2013. Density aggregation operators based on the intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers for multiple attribute decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(sup1): S454–S470.
- Liu, H. C.; Liu, L.; Liu, N.; Mao, L. X. 2012. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications 39(17): 12926–12934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
- Liu, H. C.; Mao, L. X.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Li, P. 2013. Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(9): 6325–6338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.026
- Liu, H.; Yan, T.2007. Bidding-evaluation of construction projects based on VIKOR method, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, 18–21 August 2007, Jinan, 1778–1782.
- Liu, P.; Wu, X. 2012. A competency evaluation method of human resources managers based on multi- granularity linguistic variables and VIKOR method, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(4): 696–710. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.753169
- Macmillan, I. C.; Siegel, R.; Narasimha, S. P. N. 1985. Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals, Journal of Business Venturing 1(1): 119–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(85)90011-4
- Macmillan, I. C.; Zemann, L.; Narsimha, S. P. N. 1987. Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures screening process, Journal of Business Venturing 2(2): 123–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90003-6
- Manigart, S.; Wright, M.; Robbie, K.; Desbriere, P.; De Waele, K. 1998. Venture capitalists’ appraisal of investment projects: an empirical European study, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 21(4): 29–43.
- Mason, C. M.; Harrison, R. T. 1996. Why business angels’ say no: a case study of opportunities rejected by an informal investor, International Small Business Journal 14(2): 35–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242696142003
- Mason, C. M.; Harrison, R. T. 2002. Is it worth it? The rates of return from informal venture capital investments, Journal of Business Venturing 17(13): 211–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00060-4
- Mason, C. M.; Harrison, R. T. 2003. Auditioning for money: what do technology investors look for at the initial screening stage?, Journal of Private Equity 6(2): 29–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2003.320037
- Mason, C. M.; Rogers, A.1997. The business angel's investment decision: an exploratory analysis, in D. Deakins; P. Jennings; C. Mason (Eds.). Entrepreneurship in the 1990s. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 29–46.
- Mason, C. M.; Stark, M. 2004. What do investors look for in a business plan? A comparison of the investment criteria of bankers, venture capitalists and business angels, International Small Business Journal 22(3): 227–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242604042377
- Maxwell, A. L.; Jeffrey, S. A.; Lévesque, M. 2011. Business angel decision-making, Journal of Business Venturing 26(2): 212–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.002
- Muzyka, D.; Birley, S.; Leleux, B. 1996. Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists, Journal of Business Venturing 11(4): 273–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00126-3
- National Survey of Innovation. 2011. Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre (MASTIC), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI).
- Opricovic, S.1998. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering Belgrade, Belgrade.
- Opricovic, S. 2011. Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning, Expert Systems with Applications 38(10): 12983–12990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097
- Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2002. Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 17(3): 211–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8667.00269
- Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2003. Defuzzification for a multicriteria decision making model, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 11(5): 635–652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218488503002387
- Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156(2): 445–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
- Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2007. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research 178(2): 514–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
- Paul, S.; Whittam, G.; Wyper, J. 2007. Towards a model of the business angel investment process, Venture Capital 9(2): 107–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691060601185425
- Peng, K. H.; Tzeng, G. H. 2013. A hybrid dynamic MADM model for problem-improvement in economics and business, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(4): 638–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.837114
- Riding, A.; Duxbury, L.; Haines, G. J.1997. Financing enterprise development: decision-making by Canadian angels, Conference Proceedings for the Entrepreneurship Division of the Association of Management and International Association of Management, August 1997, 17–22.
- Rostamzadeh, R.; Ismail, K.; Nobar, H. B. K.2014. An application of a hybrid MCDM method for the evaluation of entrepreneurial intensity among the SMEs: a case study, The Scientific World Journal, Volume 2014, Article ID 703650, 16 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/703650
- Sanayei, A.; Mousavi, S. F.; Yazdankhah, A. 2010. Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications 37(1): 24–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063
- Sayadi, M. K.; Heydari, M.; Shahanaghi, K. 2009. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers, Applied Mathematical Modelling 33(5): 2257–2262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002
- Sedaghat, M. 2013. A productivity improvement evaluation model by integrating AHP, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods under fuzzy environment, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 47(1): 235–258.
- Schwarzkopf, J.; Lévesque, M.; Maxwell, A. 2010. How entrepreneurs-in-residence increase seed investment rates, Venture Capital 12(1): 65–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691060903435783
- Shemshadi, A.; Shirazi, H.; Toreihi, M.; Tarokh, M. J. 2011. A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting, Expert Systems with Applications 38(10): 12160–12167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.027
- Shepherd, D. A. 1999. Venture capitalists’ assessment of new venture survival, Management Science 45(5): 621–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.5.621
- Silva, J. 2004. Venture capitalists’ decision-making in small equity markets: a case study using participant observation, Venture capital 6(2/3): 125–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691060410001675974
- Stedler, H.; Peters, H. 2003. Business angels in Germany: an empirical study, Venture Capital 5(3): 269–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369106032000126596
- Sudek, R. 2007. Angel investment criteria, Journal of Small Business Strategy 17(2): 89–103. Tyebjee, T. T.; Bruno, A. V. 1984. A model of venture capitalists investment activity, Management Science 30(9): 1051–1066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1051
- Van Osnabrugge, M. 2000. A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: an agency theory-based analysis, Venture Capital 2(2): 91–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136910600295729
- Wang, Y. L.; Tzeng, G. H. 2012. Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods, Expert Systems with Applications 39(5): 5600–5615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.057
- Wei, J.; Lin, X.2008. The multiple attribute decision-making VIKOR method and its application, in 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2008. WiCOM ‘08, IEEE, 12–14 October 2008, Dalian, 1–4.
- Wei, G.; Zhao, X.; Wang, H. 2012. An approach to multiple attribute group decision making with interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy information, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(2): 317–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.676995
- Wells, W. A.1974. Venture capital decision making: Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
- Wu, H. Y.; Chen, J. K.; Chen, I. S. 2010. Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese Universities: a hybrid fuzzy model application, Expert Systems with Applications 37(2): 1635–1642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.045
- Yang, Y. P. O.; Shieh, H. M.; Tzeng, G. H. 2013. A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment, Information Sciences 232(20): 482–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.012
- Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Fouladgar, M. M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Moini, S. H. H. 2013. Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision making, Journal of Business Economics and Management 14(5): 957–978. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.766257
- Yücenur, G. N.; Demirel, N. C. 2012. Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications 39(3): 3702–3707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.065
- Zacharakis, A.; Meyer, G. D. 1998. A lack of insight: do venture capitalists really understand their own decision processes?, Journal of Business Venturing 13(1): 57–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00004-9
- Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8(3): 338–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
- Zadeh, L. A. 1976. A fuzzy algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 8(3): 249–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(76)80001-6
- Zandi, A.; Roghanian, E. 2013. Extension of fuzzy ELECTRE based on VIKOR method, Computers & Industrial Engineering 66(2): 258–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.06.011
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Antuchevičienė, J. 2008. Modelling multidimensional redevelopment of derelict buildings, International Journal of Environment and Pollution 35(2/3/4): 331–344.
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Volvačiovas, R.; Kildienė, S.2013. Multi-criteria assessment model of technologies, Studies in Informatics and Control22(4): 249–258. Bucharest: National Institute for Research & Development in Informatics.
- Zhang, N.; Wei, G. 2013. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(7): 4938–4947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.002
- Zimmermann, H. J.2001. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. 4th ed. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0
- Zolfani, S. H.; Esfahani, M. H.; Bitarafan, M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Arefı, S. L. 2013. Developing a new hybrid MCDM method for selection of the optimal alternative of mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants during automobile accidents, Transport 28(1): 89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2013.782567