References
- Bagocius, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2014. Sequence determining of construction of the offshore wind farm construction applying permutation method, E & M Ekonomie a Management 17(3): 50–61.
- Beng, L. G.; Omar, B. 2014. Integrating axiomatic design principles into sustainable product development, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing – Green Technology 1(2): 107–117.
- Boran, F. E.; Boran, K.; Dizdar, E. 2012. A fuzzy multi criteria decision making to evaluate energy policy based on an information axiom: a case study in Turkey, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 7(3): 230–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15567240902839294
- Cebi, S.; Kahraman, C. 2010. Extension of axiomatic design principles under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications 37(3): 2682–2689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.08.010
- Chen, Y. Q.; Liu, J. Y.; Li, B.; Lin, B. 2011. Project delivery system selection of construction projects in China, Expert Systems with Applications 38(5): 5456–5462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.008
- Cheng, E. W. L.; Li, H. 2005. Analytic network process applied to project selection, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 131(4): 459–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(459)
- Chou, S. Y.; Chang, Y. H.; Shen, C. Y. 2008. A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes, European Journal of Operational Research 189(1): 132–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.006
- Contreras, A. V.; Serrano, M. D.; Quevedo, R. A.; Pérez, J. S. 2012. The importance of geological and geophysical exploration costs in the construction of hydroelectric dams – comparative examples in Mexico, International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences 12(3): 438–448.
- Dey, P. K. 2006. Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique, International Journal of Production Economics 103(1): 90–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.018
- Ebrahimnejad, S.; Mousavi, S. M.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Hashemi, H.; Vahdani, B. 2012. A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment, Applied Mathematical Modelling 36(9): 4197–4217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.050
- Han, S. H.; Diekmann, J. E.; Ock, J. H. 2005. Contractor's risk attitudes in the selection of international construction projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 131(3): 283–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(283)
- Hernández, C.; Pajares, J.; Paredes, A. L. 2011. A portfolio inspired metric for project selection in construction management, Organization, Technology and Management in Construction – An International Journal 3(1): 264–268.
- Kahraman, C.; Çebı, S. 2009. A new multi-attribute decision making method: hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design, Expert Systems with Applications 36(3-Part 1): 4848–4861.
- Kannan, D.; Govindan, K.; Rajendran, S. 2014. Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore, Journal of Cleaner Production 96: 194–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.076
- KarimiAzari, A.; Mousavi, N.; Mousavi, S. F.; Hosseini, S. B. 2011. Risk assessment model selection in construction industry, Expert Systems with Applications 38(8): 9105–9111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.110
- Kulak, O.; Cebi, S.; Kahraman, C. 2010. Applications of axiomatic design principles: a literature review, Expert Systems with Applications 37(9): 6705–6717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.061
- Li, M. 2013. Extension of axiomatic design principles for multicriteria decision making problems in intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 813471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/813471
- Mojahed, M.; Yusuff, R. M.; Reyhani, M. 2010. Determining and ranking essential criteria of construction project selection in telecommunication of North Khorasan – Iran, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 1(1): 79–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2010.V1.16
- Naaranoja, M.; Kähkönen, K.; Keinänen, M. 2014. Construction projects as research objects – different research approaches and possibilities, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 119: 237–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.028
- Panić, M.; Urošev, M.; Pešić, A. M.; Brankov, J.; Bjeljac, Ž. 2013. Small hydropower plants in Serbia: hydropower potential, current state and perspectives, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 23: 341–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.016
- Puthamont, S.; Charoenngam, C. 2007. Strategic project selection in public sector: construction projects of the ministry of defence in Thailand, International Journal of Project Management 25(2): 178–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.05.001
- Rejment, M.; Dziadosz, A. 2014. Selected aspects of construction projects selection including risk estimation, Technical Transactions, Civil Engineering 1-B: 221–228.
- Rikhtegar, N.; Mansouri, N.; Oroumieh, A. A.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kildienė, S. 2014. Environmental impact assessment based on group decision-making methods in mining projects, Economic Research – Ekonomska Istrazivanja 27(1): 378–392.
- Rouyendegh, B. D. 2012. Evaluating projects based on intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making, Journal of Applied Mathematics, Article ID-824265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/824265
- Siozinyte, E.; Antucheviciene, J.; Kutut, V. 2014. Upgrading the old vernacular building to contemporary norms: multiple criteria approach, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 20(2): 291–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.904814
- Staniūnas, M.; Medineckienė, M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kalibatas, D. 2013. To modernize or not: ecological-economical assessment of multi-dwelling houses modernization, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 13(1): 88–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2012.11.003
- Streimikiene, D. 2013. Assessment of energy technologies in electricity and transport sectors based on carbon intensity and costs, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(4): 606–620. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.837113
- Suh, N. P. 1990. The principles of design. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Suh, N. P. 2001. Axiomatic design: advances and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Taylan, O.; Bafail, A. O.; Abdulaal, R. M. S.; Kabli, M. R. 2014. Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies, Applied Soft Computing 17: 105–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003
- Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kutut, V. 2013. Model based on ARAS-G and AHP methods for multiple criteria prioritizing of heritage value, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 12(1): 45–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S021962201350003X
- Vinodh, S. 2011. Axiomatic modelling of agile production system design, International Journal of Production Research 49(11): 3251–3269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.481295
- Vodopivec, B.; Žarnic, R.; Tamošaitienė, J.; Lazauskas, M.; Šelih, J. 2014. Renovation priority ranking by multi-criteria assessment of architectural heritage: the case of castles, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 18(1): 88–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2014.889771
- Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z. 2009. Research on project selection system of pre-evaluation of engineering design project bidding, International Journal of Project Management 27(6): 584–599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.003
- Weissenböck, S.; Girmscheid, G. 2014. Project selection regarding life-cycle oriented and equity-intensive projects: a critical assessment of the PPP project selection process in the construction industry, in J. Crittenden, C. Hendrickson, B. Wallace (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure, ICSI 2014: Creating Infrastructure for a Sustainable World, 6–8 November 2014, Long Beach, California. ASCE, 377–387.
- Wu, Y.; Geng, S.; Xu, H.; Zhang, H. 2014. Study of decision framework of wind farm project plan selection under intuitionistic fuzzy set and fuzzy measure environment, Energy Conversion and Management 87: 274–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.001
- Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8(3): 338–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Antucheviciene, J.; Saparauskas, J.; Turskis, Z. 2013. MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 47(2): 5–20.
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Vilutienė, T.; Turskis, Z.; Šaparauskas, J. 2014. Multi-criteria analysis of Projects’ performance in construction, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 14(1): 114–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2013.07.006
- Zelenakova, M.; Zvijakova, L.; Purcz, P. 2013. Small hydro power plant – Environmental impact assessment – Case study, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 3(4): 35–42.