Taxonomic revision of the Lecania cyrtella group based on molecular and morphological evidence

LITERATURE CITED

• Acharius E. 1799 (1798). Lich suec Prod. Linköping, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1803. Meth Lich. Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1808. Förteckning på de i Sverige växande arter af Lafvarnes famille. Nov Act Reg Acad Sci Holm XXIX, 259–283.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1814. Syn Lich. Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Anzi M. 1860. Catalogus lichenum quos in provincia Sondriensi collegit et ordinavit et in ordinem system-aticum digessit presbyter M. Anzi. Novi-Comi, Italy: C. Franchi.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1868. Lichenes rariores Longobardiae exsiccati, quos collegit ediditque presb. Martinus Anzi in seminario Novo-Comensi professor. Novi-Comi, Italy: Fasc. XIII, No. 516.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold F. 1859. Die Lichenen des fränkischen Jura. Flora Regensburg 42:145–156.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1870. Lichenologisch Fragmente X. Flora Regensburg 53:465–488.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1884. Die Lichenen des fränkischen Jura. Flora Regensburg 67:403–434.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge PD, Hawksworth DL. 1998. What molecular biology has to tell us at the species level in lichenized fungi. Lichenologist 30:307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Brodo IM, Sharnoff SD, Sharnoff S. 2001. Lichens of North America. New Haven and London: Yale Univ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone I, Kohn LM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91:553–556.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 2001. A microbial population-species interface: nested cladistic and coalescent inference with multilocus data. Mol Ecol 10:947–964.
   Google Scholar
• Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9: 1657–1660.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo A, Cubero OF. 1998. A molecular approach to the circumscription and evaluation of some genera segregated from Parmelia sensu lato. Lichenologist 30:369–380.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings MP, Handley SA, Myers DS, Reed DL, Rokas A, Winka K. 2003. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst Biol 52: 477–487.
   Google Scholar
• Elenkin AA. 1907. Neue Flechten aus dem europäischen Russland. J Bot 10:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Erixon P, Svennblad B, Britton T, Oxelman B. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst Biol 52: 665–673.
   Google Scholar
• Foucard T. 2001. Svenska skorplavar och svampar som växer på dem. Stockholm, Sweden: Interpublishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fries E. 1822. Beskrifning pa nya Lafslägten. Andra styket. Act Reg Acad Scien Holm, 251–276.
   Google Scholar
• Fries TM. 1871. Lich Scand. Vo. 1. Uppsala, Sweden: Schultz.
   Google Scholar
• Galløe O. 1929. Natural History of the Danish Lichens. Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes— application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2: 113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Goloboff P, Farris JS, Nixon K. 2003. TNT: tree analysis using new technology. Version 1 Publ by authors.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Series 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
   Google Scholar
• James PW, Purvis OW. 1992. Lecania Massal. (1853). In: Purvis OW, Coppins BJ, Hawksworth DJ, James PW, Moore DM, eds. The Lichen Flora of Great Britain and Ireland. London, United Kingdom: Natural History MuseumPUBLICations 285–292.
   Google Scholar
• Jatta A. 1889. Monographia lichenum Italiae Meridionalis. Trani, Italy: V. Vecchi.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1900. Syll Lich ital. Trani, Italy: V. Vecchi.
   Google Scholar
• Kilias R. 1981. Revision gesteinsbewohnender Sippen der Flechtengattung Catillaria Massal. in Europa. Hezogia 5:209–448.
   Google Scholar
• Körber GW. 1860. Parerg Lich. Breslau, Poland, p 97–192.
   Google Scholar
• Kroken S, Taylor JW. 2001. A gene genealogical approach to recognize phylogenetic species boundaries in the lichenized fungus Letharia. Mycologia 93:38–53.
   Google Scholar
• LaGreca S. 1999. A phylogenetic evaluation of the Ramalina Americana chemotype complex (lichenized Ascomycota, Ramalinaceae) based on rDNA ITS sequence data. Bryologist 102:602–618.
   Google Scholar
• Lettau G. 1912. Beiträge zur Lichenographie von Thüringen. Hedwigia 52:81–264.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom L, Ekman S. 2005. Molecular evidence supports the distinction between Xanthoria parietina and X. aureola (Teloschistaceae, lichenized Ascomycota). Mycol Res 109:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 2006. Genetic variation and population differentiation in the lichen-forming ascomycete Xanthoria parietina on the island Storfosna, central Norway. Mol Ecol 15:1545–1559.
   Google Scholar
• Mann WB. 1825. Lichenum in Bohemia observatorum dispositio succinctaque descriptio Auctore Wenceslao Mann. Prague, Czech Republic,
   Google Scholar
• Mason-Gamer RJ, Kellogg EA. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Graminae). Syst Biol 45:524–545.
   Google Scholar
• Massalongo AB. 1852. Ric Lich Crost. Verona, Italy: Frizerio.
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson J-E, Wedin M. 1998. Phylogeny of the Parmeliaceae—DNA data versus morphological data. Lichenologist 30:463–472.
   Google Scholar
• Mayrhofer M. 1988. Studien über die saxicolen Arten der Flechtengattung Lecania in Europa II. Lecania s. str. Bibl Lich 28:1–133.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer B, Printzen C. 2000. Proposal for a standardized nomenclature and characterization of insoluble lichen pigments. Lichenologist 32:571–583.
   Google Scholar
• Mort ME, Archibald JK, Randle CP, Levsen ND, O’Leary TR, Topalov K, Wiegand CM, Crawford DJ. 2007. Inferring phylogeny at low taxonomic levels: utility of rapidly evolving cpDNA and nuclear ITS loci. Am J Bot 94:173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Mudd W. 1861. Man Br Lich. Darlington, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Müller Argoviensis J. 1894. Conspectus systematicus lichenum Novae Zelandiae, quem elaboravit. Bull Herb Boissier 2:1–114.
   Google Scholar
• Nylander W. 1855. Essai d’une nouvelle classification des lichens, (second mémoire). Mém Soc Sci Nat Cherbourg 3:161–202.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1861. Lich Scand. Notiser ur sällskapets pro fauna et flora fennica förhandlingar 5:1–313.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1867. Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam europaeam. Flora (Regensburg) 50:326–330.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1873. Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam europaeam. Flora (Regensburg) 56:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1876. Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam europaeam. Flora (Regensburg) 59:231–239.
   Google Scholar
• Poelt J. 1969. Bestimmungsschlüssel Europäischer Flechten. Lehre, Germany: Verlag von J. Cramer.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trend Ecol Evol 16:37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Printzen C, Ekman S. 2002. Genetic variability and its geographical distribution in the widely disjunct Cavernularia hultenii. Lichenologist 34:101–111.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 2003. Local population subdivision in the lichen Cladonia subcervicornis as revealed by mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 intron sequences. Mycologia 95:399–406.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Tønsberg T. 2003. Phylogeography of Cavernularia hultenii: evidence of slow genetic drift in a widely disjunct lichen. Mol Evol 12:1473–1486.
   Google Scholar
• Reese Næsborg R, Ekman S, Tibell L. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Lecania (Ramalinaceae, lichenized Ascomycota). Mycol Res 111:581–591.
   Google Scholar
• Röhling JC. 1813. Deutschlands Flora. Vol. III, 2. Abt. Frankfurt a M, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
   Google Scholar
• Sandstede H. 1912. Die Flechten des nordwestdeutschen Tieflandes und der deutschen Nordseeinseln. Abhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Bremen 21:337–383.
   Google Scholar
• Santesson R. 1993. The lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Sweden and Norway. Lund, Sweden: SBT-förlaget.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Moberg R, Nordin A, Tønsberg T, Vitikainen O. 2004. Lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi of Fennoscandinavia. Uppsala, Sweden: Museum of Evolution.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AL. 1918. Monogr Br Lich. London, UK: British Museum: Part 1.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. PNAS 99:16138–16143.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow P. 1887. Die Flechten Deutschlands. Anleitung zur Kenntniss und Bestimmung der deutschen Flechten. Berlin, Germany,
   Google Scholar
• Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633.
   Google Scholar
• Tibell L. 2006. Calicium in the Indian Himalayas. J Hattori Bot Lab 100:809–852.
   Google Scholar
• van den Boom PPG. 1992. The saxicolous species of the lichen genus Lecania in The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxemburg. Nov Hedwig 54:229–254.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Ryan BD. 2004. Lecania. In: NashIIITH, Ryan BD, Diederich P, Gries C, Bungartz F, eds. The lichen flora of the greater Sonoran desert region. Lichens Unlimit 2:133–161.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York and London: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar