Ophiostoma gemellus and Sporothrix variecibatus from mites infesting Protea infructescences in South Africa

LITERATURE

• Aghayeva DN, Wingfield MJ, Kirisits T, Wingfield BD. 2005. Ophiostoma dentifundum sp. nov. from oak in Europe, characterised using molecular phylogenetic data and morphology. Mycol Res 109:1127–1136.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres MP, Wilkens RT, Ruel JJ, Vallery E. 2000. Fungal relationships and the nitrogen budget of phloem-feeding bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecology 81:2198–2210.
   Google Scholar
• Barras SJ, Perry TJ. 1975. Interrelationships among micro-organisms, bark or ambrosia beetles, and woody host tissue: an annotated bibliography, 1956–1974. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-10.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver RA. 1989. Insect-fungus relationships in the bark and ambrosia beetles. In: Wilding N, Collins NM, Hammond PM, Webber JF, eds. Insect-fungus interactions. London: Academic Press. p 121–143.
   Google Scholar
• Berryman AA. 1989. Adaptive pathways in Scolytid-fungus associations. In: Wilding N, Collins NM, Hammond PM, Webber JF, eds. Insect-fungus interactions. London: Academic Press. p 121–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges JR, Moser JC. 1983. Role of two phoretic mites in transmission of bluestain fungus, Ceratocystis minor. Ecol Entomol 8:9–12.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1986. Relationship of phoretic mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) to the bluestaining fungus, Ceratocystis minor, in trees infested by southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 15:951–953.
   Google Scholar
• Cassar S, Blackwell M. 1996. Convergent origins of ambrosia fungi. Mycologia 88:596–601.
   Google Scholar
• De Beer ZW, Harrington TC, Vismer HF, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. 2003. Phylogeny of the Ophiostoma stenoceras-Sporothrix schenckii complex. Mycologia 95: 434–441.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Wingfield MJ, Kemp GHJ. 1995. First report of Ophiostoma querci in South Africa. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Congress for the South African Society for Plant Pathology. S Afr J Sci 91:VI.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Witthuhn RC, Britz H, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD. 1999. 18S rDNA sequences place Ophiostoma isolates from hardwoods in the southern hemisphere in the species Ophiostoma stenoceras. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Congress for the South African Society for Plant Pathology. S Afr J Sci 95:VI.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenetics: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
   Google Scholar
• Francke-Grosmann H. 1967. Ectosymbiosis in wood-inhabiting insects. In: Henry SM, ed. Symbiosis. Vol II. New York: Academic Press. p 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous Ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbio 61:1323–1330.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington TC. 1987. New combinations in Ophiostoma of Ceratocystis species with Leptographium anamorphs. Mycotaxon 28:39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs K, Wingfield MJ. 2001. Leptographium species: tree pathogens, insect associates and agents of blue-stain. St Paul, Minnesota: APS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirisits T. 2004. Fungal associates of European bark beetles with special emphasis on the ophiostomatoid fungi. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire JC, Evans H, eds. Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press. p 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Klepzig KD, Moser JC, Lombardero MJ, Ayres MP, Hofstetter RW, Walkinshaw CJ. 2001a. Mutualism and antagonism: ecological interactions among bark beetles, mites and fungi. In: Jeger MJ, Spence NJ, eds. Biotic interactions in plant-pathogen associations. Cambridge: CAB International. p 237–267.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———, ———, Ayres MP. 2001b. Symbiosis and competition: complex interactions among beetles, fungi and mites. Symbiosis 30:83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lévieux J, Lieutier J, Moser JC, Perry TJ. 1989. Transportation of phytopathogenic fungi by the bark beetle Ips sexdentatus Boemer and associated mites. J Appl Entomol 108:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Linder HP. 2003. The radiation of the Cape flora, southern Africa. Biol Rev 78:597–638.
   Google Scholar
• Malloch D, Blackwell M. 1993. Dispersal biology of the ophiostomatoid fungi. In: Wingfield MJ, Seifert KA, Webber JF, eds. Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity. St Paul, Minnesota: APS Press. p 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Marais GJ, Wingfield MJ. 1994. Fungi associated with infructescences of Protea species in South Africa, including a new species of Ophiostoma. Mycol Res 98: 396–374.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1997. Ophiostoma protearum sp. nov. associated with Protea caffra infructescences. Can J Bot 75:362–367.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 2001. Ophiostoma africanum sp. nov., and a key to ophiostomatoid species from Protea infructescences. Mycol Res 105:240–246.
   Google Scholar
• Moser JC. 1997. Phoretic mites and their hyperphoretic fungi associated with flying Ips typographys japonicus Niijima (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Japan. J Appl Entomol 121:425–428.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Perry TJ, Solheim H. 1989. Ascospores hyperphoretic on mites associated with Ips typographus. Mycol Res 93:513–517.
   Google Scholar
• Münch E. 1907. Die Blaufäule des Nadelholzes. I–II. Naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrifr für Land- und Forstwitschaft 5:531–573.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1908. Die Blaufäule des Nadelholzes. III–IV. Naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrifr für Land- und Forstwitschaft 6:32–47, 297–323.
   Google Scholar
• Norris DM. 1979. The mutualistic fungi of xyleborine beetles. In: Batra LR, ed. Insect-fungus symbiosis. Sussex, UK: Halsted Press. p 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. 1997. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol Phylogenet Evol 7:103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
   Google Scholar
• Price TS, Doggett C, Pye JM, Holmes TP. 1992. A history of southern pine beetle outbreaks in the southeastern United States. Macon: Georgia Forestry Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Rebelo T. 1995. Proteas of South Africa. Capetown: Fernwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roets F, Crous PW, Dreyer LL. 2005. Seasonal trends in colonization of Protea infructescences by Gondwanamyces and Ophiostoma spp. S Afr J Bot 71:307–311.
   Google Scholar
• ———, de Beer ZW, Dreyer LL, Zipfel R, Crous PW, Wingfield MJ. 2006. Multigene phylogeny for Ophiostoma spp. reveals two new species from Protea infructescences. Stud Mycol 55:199–212.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Dreyer LL. 2007. Discovery of fungus-mite-mutualism within a unique niche of the Cape Floral Kingdom. Environ Entomol 36 (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
   Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425.
   Google Scholar
• Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16:1114–1116.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair WA, Lyon HH. 2005. Diseases of trees and shrubs. 2nd ed. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Six DL, Paine TD. 1998. Effects of mycangial fungi on host tree species progeny survival and emergence of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 27:1393–1401.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens RB. 1974. Mycology guidebook. Seattle: University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0bla. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tavare S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect Mat Life Sci 17: 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay HP. 1981. A monograph of Ceratocystis and Ceratocystiopsis. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: New York Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney HS. 1982. Relationships between bark beetles and symbiotic organisms. In: Mitton JB, Sturgeon KB, eds. Bark beetles in North American conifers. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield MJ, Seifert KA, Webber JF. 1993. Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity. St Paul, Minnesota: APS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou XD, de Beer ZW, Ahumada R, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. 2004. Ophiostoma and Ceratocystiopsis spp. associated with two pine-infesting bark beetles in Chile. Fungal Divers 15:261–274.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Wingfield MJ. 2006. DNA sequence comparisons of Ophiostoma spp., including Ophiostoma aurorae sp. nov., associated with bark beetles in South Africa. Stud Mycol 55:269–277.
   Google Scholar
• Zipfel RD, de Beer ZW, Jacobs K, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. 2006. Multigene phylogenies define Ceratocystiopsis and Grosmannia distinct from Ophiostoma. Stud Mycol 55:75–97.
   Google Scholar