Phylogenetic relationships of Polyporus and morphologically allied genera¹

LITERATURE CITED

• Adanson M. 1763. Familles des plantes. Vol. 2. Fungi Sect V. Paris: Chez Vincent. 675 p.
   Google Scholar
• Binder M, Hibbett DS. 2002. Higher-level phylogenetic relationships of Homobasidiomycetes (mushroom-forming fungi) inferred from four rDNA regions. Mol Phyl Evol 22:76–90.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Larsson K-H, Larsson E, Langer G. 2005. The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom-forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes). Syst Biodiv 3:113–157.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan PK, Ryvarden L. 1998. New Zealand polypore fungi (Aphyllophorales): three new species and a new record. NZ J Bot 36:219–231.
   Google Scholar
• Corner EJH. 1983. Ad Polyporaceas I. Amauroderma and Ganoderma. Beih Nov Hedwig 75:1–182.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1984. Ad Polyporaceas II & III. Beih Nov Hedwig 78: 1–222.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham GH. 1965. Polyporaceae of New Zealand. NZ Dept Sci Ind Res Bull 164:1–304.
   Google Scholar
• Dai Y-C. 1996. Changbai wood-rotting fungi 5. Study on Polyporus mongolicus and P. tubaeformis. Ann Bot Fennici 33:153–163.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1999. Changbai wood-rotting fungi 11. Species of Polyporus sensu stricto. Fung Sci 14:67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Donk MA. 1933. Revision de Niederlandischen Homobasi-diomycetes. Aphyllophoraceae II. Meded Bot Mus Herb Rijks Univ Utrecht 9:1–141.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1960. The generic names proposed for Polyporaceae. Persoonia 1:173–302.
   Google Scholar
• Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315–319.
   Google Scholar
• Fries EM. 1821. Systema Mycologicum. Vol. 1. Mauritius: Greifswald. 520 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertson RL, Ryvarden L. 1986. North American Polypores. Vol. 1. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. 433 p.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1987. North American Polypores. Vol. 2. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. p 434–885.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acid Symp Ser 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hattori T. 2000. Type studies of the polypores described by E.J.H. Corner from Asia and west Pacific I. Species described in Polyporus, Buglossoporus, Melipilus, Daedalea, and Flabellophora. Mycoscience 41:339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbett DS, Donoghue MJ. 1995. Progress toward a phylogenetic classification of the Polyporaceae through parsimony analyses of mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Can J Bot 73(Suppl 1):S853–S861.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Thorn RG. 2001. Basidiomycota: Homobasidiomycetes. In: McLaughlin FJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA, eds. Systematics and evolution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Mycota VII: 121–168.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren PK, Holmgren NH, Barnet LC. 1990. Index herbariorum 1: the herbaria of the world. 8th ed New York Botanical Garden. 693 p.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Imazeki R, Hongo T. 1989. Colored illustrations of mushrooms of Japan. Vol. 2. Osaka, Japan: Hoikusha. 315 p.
   Google Scholar
• Jülich W. 1981. Higher taxa of Basidiomycetes. Vaduz, Germany: J Cramer. 485 p.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten PA. 1881. Enumeratio Boletinearum et Polyporearum Fennicum, Systemate novo dispositarum. Rev Mycol 3:16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ko KS, Jung HS. 2002. Phylogenetic evaluation of Polyporus s. str. based on molecular sequences. Mycotaxon 82: 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzer AM, Bruns TD. 1999. Use of atp6 in fungal phylogenetics: an example from the Boletales. Mol Phyl Evol 13:483–492.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger D, Gargas A. 2004. The basidiomycete genus Polyporus—an emendation based on phylogeny and putative secondary structure of ribosomal RNA molecules. Feddes Repert 115:530–546.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Petersen RH, Hughes KW. 2006. Molecular phylogenies and mating study data in Polyporus with special emphasis on group “Melanopus” (Basidiomycota). Mycol Prog 5:185–206.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol Biol Evol 16:1799–1808.
   Google Scholar
• Matheny PB. 2005. Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe: Agaricales). Mol Phy Evol 35:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo J-M, Ge Z-W, Yang Z-L, Slot JC, Ammirati JF, Baroni TJ, Bougher NL, Hughes KW, Lodge DJ, Kerrigan RW, Seidl MT, Aanen DK, DeNitis M, Daniele GM, Desjardin DE, Kropp BR, Norvell LL, Parker A, Vellinga EC, Vilgalys R, Hibbett DS. 2006. Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98:982–995.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill J, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Demoulin V, Hawksworth DJ, Marhold K, Nicolson DH, Prada J, Silva PC, Skog JE, Wiersema JH, Turland NJ. 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the 17th International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Regnum Veget 146:(i)xviii, 1–568.
   Google Scholar
• Micheli PA. 1729. Nova Plantarum Genera. Florence, Italy, 234 p, 108 pl.
   Google Scholar
• Murrill WA. 1904. The Polyporaceae of North America VI. The genus Polyporus. Bull Torrey Bot Club 31:29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä T, Kotiranta H. 1991. Polypore survey of Finland 5. The genus Polyporus. Karstenia 31:55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez M, Ryvarden L. 1995. Polyporus (Basidiomycotina) and related genera. Synopsis Fungorum 10. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. 85 p.
   Google Scholar
• Patouillard NT. 1887. Les Hyménomycètes d’Europe. Anatomie générale et classification des champignons supérieurs. Paris. 166 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pauzar Z. 1972. Amyloidity in polypores I. The genus Polyporus Mich. ex Fr. Ceska Mykol 26:82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Pegler DN. 1983. The genus Lentinus: a world monograph. Kew Bull Add Ser 10. 281 p.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14(9):817–818.
   Google Scholar
• Ryvarden L. 1991. Genera of polypores. Nomenelature and taxonomy. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. 363 p.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Gilbertson RL. 1993. European polypores. Vol. 1. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. 387 p.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1994. European polypores. Vol. 2. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. p 388–743.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Iturriaga T. 2004. Studies in Neotropical polypores 21. New and interesting species from Venezuela. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. p 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Johansen I. 1980. A preliminary polypore flora of east Africa. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. 636 p.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarze FWMR, Engels J, Mattheck C. 2000. Fungal strategies of wood decay in trees. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 185 p.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira RMB, Wright JE. 2005. The taxonomy of Echinochaete and Polyporus s. str. in South America. Mycotaxon 93:1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Singer R. 1986. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy, 4th ed. Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books. 981 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sotome K, Hattori T, Kakishima M. 2007. Polyporus phyllostachydis sp. nov. with notes on other rhizophilic species of Polyporus. Mycoscience 48:42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acid Res 22:4673–4680.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner T, Fischer M. 2002. Proceedings toward a natural classification of the worldwide taxa Phellinus s.l. and Inonotus s.l., and phylogenetic relationships of allied genera. Mycologia 94:998–1016.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng HD, Liu PG. 2005. Type studies on Albatrellus henanensis and A. jianfenglingensis. Mycotaxon 95:257–263.
   Google Scholar