Interspecific hybridization and apomixis between Phytophthora capsici and Phytophthora tropicalis

LITERATURE CITED

• Aragaki M, Uchida J. 2001. Morphological distinctions between Phytophthora capsici and P. tropicalis sp. nov. Mycologia 93:137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Aragón-Caballero L, Hurtado-Gonzáles OP, Flores-Torres J, Figueroa C, Lamour KH. 2006. Root rot of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) (Thunb.) Lindl.) caused by Phytophthora sp. Fitopathologia 41:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Babadoost M. 2000. Outbreak of Phytophthora foliar blight and fruit rot in processing pumpkin fields in Illinois. Plant Dis 84:1345.
   Google Scholar
• Boccas BR. 1980. Interspecific crosses between closely related heterothallic Phytophthora species. Phytopathology 71:60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bonants PJM, Hagenaar-de Weerdt M, Man in’t Veld WA, Baayen RP. 2000. Molecular characterization of natural hybrids of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. cactorum. Phytopathology 90:867–874.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers JH, Martin FN, Tooley PW, Luz EDMN. 2007. Genetic and morphological diversity of temperate and tropical isolates of Phytophthora capsici. Phytopathology 97:492–503.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciola SO, Spica D, Cooke DEL, Raudino F, Magnano di San Lio G. 2006. Wilt and collapse of Cuphea ignea caused by Phytophthora tropicalis in Italy. Plant Dis 90: 680.
   Google Scholar
• Chang TT, Ko WH. 1993. Evidence for absence of hybridization in crosses between Phytophthora infestans and Phytophthora parasitica. Mycol Res 97:675–678.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke DEL, Drenth A, Duncan JM, Wagels G, Brasier CM. 2000. A molecular phylogeny of Phytophthora and related Oomycetes. Fungal Genet Biol 30:17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK. 1996. Phytophthora diseases worldwide. St. Paul: American Phytopathological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
   Google Scholar
• Forster H, Oudemans P, Coffey MD. 1990. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA diversity within six species of Phytophthora. Exp Mycol 14:18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin SB, Fry WE. 1994. Genetic analyses of interspecific hybrids between Phytophthora infestans and Phytophthora mirabilis. Exp Mycol 18:20–32.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Legard DE, Smart CD, Levy M, Fry WE. 1999. Gene flow analysis of molecular markers confirms that Phytophthora mirabilis and P. infestans are separate species. Mycologia 91:786–810.
   Google Scholar
• Gu YH, Ko WH. 2005. Evidence for mitochondrial gene control of mating types in Phytophthora. Can J Microbiol 51:934–940.
   Google Scholar
• Habera L, Smith N, Donahoo R, Lamour K. 2004. Use of a single primer to fluorescently label selective amplified fragment length polymorphism reactions. Biotechniques 37:902–903.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann MG, Durtschi JD, Bromley LK, Wittwer CT, Voelkerding KV. 2006. Amplicon DNA melting analysis for mutation scanning and genotyping: cross-platform comparison of instruments and dyes. Clin Chem 52: 494–503.
   Google Scholar
• Hong CX, Richardson PA, Kong P, Jeffers SN, Oak SW. 2006. Phytophthora tropicalis isolated from diseased leaves of Pieris japonica and Rhododendron catawbiense and found in irrigation water and soil in Virginia. Plant Dis 90:525.
   Google Scholar
• Ioos R, Andrieux A, Marcais B, Frey P. 2006. Genetic characterization of the natural hybrid species Phytophthora alni as inferred from nuclear and mitochonrial DNA analyses. Fungal Genet Biol 43:511–529.
   Google Scholar
• Isakeit T. 2007. Phytophthora blight caused by Phytophthora capsici on pumpkin and winter squash in Texas. Plant Dis 91:633.
   Google Scholar
• Kroon LPNM, Bakker FT, van den Bosch GBM, Bonants PJM, Flier WG. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of Phytophthora species based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Fungal Genet Biol 41:766–782.
   Google Scholar
• Lamour KH, Hausbeck MK. 2001. Investigating the spatiotemporal genetic structure of Phytophthora capsici in Michigan. Phytopathology 91:973–980.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2002. The spatiotemporal genetic structure of Phytophthora capsici in Michigan and implications for disease management. Phytopathology 92:681–684.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Finley L. 2006. A strategy for recovering high quality genomic DNA from a large number of Phytophthora isolates. Mycologia 98:514–517.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy RM. 2006. Phytophthora blight of pothos, F.D.A.C. Services, ed Gainesville, Florida: Division of Plant Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Man in’t Veld WA, Veenbaas-Rijks WJ, Ilieva E, deCock WAM, Bonants PJM, Pieters R. 1998. Natural hybrids of Phytophthora nicotianae and Phytophthora cactorum demonstrated by isozyme analysis and random amplified polymorphic DNA. Phytopathology 88:922–929.
   Google Scholar
• ———, deCock WAM, Summerbell RC. 2007. Natural hybrids of resident and introduced species proliferating on multiple new hosts. Eur J Plant Pathol 117:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2001. First report of natural hybrids of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. cactorum on loquat in Taiwan. Plant Dis 85:98.
   Google Scholar
• Martin FN, Tooley PW. 2003a. Phylogenetic relationships of Phytophthora ramorum, P. nemorosa, and P. pseudosyringae, three species recovered from areas in California with sudden oak death. Mycol Res 107:1379–1391.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2003b. Phylogenetic relationships among Phytophthora species inferred from sequence analysis of mitochondrially encoded cytochrome oxidase I and II genes. Mycologia 95:269–284.
   Google Scholar
• Mchau GR, Coffey MD. 1995. Evidence for the existence of two subpopulations in Phytophthora capsici and a redescription of the species. Mycol Res 99:89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Oudemans P, Coffey MD. 1991. A revised systematics of twelve papillate Phytophthora species based on isozyme analysis. Mycol Res 95:1025–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–181.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
   Google Scholar
• Sanogo S, Carpenter J. 2006. Incidence of phytophthora blight and verticillium wilt within chile pepper fields in New Mexico. Plant Dis 90:291–296.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. (2002). PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignments through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680.
   Google Scholar
• Tian D, Babadoost M. 2004. Host range of Phytophthora capsici from pumpkin and pathogenicity of isolates. Plant Dis 88:485–489.
   Google Scholar
• Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, et al. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox TP, Zwickl DJ, Heath TA, Hillis DM. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol Phylogenet Evol 25:361–371.
   Google Scholar
• Wittwer CT, Reed GH, Gundry CN, Vandersteen JG, Pryor RJ. 2003. High-resolution genotyping by amplicon melting analysis using LCGreen. Clin Chem 49:853–860.
   Google Scholar