Trichoderma evansii and T. lieckfeldtiae: two new T. hamatum-like species

LITERATURE CITED

• Bailey BA, Bae H, Strem MD, Crozier J, Thomas SE, Samuels GJ, Vinyard BT, Holmes KA. 2008. Antibiosis, mycoparasitism, and colonization success for endophytic Trichoderma isolates with biological control potential in Theobroma cacao. Biol Control 46:24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bainier G. 1906. Mycothèque de l’École de Pharmacie III. Bull Soc Mycol. Fr 22:130–133.
   Google Scholar
• Bissett J. 1991a. A revision of the genus Trichoderma II. Infrageneric classification. Can J Bot 69:2357–2372.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1991b. A revision of the genus Trichoderma III. Section Pachybasium. Can J Bot 69:2373–2417.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone I, Kohn LM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous Ascomycetes. Mycologia 91:553–556.
   Google Scholar
• Chaverri PC, Samuels GJ. 2003. Hypocrea/Trichoderma. Ascomycota, Hypocreales, Hypocreaceae): species with green ascospores. Stud Mycol 48:1–116.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Castlebury LA, Samuels GJ, Geiser DM. 2003. Multilocus phylogenetic structure of the Trichoderma harzianum/Hypocrea lixii complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol 27:302–313.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Overton BE, Samuels GJ. 2004. Hypocrea/Trichoderma: species with conidiophore elongations and green conidia. Mycologia 95:1100–1140.
   Google Scholar
• Darlu P, Lecointre G. 2002. When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Mol Biol Evol 14:432–437.
   Google Scholar
• Degenkolb T, Dieckmann R, Nielsen KF, Gräfenhan T, Theis C, Zafari D, Chaverri P, Ismaiel A, Brückner H, von Döhren H, Thrane U, Petrini O, Samuels GJ. 2008. The Trichoderma brevicompactum clade: a separate lineage with new species, new peptaibiotics, and mycotoxins. Mycol Prog 7:177–209.
   Google Scholar
• Dettman JR, Jacobson DJ, Taylor JW. 2003. A multilocus genealogical approach to phylogenetic species recognition in the model eukaryote Neurospora. Evolution: Intern J Organic Evol 57:2703–2720.
   Google Scholar
• Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS. 1991. Touchdown PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucl Acids Res 19:4008.
   Google Scholar
• Druzhinina I, Kopchinskiy AG, Komon M, Bissett J, Szakacs G, Kubicek CP. 2005. An oligonucleotide barcode for species identification in Trichoderma and Hypocrea. Fungal Genet Biol 42:813–828.
   Google Scholar
• Evans HC, Holmes KA, Thomas SE. 2003. Endophytes and mycoparasites associated with an indigenous forest tree, Theobroma gileri, in Ecuador and a preliminary assessment of their potential as biocontrol agents of cocoa diseases. Mycol Prog 2:149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Sys Biol 42:182–192.
   Google Scholar
• Hoitink HAJ, Madden LV, Dorrance AE. 2006. Systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma spp.: interactions between the host, the pathogen, the biocontrol agent, and soil organic matter quality. Phytopathology 96: 186–189.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. Mr Bayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Jaklitsch WM, Samuels GJ, Dodd S, Lu BS, Druzhinina IS. 2006. Hypocrea rufa/Trichoderma viride: a reassessment, and description of five closely related species with and without warted conidia. Stud Mycol 56:135–177.
   Google Scholar
• Kullnig-Gradinger CM, Szakacs G, Kubicek C. 2002. Phylogeny and evolution of the genus Trichoderma: a multigene approach. Mycol Res 106:757–767.
   Google Scholar
• Leache AD, Reeder TW. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard. (Scloporus undulates): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Sys Biol 51:44–68.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among Ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol Biol Evol 16:1799–1808.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison DR, Maddison WM. 2000. MacClade 4 analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.06. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nirenberg HI. 1976. Untersuchungen über die morphologische und biologische Differenzierung in der Fusarium-Sektion Liseola. Mitt Biol Land- Forstw Berlin-Dahlem 169:i–v + 1–117.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:917–918.
   Google Scholar
• Rifai MA. 1969. A revision of the genus Trichoderma. Mycol Pap 116:1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels GJ, Dodd S, Lu BS, Petrini O, Schroers H-J, Druzhinina I. 2006. The Trichoderma koningii aggregate species. Stud Mycol 56:67–133.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Gams W, Castlebury LA, Petrini O. 2002. Trichoderma species associated with the green mold epidemic of commercially grown Agaricus bisporus. Mycologia 94:146–170.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.06b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface; flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nuc Acids Res 24:4876–4882.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. 1990. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar