DNA phylogeny reveals polyphyly of Phoma section Peyronellaea and multiple taxonomic novelties

LITERATURE CITED

• Arenal F, Platas G, Monte E, Peláez F. 2000. ITS sequencing support for Epicoccum nigrum and Phoma epicoccina being the same biological species. Mycol Res 104:301–303.
   Google Scholar
• Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Crous PW. 2008. Biology and recent developments in the systematics of Phoma, a complex genus of major quarantine significance. Fungal Divers 31:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge PD, Roberts PJ, Spooner BM, Panchal G. 2003. On the unreliability of published DNA sequences. New Phytol 160:43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Boerema GH. 1983. Mycologisch taxonomisch onderzoek. Phoma-soorten van de sectie Peyronellaea. Versl Med Pl ziektenk Dienst 159(Jaarboek 1982):25–27.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1986. Mycologisch taxonomisch onderzoek. Een subtropische bodemschimmel die zich ook thuis voelt in onze kassen. Versl Med Pl ziektenk Dienst 164(Jaarboek 1985):28–32.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1993. Contributions toward a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) II. Section Peyronellaea. Persoonia 15: 197–221.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1997. Contributions toward a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) V. Subdivision of the genus in sections. Mycotaxon 64:321–333.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Bollen GJ. 1975. Conidiogenesis and conidial septation ads differentiating criteria between Phoma and Ascochyta. Persoonia 8:111–144.
   Google Scholar
• ———, de Gruyter J. 1998. Contributions toward a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) VII. Section Sclerophomella. Taxa with thick-walled pseudoparenchymatous pycnidia. Persoonia 17:81–95.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Noordeloos ME, Hamers MEC. 2004. Phoma identification manual. Differentiation of specific and infra-specific taxa in culture. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing. 470 p.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Dorenbosch MMJ, van Kesteren HA. 1965. Remarks on species of Phoma referred to Peyronellaea. Persoonia 4:47–68.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 1968. Remarks on species of Phoma referred to Peyronellaea II. Persoonia 5:201–205.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 1971. Remarks on species of Phoma referred to Peyronellaea III. Persoonia 6:171–177.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 1973. Remarks on species of Phoma referred to Peyronellaea IV. Persoonia 7:131–139.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 1977. Remarks on species of Phoma referred to Peyronellaea V. Kew Bull 31:533–544.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone I, Kohn LM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91:553–556.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Dickson DW, Kimbrough JW. 1996. Phoma heteroderae sp. nov. isolated from the eggs of Heterodera glycines. Mycologia 88:885–891.
   Google Scholar
• Crous PW, Gams W, Stalpers JA, Robert V, Stegehuis G. 2004. MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Stud Mycol 50:19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Damm U, Verkley GJM, Crous PW, Fourie PH, Haegi A, Riccioni L. 2008. Novel Paraconiothyrium species on stone fruit trees and other woody hosts. Persoonia 20: 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• de Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME, Boerema GH. 1993. Contributions toward a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) I-2. Section Phoma: additional taxa with very small conidia and taxa with conidia up to 7 μm long. Persoonia 15:369–400.
   Google Scholar
• de Hoog GS, Gerrits van den Ende AHG. 1998. Molecular diagnostics of clinical strains of filamentous Basidiomycetes. Mycoses 41:183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Dorenbosch MMJ. 1970. Key to nine ubiquitous soil-borne phoma-like fungi. Persoonia 6:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis JB, Everhart BM. 1888. New species of fungi from various localities. J Mycol 4:97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Gams W, Verkley GJM, Crous PW. 2007. CBS Course of Mycology. 5th ed. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Centraal-bureau voor Schimmelcultures.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Jooste WJ, Papendorf MC. 1981. Phoma cyanea sp. nov. from wheat debris. Mycotaxon 12:444–448.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA. 2008. Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. 10th ed. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing. 700 p.
   Google Scholar
• Luedemann GM. 1961. The dictyochlamydospore of Peyronellaea glomerata (Corda) Goidanich ex Togliani contrasted with the dictyospore of Alternaria tenuis Auct. Mycologia 51:772–780.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Jones G, Burch KB. 1987. Studies in the genus Phoma IX. Concerning Phoma jolyana. Mycotaxon 30: 239–246.
   Google Scholar
• ———, White JF. 1983. Studies in the genus Phoma I. Phoma americana sp. nov. Mycotaxon 16:403–413.
   Google Scholar
• Noordeloos ME, de Gruyter J, van Eijk GW, Roeijmans HJ. 1993. Production of dendritic crystals in pure cultures of Phoma and Ascochyta and its value as a taxonomic character relative to morphology, pathology and cultural characteristics. Mycol Res 97:1343–1350.
   Google Scholar
• Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest 2.2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala, Sweden: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Page RDM. 1996. Treeview: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Bioinformatics 12:357–358.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner RW. 1970. A mycological colour chart. Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute and British Mycological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy PV, Patel R, White JF. 1998. Phylogenetic and developmental evidence supporting reclassification of cruciferous pathogens Phoma lingam and Phoma wasabiae in Plenodomus. Can J Bot 76:1916–1922.
   Google Scholar
• Saccas AM. 1981. Etude de la flore cryptogamique des cafeiers en Afrique Centrale. Paris, France: Institut Français du Café et du Cacao.
   Google Scholar
• Schoch CL, Shoemaker RA, Seifert KA, Hambleton S, Spatafora JW, Crous PW. 2006. A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci. Mycologia 98:1041–1052.
   Google Scholar
• Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16:1114–1116.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web-Servers. Syst Biol 75:758–771.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b 10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Torres MS, White JF, Cazares G, Bergen M, Bischoff JF, Sullivan RF. 2005a. A new species and its phylogenetic placement in the Didymella/Phoma complex (Phaeosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales). Mycotaxon 93:297–308.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Bergen M, Singh S, Bischoff JF, Sullivan RF, White JF. 2005b. Plenodomus morganjonesii sp. nov. and a discussion of the genus Plenodomus. Mycotaxon 93: 333–343.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aa HA, Noordeloos ME, de Gruyter J. 1990. Species concepts in some larger genera of the Coelomycetes. Stud Mycol 32:3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Verkley GJM, da Silva M, Wicklow DT, Crous PW. 2004. Paraconiothyrium, a new genus to accommodate the mycoparasite Coniothyrium minitans, anamorphs of Paraphaeosphaeria, and four new species. Stud Mycol 50:323–335.
   Google Scholar
• White JF, Morgan-Jones G. 1983. Studies in the genus Phoma II. Concerning Phoma sorghina. Mycotaxon 18: 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1984. Studies in the genus Phoma IV. Concerning Phoma macrostoma. Mycotaxon 20:197–204.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1986. Studies in the genus Phoma V. Concerning Phoma pomorum. Mycotaxon 25:461–466.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1987. Studies in the genus Phoma VII. Concerning Phoma glomerata. Mycotaxon 28:437–445.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and amplifications. San Diego: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar