A re-evaluation of genus Chaetomidium based on molecular and morphological characters

LITERATURE CITED

• Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402.
   Google Scholar
• Bainier MG. 1909. Monographie des Chaetomidium et des Chaetomium. Bull Soc Mycol Fr 25:191–237.
   Google Scholar
• Benny GL. 1980. A second species of Chaetomidium with a cephalothecoid peridium wall. Mycologia 72:832–840.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Samuels DA, Kimbrough JW. 1980. Ascocarp development in Chaetomidium arxii (Chaetomiaceae) with special emphasis on the ontogeny of its cephalothecoid peridium. Bot Gaz 141:347–352.
   Google Scholar
• Booth C. 1961. Studies of Pyrenomycetes VI: Thielavia, with notes on some allied genera. Mycol Pap 83:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Shipton WA. 1966. Thielavia pilosa sp. nov., with key to species of Thielavia. Trans Br Mycol Soc 49:665–667.
   Google Scholar
• Cai L, Jeewon R, Hyde KD. 2006a. Molecular systematics of Zopfiella and allied genera: evidence from multi-gene sequence analysis. Mycol Res 110:359–368.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 2006b. Phylogenetic investigations of Sordariaceae based on multiple gene sequences and morphology. Mycol Res 110:137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Cain RF. 1961. Studies of soil fungi III. New species of Coniochaeta, Chaetomidium and Thielavia. Can J Bot 39: 1231–1239.
   Google Scholar
• Cano J, Guarro J, ElShafie AE. 1993. A new Chaetomidium from Oman. Mycotaxon 69:399–403.
   Google Scholar
• Chesters CGC. 1934. Studies on British pyrenomycetes I. The life histories of three species of Cephalotheca Fuck. Trans Br Mycol Soc 19:261–279.
   Google Scholar
• Chivers AH. 1915. A monograph of the genera Chaetomium and Ascotricha. Mem Torrey Bot Club 14:155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Clements FE, Shear CL. 1931. The genera of the Fungi. New York: Hafner Publishing Co. 450 p.
   Google Scholar
• Doveri F, Guarro J, Cacialli G, Caroti V. 1998. Contributions to the study of fimicolous fungi XXVII. A new Chaetomidium from Italy with a cephalothecoid peridium. Mycotaxon 67:427–432.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
   Google Scholar
• Greif MD, Currah RS. 2007. Development and dehiscence of the cephalothecoid peridium in Aporothielavia leptoderma shows it belongs in Chaetomidium. Mycol Res 111:70–77.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Tsuneda A, Currah RS. 2004. The peridial development and dehiscence mechanism of Cryptendoxyla hypophloia, a cleistothecial ascomycete isolated from the bodies of arthropods. Int J Plant Sci 165:957–964.
   Google Scholar
• Gwynne-Vaughan H. 1922. Fungi: Ascomycetes, Ustilaginales, Uredinales. Cambridge: University Press. 232 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlin RT. 1999. The morphology of Cercophora palmicola (Lasiosphaeriaceae). Am J Bot 86:780–784.
   Google Scholar
• Hawksworth DL. 1986. The evolution and adaptation of sexual reproductive structures in the Ascomycotina. In: Rayner EDM, Brasier CM, Moore D, eds. Evolutionary biology of the Fungi. Cambridge: University Press. p 179–189.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Booth C. 1974. A revision of the genus Zopfia Rabenh. Mycol Pap 135:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Mark PVD, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees version 3.1.2. http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/download.php
   Google Scholar
• ———, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Huhndorf SM, Miller AN, Fernandez FA. 2004. Molecular systematics of the Sordariales: the order and the family Lasiosphaeriaceae redefined. Mycologia 96:368–387.
   Google Scholar
• Jeng RS, Cain RF. 1977. Rhytidospora, a new cleistocarpous genus of the melanosporaceae. Mycotaxon 1:278–282.
   Google Scholar
• Lane DJ, Pace B, Olsen GJ, Stahl DA, Sogin ML, Pace NR. 1985. Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 82:6955–6959.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among Ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol Biol Evol 16:1799–1808.
   Google Scholar
• Lodha BC. 1974. Studies on Chaetomidium. Nov Hedw Beih 47:367–372.
   Google Scholar
• Lumbsch HT, Huhndorf SM, eds. 2007. Myconet. Outline of the Ascomycota 13. http://www.fieldmuseum.org/myconet/
   Google Scholar
• Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2007. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.01. http://mesquiteproject.org
   Google Scholar
• Malloch D, Benny GL. 1973. California Ascomycetes: four new species and a new record. Mycologia 65:648–660.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Cain RF. 1970. Five new genera in the new family Pseudeurotiaceae. Can J Bot 48:1815–1825.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1973. The genus Thielavia. Mycologia 65: 1055–1077.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer RJ. 1983. A new species of Chaetomidium with four-spored asci. Mycologia 75:1064–1069.
   Google Scholar
• Miller AN, Huhndorf SM. 2004. Using phylogenetic species recognition to delimit species boundaries within Lasiosphaeria. Mycologia 96:1106–1127.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 2005. Multi-gene phylogenies indicate ascomal wall morphology is a better predictor of phylogenetic relationships than ascospore morphology in the Sordariales (Ascomycota, Fungi). Mol Phylogenet Evol 35:60–75.
   Google Scholar
• Mukerji KG, Saxena AS. 1974. Notes on Achaetomium, Anixiella, Boothiella, Chaetomidium, Lophotrichus, Pseudeurotium, Pycnidiophora, and the classification of the Chaetomiales. Nova Hedw Beih 47:373–404.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut A. 2002. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/
   Google Scholar
• Saccardo PA. 1882. Sylloge Fungorum. 1:39.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels GJ, Rodrigues KF. 1989. Batistia annulipes and its anamorph, Acrostroma annellosynnema. Mycologia 81: 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Seth HK. 1967. Chaetomidium subfimeti sp. nov. from Wales. Trans Br Mycol Soc 50:45–47.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1968. Chaetomidium trichorobustum sp. nov. from Germany. Nova Hedw 16:429–434.
   Google Scholar
• Silva DMW, Hanlin RT. 1996. Chaetomidium heterotrichum from Venezuela, with a key to species and cladistic analysis of the genus Chaetomidium. Mycoscience 37: 261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Skolko AJ, Groves JW. 1953. Notes on seed-borne fungi VII. Chaetomium. Can J Bot 31:779–809.
   Google Scholar
• Stchigel AM, Guarro J, Jato V, Aira MJ. 2004. Two new species of Chaetomidium (Sordariales). Stud Mycol 50: 215–220.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Sagues M, Cano J, Guarro J. 2000. Three new thermotolerant species of Corynascus from soil, with a key to the known species. Mycol Res 104:879–887.
   Google Scholar
• Suh S, Blackwell M. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of the cleistothecial fungi placed in the Cephalotheceae and Pseudeurotiaceae. Mycologia 91:836–848.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Untereiner WA, Debois V, Naveau FA. 2001. Molecular systematics of the ascomycete genus Farrowia (Chaetomiaceae). Can J Bot 79:321–333.
   Google Scholar
• von Arx JA. 1975. On Thielavia and some similar genera of Ascomycetes. Stud Mycol 8:1–29.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Dreyfuss M, Muller E. 1984. A revaluation of Chaetomium and the Chaetomiaceae. Persoonia 12: 169–179.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DA, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. 1990 PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, California: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside WC. 1962. Morphological studies in the Chaetomiaceae II. Mycologia 54:152–159.
   Google Scholar