79
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Using phylogenies of pheromone receptor genes in the Microbotryum violaceum species complex to investigate possible speciation by hybridization

, , &
Pages 689-696 | Received 31 Jul 2009, Accepted 16 Oct 2009, Published online: 20 Jan 2017

LITERATURE CITED

  • Arnold M. 2004. Natural hybridization and the evolution of domesticated, pest and other organisms. Mol Ecol 13: 997–1007.
  • Casselton LA, Kues U. 2007. The origin of multiple mating-types in the model mushrooms Coprinopsis cinerea and Schizophyllum commune. In: Heitman J, Kronstad JW, Taylor JW, Casselton LA, eds. Sex in Fungi. Washington DC: ASM Press. p 142–147.
  • de Vienne DM, Hood ME, Giraud T. 2009. Phylogenetic determinants of potential host shifts in fungal pathogens. J Evol Biol (In press).
  • ———, Refrégier G, Hood ME, Guigue A, Devier B, Vercken E, Smadja C, Deseille A, Giraud T. 2009. Hybrid sterility and inviability in the parasitic fungal species complex Microbotryum. J Evol Biol 22:683–698.
  • Denchev CM. 2007. Microbotryum lagerheimii sp. nov. (Microbotryaceae). Mycol Balcanica 4:61–67.
  • ———, Giraud T, Hood ME. 2009. Three new species of anthericolous smut fungi on Caryophyllaceae. Mycol Balcanica 6:79–84.
  • Devier B, Aguileta G, Hood M, Giraud T. 2009. Ancient transspecific polymorphism at pheromone receptor genes in basidiomycetes. Genetics 181:209–223.
  • Du MZ, Schardl CL, Nuckles EM, Vaillancourt LJ. 2005. Using mating-type gene sequences for improved phylogenetic resolution of Colletotrichum species complexes. Mycologia 97:641–658.
  • Giraud T. 2004. Patterns of within population dispersion and mating of the fungus Microbotryum violaceum parasitising the plant Silene latifolia. Heredity 93:559–565.
  • ———, Jonot O, Shykoff JA. 2005. Selfing propensity under choice conditions in a parasitic fungus, Microbotryum violaceum, and parameters influencing infection success in artificial inoculations. Int J Plant Sci 166:649–657.
  • ———, Refrégier G, de Vienne DM, Le Gac M, Hood ME. 2008a. Speciation in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 45:791–802.
  • ———, Yockteng R, Lopez-Villavicencio M, Refrégier G, Hood ME. 2008b. The mating system of the anther smut fungus, Microbotryum violaceum: selfing under heterothallism. Euk Cell 7:765–775.
  • Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704.
  • Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano TA. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial-DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160–174.
  • Hood ME, Antonovics J. 2000. Intratetrad mating, heterozygosity and the maintenance of deleterious alleles in Microbotryum violaceum (= Ustilago violacea). Heredity 85:231–241.
  • Joly S, McLenachan PA, Lockhart PJ. 2009. A statistical approach for distinguishing hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting. Am Nat 174:E54–E70.
  • Kemler M, Goker M, Oberwinkler F, Begerow D. 2006. Implications of molecular characters for the phylogeny of the Microbotryaceae (Basidiomycota : Urediniomycetes). BMC Evol Biol 6:35.
  • Kishino H, Hasegawa M. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol 29:170–179.
  • Le Gac M, Giraud T. 2008. Existence of a pattern of reproductive character displacement in Basidiomycota but not in Ascomycota. J Evol Biol 21:761–772.
  • ———, Hood ME, Fournier E, Giraud T. 2007a. Phylogenetic evidence of host-specific cryptic species in the anther smut fungus. Evolution 61:15–26.
  • ———, ———, Giraud T. 2007b. Evolution of reproductive isolation within a parasitic fungal complex. Evolution 61:1781–1787.
  • Lowe AJ, Abbott RJ. 2004. Reproductive isolation of a new hybrid species, Senecio eboracensis Abbott & Lowe (Asteraceae). Heredity 92:386–395.
  • Lutz M, Goker M, Piatek M, Kemler M, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F. 2005. Anther smuts of Caryophyllaceae: molecular characters indicate host-dependent species delimitation. Mycol Progress 4:225–238.
  • ———, Pia Tek M, Kemler M, Chlebicki A, Oberwinckler F. 2008. Anther smuts of Caryophyllaceae: Molecular analyses reveal further new species. Mycol Res 112: 1280–1296.
  • Mallet J. 2005. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 20:229–237.
  • ———. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446:279–283.
  • Masneuf I, Hansen J, Groth C, Piskur J, Dubourdieu D. 1998. New hybrids between Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeast species found among wine and cider production strains. App Environ Microbiol 64:3887–3892.
  • McCarthy EM, Asmussen MA, Anderson WW. 1995. A theoretical assessment of recombinational speciation. Heredity 74:502–509.
  • Moon CD, Craven KD, Leuchtmann A, Clement SL, Schardl CL. 2004. Prevalence of interspecific hybrids amongst asexual fungal endophytes of grasses. Mol Ecol 13: 1455–1467.
  • Newcombe G, Stirling B, McDonald S, Vradshaw Jr HD. 2000. Melampsora columbiana, a natural hybrid of M. medusae and M. occidentalis. Mycol Res 104:261–274.
  • O’Donnell K, Ward TJ, Geiser DM, Kistler HC, Aoki T. 2004. Genealogical concordance between the mating-type locus and seven other nuclear genes supports formal recognition of nine phylogenetically distinct species within the Fusarium graminearum clade. Fungal Genet Biol 41:600–623.
  • Olson A, Stenlid J. 2002. Pathogenic fungal species hybrids infecting plants. Microb Infect 4:1353–1359.
  • Pollard DA, Iyer VN, Moses AM, Eisen MB. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. PLoS Genet 2:1634–1647.
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
  • Rau D, Attene G, Brown AHD, Nanni L, Maier FJ, Balmas V, Saba E, Schafer W, Papa R. 2007. Phylogeny and evolution of mating-type genes from Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley “net blotch” disease. Curr Genet 51:377–392.
  • Refrégier G, Le Gac M, Jabbour F, Widmer A, Hood M, Giraud T. 2008. Cophylogeny of the anther smut fungi and their Caryophyllaceous hosts: prevalence of host shifts and importance of delimiting parasite species. BMC Evol Biol 8:100.
  • Richman A. 2000. Evolution of balanced genetic polymorphism. Mol Ecol 9:1953–1963.
  • Schardl CL, Craven KD. 2003. Interspecific hybridization in plant-associated fungi and oomycetes: a review. Mol Ecol 12:2861–2873.
  • Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16:1114–1116.
  • ———, ———. 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17:1246–1247.
  • Sloan D, Giraud T, Hood M. 2008. Maximized virulence in a sterilizing pathogen: the anther-smut fungus and its co-evolved hosts. J Evol Biol 21:1544–155.
  • Staats M, van Baarlen P, van Kan JAL. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of the plant pathogenic genus Botrytis and the evolution of host specificity. Mol Biol Evol 22:333–346.
  • Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial-DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526.
  • Thrall PH, Biere A, Antonovics J. 1993. Plant-life history and disease susceptibility—the occurrence of Ustilago violacea on different species within the Caryophyllaceae. J Ecol 81:489–498.
  • Voigt K, Cozijnsen AJ, Kroymann R, Poggeler S, Howlett BJ. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships between members of the crucifer pathogenic Leptosphaeria maculans species complex as shown by mating-type (MAT1–2), actin, and beta-tubulin sequences. Mol Phyl Evol 37:541–557.
  • Yockteng R, Marthey S, Chiapello H, Hood M, Rodolphe F, Devier B, Wincker P, Dossat C, Giraud T. 2007. Expressed sequence tags of the anther smut fungus, Microbotryum violaceum, identify mating and pathogenicity genes. BMC Genomics 8:272.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.