Expansion of the Stictidaceae by the addition of the saxicolous lichen-forming genus Ingvariella

LITERATURE CITED

• Akaike H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado. p 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Baloch E, Gilenstam G, Wedin M. 2009. Phylogeny and classification of Cryptodiscus, with a taxonomic synopsis of the Swedish species. Fungal Divers 38:51–68.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Lücking R, Lumbsch HT, Wedin M. 2010. Major clades and phylogenetic relationships between lichenized and non-lichenized lineages in Ostropales (Ascomycota: Lecanoromycetes). Taxon 59:1483–1494.
   Google Scholar
• Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN, Collett JR, D’Souza LM, Du Y, Feng B, Lin N, Madabusi LV, Muller KM, Pande N, Shang Z, Yu N, Gutell RR. 2002. The comparative RNA Website (CRW): an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron and other RNA. BMC Bioinformatics 3:2–15, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-3-2
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791, doi:10.2307/2408678
   Google Scholar
• Frisch A. 2006. The lichen family Thelotremataceae in Africa. Bibl Lichenol 92:3–370.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Kalb K, Grube M. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the Thelotremataceae. Bibl Lichenol 92:517–539.
   Google Scholar
• Gaya E, Redelings BD, Navarro-Rosinés P, Llimona X, de Cáceres M, Lutzoni F. 2011. Align or not to align? Resolving species complexes within the Caloplaca saxicola group as a case study. Mycologia 103:361–378, doi:10.3852/10-120
   Google Scholar
• Gilenstam G. 1969. Studies in the lichen genus Conotrema. Ark Bot 7:149–179.
   Google Scholar
• Grube M, Baloch E, Lumbsch HT. 2004. The phylogeny of Porinaceae (Ostropomycetidae) suggests neotenic origin of perithecia in Lecanoromycetes. Mycol Res 108: 1111–1118, doi:10.1017/S0953756204000826
   Google Scholar
• Guderley R, Lumbsch HT, Feige GB. 1997. Ingvariella, a new genus in the Thelotremataceae (lichenized Ascomycotina). Nova Hedwig 64:147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Gueidan C, Roux C, Lutzoni F. 2007. Using a multigene phylogenetic analysis to assess generic delineation and character evolution in Verrucariaceae (Eurotiomycetes, Ascomycota). Mycol Res 111:1145–1168, doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.010
   Google Scholar
• ———, Ruibal Villaseñor C, de Hoog GS, Gorbushina AA, Untereiner WA, Lutzoni F. 2008. A rock-inhabiting ancestor for mutualistic and pathogen-rich fungal lineages. Stud Mycol 61:111–119, doi:10.3114/sim.2008.61.11
   Google Scholar
• Hale ME. 1980. Generic delimitation in the lichen family Thelotremataceae. Mycotaxon 11:130–138.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1981. A revision of the lichen family Thelotremataceae in Sri Lanka. Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) Bot 8:227–332.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Henssen A. 1995. Sagiolechia atlantica, eine neue Flechte von den Atlantischen Inseln (Ascomycotina, Ostropales). Bibl Lichenol 58:123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinf Appl Note 17: 754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Kauff F, Lutzoni F. 2002. Phylogeny of the Gyalectales and Ostropales (Ascomycota, Fungi): among and within order relationships based on nuclear ribosomal RNA small and large subunits. Mol Phylogenet Evol 25:138–156, doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00214-2
   Google Scholar
• Kjer KM. 1995. Use of rRNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: an example of alignment and data presentation from frogs. Mol Phylogenet Evol 4:314–330, doi:10.1006/mpev.1995.1028
   Google Scholar
• Lee SB, Milgroom MG, Taylor JW. 1988. A rapid, high yield mini-prep method for isolation of total genomic DNA from fungi. Fungal Genet Newsl 35:23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lücking R, Stuart BL, Lumbsch HT. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of Gomphillaceae and Asterothyriaceae: evidence from a combined Bayesian analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences. Mycologia 96:283–294, doi:10.2307/3762064
   Google Scholar
• Lumbsch HT. 1989. Die holarktischen Vertreter der Flechtengattung Diploschistes (Thelotremataceae). J Hattori Bot Lab 66:133–196.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2004. Ingvariella. In: Nash TH III, Ryan BD, Diederich P, Gries C, Bungartz F, eds. Lichen flora of the greater Sonoran Desert region II. Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi. Tempe: Lichens Unlimited, Arizona State Univ. p 136–137.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Schmitt I, Palice Z, Wiklund E, Ekman S, Wedin M. 2004. Supraordinal phylogenetic relationships of Lecanoromycetes based on a Bayesian analysis of combined nuclear and mitochondrial sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3:822–832, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Lutzoni F, Kauff F, Cox CJ, McLaughlin D, Celio G, Dentinger B, Padamsee M, Hibbett D, James TY, Baloch E, Grube M, Reeb V, Hofstetter V, Schoch C, Arnold AE, Miadlikowska J, Spatafora J, Johnson D, Hambleton S, Crockett M, Shoemaker R, Sung G-H, Lücking R, Lumbsch T, O’Donnell K, Binder M, Diederich P, Ertz D, Gueidan C, Hansen K, Harris RC, Hosaka K, Lim YW, Matheny B, Nishida H, Pfister D, Rogers J, Rossman A, Schmitt I, Sipman H, Stone J, Sugiyama J, Yahr R, Vilgalys R. 2004. Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life: progress, classification and evolution of subcellular traits. Am J Bot 91:1446–1480, doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1446
   Google Scholar
• ———, Pagel M, Reeb V. 2001. Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors. Nature 411: 937–940, doi:10.1038/35082053
   Google Scholar
• ———, Wagner P, Reeb V, Zoller S. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst Biol 49:628–651, doi:10.1080/106351500750049743
   Google Scholar
• Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2010. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.73. http://mesquiteproject.org
   Google Scholar
• Mangold A, Elix JA, Lumbsch HT. 2009. Thelotremataceae. In: Flora of Australia. Vol. 57, Lichens 5. Canberra and Melbourne: ABRS and CSIRO Publishing. p 242–243.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Martin MP, Lücking R, Lumbsch HT. 2008. Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Thelotremataceae within Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Ostropales). Taxon 57:476–486.
   Google Scholar
• Mason-Gamer RJ, Kellogg EA. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular datasets in the tribe Triticiae (Gramineae). Syst Biol 45:524–545, doi:10.1093/sysbio/45.4.524
   Google Scholar
• Miadlikowska J, Kauff F, Hofstetter V, Fraker E, Grube M, Hafellner J, Reeb V, Hodkinson BP, Kukwa M, Lücking R, Hestmark G, García Otalora M, Rauhut A, Büdel B, Scheidegger C, Timdal E, Stenroos S, Brodo I, Perlmutter G, Ertz D, Diederich P, Lendemer JC, May P, Schoch CL, Arnold AE, Gueidan C, Tripp E, Yahr R, Robertson C, Lutzoni F. 2006. New insights into classification and evolution of the Lecanoromycetes (Pezizomycotina, Ascomycota) from phylogenetic analyses of three ribosomal RNA- and two protein-coding genes. Mycologia 98:1088–1103, doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.1088
   Google Scholar
• ———, Lutzoni F. 2000. Phylogenetic revision of the genus Peltigera (lichen-forming ascomycetes) based on morphological, chemical and large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA data. Int J Plant Sci 161:925–958, doi:10.1086/317568
   Google Scholar
• Müller Argoviensis J. 1887. Graphideae Féeanae inclus. trib. affinibus nec non Graphidaea exoticae Acharii, El. Friesii et Zenkeri e novo studio speciminum originalium expositae et in novam dispositionem ordinatae. Mém Soc Phys Hist Nat Genève 29:1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Nimis PL. 1998. A critical appraisal of modern generic concepts in lichenology. Lichenologist 30:427–438.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. 2003. Using Modeltest and PAUP* to select a model of nucleotide substitution. In: Baxevanis AD, Davison DB, Page RDM, Petsko GA, Stein LD, Stormo GD, eds. Current protocols in bioinformatics. John Wiley & Sons. p 6.5.1–6.5.14.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
   Google Scholar
• Redinger K. 1936. Thelotremataceae brasilienses imprimis ex herbario Regnelliano cognitae praetereaque in herbariis Krempelhuberi, Mülleri Arg., Nylanderi, Wainionis et Zahlbruckneri asservatae. Ark Bot 28A 8: 1–122.
   Google Scholar
• Reeb V, Lutzoni F, Roux C. 2004. Contribution of RPB2 to multilocus phylogenetic studies of the Pezizomycotina (euascomycetes, Fungi) with special emphasis on the lichen-forming Acarosporaceae and evolution of polyspory. Mol Phylogenet Evol 32:1036–1060, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury G. 1971. The Thelotremata of Angola and Mocambique. Rev Biol (Lisbon) 7:271–280.
   Google Scholar
• Schoch CL, Kohlmeyer J, Volkmann-Kohlmeyer B, Tsui CKM, Spatafora JW. 2006. The halotolerant fungus Glomerobolus gelineus is a member of the Ostropales. Mycol Res 110:765–772, doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2005.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood MA. 1977. The Ostropalean fungi. Mycotaxon 5: 1–277.
   Google Scholar
• Staiger B, Kalb K, Grube M. 2006. Phylogeny and phenotypic variation in the lichen family Graphidaceae (Ostropomycetidae, Ascomycota). Mycol Res 110:765–772, doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2006.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tavaré S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. In: Miura RM, ed. Some mathematical questions in biology—DNA sequence analysis. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. p 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Vězda A. 1967. Flechtensystematische Studien VI. Die Gattung Sagiolechia Massal. Folia Geobot Phytotaxon 2:383–396.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Vivant J. 1975. Absconditella pauxilla Vězda et Vivant sp. n., un nouveau lichen des Pyrenees-Atlantiques. Folia Geobot Phytotaxon 10:205–108.
   Google Scholar
• Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   Google Scholar
• Wedin M, Döring H, Gilenstam G. 2004. Saprotrophy and lichenization as options for the same fungal species on different substrata: environmental plasticity and fungal lifestyles in the Stictis-Conotrema complex. New Phytol 164:459–465, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01198.x
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 2006. Stictis s. lat. (Ostropales, Ascomycota) in northern Scandinavia, with a key and notes on morphological variation in relation to lifestyle. Mycol Res 110:773–789, doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2006.04.010
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Koenberg K, Gilenstam G. 2005a. Generic delimitations in the family Stictidaceae (Ostropales, Ascomycota): the Stictis-Conotrema problem. Lichenologist 37:67–75, doi:10.1017/S0024282904014653
   Google Scholar
• ———, Wiklund E, Crewe A, Döring H, Ekman S, Nyberg A, Schmitt I, Lumbsch HT. 2005b. Phylogenetic relationships of Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota) as revealed by analyses of mt SSU and nLSU rDNA sequence data. Mycol Res 109: 159 – 172, doi:10.1017/S0953756204002102
   Google Scholar
• Winka K, Ahlberg C, Eriksson OE. 1998. Are there lichenized Ostropales? Lichenologist 30:455–462.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller S, Scheidegger C, Sperisen C. 1999. PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming Ascomycetes. Lichenologist 31:511–516.
   Google Scholar
• Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [doctoral dissertation]. Austin: Univ Texas Press. 115 p.
   Google Scholar