Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in response to restoration practices

Literature cited

• AhuluEMGollotteAGianinazzi-PearsonVNonakaM. 2006. Cooccurring plants forming distinct arbuscular mycorrhizal morphologies harbor similar AM fungal species. Mycorrhiza 17:37–49, doi:10.1007/s00572-006-0079-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlexanderIAhmadNSeeLS. 1992. The role of mycorrhizas in the regeneration of some Malaysian forest trees. Philos T Roy Soc B 335:379–388, doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0029
   Google Scholar
• AltschulSFGishWMillerWMyersEWLipmanDJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarterMRGregorichEG. 2008. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. 1224 p.
   Google Scholar
• CoatesKD. 2000. Conifer seedling response to northern temperate forest gaps. Forest Ecol Manag 127:249–269, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00135-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DicksonSSmithFASmithSE. 2007. Structural differences in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosies: More than 100 years after Gallaud, where next? Mycorrhiza 17:375–393, doi:10.1007/s00572-007-0130-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdgarRC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797, doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ForsmanJTReunanenPJokimäkiJMönkkönenM. 2010. The effects of small-scale disturbance on forest birds: a meta analysis. Can J Forest Res 40:1833–1842, doi:10.1139/X10-126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GallaudI. 1905. Études sur les mycorrhizes endotrophs. Rev Gen Bot 17:66–83, 123–135, 223–239, 313–325, 425, 479–500.
   Google Scholar
• GuindonSGascuelO. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704, doi:10.1080/10635150390235520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HartesveldtRJHarveyHTShellhammerHSSteckerRE. 1975. The giant sequoia of the Sierra Nevada. Washington DC: US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 180 p.
   Google Scholar
• HarveyHTShellhammerHSSteckerRE. 1980. Giant sequoia ecology: fire and reproduction. Washington DC: US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 182 p.
   Google Scholar
• HerreEAMejíaLCKylloDARojasEMaynardZButlerAvan BaelSA. 2007. Ecological implications of antipathogen effects of tropical fungal endophytes and mycorrhizae. Ecology 88:550–558, doi:10.1890/05-1606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoeksemaJDChaudharyVBGehringCAJohnsonNCKarstJKoideRTPringleAZabinskiCBeverJDMooreJCWilsonGWTKlironomosJNUmbanhowarJ. 2010. A meta analysis of context dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol Lett 13:394–407, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuelsenbeckJPRonquistF. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JanosDP. 1980. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae affect lowland tropical rain forest plant growth. Ecology 61:151–162, doi:10.2307/1937165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonNCRowlandDLCorkidiLEgerton-WarburtonLMAllenEB. 2003. Nitrogen enrichment alters mycorrhizal allocation at five mesic to semiarid grasslands. Ecology 84:1895–1908, doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1895:NEAMAA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesMDSmithSE. 2004. Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas: Are mycorrhizas always mutualisms? Can J Bot 82:1089–1109, doi:10.1139/b04-110
   Google Scholar
• KlironomosJ. 2000. Host-specificity and functional diversity among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, In: BellCByrlinskyMJohnson-GreenP, eds. Microbial biosystems: new frontiers. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology. Atlantic Canada Society for Microbial Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• KoskeREGemmaJN. 1989. A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycol Res 92:486–488, doi:10.1016/S0953-7562(89)80195-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KoughJLMolinaRLindermanRG. 1985. Mycorrhizal responsiveness of Thuja, Calocedrus, Sequoia and Sequoiadendron species of western North America. Can J Forest Res 15:1049–1054, doi:10.1139/x85-170
   Google Scholar
• KrügerMStockingerHKrügerCSchüßlerA. 2009. DNA-based species level detection of Glomeromycota: one PCR primer set for all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 183:212–223, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02835.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LovelockCEMillerR. 2002. Heterogeneity in inoculum potential and effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 83:823–832, doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0823:HIIPAE]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGonigleTPMillerMHEvansDGFairchildGLSwanJA. 1990. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 115:495–501, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MengeJA. 1982. Effect of soil fumigants and fungicides on vesicular-arbuscular fungi. Phytopathology 72:1125–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MitchellRJHiersJKO'BrienJJJackSBEngstromRT. 2006. Silviculture that sustains: the nexus between silviculture, frequent prescribed fire and conservation of biodiversity in longleaf pine forests of the southeastern United States. Can J Forest Res 36:2724–2736, doi:10.1139/x06-100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MutchLSSwetnamTW. 1995. Effects of fire severity and climate on ring-width growth of giant sequoia after burning. Missoula, Montana: Symposium on Fire in Wilderness and Park Management. USDA Forest Serv Gen Tech Rep INT-GTR-320. p 241–246.
   Google Scholar
• NijjerSRogersWESiemannE. 2010. The impacts of fertilization on mycorrhizal production and investment in western Gulf Coast grasslands. Am Midl Nat 163:124– 133, doi:10.1674/0003-0031-163.1.124
   Google Scholar
• ParikkaPLemmettyA. 2004. Tracing latent infection of Colletotrichum acutatum on strawberry by PCR. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:393–398, doi:10.1023/B:EJPP.0000021073.67137.d2
   Google Scholar
• PearsonJNJakobsenI. 1993. Symbiotic exchange of carbon and phosphorus between cucumber and three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 124:481–488, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03839.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PearsonJNSmithSESmithFA. 1991. Effect of photon irradiance on the development and activity of VA mycorrhizal infection in Allium porrum. Mycol Res 95:741–746, doi:10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80824-1
   Google Scholar
• PerryDAMolinaRAmaranthusMP. 1987. Mycorrhizae, mycorrhizospheres and reforestation—current knowledge and research needs. Can J Forest Res 17:929–940, doi:10.1139/x87-145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PorcelRRuiz-LozanoJM. 2004. Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J Exp Bot 55:1743–1750, doi:10.1093/jxb/erh188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RonquistFHuelsenbeckJP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithFASmithSE. 1997. Structural diversity in (vesicular)-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 137:373– 388, doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00848.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithSEReadDJ. 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. New York: Academic Press. 800 p.
   Google Scholar
• StephensonNL. 1999. Reference conditions for giant sequoia forest restoration: structure, process and precision. Ecol Appl 9:1253–1265, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1253:RCFGSF]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TavaréS. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. In: MiuraRM, ed. New York: American Mathematical Society: lectures on mathematics in the life sciences. p 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• UmbanhowarJMcCannK. 2005. Simple rules for the coexistence and competitive dominance of plants mediated by mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol Lett 8:247–252, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00714.x
   Google Scholar
• WalkerLRdel MoralR. 2003. Primary succession and ecosystem rehabilitation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. 442 p.
   Google Scholar
• WhippsJM. 2004. Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens. Can J Bot 82:1198– 1227, doi:10.1139/b04-082
   Google Scholar
• WhitbeckJL. 2001. Effects of light environment on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza development in Inga leiocalycina, a tropical wet forest tree. Biotropica 33:303–311.
   Google Scholar
• YorkRABattlesJJEschtruthAKSchurrFG. 2011. Giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) regeneration in experimental canopy gaps. Restor Ecol 19:14–23, doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00537.x
   Google Scholar
• YorkRABattlesJJHealdRC. 2003. Edge effects in mixed conifer group selection openings: tree height response to resource gradients. Forest Ecol Manag 179:107–121, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00487-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YorkRAFuchsDBattlesJJStephensSL. 2010. Radial growth responses to gap creation in large, old Sequoiadendron giganteum. Appl Veg Sci 13:498–509, doi:10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01089.x
   Google Scholar
• YorkRAHealdRCBattlesJJYorkJD. 2004. Group selection management in conifer forests: relationships between opening size and tree growth. Can J For Res 34:630– 641, doi:10.1139/x03-222
   Google Scholar
• YorkRAStephensonNLMeyerMHannaSMoodyTCaprioTBattlesJJ. 2012. Giant sequoia. In: PanekJABattlesJJAustinJTSydoriakCANydickNREsperanzaAmSaahDD, eds. National Park Service. Fort Collins, Colorado: A natural resource condition assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks. (In press).
   Google Scholar