New species of Xerocomus (Boletales) from the Guiana Shield, with notes on their mycorrhizal status and fruiting occurrence

Literature cited

• AgererR. 1991. Characterization of ectomycorrhiza. Method Microbiol 23:25–73, 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70172-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BinderMHibbettDS. 2006. Molecular systematics and biological diversification of Boletales. Mycologia 98: 971–981, 10.3852/mycologia.98.6.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CornerEJH. 1972. Boletus in Malaysia. Singapore: Government Printer. 263 p.
   Google Scholar
• CornerEJH. 1974. Boletus and Phylloporus in Malaysia: further notes and descriptions. Garden’s Bull Singapore 27:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• DentingerBTMAmmiratiJFBothEEDesjardinDEHallingREHenkelTWMoreauPANagasawaESoytongKTaylorAFWatlingRMoncalvoJMMcLaughlinDJ. 2010. Molecular phylogenetics of porcini mushrooms (Boletus section Boletus). Mol Phylogenet Evol 57:1276–1292, 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrehmelDJamesTYVilgalysR. 2008. Molecular phylogeny and biodiversity of the boletes. Fungi 1:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• FulgenziTDHallingREHenkelTW. 2010. Fistulinella cinereoalba sp. nov. and new distribution records for Austroboletus from Guyana. Mycologia 102:224–232, 10.3852/09-059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FulgenziTDHenkelTWHallingRE. 2007. Tylopilus orsonianus sp. nov. and Tylopilus eximius from Guyana. Mycologia 99:622–627, 10.3852/mycologia.99.4.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FulgenziTDMayorJRHenkelTWHallingRE. 2008. New species of Boletellus from Guyana. Mycologia 100:490–495, 10.3852/07-170R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GómezLD. 1996. Basidiomycetes de Costa Rica 9. Xerocomus, Chalciporus, Pulveroboletus, Boletellus, Xanthoconium (Agaricales, Boletaceae). In: CarranzaJMuellerGM, eds. Fungi of Costa Rica: selected studies on ecology and biodiversity. Rev Biol Trop 44 Suppl. 4, 59–90.
   Google Scholar
• HallingRENuhnMFechnerNAOsmundsonTWSoytongKAroraDHibbettDSBinderM. 2012. Sutorius, a new genus for Boletus eximius. Mycologia 104:951–961, 10.3852/11-376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeinemannP. 1964. Boletineae du Katanga. Bull Jard Etat Brux 34:425–478, 10.2307/3667162
   Google Scholar
• HeinemannPGoossens-FontanaM. 1954. Flore iconographique des champignons du Congo. Fascicle 3. Boletineae. Brussels: Le Jardin botanique de l’Etat. p 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• HenkelTW. 1999. New taxa and distribution records for Tylopilus from Dicymbe forests of Guyana. Mycologia 91: 655–665, 10.2307/3761252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenkelTW. 2001. Tylopilus pakaraimensis sp. nov., a new bolete in Tylopilus section Potamogetones from Guyana. Mycotaxon 78:105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenkelTWAimeMCChinMMillerSLVilgalysRSmithME. 2012. Ectomycorrhizal fungal sporocarp diversity and discovery of new taxa in Dicymbe monodominant forests of the Guiana Shield. Biodivers Conserv 21:2195–2220, 10.1007/s10531-011-0166-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolmgrenPKHolmgrenNHBarnettLC. 1990. Index herbariorum I. The herbaria of the world. New York Botanical Garden. 693 p.
   Google Scholar
• HorakE. 2011. Revision of Malaysian species of Boletales s.l. (Basidiomycota) described by E.J.H. Corner (1972, 1974). Malayan Forest Records 51. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Serangor Darul Ehsan. 283 p.
   Google Scholar
• KornerupAWanscherJH. 1978. Methuen handbook of color. London: Eyre Methuen. 252 p.
   Google Scholar
• LadurnerHSimoniniG. 2003. Xerocomus s. l. Fungi Europaei. Vol. 8. Edizioni Candusso, Alassio. 527 p.
   Google Scholar
• MayorJRFulgenziTDHenkelTWHallingRE. 2008. Boletellus piakaii sp. nov. and a new distribution record for Boletellus ananas var. ananas from Guyana. Mycotaxon 105:387–398.
   Google Scholar
• McNabbRFR. 1968. The Boletaceae of New Zealand. NZ J Bot 6:137–176, 10.1080/0028825X.1968.10429056
   Google Scholar
• NevesMABinderMHallingRHibbettDSoytongK. 2012. The phylogeny of selected Phylloporus species, inferred from NUC-LSU and ITS sequences, and descriptions of new species from the Old World. Fungal Divers 55:109–123, 10.1007/s13225-012-0154-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NevesMAHenkelTWHallingRE. 2010. Phylloporus colligatus, a new species of gilled bolete from Guyana. Mycotaxon 111:143–148, 10.5248/111.143
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-SantanaBLodgeDJBaroniTJBothEE. 2007. Boletes from Belize and the Dominican Republic. Fungal Divers 27:247–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeintnerULadurnerHSimoniniG. 2006. Xerocomus cisalpinus sp. nov., and the delimitation of species in the X. chrysenteron complex based on morphology and rDNA-LSU sequences. Mycol Res 197:659–679.
   Google Scholar
• SingerR. 1945. The Boletineae of Florida with notes on extralimital species II. The Boletaceae (Gyroporoideae). Farlowia 2:223–303.
   Google Scholar
• SingerRGarciaJGómezPL. 1991. The Boletineae of Mexico and Central America III. Beih Nova Hedwig 102:1–99.
   Google Scholar
• SingerRIvoryMAraujoI. 1983. The ectotrophically mycorrhizal fungi of the Neotropical lowlands, especially central Amazonia. Beih Nova Hedwig 77:1–352.
   Google Scholar
• SmithAHThiersHD. 1971. The boletes of Michigan. Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Press. 428 p.
   Google Scholar
• SmithMEHenkelTWAimeMCFremierAKVilgalysR. 2011. Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure on three co-occurring leguminous canopy tree species in a Neotropical rainforest. New Phytol 192:699–712, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03844.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SnellWHDickEA. 1970. The boleti of northeastern North America. Lehre, Germany: Cramer. 115 p.
   Google Scholar
• SutaraJ. 2008. Xerocomus s.l. in the light of the present state of knowledge. Czech Mycol 60:29–62.
   Google Scholar
• TaylorAFSHillsAESimoniniGBothEEEberhardtU. 2006. Detection of species within the Xerocomus subtomentosus complex in Europe using rDNA–ITS sequences. Mycol Res 110:276–287, 10.1016/j.mycres.2005.11.013
   Google Scholar
• WatlingR. 2008. A manual and source book on the boletes and their allies. Synopsis Fungorum 24:51–100.
   Google Scholar