Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal three new species of Cantharellus within 20 m of one another in western Wisconsin, USA

Literature cited

• AndersonJBUllrichRC. 1979. Biological Species of Armillaria mellea in North America. Mycologia 71: 402–414, 10.2307/3759160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AroraDDunhamS. 2008. A new, commercially valuable chanterelle species, Cantharellus californicus sp. nov., associated with live oak in California, USA. Econ Bot 62:376–391, 10.1007/s12231-008-9042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BanikMTBurdsallHHVolkTJ. 1998. Identification of groups within Laetiporus sulphureus in the United States based on RFLP analysis of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. Folia Cryptogamica Estonia 33:9–14.
   Google Scholar
• BigelowH. 1978. The cantharelloid fungi of New England and adjacent areas. Mycologia 70:707–756, 10.2307/3759354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuyckBCruaudCCoulouxAHofstetterV. 2011. Cantharellus texensis sp. nov. from Texas, a southern lookalike of C. cinnabarinus revealed by tef-1 sequence data. Mycologia 103:1037–1046, 10.3852/10-261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuyckBHofstetterV. 2011. The contribution of tef-1 sequences to species delimitation in the Cantharellus cibarius species complex in the southeastern USA. Fungal Divers 49:35–46, 10.1007/s13225-011-0095-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CalendiniFMartinJ-F. 2007. PAUPUp 1.0.3.1. A free graphical frontend for PAUP* DOS software.
   Google Scholar
• CokerWC. 1919. Craterellus, Cantharellus and related genera in North Carolina, with a key to the genera of gilled fungi. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 35:24–48.
   Google Scholar
• DunhamSO’DellTMolinaR. 2003. Analysis of nrDNA sequences and microsatellite allele frequencies reveals a cryptic chanterelle species Cantharellus cascadensis sp. nov. from the American Pacific Northwest. Mycol Res 107:1163–1177, 10.1017/S0953756203008475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FeibelmanTBaymanPCibulaW. 1994. Length variation in the internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA in chanterelles. Mycol Res 98:614–618, 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80407-3
   Google Scholar
• FeibelmanTDoudrickRCibulaWBennettJ. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships within the Cantharellaceae inferred from sequence analysis of the nuclear large subunit rDNA. Mycol Res 101:1423–1430, 10.1017/S0953756297004115
   Google Scholar
• FriesEM. 1821. Cantharellus. Systema Mycologicum I. 318.
   Google Scholar
• GardesMBrunsT. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—applications to the indentification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2: 113–118, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuindonSGascuelO. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704, 10.1080/10635150390235520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallT. 2007. Bioedit 7.13. A user friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows.
   Google Scholar
• HomolaRL. 1993. Cantharelloid fungi of Maine. Maine Nat 1:5–12, 10.2307/3858219
   Google Scholar
• KuoMDewsburyDRO’DonnellKCarterMCRehnerSAMooreJDMoncalvoJ-MCanfieldSAStephensonSLMethvenAVolkTJ. 2012. Taxonomic revision of true morels (Morchella) in Canada and the United States. Mycologia, 10.3852/11-375
   Google Scholar
• LindnerDBanikM. 2009. Effects of cloning root-tip size on observations of fungal ITS sequences from Picea glauca roots. Mycologia 101:157–165, 10.3852/08-034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaddisonWPMaddisonDR. 2011. Mesquite 2.75. A modular system for evolutionary analysis. ( http://mesquiteproject.org)
   Google Scholar
• MathenyPBAustinEABirkebakJMWolfenbargerAD. 2010. Craterellus fallax, a black trumpet mushroom from eastern North America with a broad host range. Mycorrhiza 20:569–575, 10.1007/s00572-010-0326-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoncalvoJNilssonRHKosterBDunhamSMBernauerTMathenyPBPorterTMMargaritescuSGarnicaMWSDanellELangerGLangerELarssonELarssonKVilgalysR. 2006. The cantharelloid clade: dealing with incongruent gene trees and phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Mycologia 98:937–948, 10.3852/mycologia.98.6.937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorehouseEAJamesTYGanleyARDVilgalysRBergerLMurphyPJLongcoreJE. 2003. Multilocus sequence typing suggests the chytid pathogen of amphibians is a recently emerged clone. Mol Ecol 12:395–403, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01732.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PageRDM. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PeckC. 1887. New York species of Cantharellus. Bull New York State Mus Nat Hist 1:34–43.
   Google Scholar
• PetersenRH. 1969. Notes on cantharelloid fungi II. Some new taxa, and notes on Pseudocraterellus. Persoonia 5: 211–223.
   Google Scholar
• PetersenRH. 1971. Interfamilial relationships in the clavarioid and cantharelloid fungi. In: PetersenRH, ed. Evolution in the higher Basidiomycetes. Knoxville: Univ. Tennessee Press. p 345–374.
   Google Scholar
• PetersenRH. 1976. Notes on cantharelloid fungi VII. The taxa described by Charles H. Peck. Mycologia 68:304–326, 10.2307/3759002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetersenRH. 1979. Notes on cantharelloid fungi IX. Illustrations of new or poorly understood taxa. Nova Hedwigia 31:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetersenRH. 1985. Notes on clavarioid fungi XIX. Colored illustrations of selected taxa, with comments on Cantharellus. Nova Hedwigia 42:151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PosadaD. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256, 10.1093/molbev/msn083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RedheadS. 2012. Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum 5:1. ISSN 2049–2375
   Google Scholar
• RedheadSNorvellLDanellE. 1997. Cantharellus formosus and the Pacific golden chanterelle harvest in western North America. Mycotaxon 65:285–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithAH. 1968. The Cantharellaceae of Michigan. Mich Bot 7:143–167.
   Google Scholar
• SmithAHMorseEE. 1947. The genus Cantharellus in the western United States. Mycologia 39:497–534, 10.2307/3755192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwoffordDL. 1993. PAUP 3.1. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Washington DC: Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• TibuhwaDDSanjaSLeifTKivaisiAK. 2012. Afrocantharellus gen. stat. nov. is part of a rich diversity of African Cantharellaceae. IMA Fungus 3:25–38, 10.5598/imafungus.2012.03.01.04
   Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WatlingR. 1997. The business of fructification. Nature 385: 299–300, 10.1038/385299a0
   Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTDLeeSBTaylorJW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: InnisMGelfandDSninskyJWhiteT, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• ZwicklDJ. 2006. vol Garli: genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [doctoral dissertation], Austin: Univ. Texas Press. 125p.
   Google Scholar