Morphological and molecular data for Australian Hebeloma species do not support the generic status of Anamika

Literature cited

• AanenDKKuyperTWBoekhoutTHoekstraRF. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Hebeloma based on ITS 1 and 2 sequences, with special emphasis on the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex. Mycologia 92:261–281 , doi:10.2307/3761560
   Google Scholar
• BougherNLSymeK. 1998. Fungi of southern Australia. Perth: Univ. Western Australia. 391 p.
   Google Scholar
• BougherNLTommerupICMalajczukN. 1991. Nuclear behavior in the basidiomes and ectomycorrhizas of Hebeloma westraliense sp. nov. Mycol Res 95:683–688 , doi:10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80815-0
   Google Scholar
• BoyleHZimdarsBRenkerCBuscotF. 2006. A molecular phylogeny of Hebeloma species from Europe. Mycol Res 110:369–380 , doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2005.11.015
   Google Scholar
• BresinskyA. 2000. Hebeloma khogianum sp. nov., Hygrocybe fibula sp. nov. et autres macromycètes de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Bull Soc Mycol Fr 116:217–229.
   Google Scholar
• EberhardtUBekerHJ. 2010. Hebeloma vesterholtii, a new species in section Theobromina. Mycol Prog 9:215–223 , doi:10.1007/s11557-009-0627-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdgarRC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797 , doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FelsensteinJ. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791 , doi:10.2307/2408678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GardesMBrunsTD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118 , doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreyPGreyE. 2005. Fungi down under: the Fungimap guide to Australian Fungi. Melbourne: Fungimap. 146 p.
   Google Scholar
• GrgurinovicCA. 1997. Larger fungi of South Australia. Adelaide: The Botanic Gardens of Adelaide and State Herbarium and the Flora and Fauna of South Australia Handbooks Committee. 725 p.
   Google Scholar
• HeslerLR. 1977. New species of Hebeloma. Kew Bull 31:471–480 , doi:10.2307/4119390
   Google Scholar
• HeykoopMEsteve-RaventósF. 1997. Mycological notes II. Neotypification of Hebeloma cistophilum, a Mediterranean pleurocystidiate species, and combination of Hebeloma cremeopallidium (Esteve-Rav. & Heykoop) comb. nov. Mycotaxon 61:209–213.
   Google Scholar
• HollandAAPeglerDN. 1983. Hebeloma victoriense and the genus Metraria. Trans Br Mycol Soc 80:157–186 , doi:10.1016/S0007-1536(83)80177-6
   Google Scholar
• HongoT. 1965. Notes on Japanese larger fungi. J Japan Bot 40:314–315.
   Google Scholar
• KornerupAWanscherJH. 1978. Methuen handbook of color. 3rd ed. London: Eyre Methuen. 252 p.
   Google Scholar
• MathenyPBCurtisJMHoffsteterVAimeMCMoncalvoJ-MGeZ-WYangZ-LSlotJCAmmiratiJFBaroniTJBougherNLHughesKWLodgeDJKerriganRWSeidlMTAanenDKDeNitisKDanieleGMDesjardinDEKroppBRNorvellLLParkerAVellingaECVilgalysRHibbettDS. 2006. Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98:982–995 , doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MillerOKHiltonRN. 1987. New and interesting agarics from Western Australia. Sydowia 39:126–137.
   Google Scholar
• MoreauPA. 2005. A nomenclatural revision of the genus Alnicola (Cortinariaceae). Fungal Divers 21:121–155.
   Google Scholar
• MoreauPAPeintnerUGardesM. 2006. Phylogeny of the ectomycorrhizal mushroom genus Alnicola (Basidiomycota, Cortinariaceae) based on rDNA sequences with special emphasis on host specificity and morphological characters. Mol Phylogenet Evol 38:794–807 , doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeintnerUBougherNLCastellanoMAMoncalvoJ-MMoserMMTrappeJMVilgalysR. 2001. Multiple origins of sequestrate fungi related to Cortinarius (Cortinariaceae). Am J Bot 88:2168–2179 , doi:10.2307/3558378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RambautA. 2002. Sequence alignment editor. 2.0. Oxford, UK: Univ. Oxford, Department of Zoology.
   Google Scholar
• RonquistFHuelsenbeckJP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574 , doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SingerR. 1986. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 4th ed. Koenigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books. 981 p.
   Google Scholar
• SmithAH. 1984. Studies of Hebeloma (Fr.) Kummer from the Great Lakes region of North America I. Sydowia 37: 271–283.
   Google Scholar
• SmithAHEvensonVSMitchellDS. 1983. The veiled species of Hebeloma in the western United States. Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Press. 232 p.
   Google Scholar
• SwoffordDL. 2003. PAUP* 4: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• ThomasKAPeintnerUMoserMMManimohanP. 2002. Anamika, a new mycorrhizal genus of Cortinariaceae from India and its phylogenetic position based on ITS and LSU sequences. Mycol Res 106:245–251 , doi:10.1017/S0953756201005445
   Google Scholar
• VesterholtJ. 2005. The genus Hebeloma. Fungi of northern Europe. Vol. 3. Copenhagen: Danish Mycological Society. 146 p.
   Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJ. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogentics. In: InnisMAGelfandDHSninskyJJWhiteTJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• YangZLMathenyPBGeZWSlotJCHibbettDS. 2005. New Asian species of the genus Anamika (eugarics, hebelomatoid clade) based on morphology and ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Res 109:1259–1267 , doi:10.1017/S0953756205003758
   Google Scholar
• YoungAM. 2002. Brief notes on Hebeloma aminophilum R.N. Hilton & O.K. Miller (“ghoul fungus”) from northern Queensland and Tasmania. Aust Mycol 21:79–80.
   Google Scholar
• YoungAM. 2005. A field guide to the Fungi of Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press. 240 p.
   Google Scholar