Common, unsightly and until now undescribed: Fumiglobus pieridicola sp. nov., a sooty mold infesting Pieris japonica from western North America

Literature cited

• AndrewJH. 1992. Biological control in the phyllosphere. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:603–635, doi:10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.003131
   Google Scholar
• BatistaACCiferriR. 1963a. Capnodiales. Pavia, Italy: R. Cortina. 298 p.
   Google Scholar
• BatistaACCiferriR. 1963b. The sooty molds of the family Asbolisiaceae. Quaderno/Istituto botanico della Università. Laboratorio crittogamico Pavia 31:1–216.
   Google Scholar
• BlakemanJPFokkemaNJ. 1982. Potential for biological control of plant diseases on the phylloplane. Annu Rev Phytopathol 20:167–192, doi:10.1146/annurev.py.20.090182.001123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuczackiSTHarrisKMHargreavesB. 1981. Collins guide to the pests, diseases and disorders of garden plants. Glasgow, UK: Collins. 512 p.
   Google Scholar
• ChomnuntiPSchochCLAguirre-HudsonBKo-KoTWHongsananSJonesEBGKodsuebRPhookamsakRChukeatiroteEBahkaliAHHydeKD. 2011. Capnodiaceae. Fungal Divers 51:103–134, doi:10.1007/s13225-011-0145-6
   Google Scholar
• CrousPWBraunUGroenewaldJZ. 2007. Mycosphaerella is polyphyletic. Stud Mycol 58:1–32, doi:10.3114/sim.2007.58.01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrousPWSchochCLHydeKDWoodARGueidanCde HoogGSGroenewaldJZ. 2009. Phylogenetic lineages in the Capnodiales. Stud Mycol 64:17–47, doi:10.3114/sim.2009.64.02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DarribaDTaboadaGLDoalloRPosadaD. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772, doi:10.1038/nmeth.2109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DhamiMKWeirBSTaylorMWBeggsJR. 2013. Diverse honeydew-comsuming fungal communites associated with scale insects. PLoS ONE8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0070316
   Google Scholar
• FarrDFBillsGFChamurisGPRossmanAY. 1989. Fungi on plants and plant products in the United States. St Paul, Minnesota: APS Press. 1252 p.
   Google Scholar
• FraserL. 1935. An investigation of the sooty molds of New South Wales IV. The species of the Eucapnodieae. Proc Linn Soc NSW 40:159–178.
   Google Scholar
• GargasATaylorJW. 1992. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for amplifying and sequencing nuclear 18S rDNA from lichenized fungi. Mycologia 48:589–592, doi:10.2307/3760327
   Google Scholar
• GuindonSGascuelO. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704, doi:10.1080/10635150390235520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HansfordCG. 1961. The Meliolineae, a monograph. Beih Sydowia 2:1–806.
   Google Scholar
• HollingsworthCS. 2013. Pacific Northwest insect management handbook. Corvallis: Oregon State Univ, http://pnwhandbooks.org/insect/pacific-northwest-insect-management-handbook/citing-handbook#sthash.VEI0l8eS.dpuf ( Accessed 30 Nov 2013).
   Google Scholar
• HosagoudarVBAgarwalDK. 2008. Taxonomic studies of Meliolales: identification manual. Dehradun India: International Book Distributors. 263 p.
   Google Scholar
• HughesSJ. 1972. New Zealand Fungi 17. Pleomorphism in Euantaennariaceae and Metacapnodiaceae, two families of sooty molds. N Z J Bot 10:225–242, doi:10.1080/0028825X.1972.10429151
   Google Scholar
• HughesSJ. 1976. Sooty molds. Mycologia 68:693–820, doi:10.2307/3758799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JaczewskiAA. 1917. Opredelitel’ gribov. T.2. Nesovershennie gribi. Petrograd, Russia.
   Google Scholar
• JamesADunganRPlankMItoR. 2007. A dynamical model of honeydew droplet production by sooty-beech scale insects (Ultracoelostoma spp.) in New Zealand Nothofagus forest. Ecol Model 209: 323–332, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.06.024
   Google Scholar
• JamesTYKauffFSchochCLMathenyPBHofstetterVCoxCJCelioGGueidanCFrakerEMiadlikowskaJLumbschHTRauhutAReebVArnoldAEAmtoftAStajichJEHosakaKSungGHJohnsonDO’RourkeBCrockettMBinderMCurtisJMSlotJCWangZWilsonAWSchuszlerALongcoreJEO’DonnellKMozleyStandridgeSPorterDLetcherPMPowellMJTaylorJWWhiteMMGriffithGWDaviesDRHumberRAMortonJBSugiyamaJRossmanAYRogersJDPfisterDHHewittDHansenKHambletonSShoemakerRAKohlmeyerJVolkmann-KohlmeyerBSpottsRASerdaniMCrousPWHughesKWMatsuuraKLangerELangerGUntereinerWALuckingRBudelBGeiserDMAptrootADiederichPSchmittISchultzMYahrRHibbettDSLutzoniFMcLaughlinDJSpataforaJWVilgalysR. 2006. Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature 443:818–822, doi:10.1038/nature05110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesRKBensonDM. 2001. Diseases of woody ornamentals and trees in nurseries. St Paul, Minnesota: APS Press. 482 p.
   Google Scholar
• KatohKKumaKTohHMiyataT. 2005. MAFFT 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33:511–518, doi:10.1093/nar/gki198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KellyD. 1990. Honeydew density in mixed Nothofagus forest, Westland, New Zealand. N Z J Bot 28:53–58, doi:10.1080/0028825X.1990.10412343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KirkPMCannonPFMinterDWStalpersJA. 2008. Dictionary of the Fungi. Wallingford, UK: CABI. 747 p.
   Google Scholar
• KhodaparastSA. 2006. A survey on citrus sooty mold fungi in Gilan Province, Iran. Rostaniha 7:59–65 (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• LinnaeusC. 1751. Philosophia botanica. Stockholm, Sweden: Godofr. Kiesewetter. 402 p.
   Google Scholar
• LumbschHTHuhndorfSM. 2010. Myconet. Vol. 14. Outline of Ascomycota—2009. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4751–5113. Fieldiana Life Earth Sci 1: 1–64, doi:10.3158/1557.1
   Google Scholar
• MaddisonWPMaddisonDR. 2011. Mesquite 2.75: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. http://mesquiteproject.org
   Google Scholar
• McAlpineD. 1896. Two additions to the fungi of New South Wales. Proc Linn Soc N S W 21:722–724.
   Google Scholar
• McNeillJBarrieFRBuckWRDemoulinVGreuterWHawksworthDLHerendeenPSKnappSMarholdKPradoJPrud’homme van ReineWFSmithGFWiersemaJHTurlandNJ. 2012. Names of anamorphic fungi or fungi with a pleomorphic life cycle. Chapter VIII. International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Melbourne Code). Koenigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books.
   Google Scholar
• PartykaRE. 1980. Woody ornamentals: plants and problems. Columbus, Ohio: ChemLawn Corp. 427 p.
   Google Scholar
• PetrakFSydowH. 1935. Kritisch-Systematische Originaluntersuchungen über Pyrenomyceten, Sphaeropsideen und Melanconieen VI. Ann Mycol 33:190–191.
   Google Scholar
• RambautA. 2002. Se-Al sequence alignment editor, 2.0a11. Oxford, UK: Univ. Oxford Press, http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/
   Google Scholar
• ReynoldsDR. 1976. Observations on growth forms of sooty mold Fungi. Nova Hedwigia 26:179–193.
   Google Scholar
• ReynoldsDR. 1998. Capnodiaceous sooty mold phylogeny. Can J Bot 76:2125–2130.
   Google Scholar
• ReynoldsDRGilbertGS. 2006. Epifoliar Fungi from Panama. Cryptogam Mycol 27:249–270.
   Google Scholar
• SaccardoPA. 1893. Mycetes aliquot Australienses. Series quarta. Hedwigia 32:56–59.
   Google Scholar
• SchochCLCrousPWGroenewaldJZBoehmEWABurgessTIde GruyterJde HoogGSDixonLJGrubeMGueidanCHaradaYHatakeyamaSHirayamaKHosoyaTHuhndorfSMHydeKDJonesEBGKohlmeyerJKruysALiYMLuckingRLumbschHTMarvanovaLMbatchouJSMcVayAHMillerANMugambiGKMuggiaLNelsenMPNelsonPOwensbyCAPhillipsAJLPhongpaichitSPointingSBPujade-RenaudVRajaHAPlataERRobbertseBRuibalCSakayarojJSanoTSelbmannLShearerCAShirouzuTSlippersBSuetrongSTanakaKVolkmann-KohlmeyerBWingfieldMJWoodARWoudenbergJHCYonezawaHZhangYSpataforaJW. 2009a. A classwide phylogenetic assessment of Dothideomycetes. Stud Mycol 64:1–15, doi:10.3114/sim.2009.64.01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchochCLShoemakerRASeifertKAHambletonSSpataforaJWCrousPW. 2006. A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci. Mycologia 98: 1041–1052, doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.1041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchochCLSungG-HLopez-GiraldezFTownsendJPMiadlikowskaJHofstetterVRobbertseBMathenyPBKauffFWangZGueidanCAndrieRMTrippeKCiufettiLMWynnsAFrakerEHodkinsonBPBonitoGGroenewaldJZArzanlouMde HoogGSCrousPWHewittDPfisterDHPetersonKGryzenhoutMWingfieldMJAptrootASuhS-OBlackwellMHillisDMGriffithGWCastleburyLARossmanAYLumbschHTLueckingRBuedelBRauhutADiederichPErtzDGeiserDMHosakaKInderbitzinPKohlmeyerJVolkmann-KohlmeyerBMostertLO’DonnellKSipmanHRogersJDShoemakerRASugiyamaJSummerbellRCUntereinerWJohnstonPRStenroosSZuccaroADyerPSCrittendenPDColeMSHansenKTrappeJMYahrRLutzoniFSpataforaJW. 2009b. The Ascomycota tree of life: a phylumwide phylogeny clarifies the origin and evolution of fundamental reproductive and ecological traits. Syst Biol 58:224–239, doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchreadJC. 1970. Control of scale insect and mealy bugs on ornamentals. New Haven, Connecticut: Bulletin of the Connecticut Agricultural Experimental Station. Vol. 710.
   Google Scholar
• SharmaNDAgarwalGP. 1977. Fungi causing plant diseases at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India, 15. Some Sphaeropsidales. Sydowia 30:290–296.
   Google Scholar
• SinclairWALyonHL. 2005. Diseases of trees and shrubs. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Univ. Press. 660 p.
   Google Scholar
• SivanesanA. 1984. The bitunicate Ascomycetes and their anamorphs. Vaduz, Liechtenstein: J. Cramer. 526 p.
   Google Scholar
• SpegazziniC. 1918. Notas micológicas. Physis Rev Soc Argent Cienc Nat 4:281–295.
   Google Scholar
• StamatakisA. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StevensFL. 1916. The genus Meliola in Porto Rico. Ill Biol Monogr 2:475–554.
   Google Scholar
• StevensFL. 1931. A misnomer in the use of the term sooty mold. Philipp Agric 19:549.
   Google Scholar
• SuttonBC. 1977. Coelomycetes VI. Nomenclature of generic names proposed for Coelomycetes. Mycol Pap 141:1–253.
   Google Scholar
• TheissenF. 1915. Mykologische Abhandlungen. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft, Wien 66:296–400.
   Google Scholar
• TheissenFSydowH. 1918. Synoptische tafeln. Ann Mycol 15: 389–491.
   Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalshBDRileyCV. 1868. A new bark louse on the osage orange. Am Ent 1:14, doi:10.4039/Ent114-2
   Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJ. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: InnisMAGelfandDHSninskyJJWhiteTJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press. p. 315–322.
   Google Scholar