Alessioporus and Pulchroboletus (Boletaceae, Boletineae), two novel genera for Xerocomus ichnusanus and X. roseoalbidus from the European Mediterranean basin: molecular and morphological evidence

Literature Cited

• AgererR. 1999. Never change a functionally successful principle: the evolution of Boletales s.l. (Hymenomycetes, Basidiomycota) as seen from belowground features. Sendtnera 6:5–91.
   Google Scholar
• AgererR. 2006. Fungal relationships and structural identity of their ectomycorrhizae. Mycol Progr 5:67–107, doi:10.1007/s11557-006-0505-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÁguedaBParladeJde MiguelAMMartinez-PenaF. 2006. Characterization and identification of field ectomycorrhizae of Boletus edulis and Cistus ladanifer. Mycologia 98:23–30, doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AinsworthAMSmithJHBoddyLDentingerBTMJordanMParfittDRogersHJSkeatesSJ. 2013. Red list of Fungi for Great Britain: Boletaceae—a pilot conservation assessment based on national database records, fruit body morphology and DNA barcoding. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK: Species status 14. 37 p.
   Google Scholar
• AlessioCL. 1984. Un boleto non ancora noto. Xerocomus ichnusanus Alessio, Galli et Littini sp. nov. Boll Gruppo Micol G Bres 27:166–170.
   Google Scholar
• AlessioCL. 1985. Boletus Dill. ex L. Saronno, Italy: Fungi Europaei 2. Libreria Editrice Biella Giovanna. 706 p.
   Google Scholar
• AlessioCL. 1987. Xerocomus roseoalbidus sp. nov. Micol Ital 16: 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• AlessioCL. 1990. Revisione dei miei lavori comparsi nei numeri 26–50 di Micologia Italiana. Micol Ital 19:67–73.
   Google Scholar
• AlessioCL. 1991. Boletus Dill. ex L. (supplemento). Saronno, Italy: Fungi Europaei 2a. Libreria Editrice Biella Giovanna. 126 p.
   Google Scholar
• AMS (Austrian Mycological Society). 2009. Database of fungi in Austria. austria.mykodata. austria.mykodata.net
   Google Scholar
• AngaranoM. 1990. Specie a confronto I. Boletus a cappello asciutto. Boll Gruppo Micol G Bres 33:136–164.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1989. Une espèce corse qui est à l’étude. Ass Mycol Facade Médit 4:34.
   Google Scholar
• AssyovBDenchevCM. 2009. Boletus roseoalbidus (Boletaceae)—a rare southern bolete in Bulgaria. Mycol Balc 6:169–173.
   Google Scholar
• AssyovBStoykovD. 2011a. Boletus bubalinus (Bol etaceae). A new addition for the bolete mycota of Bulgaria and the Balkans. Compt rend Acad bulg Sci 64:1585–1589.
   Google Scholar
• AssyovBStoykovD. 2011b. First record of Boletus ichnusanus (Boletaceae) in Bulgaria. Phytol Balc 17:269–272.
   Google Scholar
• BaroniTJBessetteAERoodyWC. 1998. Boletus patrioticus—a new species from the eastern United States. Bull Buff Soc Nat Sci 36:265–268.
   Google Scholar
• BessetteAERoodyWCBessetteAR. 2000. North American boletes. A color guide to the fleshy pored mushrooms. New York: Syracuse Univ. Press. 400 p.
   Google Scholar
• BinderM. 1999. Zur molekularen Systematische der Boletales: Boletineae und Sclerodermatineae subordo nov. [doctoral dissertation]. Univ. Regensburg, Germany. 149 p.
   Google Scholar
• BinderMBresinskyA. 2002a. Retiboletus, a new genus for species complex in the Boletaceae producing retipolites. Feddes Repert 113:30–40, doi:10.1002/1522-239X(200205)113:1/2,30::AID-FEDR30.3.0.CO;2-D
   Google Scholar
• BinderMBresinskyA. 2002b. Derivation of a polymorphic lineage of Gasteromycetes from boletoid ancestors. Mycologia 94:85–98, doi:10.2307/3761848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BinderMFischerM. 1997. Molekularbiologische Charakterisierung der Guttungen Boletellus und Xerocomus: Xerocomus pruinatus und verwandte Arten. Boll Gruppo Micol G Bres 40:79–90.
   Google Scholar
• BinderMHibbettDS. 2006. Molecular systematics and biological diversification of Boletales. Mycologia 98: 971–981, doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoccardoTTraversoMVizziniAZottiM. 2008. Funghi d’Italia. Bologna, Italy: Zanichelli. 622 p.
   Google Scholar
• BreitenbachJKränzlinF. 1991. Fungi of Switzerland. Vol. 3. Boletes and agarics 1. Luzern, Switzerland: Verlag Mykologia. 361 p.
   Google Scholar
• BresinskyABeslH. 2003. Beiträge zu einer Mykoflora Deutschlands – Schlüssel zur Gattungsbestimmung der Blätter-, Leisten- und Röhrenpilze mit Literaturhinweisen zur Artbestimmung. Regensburger Mykologische Schriften 11:5–236.
   Google Scholar
• BrotzuR. 1988. Guida ai Funghi della Sardegna. 1st ed. Nuoro, Sardinia, Italy: Archivio Fotografico Sardo. 448 p.
   Google Scholar
• BrotzuR. 1993. Guida ai Funghi della Sardegna. 2nd ed. Nuoro, Sardinia, Italy: Archivio Fotografico Sardo. 467 p.
   Google Scholar
• BrotzuRColomoS. 2009. I funghi della Sardegna. Vol. 6. Nuoro, Sardinia, Italy: Archivio Fotografico Sardo. 222 p.
   Google Scholar
• Calza da DomínguezAC. 2007. Guía de los boletos de España y Portugal. Medina del Campo, Spain: Náyade Editorial. 408 p.
   Google Scholar
• CazzoliP. 2002. Micologia di Base—approccio al genere Xerocomus. Riv Micol 45:291–310.
   Google Scholar
• CazzoliP. 2006. Due Xerocomus un po’ particolari. Pag Micol 26:23–26.
   Google Scholar
• CettoB. 1980. Les Champignons de A à Z. Vol. 1. Paris: Ama-Cor. Sedes. 280 p.
   Google Scholar
• CettoB. 1982. Mille funghi. Vol. 2. Trento, Italy: Erpi. 352 p.
   Google Scholar
• CettoB. 1983. I funghi dal vero. Vol. 4. Trento, Italy: Saturnia. 696 p.
   Google Scholar
• CettoB. 1987. I Funghi dal vero. Vol. 5. Trento, Italy: Saturnia. 730 p.
   Google Scholar
• ChevtzoffB. 1998. Xerocomus ichnusanus Alessio, Galli R. & Littini, Boletales nouvelle pour la France. Bull sem Féd Ass mycol Médit 13:14–20.
   Google Scholar
• ConsiglioGPapettiC. 2001. Atlante fotografico dei Funghi d’Italia. Vol II. Vicenza, Italy: AMB Centro Studi Micologici. p 501–1000.
   Google Scholar
• ConsiglioGPapettiC. 2009. Atlante fotografico dei Funghi d’Italia. Vol III. Vicenza, Italy: AMB Centro Studi Micologici. p 1001–1500.
   Google Scholar
• ConstantinidisG. 2009. Mushrooms, a photographic guide for collectors. Athens: Privately published. 369 p.
   Google Scholar
• ContuM. 1999. Boletales interessanti osservate in Sardegna I. Pag Micol 12:9–13.
   Google Scholar
• DenchevCMAssyovB. 2010. Checklist of the larger basidiomycetes in Bulgaria. Mycotaxon 111:279–282, doi:10.5248/111.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DentingerBTMAmmiratiJFBothEEDesjardinDEHallingREHenkelTWMoreauPANagasawaESoytongKTaylorAFSWatlingRMoncalvoJMMcLaughlinDJ. 2010. Molecular phylogenetics of porcini mushrooms (Boletus section Boletus). Mol Phyl Evol 57:1276–1292, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesjardinDEBinderMRoekringSFlegelT. 2009. Spongiforma, a new genus of gastroid boletes from Thailand. Fungal Divers 37:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesjardinDEWilsonAWBinderM. 2008. Durianella, a new gasteroid genus of boletes from Malaysia. Mycologia 100:956–961, doi:10.3852/08-062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrehmelDJamesTVilgalysR. 2008. Molecular phylogeny and biodiversity of the Boletes. Fungi 1:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• DrummondAJAshtonBCheungMHeledJKearseMMoirRStones-HavasSThiererTWilsonA. 2010. Geneious 5.3. www.geneious.com
   Google Scholar
• EngelHDermekAKlofacWLudwigEBrücknerT. 1996. Schmierund Filzröhrlinge s.l. in Europa. Die Gattungen Boletellus, Boletinus, Phylloporus, Suillus, Xerocomus. Weidhausen-Coburg, Germany: Verlag Heinz Engel. 268 p.
   Google Scholar
• EstadèsALannoyG. 2004. Les bolets européens. Bull Mycol Botan Dauphinée-Savoie 44:3–79.
   Google Scholar
• EyssartierGRouxP. 2011. Le guide des champignons—France et Europe. Paris: Belin. 1120 p.
   Google Scholar
• FelsensteinJ. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791, doi:10.2307/2408678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FengBXuJWuGZengNKLiYCTolgorBKostGWYangZL. 2012. DNA sequence analyses reveal abundant diversity, endemism and evidence for Asian origin of the Porcini mushrooms. PLoS ONE 7(5):e37567, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037567
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FoieraFLazzariniESnablMTaniO. 1993. Funghi Boleti. Bologna, Italy: Edizioni Edagricole. 260 p.
   Google Scholar
• GalliR. 1981. Uno Xerocomus sconosciuto in Sardegna. Nat Funghi 2:28–31.
   Google Scholar
• GalliR. 1987. I Boleti delle nostre Regioni. 2nd ed. Milano, Italy: La Tipotecnica. 193 p.
   Google Scholar
• GalliR. 1998. I Boleti. 3rd ed. Milano, Italy: Edinatura. 287 p.
   Google Scholar
• GalliR. 2004. Funghi & Natura 5. Cover.
   Google Scholar
• GalliR. 2007. I Boleti. 4th ed. Milano, Italy: Dalla Natura. 296 p.
   Google Scholar
• GalliR. 2013. I Boleti. 5th ed. Milano, Italy: Dalla Natura. 296 p.
   Google Scholar
• GardesMBrunsTD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118, doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GelardiM. 2007 (2010). Interessanti Boletaceae mediterranee rinvenute nel Lazio: Xerocomus ichnusanus e X. persicolor. Boll Gruppo Micol G Bres 50:141–160.
   Google Scholar
• GelardiM. 2009. First record of Xerocomus bubalinus in Italy and the generic placement of Xerocomus engelii comb. nov. Boll AMER 75–76:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• GelardiMVizziniAErcoleEVoyronSSunJZLiuXZ. 2013. Boletus sinopulverulentus, a new species from Shaanxi Province (central China) and notes on Boletus and Xerocomus. Sydowia 65:45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GennariA. 1994. 101 Funghi. Vol. 2. Arezzo, Italy: G. Ezechielli. 143 p.
   Google Scholar
• GennariA. 1997. 101 Funghi. Vol. 3. Arezzo, Italy: G. Ezechielli. 127 p.
   Google Scholar
• GennariA. 2005. Funghi. Arezzo, Italy: G. Ezechielli. 639 p.
   Google Scholar
• HallingREBaroniTJBinderM. 2007. A new genus of Boletaceae from eastern North America. Mycologia 99: 310–316, doi:10.3852/mycologia.99.2.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallingRENuhnMFechnerNOsmundsonTWSoytongKAroraDHibbettDSBinderM. 2012a. Sutorius: a new genus for Boletus eximius. Mycologia 104:951–961, doi:10.3852/11-376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallingRENuhnMOsmundsonTWFechnerNTrappeJMSoytongKAroraDHibbettDSBinderM. 2012b. Affinities of the Boletus chromapes group to Royoungia and the description of two new genera, Harrya and Australopilus. Austr Syst Botan 25:418–431, doi:10.1071/SB12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolecJ. 1994. The ultrastructure of the spore wall and ornamentation in the Xerocomus group of Boletus. Czech Mycol 47:173–184.
   Google Scholar
• HorakE. 2005. Röhrlinge und Blatterpilze in Europa. Vol. 6. München, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. 555 p.
   Google Scholar
• HosenIFengBWuGZhuXTLiYCYangZL. 2012. Borofutus, a new genus of Boletaceae from tropical Asia: phylogeny, morphology and taxonomy. Fungal Divers 58:215–226, doi:10.1007/s13225-012-0211-8
   Google Scholar
• HuelsenbeckJPRonquistF. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IlliceMTaniOZuccherelliA. 2011. Funghi velenosi e commestibili. Ozzano Emilia, Italy: Tipoarte Industrie Grafiche. 432 p.
   Google Scholar
• InzengaG. 1869. Funghi Siciliani. Centuria II. Palermo, Italy: F. Lao. 79 p.
   Google Scholar
• KárolyE. 2006. Adatok Zemplén védendô nagygombáiról. Folia Hist Nat Mus Matr 30:399–405.
   Google Scholar
• KatohKMisawaKKumaKMiyataT. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3059–3066, doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlofacW. 2007. Schlüssel zur Bestimmung von Frischfunden der europäischen Arten der Boletales mit röhri-gem Hymenophor. Österr Z Pilzk 16:187–279.
   Google Scholar
• KnudsenHTaylorAFS. 2012. Boletales E.-J. Gilbert. In: KnudsenHVesterholtJ, eds. Funga Nordica. Vol. 1. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordsvamp. 1083 p.
   Google Scholar
• KornerupAWanscherJH. 1978. Methuen handbook of color. London: Eyre Methuen & Co. Ltd. 252 p.
   Google Scholar
• LadurnerHSimoniniG. 2003. Xerocomus s.l. Alassio, Italy: Fungi Europaei 8. Edizioni Candusso. 530 p.
   Google Scholar
• LannoyGEstadèsA. 2001. Flore Mycologique d’Europe 6—Les Bolets. Lille, France: Doc Mycol, Mém. hors série 6. 163 p.
   Google Scholar
• LavoratoC. 1991. Chiave analitica e note bibliografiche della micoflora del cisto. Boll AMER 24:16–45.
   Google Scholar
• LavoratoC. 1996. Chiave per la determinazione delle Boletaceae delle foreste della Calabria. Pag Micol 5:2–27.
   Google Scholar
• LavoratoCRotellaM. 1999. Funghi. Guida alle specie commestibili, commerciabili e velenose. Pratica ispettiva di funghi alpini, appenninici e mediterranei. Cosenza, Italy: Pubblisfera di San Giovanni in Fiore. 380 p.
   Google Scholar
• LebelTOriharaTMaekawaN. 2011. The sequestrate genus Rosbeeva T.Lebel, Orihara gen. nov. (Boletaceae) from Australasia and Japan: new species and new combinations. Fungal Divers 52:49–71, doi:10.1007/s13225-011-0109-x
   Google Scholar
• LiYCFengBYangZL. 2011. Zangia, a new genus of Boletaceae supported by molecular and morphological evidence. Fungal Divers 49:125–143, doi:10.1007/s13225-011-0096-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LittiniG. 1992. Xerocomus roseoalbidus Alessio et Littini. Rivista Micol 35:192.
   Google Scholar
• MartinFBonitoGM. 2012. Ten years of genomics for ectomycorrhizal fungi: What have we achieved and where are we heading? In: ZambonelliABonitoGM, eds. Edible ectomycorrhizal mushrooms. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. p 383–401, 10.1007/978-3-642-33823-6_21
   Google Scholar
• MartinFCullenDHibbettDPisabarroASpataforaJWBakerSEGrigorievIV. 2011. Sequencing the fungal tree of life. New Phytol 190:818–821, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03688.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MigliozziVCamboniM. 2002. La micoflora del litorale romano. 11° contributo. Descrizione di Helvella juniperi, Boletus comptus, Boletus luridus, Boletus permagnificus e Xerocomus roseoalbidus. Boll Gruppo Micol G Bres 45:7–28.
   Google Scholar
• MigliozziVCocciaM. 1991. Segnalazione per il territorio laziale di Boletacee interessanti e descrizione di Boletus poikilochromus Pöder, Cetto & Zuccherelli. Boll AMER 24:9–15.
   Google Scholar
• MillerMAPfeifferWSchwartzT. 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 14 Nov 2010, New Orleans. p 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• MoraraM. 1988. Segnalazioni micologiche dall’Emilia e dalle Marche. Micol Ital 17:65–66.
   Google Scholar
• MorenoGHeykoopMGonzalezVArenalF. 1995. Suillus bovinoides (Blum) Bon and Boletus roseoalbidus (Alessio & Littini) comb. nov.—two interesting Mediterranean species. Doc Mycol 25:270–277.
   Google Scholar
• MuñozJA. 2005. Boletus s.l. (excl. Xerocomus). Alassio, Italy: Fungi Europaei 2, Edizioni Candusso. 952 p.
   Google Scholar
• MuñozJACadiñanos AguirreJAFidalgoE. 2008. Contribución al catálogo corológico del género Xerocomus en la Peninsula Iberica. Bol Soc Micol Madrid 32:249–277.
   Google Scholar
• NuhnMEBinderMTaylorAFSHallingREHibbettDS. 2013. Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae. Fungal Biol 117:479–451, doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OolbekkinkGT. 1991. The taxonomic value of the ornamentation of spores in ‘the Xerocomus-group’ of Boletus. Persoonia 14:245–273.
   Google Scholar
• OriharaTSawadaFIkedaSYamatoMTanakaCShimomuraNHashiyaMIwaseK. 2010. Taxonomic reconsideration of a sequestrate fungus, Octaviania columellifera, with the proposal of a new genus, Heliogaster, and its phylogenetic relationships in the Boletales. Mycologia 102:108–121, doi:10.3852/08-168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PardoFMVMaquedaSMPimientaABLPachecoDP. 2004. Aproximación al catálogo de las especies del orden Boletales (Basidiomycetes, Fungi) en Extremadura (España). Rev Est Extremeños 40:1255–1291.
   Google Scholar
• PeintnerULadurnerHSimoniniG. 2003. Xerocomus cisalpinus sp. nov. and the delimitation of species in the X. chrysenteron complex based on morphology and rDNA-LSU sequences. Mycol Res 107:659–679, doi:10.1017/S0953756203007901
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-De-GregorioMÀ. 2000. Xerocomus ichnusanus Alessio, Galli & Littini. Làmina 950. Bolets de Catalunya XIX. Barcelona, Spain: Societat Catalana de Micologia, Alsograf.
   Google Scholar
• PolemisEDimouDMTzanoudakisDZervakisGI. 2012. Annotated checklist of Basidiomycota (subclass Agaricomycetidae) from the islands of Naxos and Amorgos (Cyclades, Greece). Ann Bot Fennici 49:145–161, doi:10.5735/085.049.0301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PosadaD. 2008. jModeltest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256, doi:10.1093/molbev/msn083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RedeuilhGSimoniniG. 1995. Comitato per la unificazione dei nomi dei boleti europei. Pag Micol 3:35–73.
   Google Scholar
• RedeuilhGSimoniniG. 1999. Comitato per la unificazione dei nomi dei boleti europei. Pag Micol 12:95–128.
   Google Scholar
• RehnerSABuckleyE. 2005. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97:84–98, doi:10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReijndersAFM. 1948. Le développement et l’organisation histologique des carpofores dans les Agaricales. Rec Trav Bot Neerlandica 4:213–396.
   Google Scholar
• ReijndersAFM. 1963. Les problèmes du développement des carpophores des Agaricales et quelques groupes voisins. Den Haag, Holland: W. Junk. 412 p.
   Google Scholar
• RodàP. 2012. Funghi aspromontani comparati. Boletales. Reggio Calabria, Italy: AZ Editrice. 184 p.
   Google Scholar
• RödigT. 2012. Die europäischen Arten der Gattungen Xerocomus s. str. und Xerocomellus nach dem Gattung-konzept von Šutara 2008 sowie Abgrenzung zu verwandten europäischen Gattungen und Arten. retrieved from the website: www.pabb.de
   Google Scholar
• RossiGMontagnaniCGarganoDPeruzziLAbeliTRaveraSCogoniAFenuGMagriniSGennaiMFoggiBWagensommerRPVenturellaGBlasiCRaimondoFMOrsenigoS. 2013. Lista rossa della flora Italiana 1. Policy species e altre specie minacciate. Comitato Italiano IUCN e Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare. Roma, Italy: Stamperia Romana. 54 p.
   Google Scholar
• RothA. 1994. Boletus permagnificus Pöder, Xerocomus roseoalbidus Alessio & Littini. Bull Soc Mycol Fr 110: 293–294.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz FernándezJM. 1997. Guía Micológica. Tomo I: Orden Boletales en España. Madrid, Spain: Servisistem Euskoprinter. 295 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz FernándezJMRuiz PastorE. 2006. Guía Micológica. Tomo IV: Suplemento al Orden Boletales en España. Madrid, Spain: Croman Linea Grafica. 208 p.
   Google Scholar
• SimoniniGFiandriF. 1987 (1988). Ritrovamenti nelle province di Reggio Emilia e Modena di Boletus poikilochromus Pöder, Cetto & Zuccherelli. Il Fungo 7:17–26.
   Google Scholar
• SimoniniGFiandriF. 1988 (1989). Ritrovamenti di Xerocomus roseoalbidus in provincia di Modena. Il Fungo (special Issue Atti II Seminario Boletales e Russulales):17–26.
   Google Scholar
• SingerR. 1986. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 4th ed. Koenigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books. 981 p.
   Google Scholar
• StamatakisA. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ŠutaraJ. 1989. The delimitation of the genus Leccinum. Česká Mykol 43:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• ŠutaraJ. 2005. Central European genera of the Boletaceae and Suillaceae, with notes on their anatomical characters. Czech Mycol 57:1–50.
   Google Scholar
• ŠutaraJ. 2008. Xerocomus s.l. in the light of the present state of knowledge. Czech Mycol 60:29–62.
   Google Scholar
• ŠutaraJMikšíkMJandaV. 2009. Hřibovité houby. Praga, Czech Republic: Academia. 294 p.
   Google Scholar
• TamuraKPetersonDPetersonNStecherGNeiMKumarS. 2011. MEGA 5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739, doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaylorAFSHillsAESimoniniG. 2002. A fresh look at xerocomoid fungi. Field Mycol 3:89–102, doi:10.1016/S1468-1641(10)60161-2
   Google Scholar
• TaylorAFSHillsAESimoniniGBothEEEberhardtU. 2006. Detection of species within the Xerocomus subtomentosus complex in Europe using rDNA–ITS sequences. Mycol Res 110:276–287, doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2005.11.013
   Google Scholar
• TaylorAFSHillsAESimoniniGMuñozJAEberhardtU. 2007. Xerocomus silwoodensis sp. nov., a new species within the European X. subtomentosus complex. Mycol Res 111:403–408, doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.01.014
   Google Scholar
• TaylorAFSJonssonLJonssonMRoslingAHillsAESimoniniG. 2001. Species delineation within European species of Xerocomus using internal transcriber spacer sequence data. Micol Veget Medit 16:171–192.
   Google Scholar
• TentoriA. 2006. Funghi interessanti dell’isola di Ischia I. Riv Micol 49:345–355.
   Google Scholar
• ThiersB. 2014 (continuously updated). Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/
   Google Scholar
• TrappeJMCastellanoMAHallingREOsmundsonTWBinderMFechnerNMalajczukN. 2013. Australasian sequestrate fungi 18: Solioccasus polychromus gen. & sp. nov., a richly colored, tropical to subtropical, hypogeous fungus. Mycologia 105:888–895, doi:10.3852/12-046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VelenovskýJ. 1922. České Houby. Vol. 4–5. Praha, Czech Republic: Nákladem České botanické společnosti. 317 p.
   Google Scholar
• VenturellaG. 2004. Mycological investigation and conservation of fungi in Sicily (south Italy). Mycol Balc 1:21–23.
   Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VizziniAContuMMusumeciEErcoleE. 2011. A new taxon in the Infundibulicybe gibba complex (Basidiomycota, Agaricales, Tricholomataceae) from Sardinia (Italy). Mycologia 103:904–911, doi:10.3852/10-382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VizziniASimoniniGErcoleEVoyronS. 2014. Boletus mendax, a new species of Boletus sect. Luridi from Italy and insights on the B. luridus complex. Mycol Progr 13: 95–109, doi:10.1007/s11557-013-0896-4
   Google Scholar
• WatlingRHillsAE. 2005. Boletes and their allies. In: HendersonDMWatlingR, eds. British fungus flora, Agarics and Boleti. Vol 1. Edinburgh, Scotland: HMSO. 174 p.
   Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTDLeeSTaylorJ. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: InnisMAGelfandDHSniskyJJWhiteTJ, eds. PCR protocols. London: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• WilsonAWBinderMHibbettDS. 2011. Effects of fruiting body morphology on diversification rates in three independent clades of fungi estimated using binary state speciation and extinction analyses. Evolution 65: 1305–1322, doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01214.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilsonAWBinderMHibbettDS. 2012. Diversity and evolution of ectomycorrhizal host associations in the Sclerodermatineae (Boletales, Basidiomycota). New Phytol 194: 1079–1095, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04109.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangZL. 2011. Molecular techniques revolutionize knowledge of basidiomycete evolution. Fungal Divers 50:47–58, doi:10.1007/s13225-011-0121-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZengNKCaiQYangZL. 2012. Corneroboletus, a new genus to accommodate the southeastern Asian Boletus indecorus. Mycologia 104:1420–1432, doi:10.3852/11-326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZuccherelliA. 1993. I funghi delle pinete delle zone mediterranee. Vol. 1. Ravenna, Italy: Longo Editore. 377 p.
   Google Scholar
• ZuccherelliA. 2006. I funghi delle pinete delle zone mediterranee. Vol 2. Ravenna, Italy: Longo Editore. 397 p.
   Google Scholar