Molecular analysis of Chinese truffles resembling Tuber californicum in morphology reveals a rich pattern of species diversity with emphasis on four new species

Literature cited

• AlfaroMEZollerSLutzoniF. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol 20:255–266, doi:10.1093/molbev/msg028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlvaradoPMorenoGManjónJL. 2012. Comparison between Tuber gennadii and T. oligospermum lineages reveals the existence of the new species T. cistophilum (Tuberaceae, Pezizales). Mycologia 104:894–910, doi:10.3852/11-254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BonitoGSmithMENowakMHealyRAGuevaraGCazaresEKinoshitaANouhraERDominguezLSTedersooLMuratCWangYMorenoBAPfisterDHNaraKZambonelliATrappeJMVilgalysR. 2013. Historical biogeography and diversification of truffles in the tuberaceae and their newly identified southern hemisphere sister lineage. PLoS One 8:E52765, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BonitoGTrappeJMVilgalysR. 2009. North American truffles in the Tuberaceae: molecular and morphological perspectives. Acta Bot Yunnanica Suppl. XVI: 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• CaoJZ. 2010. The genus Tuber in China [doctoral dissertation]. Changchun: Jinlin Agricultural University. 86 p. ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• ChenJ. 2007. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Tuber in China (Pezizales, Ascomycetes, Ascomycotina) [doctoral dissertation]. Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences. 125 p. ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• ChenJDengXJChenJYQiaoPZhangJPWanSPWangRLiuPG. 2011. A checklist of the genus Tuber (Pezizales, Ascomycota) in China. J Fungal Res 9: 244–254 ( in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• DringDM. 1971. Techniques for microscopic preparation. p 95–111, in BoothC., ed. Methods in microbiology. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• FanLCaoJZJiaY. 2012a. Tuber in China: T. sinopuberulum and T. vesicoperidium spp. nov. Mycotaxon 121: 255–263, doi:10.5248/121.255
   Google Scholar
• FanLCaoJZLiY. 2012b. Tuber microsphaerosporum and Paradoxa sinensis spp. nov. Mycotaxon 120:471–475, doi:10.5248/120.471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FanLCaoJZLiY. 2012c. Tuber sinosphaerosporum sp. nov. from China. Mycotaxon 122:347–353, doi:10.5248/122.347
   Google Scholar
• FanLCaoJZLiuYYLiY. 2011. Two new species of Tuber from China. Mycotaxon 116:349–354, doi:10.5248/116.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FanLYueSF. 2013. Phylogenetic divergence of three morphologically similar truffles: Tuber sphaerosporum, T. sinosphaerosporum and T. pseudosphaerosporum sp. nov. Mycotaxon 125:283–288, doi:10.5248/125.283
   Google Scholar
• GardesMBrunsTD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118, doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GilkeyHM. 1939. Tuberales of North America. Oregon State Monographs. 63 p.
   Google Scholar
• GilkeyHM. 1954. Tuberales. N Am Fl Ser II, 1:1–36.
   Google Scholar
• GuevaraGBonitoGTrappeJMCázaresEWilliamsGHealyRASchadtCVilgalysR. 2013. New North American truffles (Tuber spp.) and their ectomycorrhizal associations. Mycologia 105:194–209, doi:10.3852/12-087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillisDMBullJJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182–192, doi:10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KinoshitaASasakiHNaraK. 2011. Phylogeny and diversity of Japanese truffles (Tuber spp.) inferred from sequences of four nuclear loci. Mycologia 103: 779–794, doi:10.3852/10-138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LöytynoyaAGoldmanN. 2005. An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10557–10562, doi:10.1073/pnas.0409137102
   Google Scholar
• NylanderJ. 2004. MrModeltest 2.2. Computer software distributed by the University of Uppsala. SwedenEvolutionary Biology Centre.
   Google Scholar
• PageRDM. 2001. TreeView 32 1.6.6. Distributed by the author [available on internet at http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html].
   Google Scholar
• RambautA. 2000. Estimating the rate of molecular evolution: incorporating non-contemporaneous sequences into maximum likelihood phylogenies. Bioinformatics 16: 395–399, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.395
   Google Scholar
• RenDJSongMSYaoYJ. 2005. Literature review of Tuber Species in China. J Fungal Res 3:37–46 ( in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• RioussetLRioussetGChevalierGBardetMC. 2001. Truffes d’ Europe et de Chine. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris. 181 p.
   Google Scholar
• RonquistFHuelsenbeckJP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SongMS. 2005. Taxonomic and molecular systematic studies on Tuber in China [doctoral dissertation]. Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences. 156 p. ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• StamatakisA. 2014. RAxML 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics, open access link: http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/01/21/bioinformatics.btu033.abstract?keytype=ref&ijkey=VTEqgUJYCDcf0kP doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
   Google Scholar
• StamatakisALudwigTMeierH. 2005. RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21:456–463, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrappeMEvansFTrappeJM. 2007. Field guide to North American truffles: hunting, identifying and enjoying the world’s most prized fungi. Random House Digital Inc. 136 p.
   Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several species of Cryptococcus. J Bac 172: 4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangY. 1988. First report of study on Tuber species from China. Atti del II Congresso Internazionale sul Tartufo Spoleto, Nov. 24–27: 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• WangYJTanZMMuratCJeandrozSLe TaconF. 2007. Molecular taxonomy of Chinese truffles belonging to the Tuber rufum and Tuber puberulum groups. Fungal Divers 24:301–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJ. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. p 315–322. In: InnisMAet al. eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• ZhangBC. 1990. Systematics of hypogeous Pezizales and taxonomy of the Chinese genera and species (master’s thesis). BeijingInstitute of Microbiology, China Academy of Science. 130 p.
   Google Scholar
• ZhuangWY. 1998. A list of Discomycetes in China. Mycotaxon 67:365–390.
   Google Scholar
• ZhuangWY. 2001. A list of Discomycetes in China. Suppl. I. Mycotaxon 79:375–381.
   Google Scholar