Phylogenetic analyses of Chinese Tuber species that resemble T. borchii reveal the existence of the new species T. hubeiense and T. wumengense

Literature cited

• AlfaroMEZollerSLutzoniF. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol 20:255–266, doi:10.1093/molbev/msg028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BonitoGSmithMENowakMHealyRAGuevaraGCazaresEKinoshitaANouhraERDominguezLSTedersooLMuratCWangYMorenoBAPfisterDHNaraKZambonelliATrappeJMVilgalysR. 2013. Historical biogeography and diversification of truffles in the Tuberaceae and their newly identified southern hemisphere sister lineage. PLoS One 8, E52765, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaoJZ. 2010. The genus Tuber in China [doctoral dissertation]. Changchun, China: Jinlin Agricultural Univ. 86 p. ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• CastresanaJ. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments and their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552, doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenJ. 2007. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Tuber in China (Pezizales, Ascomycetes, Ascomycotina) [doctoral dissertation]. Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences. 125 p. ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• ChenJDengXJChenJYQiaoPZhangJPWanSPWangRLiuPG. 2011. A checklist of the genus Tuber (Pezizales, Ascomycota) in China. J Fungal Res 9:244–254 (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• ChenJLiuPG. 2007. Tuber latisporum sp. nov. and related taxa, based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Mycologia 99:475–481, doi:10.3852/mycologia.99.3.475
   Google Scholar
• ChenYLGongMQ. 2000a. Truffles (Tuber spp.): biodiversity and geological distribution. Edible Fungi China 19:6–7 ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• ChenYLGongMQ. 2000b. Truffles (Tuber spp.): biodiversity and geological distribution. Edible Fungi China 19:25–26 ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• DengXJLiuPGLiuCYWangY. 2012. A new white truffle species, Tuber panzhihuanense from China. Mycol Prog 12:557–561, doi:10.1007/s11557-012-0862-6
   Google Scholar
• DringDM. 1971. Techniques for microscopic preparation. In: BoothC., ed. Methods in microbiology. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press. p 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• FanLCaoJZ. 2012. Two new species of white truffle from China. Mycotaxon 121:297–305, doi:10.5248/121.297
   Google Scholar
• FanLHouCLLiY. 2012. Tuber microverrucosum and T. huizeanum two new species from China with reticulate ascospores. Mycotaxon 122:161–169, doi:10.5248/122.161
   Google Scholar
• GardesMBrunsTD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118, doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuevaraGBonitoGTrappeJMCázaresEWilliamsGHealyRASchadtCVilgalysR. 2013. New North American truffles (Tuber spp.) and their ectomycorrhizal associations. Mycologia 105:194–209, doi:10.3852/12-087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalászKBratekZSzegDRudnóySRáczDLTrappeJM. 2005. Tests of species concepts of the small, white, European group of Tuber species based on morphology and rDNA sequences with special reference to Tuber rapaeodorum. Mycol Prog 4:291–298, doi:10.1007/s11557-006-0132-6
   Google Scholar
• HallIRBrownGTZambonelliA. 2007. Taming the truffle: the history, lore and science of the ultimate mushroom. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press. 304 p. doi:10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182
   Google Scholar
• HillisDMBullJJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182–192, doi:10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KinoshitaASasakiHNaraK. 2011. Phylogeny and diversity of Japanese truffles (Tuber spp.) inferred from sequences of four nuclear loci. Mycologia 103:779–794, doi:10.3852/10-138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LangeM. 1956. Danish hypogeous fungi. Dansk Bot Arkiv 16:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• LöytynoyaAGoldmanN. 2005. An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10557–10562, doi:10.1073/pnas.0409137102
   Google Scholar
• MelloAVizziniALongatoSRollo BonfantePTrappeJM. 2000. Tuber borchii versus Tuber maculatum: neotype studies and DNA analyses. Mycologia 92:326–331, doi:10.2307/3761569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NilssonRHKristianssonERybergMHallenbergNLarssonK-H. 2008. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom Fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol Bioinform 4:193–201, doi:10.2307/3761569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NylanderJ. 2004. MrModeltest 2.2. Computer software distributed by the Univ. of Uppsala. Sweden: Evolutionary Biology Centre.
   Google Scholar
• OttMZolaJAluruSStamatakisA. 2007. Large-scale maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analysis on the IBM BlueGene/L. ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference 2007.
   Google Scholar
• PageRDM. 2001. TreeView32 1.6.6. Distributed by the author (available on internet at http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html).
   Google Scholar
• PeglerDNSpoonerBMYoungTWK. 1993. British truffles: a revision of British hypogeous fungi. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens. 224 p.
   Google Scholar
• RenDJSongMSYaoYJ. 2005. Literature Review of Tuber species in China. J Fungal Res 3:37–46 ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• RioussetLRioussetGChevalierGBardetMC. 2001. Truffes d’ Europe et de Chine. Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. 181 p.
   Google Scholar
• RonquistFHuelsenbeckJP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SongMS. 2005. Taxonomic and molecular systematic studies on Tuber in China [doctoral dissertation]. Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences. 156 p. ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• StamatakisA. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum-likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StamatakisALudwigTMeierH. 2005. RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21:456–463, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuKMXiongWPWangYLiSHXieRBaimaD. 2013. Tuber bomiense, a new truffle species from Tibet, China. Mycotaxon 126:127–132, doi:10.5248/126.127
   Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several species of Cryptococcus. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangB. 1995. Truffle resources of Sichuan. Edible Fungi 6:4 ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• WangY. 1988. First report of study on Tuber species from China. Atti del II Congresso Internazionale sul Tartufo, Spoleto, 24–27 Nov 1988. p 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• WangYJTanZMMuratCJeandrozSLe TaconF. 2007. Molecular taxonomy of Chinese truffles belonging to the Tuber rufum and Tuber puberulum groups. Fungal Divers 24:301–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJ. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, In: InnisMAGelfandDHSninskyJJWhiteTJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, California: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• ZhangBC. 1990. Systematics of hypogeous Pezizales and taxonomy of the Chinese genera and species (master’s thesis). Beijing: Institute of Microbiology Academy of Science. 130 p.
   Google Scholar
• ZhuangWY. 1998. A list of Discomycetes in China. Mycotaxon 67:365–390.
   Google Scholar
• ZhuangWY. 2001. A list of Discomycetes in China. Suppl. I. Mycotaxon 79:375–381.
   Google Scholar