Cupreoboletus (Boletaceae, Boletineae), a new monotypic genus segregated from Boletus sect. Luridi to reassign the Mediterranean species B. poikilochromus

Literature cited

• AlessioCL. 1985. Boletus Dill. ex L., Fungi Europaei 2. Saronno: Giovanna Biella. 705 p.
   Google Scholar
• AlessioCL. 1991. Boletus poikilochromus, Micol Veget Medit 6:133–138.
   Google Scholar
• AroraDFrankJL. 2014. Clarifying the butter Boletes: a new genus, Butyriboletus, is established to accommodate Boletus sect. Appendiculati, and six new species are described. Mycologia 106:464–480, doi:10.3852/13-052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AssyovBBellangerJ-CBertéaPCourtecuisseRKollerGLoizidesMMarquesGMuñozJAOppicelliNPudduDRichardFMoreauP-A. 2015. Nomenclatural novelties. Index fungorum 243:1.
   Google Scholar
• BessetteAERoodyWCBessetteAR. 2000. North American boletes. A color guide to the fleshy-pored mushrooms. New York: Syracuse University Press. 400 p.
   Google Scholar
• BiketovaAYKosakyanAWasserSPNevoE. 2015. New, noteworthy and rare species of the genus Boletus in Israel. Plant Biosyst 10 (in press), 10.1080/11263504.2014.990537
   Google Scholar
• BinderMBresinskyA. 2002. Retiboletus, a new genus for species complex in the Boletaceae producing retipolites. Feddes Repert 113:30–40, doi:10.1002/1522-239X(200205)113:1/2<30::AID-FEDR30>3.0.CO;2-D
   Google Scholar
• BinderMHibbettDS. 2006. Molecular systematics and biological diversification of Boletales. Mycologia 98:971–981, doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoixSMoisésJLlistosellaJVan WaverenLL. 2011. Boletus poikilochromus Pöder, Cetto & Zuccher., una rara espècie mediterrània trobada a Catalunya. Rev Catal Micol 33:95–99.
   Google Scholar
• BometónJ. 2011. Boletus poikilochromus Pöder, Cetto & Zuccher. Nuova cita para Cataluña. Moixeró, Agrupació Micòlogica Berguedana 2:8–11.
   Google Scholar
• BreitenbachJKränzlinF. 1991. Fungi of Switzerland. Vol. 3. Boletes and agarics 1. Luzern: Verlag Mykologia. 361 p.
   Google Scholar
• BrotzuR. 1993. Guida ai funghi della Sardegna (parte seconda). Nuoro: Archivio Fotografico Sardo. 734 p.
   Google Scholar
• CalongeFDRedeuilhG. 2000. Boletus poikilochromus Pöder, Cetto & Zuccherelli, una especie mediterránea hallada por primera vez en España. Bol Soc Micol Madrid 25:277–280.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada-DomínguezAC. 2007. Guía de los boletos de España y Portugal. Medina del Campo: Náyade Editorial. 408 p.
   Google Scholar
• CazzoliP. 1991. Contributo allo studio dei boleti del gruppo purpureus-torosus. “Il Fungo”, Atti III Seminario sui Generi Russula e Boletus: 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• CettoB. 1983. I funghi dal vero 4. Trento: Saturnia. 696 p.
   Google Scholar
• ConstantinidisG. 2009. Mushrooms, a photographic guide for collectors. Athens: Privately published. 288 p.
   Google Scholar
• DarribaDTaboadaGLDoalloRPosadaD. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772, doi:10.1038/nmeth.2109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DentingerBTMAmmiratiJFBothEEDesjardinDEHallingREHenkelTWMoreauPANagasawaESoytongKTaylorAFSWatlingRMoncalvoJMMcLaughlinDJ. 2010. Molecular phylogenetics of porcini mushrooms (Boletus section Boletus). Mol Phylogenet Evol 57:1276–1292, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrummondAJAshtonBCheungMHeledJKearseMMoirRStones-HavasSThiererTWilsonA. 2010. Geneious 5.3. www.geneious.com
   Google Scholar
• EngelHKrieglsteinerGJDermekAWatlingR. 1983. Dickröhrlinge. Die Gattung Boletus in Europa. Verlag Heinz Engel: Weidhausen b. Coburg. 175 p.
   Google Scholar
• ErricoA. 2014. Funghi del Salento. Galatina: Mario Congedo Editore. 576 p.
   Google Scholar
• EstadèsALannoyG. 2004. Les bolets européens. Bull Féd Mycol Dauphinée-Savoie 174:3–79.
   Google Scholar
• FelsensteinJ. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791, doi:10.2307/2408678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FengBXuJWuGZengNKLiYCTolgorBKostGWYangZL. 2012. DNA sequence analyses reveal abundant diversity, endemism and evidence for Asian origin of the Porcini mushrooms. Plos One 7:e37567, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GalliR. 2013. I Boleti, Atlante pratico-monografico per la determinazione dei boleti. Milano: Dalla Natura. 296 p.
   Google Scholar
• GardesMBrunsTD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118, doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GelardiMSimoniniGErcoleEVizziniA. 2014. Alessioporus and Pulchroboletus (Boletaceae, Boletineae), two novel genera for Xerocomus ichnusanus and X. roseoalbidus from the European Mediterranean basin: molecular and morphological evidence. Mycologia 106:1168–1187, doi:10.3852/14-042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GelardiMVizziniAErcoleEVoyronSSunJZLiuXZ. 2013. Boletus sinopulverulentus, a new species from Shaanxi province (central China) and notes on Boletus and Xerocomus. Sydowia 65:45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallingREBaroniTJBinderM. 2007. A new genus of Boletaceae from eastern North America. Mycologia 99:310–316, doi:10.3852/mycologia.99.2.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HornerHTTiffanyLHCodyAM. 1983. Formation of calcium oxalate crystals associated with apotecia of the Discomycete Dasyscypha capitata. Mycologia 75:423–435, doi:10.2307/3792684
   Google Scholar
• HuelsenbeckJPRonquistF. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IllescasTPérez-DaniëlsP. 2008. Boletales raros o nuevos para Andalucía. Lactarius 17:17–26.
   Google Scholar
• ImlerL. 1950. Recherches sur les bolets. Bull Soc Mycol Fr 66:177–203.
   Google Scholar
• JurcDOgrisNPiltaverADolencA. 2004. Seznam vrst in razširjenost makromicet v Sloveniji z analizo stopnje ogroženosti: ciljni raziskovalni program “Konkurenčnost Slovenije 2001–2006”. Projekt št. V4-0703. Gozdarski inštitit Slovenije. 462 p.
   Google Scholar
• KatohKMisawaKKumaKMiyataT. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066, doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlofacW. 2007. Schlüssel zur Bestimmung von Frischfunden der europäischen Arten der Boletales mit röhrigem Hymenophor. Österr Z Pilzk 16:187–279.
   Google Scholar
• KnudsenHTaylorAFS. 2012. Boletales E.-J. Gilbert. In: KnudsenHVesterholtJ, eds. Funga Nordica. Vol. 1. Copenhagen: Nordsvamp. 1083 p.
   Google Scholar
• KornerupAWanscherJH. 1978. Methuen handbook of color. London: Eyre Methuen & Co. Ltd. 252 p.
   Google Scholar
• KostyraH. 1993. Chemische und kristallographische Untersuchungen an Cystidenkristallen der Gattung Inocybe. Z Mykol 59:77–98.
   Google Scholar
• LannoyGEstadèsA. 2001. Flore Mycologique d’Europe 6—Les Bolets. Lille: Doc Mycol, Mém hors série 6. 163 p.
   Google Scholar
• LavoratoCSimoniniG. 1997. Boletus flavosanguineus sp. nov. Riv Micol 40:37–51.
   Google Scholar
• LoizidesM. 2011. Quercus alnifolia: The indigenous golden oak of Cyprus and its fungi. Field Mycol 12:81–88, doi:10.1016/j.fldmyc.2011.06.004
   Google Scholar
• LunghiniDPerroneL. 2002. Contributo allo studio e al monitoraggio delle Boletaceae del litorale laziale. 2. Boll Am 54–55:39–60.
   Google Scholar
• MalettiM. 2011. Riconosciamo i boleti (Parte 3a). Micologia nelle Marche 5:21–32.
   Google Scholar
• MathenyPBLiuYJJAmmiratiJFHallBD. 2002. Using RPB1 sequences to improve phylogenetic inference among mushrooms (Inocybe, Agaricales). Am J Bot 89:688–698, doi:10.3732/ajb.89.4.688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MathenyPBWangZBinderMCurtisJMLimYWNilssonRHet al. 2007. Contributions of rpb2 and tef1 to the phylogeny of mushrooms and allies (Basidiomycota, Fungi). Mol Phylogen Evol 43:430–451, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MigliozziVCamboniM. 1999. La micoflora del litorale romano. 1 Contributo. Descrizione di Clitocybe nivea, Lepista metachroa, Leucopaxillus paradoxus, Tephrocybe striaepilea, Boletus radicans fo. sanguineipes, Boletus poikilochromus e Gyroporus cyanescens, Boll Gr Micol Bres 42:15–45.
   Google Scholar
• MigliozziVCocciaM. 1991. Segnalazione per il territorio laziale di Boletacee interessanti e descrizione di Boletus poikilochromus Pöder, Cetto & Zuccherelli. Boll Am 24:9–15.
   Google Scholar
• MillerMAPfeifferWSchwartzT. 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 14 Nov 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana: p 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• MirG. 2007. Cuatro especies poco frequentes del orden Boletales recolectadas en la isla de Mallorca. Errotari 4:17–26.
   Google Scholar
• MirGMelisJLL. 2008. Aportación al conocimiento micológico de las Illes Balears. Menorca I. Rev Catal Micol 30:79–92.
   Google Scholar
• MuñozJA. 2005. Boletus s.l. (excl. Xerocomus). Fungi Europaei 2. Alassio: Edizioni Candusso. 952 p.
   Google Scholar
• NuhnMEBinderMTaylorAFSHallingREHibbettDS. 2013. Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae. Fungal Biol 117:479–451, doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpatowskiG. 1836. Commentatio historico-naturalis de familia fungorum Boletoideorum. Wiegman’s Arch Naturg 2:1–34.
   Google Scholar
• PacioniG. 1996. Boletus martaluciae una nuova specie mediterranea. Micol Veget Medit 11:91–96.
   Google Scholar
• PilátADermekA. 1974. Hríbovité huby. Bratislava: Veda. 207 p.
   Google Scholar
• PöderRCettoBZuccherelliA. 1987. Eine neue Boletus-Art aus der sektion Luridi: Boletus poikilochromus sp. nov. Mycol Helvetica 2:155–163.
   Google Scholar
• RedeuilhGNovelloLA. 2005. Boletus poikilochromus Pöder, Cetto & Zuccherelli, Première Récolte Française. Ann CEMM 2005:89–92.
   Google Scholar
• RehnerSABuckleyE. 2005. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97:84–98, doi:10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RodàP. 2012. Funghi aspromontani comparati. Boletales. Reggio Calabria: AZ Editrice. 184 p.
   Google Scholar
• ShinnersTCTewariJP. 1997. Diversity in crystal production by some bird’s nest fungi (Nidulariaceae) in culture. Can J Chem 75:850–856, doi:10.1139/v97-103
   Google Scholar
• SimoniniG. 1995. I Boleti della Sez. Luridi a viraggio violento: problemi tassonomici. Micol Veget Medit 10:88–112.
   Google Scholar
• SimoniniG. 1998. Qualche specie rara o poco conosciuta della famiglia Boletaceae. Fungi non Delineati V. Alassio: Mykoflora. 56 p.
   Google Scholar
• SimoniniGBertoliniV. 2012. Schede d’Identità Boleti Gr. 7. Pag Micol 36:1–46
   Google Scholar
• SimoniniGDonelliGFiandriF. 1987. Ritrovamenti nelle province di Reggio Emilia e Modena di Boletus poikilochromus. Suppl n 6 “Il Fungo”, Atti I Seminario sui Generi Russula e Boletus: 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• SingerR. 1986. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. 981 p.
   Google Scholar
• SiquierJLGalliRSalomJC. 2005. Contribución al conocimiento micológico de las Islas Baleares (España) XII. Bol Soc Micol Madrid 29:67–71
   Google Scholar
• SittaN. 1991. Boletus poikilochromus Pöder, Cetto & Zuccherelli. Micologia Veneta 7:16–17
   Google Scholar
• StamatakisA. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ŠutaraJ. 2005. Central European genera of the Boletaceae and Suillaceae, with notes on their anatomical characters Czech Mycol 57:1–50.
   Google Scholar
• ŠutaraJ. 2008. Xerocomus s.l. in the light of the present state of knowledge. Czech Mycol 60:29–62.
   Google Scholar
• ŠutaraJMikšíkMJandaV2009. Hřibovité houby. Praha: Academia. 294 p.
   Google Scholar
• TamuraKStecherGPetersonDFilipskiAKumarS. 2013. MEGA 6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729, doi:10.1093/molbev/mst197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThiersB. 2015 (continuously updated). Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/
   Google Scholar
• VasquezG. 2014. Indagini Micologiche sulle Boletales Epigee del Terittorio Siciliano—mappatura e censimento delle specie [doctoral thesis]. Catania: University Studi Catania. 375 p.
   Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VizziniA. 2014a. Nomenclatural novelties. Index fungorum 146:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• VizziniA. 2014b. Nomenclatural novelties. Index fungorum 147:1.
   Google Scholar
• VizziniA. 2014c. Nomenclatural novelties. Index fungorum 176:1.
   Google Scholar
• VizziniA. 2014d. Nomenclatural novelties. Index fungorum 183:1.
   Google Scholar
• VizziniA. 2014e. Nomenclatural novelties. Index fungorum 188:1.
   Google Scholar
• VizziniA. 2014f. Nomenclatural novelties. Index fungorum 192:1.
   Google Scholar
• VizziniASimoniniGErcoleEVoyronS. 2014. Boletus mendax, a new species of Boletus sect. Luridi from Italy and insights on the B. luridus complex. Mycol Prog 13:95–109, doi:10.1007/s11557-013-0896-4
   Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In:InnisMAGelfandDHSninskyJJWhiteTJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press Inc. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• WhitneyKDArnottHJ. 1986. Calcium oxalate crystals and basidiocarp dehiscence in Geastrum saccatum (Gasteromycetes). Mycologia 78:649–656, doi:10.2307/3807778
   Google Scholar
• WhitneyKDArnottHJ. 1987. Calcium oxalate crystal morphology and development in Agaricus bisporus. Mycologia 79:180–187, doi:10.2307/3807650
   Google Scholar
• WuGFengBXuJPZhuXTLiYCZengNKHosenIYangZL. 2014. Molecular phylogenetic analyses redefine seven major clades and reveal 22 new generic clades in the fungal family. Fungal Divers 69:93–115, doi:10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuGZhaoKLiYCZengNKFengBHallingREYangZL. 2015. Four new genera of the fungal family Boletaceae. Fungal Divers:1–24 (online first) 10.1007/s13225-015-0322-0
   Google Scholar
• ZengNKCaiQYangZL. 2012. Corneroboletus, a new genus to accommodate the southeastern Asian Boletus indecorus. Mycologia 104:1420–1432, doi:10.3852/11-326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZengNKWuGLiYCLiangZQYangZL. 2014. Crocinoboletus, a new genus of Boletaceae (Boletales) with unusual boletocrocin polyene pigments. Phytotaxa 175:133–140, doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.175.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhaoKWuGYangZL. 2014. A new genus, Rubroboletus, to accommodate Boletus sinicus and its allies. Phytotaxa 188:61–77, doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.188.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZuccherelliA. 1993. I funghi delle pinete delle zone mediterranee. Ravenna, Italy: Longo Editore. 383 p.
   Google Scholar