Phylogenetic overview of the genus Genea (Pezizales, Ascomycota) with an emphasis on European taxa

Literature cited

• AltschulSFMaddenTLSchafferAAZhangJZhangZMillerWLipmanDJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402, doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlvaradoPCaberoJMorenoGBratekZvan VoorenNKaounasVKonstantinidisGAgnelloCMerényiZSmithME. 2014. Species diversity of Genea (Ascomycota, Pezizales) in Europe. Ascomycete.org 6:41–51.
   Google Scholar
• AlvaradoPMorenoGManjónJL. 2012. Comparison between Tuber gennadii and T. oligospermum lineages reveals the existence of the new species T. cistophilum (Tuberaceae, Pezizales). Mycologia 104:894–910, doi:10.3852/11-254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BerkeleyMJBroomeCE. 1846. Notices of British hypogaeous fungi. Ann Mag Nat Hist 18:73–82.
   Google Scholar
• BonitoGSmithMENowakMHealyRAGuevaraGCázaresEKinoshitaANouhraEDomínguezLTedersooLMuratCWangYMoreno-ArroyoBPfisterDNaraKZambonelliATrappeJVilgalysR. 2013. Historical biogeography and diversification of truffles in the Tuberaceae and their newly identified southern hemisphere sister lineage. PLoS One 8:e52765, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BucholtzF. 1901. Hypogaeen aus Russland. Hedwigia 40:304–322.
   Google Scholar
• CázaresEJGarcíaJCastilloJTrappeJT. 1992. Hypogeous fungi from northern Mexico. Mycologia 84:341–359.
   Google Scholar
• CerutiA. 1960. Iconographia mycologica. Suppl. II. In: Elaphomycetales et Tuberales. Trento, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• CordaACI. Icones Fungorum hucusque cognitorum. Vol. 6. In: ZobelJB, ed. Prague, Czech Republic: F Ehrlich. p 1837–1854.
   Google Scholar
• DietrichAGKlotzschF. 1839. Flora Regni Borussici: flora des Königreichs Preussen oder Abbildung und Beschreibung der in Preussen wildwachsenden Pflanzen. Berlin: Verlag von Ludwig Ochmigke.
   Google Scholar
• DrummondAJSuchardMAXieDRambautA. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol 29:1969–1973, doi:10.1093/molbev/mss075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erős-HontiZKovácsGMSzedlayGJakucsE. 2008. Morphological and molecular characterization of Humaria and Genea ectomycorrhizae from Hungarian deciduous forests. Mycorrhiza 18:133–43, doi:10.1007/s00572-008-0164-7
   Google Scholar
• FischerE. 1897. Tuberaceen. In: RabenhorstGL, ed. Kryptogamenflora. 2nd ed. 5. Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• GardesMBrunsTD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118, doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GilkeyHM. 1939. Tuberales of North America. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State College. 63 p.
   Google Scholar
• GilkeyHM. 1954. Tuberales. In: North American Flora. Ser. II, Part 1. p 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• GoriL. 2005. Funghi ipogei della Lucchesia, di altre Province italiane e dall’estero. Maria Pacini Fazzi Ed., Firenze, Italia.
   Google Scholar
• GrossG. 1992. Die Sporenmaße der europäischen Genea-Taxa. Z Mykol 58:113–120.
   Google Scholar
• GrossG. 1996. Validierung meiner provisorischen Hypogäen-Taxa. Z Mykol 62:175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Guevara-GuerreroGStielowBTammHCázares-GonzalesEGökerM. 2012. Genea mexicana, sp. nov., and Geopora tolucana, sp. nov., new hypogeous Pyronemataceae from Mexico and the taxonomy of Geopora reevaluated. Mycol Prog 11:711–724 doi:10.1007/s11557-011-0781-y
   Google Scholar
• HansenKPerryBADranginisAWPfisterDH. 2013. A phylogeny of the highly diverse cup-fungus family Pyronemataceae (Pezizomycetes, Ascomycota) clarifies relationships and evolution of selected life history traits. Mol Phyl Evol 67:311–335 doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarknessHW. 1899. Californian hypogæous fungi. Proc Calif Acad Sci. 3rd ser. Botany 1:241–292
   Google Scholar
• HawkerLE. 1954. British hypogeous fungi. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 237:429–546 doi:10.1098/rstb.1954.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HesseR. 1894. Die Hypogaeen Deutschlands: II Die Tuberaceen und ElaphomycetenMarburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• HigginsDThompsonJGibsonTThompsonJDHigginsDGGibsonTJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680 doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MathenyPB. 2005. Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales). Mol Phyl Evol 35:1–20 doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MattiroloO. 1900a. Elenco dei “fungi hypogaei” raccolti nelle Foreste di Vallombrosa negli anni 1899–1900. Malpighia 14:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• MattiroloO. 1900b. Gli ipogei di Sardegna e di Sicilia. Malpighia 14:39–110.
   Google Scholar
• MattiroloO. 1903. I fungí ipogei Italiani. Memorie Accad Sci Torino, ser. 2. 53:331–355.
   Google Scholar
• MontecchiASarasiniM. 2000. Funghi Ipogei d’Europa. Associazione Micologica Bresadola, Fondazione Centro Studi Micologici Trento, 714 p.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-ArroyoBGómezJCalongeFD. 1998a. Genea sphaerica f.ma lobulata f.ma nova dalla Spagna. Boll Grupo Micol G Bresadola 41:205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-ArroyoBGómezJCalongeFD. 1998b. Genea subbaetica sp. nov., from Spain. Bol Soc Micol Madrid 23:85–89.
   Google Scholar
• NylanderJAA. 2004. MrModeltest 2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• OsmundsonTWRobertVASchochCLBakerLJSmithARobichGMizzanLGarbelottoMM. 2013. Filling gaps in biodiversity knowledge for macrofungi: contributions and assessment of an herbarium collection DNA bar-code sequencing project. PLoS One 8:e62419, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PerryBAHansenKPfisterDH. 2007. A phylogenetic overview of the family Pyronemataceae (Ascomycota, Pezizales). Mycol Res 111:549–571, doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PfisterDH. 1984. Genea–Jafneadelphus—a Tuberalean-Pezizalean connection. Mycologia 76:170–172, doi:10.2307/3792850
   Google Scholar
• PosadaD. 2011. Collapse: describing haplotypes from sequence alignments 1.2. Available at: http://darwin.uvigo.es/software/collapse.html [ Accessed 28 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• PrietoMWedinM. 2013. Dating the diversification of the major lineages of Ascomycota (Fungi). PLoS One 8: e65576, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065576
   Google Scholar
• RambautADrummondAJ. 2009. Tracer: MCMC trace analysis tool 1.5.0. Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/
   Google Scholar
• RehnerSABuckleyE. 2005. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97:84–98, doi:10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RodriguezFOliverJMarinAMedinaJ. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitutions. J Theor Biol 142:485–501, doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80104-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RonquistFHuelsenbeckJP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaccardoPA. 1889. Sylloge fungorum hucusque cognitorum pars. Vol. VIII. Patavii, Italia.
   Google Scholar
• SmithME. 2007. NATS truffle and truffle-like fungi 15: Genea balsleyi sp. nov. (Pyronemataceae), a new hypogeous ascomycete from New Jersey. Mycotaxon 99: 239–244.
   Google Scholar
• SmithMETrappeJMRizzoDM. 2006. Genea, Genabea and Gilkeya gen. nov: ascomata and ectomycorrhiza formation in a Quercus woodland. Mycologia 98:699–716, doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.5.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StamatakisA. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StewartELHeblackRK. 1979. Hypogeous fungi of Minnesota: Genea anthracina sp. nov. Mycotaxon 9:451–458.
   Google Scholar
• TamuraKPetersonDPetersonNStecherGNeiMKumarS. 2011. MEGA 5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739, doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TedersooLSuviTLarssonEKõljalgU. 2006. Diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a wooded meadow. Mycol Res 110:734–748, doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2006.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrappeJM. 1979. The orders, families and genera of hypogeous Ascomycotina (truffles and their relatives). Mycotaxon 9:297–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrappeJMEvansFTrappeJ. 2007. Field guide to North American truffles: hunting, identifying, and enjoying the world’s most prized fungi. Berkeley, California: Ten Speed Press. 136 p.
   Google Scholar
• TrappeJMMolinaRLuomaDLCázaresEPilzDSmithJECastellanoMAMillerSLTrappeMJ. 2009. Diversity, ecology and conservation of truffle fungi in forests of the Pacific Northwest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-772. Portland, Oregon: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• TulasneL-RTulasneC. 1851. Fungi hypogaei. F Klincksieck, ed. Paris. 222 p.
   Google Scholar
• VacekV. 1951. Zemnička kulovitá—Genea sphaerica Tul. Česká Mykol 5:3–5.
   Google Scholar
• VelenovskýJ. 1922. České Houby 4–5. Prague, Czech Republic: České Botanické Společnosti.
   Google Scholar
• VidalJM. 1997. Algunos hongos hipogeos nuevos o poco cita-dos de Cataluña (Zygomycotina, Ascomycotina y Basidiomycotina). Rev Cat Micol 20:25–62.
   Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VittadiniC. 1831. Monographia Tuberacearum. Milano, Italia. 88 p.
   Google Scholar
• WallrothKFW. 1833. Flora cryptogamica Germaniae. Vol II. Nuremberg, Germany. 923 p.
   Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: InnisMAGelfandDHSninskyJJWhiteTJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press Inc. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar