References

• Algers, B., Svedberg, J., 1989. Effects of atmospheric ammonia and litter status on broiler health. pp. 237-241 in Proc. 3rd Eur. Symp. on Poultry Welfare, Tours, France.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, C.C., 1998. Foot-pad dermatitis in broilers and turkeys-prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PhD Diss., Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Upsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, C.C., 2004. Pododermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens. In: C.A.Weeks and A. Butterworth (eds.) Measuring and auditing broiler welfare. CABI Publishing CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bessei, W., 1992. Das Verhalten von Broilern unter intensiven Haltungsbedingungen. Arch. Geflügelkd. 56:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bessei, W., 1993. The influence of stocking density on performance, behaviour and health of broilers – A literature review. Arch. Geflügelkd. 57:97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bessei, W., 2004. Stocking density. In: C.A.Weeks and A. Butterworth (eds.) Measuring and auditing broiler welfare. CABI Publishing CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 133–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bessei, W., 2006. Welfare of broilers: a review. World Poultry Sci. J. 62:455–466.
   Google Scholar
• Bessei, W., 2007. Un quadro generale sul benessere del pollo da carne. Riv. Avicolt. 76 (5):30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Blokhuis, H.J., Van der Haar, J.W., 1990. The effect of stocking density on the behaviour of broiler. Arch. Geflügelkd. 54:74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, H.K., 1991. Increasing photoperiod length provides better broiler health. Poult. Digest 50:14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cravener, T.L., Roush, W.B., Mashaly, M.M., 1992. Broiler production under very population density. Poultry Sci. 71:427–433.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M.S., Donelly, S., Jones, T.A., 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427:342–344.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, C., Algers, B., 1997. The effect of litter moisture on the development of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers. Page 370 in Proc. 11th Int. Congr. World’s Vet. Poult. Assoc., Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, C., Algers, B., Svedberg, J., 1997. Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Prev. Vet. Med. 31:167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, C., Carpenter, T.E., 1998a. Temporal aspects of footpad dermatitis in Swedish broilers. Acta Vet. Scand. 39:229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, C., Carpenter, T.E., 1998b. Using a Tobit regression model to analyse risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in commercially grown broilers. Prev. Vet. Med. 37:219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, C., Carpenter, T.E., Anderson, I., Algers, B., 1998. Prevalence and prevention of foot pad dermatitis in broilers in Sweden. Brit. Poultry Sci. 39:318–324.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 1991. Commission Regulation (EEC) of 5 June 1991 introducing detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 on certain marketing standards for poultry, 1538/91 EC. In: Official Book L 143 , 07/06/1991, pp 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 1999. Council Regulation (EC) of 19 July 1999 supplementing Regulation (EEC) 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs to include livestock production, 1804/99/EC. In: Official Book, L 222, 24/08/1999, pp 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2005. COM Proposal 221 final. Laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production. Home page address:http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0221:FIN:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2007. Council Directive 2007/43/EC of 28 June 2007 laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production. In: Official Book, L 182, 12/07/2007, pp 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrante, V., Lolli, S., Marelli, S., Vezzoli, G., Sirri, F., Guidobono Cavalchini, L., 2006. Effect of light programmes, bird densities and litter types on broilers welfare. ID 10583 in Proc. 12th Europ. Poult. Conf. on CD-Rom, Verona, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S.H., Walker, A.W., Charles, D.R., 2003. Feeding and broiler welfare. Measuring and Auditing Broiler Welfare – A Practical Guide. University of Bristol ed., Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Grashorn, M.A., Kutritz, B., 1991. Effect of stocking density on performance of modern broiler breeds. Arch. Geflügelkd. 55:84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, R.H., Damron, B.L., Simpson, C.F., 1977. Effect of wet litter and supplemental biotin and/or whey on the production of foot pad dermatitis in broilers. Poultry Sci. 56:291–296.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S., Kestin, S., 2004. Comparing welfare in different systems. In: C.A.Weeks and A. Butterworth (eds.) Measuring and auditing broiler welfare. CABI Publishing CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R.L., Ivey, W.D., McDaniel, G.R., Albert, R.A., 1979. A darkness induced eye abnormality in the domestic chicken. Poultry Sci. 58:55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kestin, S.C., Kowles, T.G., Tinch, A.E., Gregory, N.G., 1992. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chicken and its relationship with genotype. Vet. Rec. 131:190–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H.H., Wathes, C.M., 2000. Ammonia and poultry welfare: a review. World Poultry Sci. J. 56:235–245.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, N.J., Hurnik, J.F., 1990. Locomotion of broiler chickens in floor pens. Poultry Sci. 69:1087–1093.
   Google Scholar
• Manfreda, G., Bertuzzi, S., Franchini, A., Franciosi, C., 1994. Immune response of chicken’s supplemented with vitamin E in diet and/or vaccine. J. Nutr. Immunol. 3:51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Lean, J., Savory, J., Sparks, N., 2001. Welfare of male and female broiler chickens in relation to stocking density. pp 234–242 in Proc. 6th Europ. Symp. on Poultry Welfare, Zollikofen, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Meluzzi, A., Fabbri, C., Folegatti, E., Sirri, F., 2008. Survey on chicken rearing conditions in Italy: effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis and carcase injuries. Brit. Poultry Sci. 49:257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Meluzzi, A., Sirri, F., Betti, M., Bianchi, C., Franchini, A., 2004. Effect of stocking density, litter depth and light regimen on foot-pad disorders of broiler chickens. No. 1715 in Proc. 22nd World’s Poultry Congr. on CD-Rom, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Meluzzi, A., Sirri, F., Folegatti, E., 2007. Condizioni di allevamento e prestazioni produttive: gli effetti sulle performance zootecniche e sulla qualità del prodotto nell’allevamento del broiler. Riv. Avicolt. 76(6):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Meluzzi, A., Sirri, F., Petracci, M., Bianchi, C., 2003. Improving the rearing condition of chicken broiler: effects on performances and on carcass and meat quality. pp 414–420 in Proc. 16th Europ. Symp. on Quality of Poultry Meat, Ploufragan, France.
   Google Scholar
• Newberry, R.C., Hunt, J.R., Gardiner, E.E., 1988. The influence of light intensity on behaviour and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 67:1020–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Noldus, L.P.J.J., Jansen, R.G., 2004. Measuring broiler chicken behaviour and welfare: prospect for automation. In: C. A. Weeks and A. Butterworth (eds.) Measuring and auditing broiler welfare. CABI Publishing CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 267–290.
   Google Scholar
• Proudfoot, F.G., Hulan, H.W., Ramey, D.R., 1979. The effect of four stocking densities on broiler carcass grade, the incidence of breast blisters, and other performance traits. Poult. Sci. 58:791–793.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, K., Bessei, W., 2000. The behaviour of broilers in response to group size and stocking density. Arch. Geflügelkd. 64:93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, J.S., Whitehead, C.C., 1996. The effectiveness of dietary 25- and 1-hydroxycholecalciferol in preventing tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chickens. Brit. Poultry Sci. 37:413–421.
   Google Scholar
• Sanotra, G.S., Lund, J.D., Westergard, K.S., 2002. Influence of light-dark schedules and stocking density on behaviour, risk of leg problems and oc-
   Google Scholar
• currence of chronic fear in broilers. Brit. Poultry Sci. 43:344–354.
   Google Scholar
• Sanotra, G.S., Weeks, C.A., 2004. Abnormal behaviour and fear. In: C.A. Weeks and A. Butterworth (eds.) Measuring and auditing broiler welfare. CABI Publishing CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• SCAHAW, 2000. The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Report of the Scientific Committee in Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Brussels, Belgium. Home page address: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scah/out39_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shanawany, M.M., 1988. Broiler performance under high stocking density. Brit. Poultry Sci. 29:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Shanawany, M.M., 1992. Influence of litter water-holding capacity on broiler weight and carcass quality. Arch. Geflügelkd. 56:177–179.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, J.T., Sandoe, P., 2001. Assessment of animal welfare at farm and group level. Taylor and Francis, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, C.A., 2002. Some behavioural difference between fast and slow-growing strains of poultry. Brit. Poultry Sci. 43:S24-S26.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, C.A., Danburi, T.C., Davies, H.C., Hunt, P., Kestin, S.C., 2000. The behaviour of broiler chicken and its modification by lameness. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 67:111–125.
   Google Scholar
• Zubair, A.K., Leeson, S., 1996. Compensatory growth in the broiler chicken: a review. World Poultry Sci. J. 52:189–201.
   Google Scholar