References

• Abrahamsson, P., Tauson, R., 1997. Effects of group size on performance, health and birds’ use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agric. Scand. A. 47:254–260.
   Google Scholar
• Aerni, V., Brinkhof, M.W.G., Wechsler, B., Oester, H., Fröhlich, E., 2005. Productivity and mortality of laying hens in aviaries: a systematic review. World Poultry Sci. J. 61:130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Aerni, V., El-Lethey, H., Wechsler, B., 2000. Effect of foraging material and food form on feather pecking in laying hens. Brit. Poultry Sci. 41:16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Albentosa, M.J., Cooper, J.J., 2003. Cage height preferences of laying hens housed in furnished cages. Brit. Poultry Sci. 44:S5-S6.
   Google Scholar
• Albentosa, M.J., Cooper, J.J., 2004. Effects of cage height and stocking density on the frequency of comfort behaviours performed by laying hens housed in furnished cages. Anim. Welfare 13:419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M.C., 2004. What causes crowding? Effects of space, facilities and group size on behaviour, with particular reference to furnished cages for hens. Anim. Welfare 13:313–320.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M.C., Hogarth, G.S., Anderson, J.A., Huges, B.O., Whittemore, C.T., 1988. Performance of a deep litter system for egg production. Brit. Poultry Sci. 29:735–751.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O., Hogarth, G., 1989. Behaviour of laying hens in a deep litter house. Brit. Poultry Sci. 30:545–553.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M.C., Mench, J.A., Hughes, B.O., 2004. Poultry behavior and welfare. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M.C., Smith, S.F., Hughes, B.O., 1993. Nesting, dust bathing and perching by laying hens in cages – effects of design on behaviour and welfare. Brit. Poultry Sci. 34:835–847.
   Google Scholar
• Bearse, G.E., Berg, L.R., McClary, C.F., Miller, V.L., 1949. The effect of pelleting chicken rations on the incidence of cannibalism. Poultry Sci. 28:756.
   Google Scholar
• Bessei, W., 1983. Zum Problem des Federpickers und Kannibalismus. DGS-Magazin 24:656–665.
   Google Scholar
• Bessei, W., 1992. The behaviour of broilers under intensive management conditions. Arch. Geflügelkd. 56:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bestman, M.W.P., Wagenaar, J.P., 2003. Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens. Livest. Prod. Sci. 80:133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bilčik, B., Keeling, L.J., 2000. Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68:55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bilčik, B., Keeling, L.J., Newberry, R.C., 1998. Effect of group size on tonic immobility in laying hens. Behav. Process. 43:53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bubier, N.E., 1996a. The behavioural priorities of laying hens: the effect of cost/no cost multi-choice tests on time budgets. Behav. Process. 37:225–238.
   Google Scholar
• Bubier, N.E., 1996b. The behavioural priorities of laying hens: the effects of two methods of environment enrichment on time budgets. Behav. Process. 37:239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Calet, C., 1965. The relative value of pellets vs mash and grain in poultry nutrition. World Poultry Sci. J. 21:23–52.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, N.L.,Walker, A.W., Hughes, B.O., 1999. Laying hens in large flocks in a perchery system: influence of stocking density on location, use of resources and behaviour. Brit. Poultry Sci. 40:165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Collias, N.E., Collias, E.C., 1967. A field study of the red jungle fowl in North Central India. Condor69:360–386.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J.J., Albentosa, M.J., 2003. Behavioural priorities of laying hens. Avian Poult. Biol. Rev. 14:127–149.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J.J., Albentosa, M.J., 2004. Social space for laying hens. In: G.C. Perry (ed.) The Welfare of the Laying Hen. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J.J., Appleby, M.C., 1996. Individual variation in pre-laying behaviour and the incidence of floor eggs. Brit. Poultry Sci. 37:245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J.J., Appleby, M.C., 2003. The value of environmental resources to domestic hens: a comparison of the work-rate for food and for nests as a function of time. Anim. Welfare 12:39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Couch, J.R., 1955. Cage layer fatigue. Feed Age 5:55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M.S., 1989. Time budgets in Red Jungle Fowl as a basis for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15:351–364.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M.S., Hardie, S., 1989. Space needs of laying hens. Brit. Poultry Sci. 30:413–416.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, I.J.M., Cornelissen, A.M.G., 2002. A method using sustainability indicators to compare conventional and animal-friendly egg production systems. Poultry Sci. 81:173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, I.J.H., 1978. An overall assessment of poultry welfare. In: L.Y. Sørensen (ed.) Proc. 1st Danish Seminar WPSA on Poultry Welfare, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA, 2005a. Animal health and welfare aspects of Avian Influenza. EFSA Book 266:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA, 2005b. The Welfare aspects of various systems for keeping laying hens. Annex to the EFSA Book 197:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• El-Lethey, H., Jungi, T.W., Huber Eicher, B., 2001. Effects of feeding corticosterone and housing conditions on feather pecking in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Physiol. Behav. 73:243–251.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, H.A., 2004. The effects of stocking density and cage height on the health, behaviour, physiology and production of laying hens in furnished cages (AW0226). Project Report ADAS Gleadthorpe Poultry Research Centre ed., Meden Vale, Mansfield. NG20 9PF, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Esmay, M.L., 1978. Principles of Animal Environment. AVI, Westport, CT, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Estevez, I., Keeling, L.J., Newberry, R.C., 2003. Decreasing aggressions with increasing group size in young domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84:213–218.
   Google Scholar
• Estevez, I., Newberry, R.C., Keeling, L.J., 2002. Dynamics of aggression in the domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76:307–325.
   Google Scholar
• Faure, J.M., 1986. Operant determination of the cage and feeder size preferences of the laying hen. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15:325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Faure, J.M., 1994. Choice tests for space in groups of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39:89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, R.H., Whitehaed, C.C., Alvey Gregory, N.G., Wilkins, L.J., 1994. Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens hosed in different husbandry systems. Brit. Poultry Sci. 35:651–662.
   Google Scholar
• Gentle, M.J., 1992. Pain in birds. Anim. Welfare 1:235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Gentle, M.J., Breward, J., 1981. The anatomy of the beak. pp 185–189 in Proc. 1st Europ. Symp. on Poultry Welfare. Konge, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Gentle, M.J., Breward, J., 1986. The bill tip organ of the chickens (Gallus gallus var. domesticus). J. Anat. 145:79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Gentle, M.J., Waddington, D., Hunter, L.N., Jones, R.B., 1990. Behavioural evidence for persistent pain following partial beak amputation in chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 27:149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Green, L.E., Lewis, K., Kimpton, A., Nicol, C.J., 2000. Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease.Vet. Rec.147:233–238.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, N.G., Wilkins, L.J., Eleperuma, S.D., Ballantyne, A.J., Overfield, N.D., 1990. Broken bones in domestic fowls: Effect of husbandry system and stunning method in end-of-lay hens. Brit. Poultry Sci. 31:59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Grigor, P.N., Hughes, B.O., Appleby, M.C., 1995. Social inhibition of movement in domestic hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 49:1381–1388.
   Google Scholar
• Guesdon, V., Faure, J.M., 2004. Laying performance and egg quality in hens kept in standard or furnished cages. Anim. Res. 53:45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, S., Keeling, L.J., Svedberg, J., 1999. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. Brit. Poultry Sci. 40:12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, S., Matthews, L.R., Foster, T.M., Temple, W., 2000. The demand for straw and feathers as litter substrates by laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65:321–330.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, J.H, Khajavi, M., Hlalel, M.M., Sparango, O., 2004. Red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) prevalence in laying units in Northern England. Proc. 2004 Spring Meet. WPSA, UK Branch - papers. Brit. Poultry Sci. 45 (Suppl.1):S15-S16.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, E.B., 1962. Domestication and the Evolution of Behaviour. In: E.S.E. Hafez (ed.) The Behaviour of Domestic Animals. Bailliere Tindall and Cox, London, UK, pp 21–53.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorson, D., Karunakaran, D., Senne, D., Kelleher, C., Bailey, C., Abraham, A., Hinshaw, V., Newman, J., 1982. Epizootiology of aviam influenza simultaneous monitoring of sentinel ducks and turkeys in Minnesota. Avian Dis. 27:77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, I., 1994. Behavioural expression of laying hens in aviaries and cages. Degree Diss. No. 1432, Agricultural University of Norway, Aas, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, I., Braastad, B.O., 1994. Effect of rearing density on pecking behavior and plumage condition of laying hens in 2 types of aviary. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 40:263–272.
   Google Scholar
• Havenstein, G.B., Ferket, P.R., Scheideler, S.E., Rives, D.V., 1994. Carcass composition and yield of 1991 vs 1957 broilers when fed ”typical” 1957 and 1991 broiler diets. Poultry Sci. 73:1795–804.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, P.M., Gilbert, A.B, Walker, M., Waddington, D., 1987. Ovarian follicular structure of white leghorns fed ad libitum and dwarf and normal broiler breeders fed ad libitum or restricted until point of lay. Brit. Poultry Sci. 28:493–506.
   Google Scholar
• Höglund, J., Nordenfors, H., Uggla, A., 1995. Prevalence of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus galinae, in different types of production systems for egg layers in Sweden. Poultry Sci. 74:1793–1798.
   Google Scholar
• Huber-Eicher, B., Audige, L., 1999. Analysis of risk factors for the occurrence of feather pecking in laying hen growers. Brit. Poultry Sci. 40:599–604.
   Google Scholar
• Huber-Eicher, B., Sebö, F., 2001. Reducing festher pecking when raising laying hen chicks in aviary systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73:59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Huber-Eicher, B., Wechsler, B., 1998. The effect of quality and availability of foraging materials on feather pecking in laying hen chicks. Anim Behav. 55:861–873.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B.O., Appleby, M.C., 1989. Increase in bone strength of spent laying hens housed in modified cages with perches. Vet. Rec. 6:483–484.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B.O., Carmichael, N.L.,Walker, A.W., Grigor, P.N., 1997. Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:215–234.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B.O., Duncan, I.J.H., 1988. The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare. Anim. Behav. 36:1696–1707.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B.O., Duncan, I.J.H., Brown, M., 1989. The performance of nest building by domestic hens: is it more important than the construction of the nest? Anim. Behav. 36:327–335.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, D., 2001. Smittskydd och smittrisker I ekologisk fjäderfähållning. In: Ekologiskt lantbruk. LU, CUL ed., 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden, pp 83–87.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, P.F., Vestergaard, K.S., Nørgaard-Nielsen, G., 1998. Influence of early rearing condition on the development of feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 60:25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R.B., 1986. The tonic immobility reaction of the domestic fowl: a review. World Poultry Sci. J. 42:82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R.B., 1996. Fear and adaptability in poultry: insights implications and imperatives. World Poultry Sci. J. 52:131–174.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R.B., Faure, J.M., 1982. Domestic chick prefer familiar soiled substrate in an otherwise novel environment. I.R.C.S. Med. Sci. 10:847 (abstr.).
   Google Scholar
• Keeling, L.J., 1994. Inter-bird distances and behavioural priorities in laying hens: the effect of spatial restriction. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39:131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Keeling, L.J., Estevez, I., Newberry, R.C., Correia, M.G., 2003. Production-related traits of layers reared in different sized flocks: the concept of problematic intermediate group sizes. Poultry Sci. 82:1393–1396.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, J.B., 1994. Nest size effect on incidence of floor eggs and on eggshell quality in commercial deep litter systems for laying hens. Arch. Geflügelkd. 58:239–244.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, T.G., Broom, D.M., 1990. Limb bone strength and movement in laying hens from different housing systems. Vet. Rec. 14:354–356.
   Google Scholar
• Kruijt, J.P., 1964. Ontogeny of social behaviour in Burmese Red Junglefowl. Leiden, Brill, Herndon, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• LayWell Project, 2006. Home page address: http://www.laywel.eu
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P.D., Morris, T.R., 1999. Light intensity and performance in domestic pullets. World Poultry Sci. J. 55:241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, A.C., Nicol, C.J., 1996. Space and density effects on group size preferences in laying hens. Brit. Poultry Sci. 37:709–721.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, E.C., 1984 External parasites. In: M.S. Hofstad (ed.) Diseases of poultry. Iowa State University Press, USA, pp 586–613.
   Google Scholar
• Manser, C.E., 1996. Effects of lighting on the welfare of domestic poultry: a review. Anim.Welfare 5:341–360.
   Google Scholar
• Masic, B., Wood-Gush, D.G.M., Duncan, I.J.H., Mc-Corquodale, C., Savory, C.J., 1974. A comparison of the feeding behaviour of young broiler and layer males. Brit. Poultry Sci. 15:499–505.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, V., Nieri, M., Fölsch, D.W., 1988. Das suchverhalten von Dermanyssus gallinae in Hühnerställen. Arch. Geflügelkd. 52:209–205.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, G., Parer, I.P., Foenander, F., 1969. The social organisation and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. Monograph 2:125–181.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, V., Huonnic, D., 2003. A comparison of welfare, health, and production performance of laying hens reared in cages or in aviaries. pp 775–776 (abstr.) in Proc. Spring Mee. WPSA, French Branch, Tours, France.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, R.O., Guéméné, D., Larsen, H.J.S., Bakken, M., Lervik, S., Hetland, H., Tauson, R., 2004. Effects of pre-laying rearing conditions in laying hens housed in standard or furnished cages on various indicators of animal welfare. Page 329 in Proc. 22nd World’s Poultry Congr, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T.R., 2004. Environmental control for layers. World Poultry Sci. J. 60:163–175.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, C.J., 1987. Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Anim. Behav. 35:1709–1719.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, C.J., Gregory, N.G., Knowles, T.G., Parkman, I.D., Wilkins, L.J., 1999. Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65:137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, C.J., Potzsch, C., Lewis, K., Green, L.E., 2003. Matched concurrent case–control study of risk factors for feather pecking in hens on free-range commercial farms in the UK. Brit. Poultry Sci. 44:515–523.
   Google Scholar
• Nörgaard-Nielsen, G.J., 1990. Bone strength of laying hens kept in an alternative system compared with hens in cages and or on deep-litter. Brit. Poultry Sci. 31:81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Oden, K., Keeling, L.J., Algers, B., 2002. Behaviour of laying hens in two types of aviary systems on 25 commercial farms in Sweden. Brit. Poultry Sci. 43:169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, I.A.S., Keeling, L.J., 2000. Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68:243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, I.A.S., Keeling, L.J., 2002. No effect of social competition on sham dustbathing in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agric. Scand. A. 52:253–256.
   Google Scholar
• Petherick, J.C., Seawright, E., Waddington, D., 1993. Influence of motivational state on choice of food or a dustbathing foraging substrate by domestic hens. Behav. Process. 28:209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott, N.B., Wathes, C.M., 2002. Preference and motivation of laying hens to eat under different illuminances and the effect of illuminance on eating behaviour. Brit. Poultry Sci. 43:190–1955.
   Google Scholar
• Price, E.O., 1998. Behavioral genetics and the process of animal domestication. In: T. Grandin (ed.) Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals. Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp 31–65.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, L.O., Fry, J.L., Christmas, R.B., O’Sheen, A.W, Harris, L.H., 1972. Differences in tibia strength and bone ash among strains of layers. Poultry Sci. 51:1612–1615.
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, S.M., Duncan, I.J.H., 1989. Behavioural measures of aversion in domestic fowl. pp 277–279 in Proc. 3rd Eur. Symp. Poultry Welfare, Tours, France.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, D.W.B., 2000. Poultry Health and Management: Chickens, Ducks, Turkeys, Gees, Quail. 4th ed. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sauveur, B., 1988. Reproduction des volailles et production d’oeufs. INRA ed., París, France.
   Google Scholar
• Savory, C.J., 1975. A growth study of broiler and layer chicks reared in single-strain groups. Brit. Poultry Sci. 16:315–318.
   Google Scholar
• Savory, C.J., Mann, J.S., Macleod, M.G., 1999. Incidence of pecking damage in growing bantams in relation to food form, group size, stocking density, dietary tryptophan concentration and dietary protein source. Brit. Poultry Sci. 40:579–584.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlačkova, M., Bilčik, B., Koštal, L., 2004. Feather pecking in laying hens: environmental and endogenous factors. Acta Vet. Brno 73:521–531.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, H.B., Vestergaard, K., 1978. Battery cages as the cause of environmental and behavioural dependent diseases. Vet. Med. 30:241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.F., Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O., 1990. Problem solving by domestic hens opening doors to reach nest sites. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 28:287–292.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A.A., Hurnik, J.F., 1996. The long term productivity of hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. Poultry Sci. 75:47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, T., Hurnik, J. F., 1991. Behavioral responses of hens to simulated dawn and dusk periods. Poultry Sci. 70:483–488.
   Google Scholar
• Tauson, R., Abrahamsson, P., 1994. Foot and skeletal disorders in laying hens. Acta Agric. Scand. A. 44:110–119.
   Google Scholar
• Tauson, R., Abrahamsonn, P., 1996. Foot and keel bone disorders in laying hens: effects of artificial perch material and hybrid. Acta Agric. Scand. A. 46:239–246.
   Google Scholar
• Van Emous, R.M., Fiks–van Niekerk, T.G.C.M., Reuvekamp, B.F.J., 2003. Verrijkte kooien. Praktijkonderzoek Veehouderij, Praktijk Rapport. Pluimvee 9:77 (abstr.).
   Google Scholar
• Wall, H., Tauson, R., Elwinger, K., 2002. Effect of nest design, passages, and hybrid on use of nest and production performance of layers in furnished cages. Poultry Sci. 81:333–339.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, H., Tauson, R, Elwinger, K., 2004. Pop hole passages and welfare in furnished cages for laying hens. Brit. Poultry Sci. 45:20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, C.C., Wilson, S., 1992. Characteristics of osteoporosis in hens. In C.C. Whitehead (ed) Bone biology and skeletal disorders in poultry. Carfax Publishing Co, Abingdon, UK, pp 265–280.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S., Duff, S.R.I., Whitehead, C.C., 1992. Effect of age, sex and housing on the trabecular bone of laying strain domestic fowl. Res. Vet. Sci. 53:52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wood-Gush, D.G.M., 1959. A history of the domestic fowl from antiquity to the 19th century. PoultrySci. 38:321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Wood-Gush, D.G.M., 1971. The behaviour of the domestic fowl. London Heinemann, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wood-Gush, D.G.M., Duncan, I.J.H., Savory, C.J., 1978. Observations on the social behaviour of the domestic fowl in the wild. Biol. Behav. 3:193–205.
   Google Scholar